"I want to say that the image of President Biden that our press and
even the American press paints has nothing in common with reality,"
"He was on a long trip, had flown
across the Ocean, and had to contend with jet lag and the time
difference. When I fly it takes its toll. But he looked cheerful, we
spoke face-to-face for two or maybe more hours. He's completely across
his brief."
"Biden is a professional, and you have
to be very careful in working with him to make sure you don’t miss
anything. He doesn’t miss anything, I can assure you."
Russian President Vladimir Putin
"We
didn't need to spend more time talking. [I informed Mr. Putin that] we
need some basic rules of the road that we can all abide by. I did what I
came to do."
"[There
was] no substitute for face-to-face dialogue, [I told him the agenda
was] not against Russia [but] for the American people."
"This
is not about trust, this is about self-interest and verification of
self-interest [with a] genuine prospect [of improving relations]."
U.S. President Joe Biden
|
U.S. President Joe Biden (left) and Russia's President Vladimir Putin
meet at the start of the U.S.-Russia summit at Villa La Grange in
Geneva, Switzerland, on Wednesday, June 16, 2021. (Denis Balibouse) |
They're
not strangers to one another, although relations between them have been
strained; the cool distance between Washington and Moscow has been
awhile brewing. President Biden's predecessor had a relaxed, somewhat
warmish relationship with President Putin. The Democratic White House is
aggrieved over what it believes was Russian interference in the
election that brought Donald Trump to four years in the White House.
Nonsense, Moscow responds.
The summit
between them on June 16 was productive, in a cool, businesslike way,
according to each of the participants. Despite that no feel-good,
accomplishment-proud joint news conference took place after their frank
discussions laying (almost) everything on the table. There were
some 'don't go there' issues that each made clear were not up for
discussion, and they weren't. Both accomplished politicians, actors,
diplomats, smile on cue.
Vital
issues like arms control and cybersecurity talks proceeded. The
discussions were to have consumed between four to five hours. And to
make certain that it was well understood that this was strictly
business, no food to be served; water sufficed on this occasion. The
exercise in 'airing it all' (almost) took much less time than anticipated; between two to three hours, so no hardship for either in threats of famishing penance.
Certainly
the setting was conducive to feeling good, at the lakeside Villa La
Grange in Geneva. In the end, 68-year-old Vladimir Putin, acquiesced to
the 78 year-old American president, graciously putting the lie to early
dementia capturing the older man's brain. To Mr. Biden's severity of
purpose, Mr. Putin was less curt and dismissive in a notable
role-reversal, expressing his confidence in his political adversary as a
constructive, experienced discussion partner, speaking "the same language".
Reminiscent
in part, of former U.S. President George W.Bush enthusing that looking
into Vladimir Putin's eyes assured him that this was a man he "could do business with".
But in the final analysis, was unable to. Relations between the two
countries have been tense. The Kremlin came under fairly universal
condemnation with its surprise annexation of Crimea and its military
arming, training and fighting alongside ethnic Russian Ukrainians in
eastern Ukraine's Donbas region. An issue that Mr. Putin is rather
prickly about; off-limits.
President
Putin, briefing reporters following their discussion, and in lieu of
the more generally accepted joint news conference spoke of the two sides
making progress on shared goals, that the meeting had set aside
hostilities as indication of the two leaders' wish to make an effort to
understand the framework of the position each spoke from. It was "hard
to say" whether relations would improve beyond a "glimpse of hope" that
mutual trust might result.
The
remaining distance between them expressed by the lack of geniality in
each inviting the other to visit their respective capitals. According to
Mr. Biden, much time was spent on discussions around arms control and
cyber-attacks, when it was made clear by him to Mr. Putin that "critical infrastructure should be off-limits".
As emphasis, he handed over a list of 16 strategic sectors to Mr.
Putin, who undoubtedly has a similar list back home in Moscow.
The
impression was left with Mr. Biden that there was genuine concern of
being "encircled", the belief by Mr. Putin that Washington planned to
"take him down". And of course, Mr. Biden assured Mr. Putin that such
was not the case; they just had to accommodate themselves to the
practicality of getting along and pursuing their mutual interests in
ensuring the good of the global community was uppermost in mind,
primarily in restraints in arms control.
He
did warn Mr. Putin, he said, of consequences should jailed opposition
figure Alexei Navalny expire in prison as a result of detention
conditions; a situation that would prove to be "devastating for Russia".
Both agreed without hesitation that Moscow and Washington shared
nuclear stability responsibility; further discussions on altering the
recently extended New START arms limitation treaty would be on the
agenda.
Mr.
Putin made it abundantly clear that concerns about Mr. Navalny's fate
should rest solely with Russia and expanded Russia military presence
close to the eastern border of Ukraine was also Russia's internal
business. He laid to rest as far as he was concerned the very absurdity
of Russian responsibility for a series of cyber-attacks in the United
States.
Although
both Mr.Putin and Mr. Biden expressed the hope that more stable,
predictable relations between the two countries might result prior to
their meeting, it appeared somewhat obvious that the meeting itself did
little to advance that prospect; cool, collected, remote relations. The
irritants expressed on the U.S. side unresolved to its satisfaction, and
guaranteed to remain so in the near future. "I'm not confident he'll change his behaviour", the last words on the matter by Mr. Biden.
|
President Joe Biden and Russian President Vladimir Putin, arrived to
meet at the Villa la Grange on Wednesday, June 16, 2021, in Geneva,
Switzerland. (Saul Loeb) |
"I
watched Putin's press conference after the summit meeting, but since
Russians have heard most of his lies and evasions for years, there
wasn't much new for me. The foreign audience seemed shocked when Putin
said Navalny had only himself to blame for consciously breaking parole
by leaving the country -- even though Navalny was evacuated to Germany
in a poison-induced coma. He also tried to justify the Russian invasion
of Crimea in 2014 (which he used to deny) by arguing that it had
introduced "stability" after the independent nation struggled to free
itself from Putin's grip. Putin also denied responsibility for
cyberattacks and blamed the US for being the biggest offender."
"These
are examples of the absurd, reality-twisting nonsense Russians are fed
24-7 by the state-controlled media, and Putin was delighted to have the
chance to spread it around the world. Had Biden wanted to send a real
message to Putin, he would have met instead with Volodymyr Zelensky, the
president of Ukraine. Or with Sviatlana Tsikhanouskaya,
the leading opposition candidate in Belarus' sham elections last year,
who is now living in exile after fleeing persecution by Putin's loyal
servant Belarusian despot Alexander Lukashenko. Or Biden could have
extended a White House invitation to the families of Putin's many
victims."
Opinion by Garry Kasparov, CNN
<< Home