Mocking Genocide
The court's [Federal Court of Justice] decision was an "underestimation of the real danger" of the sculpture."You can't neutralize it just by putting a simple plaque alongside it of what it means. [Such] propaganda [can be found in more than 30 churches across Germany today].""The Judensau isn't only an insult, it's so much more -- it's a call to murder the Jews.""No institution besides the church, and no single person besides Martin Luther, did more to prepare the German people for Auschwitz. Auschwitz came not from a vacuum. It was the result of centuries-long agitation against the Jews.""I'm very concerned about the situation here and I think the intellectuals and those in politics are underestimating the dangers. They are willing to make concessions to the right wing.""It's my will go to to the Constitutional Court and to continue to fight this and if I lose I will go to the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg."Michael Dietrich Düllmann, 79-year-old retired psychiatric nurse, Wittenberg, Germany
A thirteenth century anti-Semitic sculpture is displayed at St. Marien church in Wittenberg, Germany. REUTERS/Annegret Hilse |
"[The ruling was] understandable [but] neither the base plate nor the explanatory slanted display contain an unambiguous condemnation of the anti-Jewish work of art.""Both the Wittenberg church community and the churches as a whole must find a clear and appropriate solution for dealing with sculptures that are hostile to Jews.""Defamation of Jews by churches must once and for all be a thing of the past."Josef Schuster, president, Central Council of Jews, Germany
Germany
has strict laws against Holocaust denial, against incitement to hatred,
against displays of antisemitism, against symbolic depictions of its
Nazi past. And it generally enforces those acts when they occur. Despite
which the ugly vitriol of antisemitism is once again blossoming its
noxious stink in the country that went to great ends to stretch its rare
resources during a world conflict, in formulating a solution to the
presence of Jews whom fascist Germany officially declared sub-human. The
'final solution' of genocide resulting in the Holocaust.
In
the last decade, despite these measures at stamping out the mass
psychosis that generated a level of hatred against Jews that made their
mass murder inevitable, acts of viral antisemitism have been spiraling
upward in Germany. Much of it resulting from a more recent inclusion
into German society of refugees and economic migrants emanating from the
Middle East and North Africa. Where now in Germany, another million
Muslims have been added to the already-present five million. A number
equaling those of the murdered Jews of Europe.
During
the Gothic and Medieval eras, Church architectural was replete with
gnome-like sculptures, sculptures of fantastic creatures, chimeras,
half-man, half-beast, frightful carvings originally meant to declare to
the devil that the Church had its own defenders against evil. Yet evil
lurked within the Church's own shadows. Among the goblins and the
witches, the gargoyles and grotesques, were mockingly cruel images meant
to caricature and belittle Jews.
The
religion of peace, goodwill to all, was not beneath spreading contempt
in influencing the faithful to detest and avoid any contact with
repugnant Jews that might live in their midst. One such depiction of the
Church's virulent contempt for Judaism was a carving on a 13th Century
Wittenberg Stadtkirche Catholic church, which boasted a "Jews' Sow" (Judensau), a sandstone carving of a rabbi lifting the hind leg of a pig, with two Jewish children suckling its teats.
Michael
Düllmann found the contemptuously hateful depiction so offensive he
applied time and again to the courts to force the church to remove the
insulting carving. Which represented a curse on Judaism with a double
meaning since in Judaism, it is forbidden to eat swine; they are
unkosher and offend religious strictures. Whoever the skilled craftsman
of the time was to whom the idea of having a rabbi enable Jewish
children to suckle from a pig implied both that Jews are hypocritical
and children of pigs, might have felt it amusing.
The
complainant's appeal to the German courts went nowhere, until the
appeals court ruled with his complaint that the sculpture was indeed
hugely antisemitic. Irrespective of which the court would not order the
church to remove the image. Judensau could remain where it was. The
church did earlier resort to an explanation on a plaque, placing the
image in the context of medieval art, once acceptable, in the current
milieu no longer so.
An
assault on the sensibilities and sensitivities of any
ethnic/religious/cultural group is still a slander and an insult. Were
it to have been directed against any other group of numbers and
influence in society consideration might have been given to removing it
as unsuitable for the times. There is also the coinciding of history,
where Martin Luther in 1517 in Wittenberg spurned the corruption of the
Catholic Church and its indulgences to bring in its Lutheran replacement
as a stricture version.
His
loathing of Jews was such that he incited to violence against the
Jewish population in Germany. His book, "On the Jews and their Lies"
precipitated the genocide that erupted during World War II. History
continues to influence the present. And the present looks back on
history, prepared to repeat it. A repentant Germany may be eager to make
amends, but how can one amend the most colossal genocide in history?
Labels: Antisemitism, Germany, History
<< Home