Baiting Muslim Wrath
"We're commanded to terrorize the disbelievers and this is a religion.... The Koran says very clearly, in the Arabic language ... terrorize them. It's a command from Allah."And who would dare defy a Koranic-inscribed demand from Allah? Certainly not faithful followers. Whose obvious lack of devotion to normalized, civilized behaviour that might assume certain ancient dictums and faith-writings might well be further examined through the lens of modernity marks them as jihad-fodder, aspiring martyrs in the game of bloody murder.
"I define terrorism as making them fearful so that they think twice before they go rape your mother or kill your brother or go onto your land and try to steal your resources." Isn't that clearly typical of fanatics who convince themselves that foreigners and apostates and non-Muslims and Jews have nothing better to do than to aspire to rape, kill and loot? All such named activities heartily embraced by Islamofascists as necessarily pre-emptive conditions of existence.
"Harming Allah and his messenger is a reason to encourage Muslims to kill whoever does that." Odiously slurring the idea of a messenger of God whose honourable repute is beyond critique of slanderous presumptuousness - even if those so engaging seek merely to illustrate the absurd hypocrisy of the proclaimed religion of peace and its exemplar who lent himself to holy wars - is more than sufficient cause for heated denunciations, threats, riots and killings.
The above quotes courtesy of one Abu Talhah al Amrikeee whose revolutionmuslim.com website attacks the South Park creators who dare to depict the Prophet Muhammad with less than the respect due him as the most hallowed figure of Islam, ancient and current. On this web site the radicalized American-born cleric Anwar al-Awlaki, whom U.S. authorities now urgently seek, appears with a sermon.
That sermon encouraging Islamists to do their duty to their peaceful religion by bringing justice to those who have "defamed" the Prophet Muhammad for, in the words of another Islamic authority: "Harming Allah and his messenger is a reason to encourage Muslims to kill whoever does that". Clear enough, although Mr. Amrikee, during a CNN interview elaborates that those offended may write letters of protest.
Oops, contradicting himself directly he also explained the purpose of the sermon was to bring to the attention of honour-bound Muslims the simple fact that Islam calls upon them to act in defence of the faith. Insulting the Prophet represents a severe offence whose response is the punishment of death. The call to arms and violent response seems to be impressively irresistible to many young radicalized Muslims.
Insulting the Prophet? Why, Muhammad was dressed - given that it is also considered an assault against Islam to portray the Prophet as he must have looked - in a cuddly brown bear suit, and in that costume, offering advice to public figures that instead of feeling insulted or offended by what others speak, consider it the permissible practise of free speech. Rather high-minded of Muhammad; who knew?
Mr. Amrikee concluded his interview by stating his opinion that those who bring shame upon themselves by making light of the Prophet's austere and sublime authority would "probably wind up like Theo van Gogh. It's not a threat, but it really is a likely outcome. They're going to be basically on a list in the back of the minds of a large number of Muslims. It's just the reality."
Agreed.
Labels: Religion, Terrorism, Traditions
posted by Pieface @ Thursday, April 22, 2010
<< Home