An Outgunned Hamas Tries to Tap Islamists’ Growing Clout
The New York Times - 19 November 2012
Bernat Armangue/Associated Press
CAIRO — Emboldened by the rising power of Islamists around the region, the Palestinian militant group Hamas demanded new Israeli concessions to its security and autonomy before it halts its rocket attacks on Israel, even as the conflict took an increasing toll on Sunday.
Articles in this related series are exploring the
rise of political Islam in the Middle East, as Islamic movements
struggle to remake the Arab world.
After five days of punishing Israeli airstrikes on the Hamas-controlled Gaza Strip
and no letup in the rocket fire in return, representatives of Israel
and Hamas met separately with Egyptian officials in Cairo on Sunday for
indirect talks about a truce.
The talks came as an Israeli bomb struck a house in Gaza on Sunday
afternoon, killing 11 people, in the deadliest single strike since the
conflict between Israel and Hamas escalated on Wednesday. The strike,
along with several others that killed civilians across the Gaza Strip,
signaled that Israel was broadening its range of targets on the fifth
day of the campaign.
By the end of the day, Gaza health officials reported that 70
Palestinians had been killed in airstrikes since Wednesday, including 20
children, and that 600 had been wounded. Three Israelis have been
killed and at least 79 wounded by unrelenting rocket fire out of Gaza
into southern Israel and as far north as Tel Aviv.
Hamas, badly outgunned on the battlefield, appeared to be trying to
exploit its increased political clout with its ideological allies in
Egypt’s new Islamist-led government. The group’s leaders, rejecting
Israel’s call for an immediate end to the rocket attacks, have instead
laid down sweeping demands that would put Hamas in a stronger position
than when the conflict began: an end to Israel’s five-year-old embargo
of the Gaza Strip, a pledge by Israel not to attack again and
multinational guarantees that Israel would abide by its commitments.
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel stuck to his demand that all
rocket fire cease before the air campaign lets up, and Israeli tanks
and troops remained lined up outside Gaza on Sunday. Tens of thousands
of reserve troops had been called up. “The army is prepared to
significantly expand the operation,” Mr. Netanyahu said at the start of a
cabinet meeting.
Reda Fahmy, a member of Egypt’s upper house of Parliament and of the
nation’s dominant Islamist party, who is following the talks, said
Hamas’s position was just as unequivocal. “Hamas has one clear and
specific demand: for the siege to be completely lifted from Gaza,” he
said. “It’s not reasonable that every now and then Israel decides to
level Gaza to the ground, and then we decide to sit down and talk about
it after it is done. On the Israeli part, they want to stop the missiles
from one side. How is that?”
He added: “If they stop the aircraft from shooting, Hamas will then stop
its missiles. But violence couldn’t be stopped from one side.”
Hamas’s aggressive stance in the cease-fire talks is the first test of
the group’s belief that the Arab Spring and the rise in Islamist
influence around the region have strengthened its political hand, both
against Israel and against Hamas’s Palestinian rivals, who now control
the West Bank with Western backing.
It also puts intense new pressure on President Mohamed Morsi of Egypt, a
former leader of the Muslim Brotherhood who was known for his fiery
speeches defending Hamas and denouncing Israel. Mr. Morsi must now
balance the conflicting demands of an Egyptian public that is deeply
sympathetic to Hamas and the Palestinian cause against Western pleadings
to help broker a peace and Egypt’s need for regional stability to help
revive its moribund economy.
Indeed, the Egyptian-led cease-fire talks illustrate the diverging paths
of the Muslim Brotherhood and Hamas, a Palestinian offshoot of the
original Egyptian Islamist group. Hamas has evolved into a more militant
insurgency and is labeled a terrorist organization by the United States
and Israel, while the Brotherhood has effectively become Egypt’s ruling
party. Mr. Fahmy said in an interview in March that the Brotherhood’s
new responsibilities required a step back from its ideological cousins
in Hamas, and even a new push to persuade the group to compromise.
But Moussa Abu Marzouk,
a senior Hamas official who was allowed to settle in Cairo after the
ouster of President Hosni Mubarak, predicted a different outcome. In an
interview at the same time, he said that if another conflict broke out
with Israel, the moderate Islamist politicians around the region like
the Egyptian Brotherhood would have to line up with the militants in
Gaza.
“The position of all Islamists in the region will be that of Hamas,” Mr. Abu Marzouk said, “not the other way around.”
Israeli officials are conducting their side of the cease-fire talks
through the contacts in Egyptian intelligence with whom they worked
during Mr. Mubarak’s rule. Officials said their main focus was on ending
the threat of rocket fire from Gaza, whether by diplomatic or military
means.
Dan Meridor, the Israeli intelligence minister, said on Israeli
television that the government would wait for Hamas “to stop firing”
before it would negotiate a long-term cease-fire. In the meantime, he
said, Israel would do “whatever it takes” to eliminate Hamas’s ability
to fire rockets, potentially including an incursion into Gaza.
In his first public comments on Gaza since the latest violence broke
out, President Obama said in Bangkok early Monday that he supported
Israel’s right to take action in Gaza but that he was trying to defuse
the conflict.
“We are actively working with all the parties in the region to see if we
can end those missiles being fired without further escalation of
violence in the region,” Mr. Obama said, noting that he had spoken with
Mr. Netanyahu several times, as well as with Mr. Morsi and Prime
Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan of Turkey. “We’re going to have to see
what kind of progress we can make in the next 24, 36, 48 hours,” Mr.
Obama added.
As the conflict has intensified, so has diplomatic pressure on Israel to
restrain its military campaign. William Hague, the British foreign
minister, said in a television appearance on Sunday that he and Prime
Minister David Cameron “stressed to our Israeli counterparts that a
ground invasion of Gaza would lose Israel a lot of the international
support and sympathy that they have in this situation,” The Associated
Press reported.
While the Israelis talked to their longtime contacts in Egyptian
intelligence, Mr. Morsi’s office worked through its own channels of
communication with Hamas, and Mr. Morsi himself met on Sunday with
Hamas’s top leader, Khaled Mashaal.
Mr. Fahmy, of Mr. Morsi’s Freedom and Justice Party, insisted Sunday
that Israel was to blame for starting the current round of violence by
killing Hamas’s top military leader, and that Israel would have to act
to end it. “Now we’re exerting pressure to stop the fighting on both
sides, but we can’t pressure the victim while the perpetrator isn’t even
ready to settle,” he said.
Mr. Morsi, speaking Saturday night at a joint news conference with Mr.
Erdogan, accused Israel of failing to abide by an earlier cease-fire
with Hamas that Egypt had negotiated just a week earlier.
“There is a power imbalance,” Mr. Morsi said, noting the death tolls on
each side: three Israelis killed by Hamas attacks during the five days
of fighting, compared with more than 40 Palestinians killed by Israel, a
figure that rose to 70 on Sunday.
“Israel is an occupying country, and international laws oblige occupiers
with many things that Israel doesn’t abide by,” Mr. Morsi said. “If the
situation was further escalated, or if a land invasion took place as
Israelis have said, this would mean dire consequences in the region, and
we could never accept that, and the free world could never accept
that.”
Still, Mr. Morsi may not have a free hand. He is a new president of a
country in a fragile political transition away from military-dominated
rule. He must maintain good relations with Egypt’s still-powerful army
and intelligence services, which are deeply wary of Hamas.
He has already shown a willingness to snub Hamas in the interest of
Egyptian security, by leading a campaign to shut down the tunnels used
to smuggle goods and occasionally weapons into Gaza under the Egyptian
border. “We are closing them every day,” he said with evident passion in
a recent interview.
Others in the Egyptian government argued that President Morsi was
gaining a new perspective on Hamas, and on what officials of the
Egyptian Foreign Ministry have long said was the group’s pattern of
sacrificing the lives of Gazans to Israeli military campaigns for little
reason other than to burnish its claim to be the champion of resistance
to the Israeli occupation. That status is a key to its hold on power,
and an asset in its rivalry with Fatah, the Western-backed faction that
controls the West Bank.
Still, in his appearance on Saturday, Mr. Morsi publicly blamed only
Israel for the violence, and warned its government that the Arab Spring
had changed the Middle East. “Everyone should remember, the peoples of
the region are different than before,” he said. “The leadership in the
region is different.”
Labels: Conflict, Culture, Defence, Diplomacy, Egypt, Gaza, Hamas, Israel
<< Home