January 15, 2013 12:53 by Simon Plosker
In a story that was reported by Israeli press, including the Jerusalem Post and Times of Israel, a video from 2010 was released by the Middle East Media Research Institute (MEMRI) of Egyptian President Mohammed Morsi opposing peace with “the descendants of apes and pigs.” (See transcript here.)
That the leader of the Arab world’s most powerful and influential state has openly expressed anti-Semitic views and his opposition to peace with Israel was a potentially huge international story. Or was it?
Forbes magazine’s Richard Behar asked the question as to why no American newsrooms deemed Morsi’s comments worthy of attention:
Needless to say, this was HUGE NEWS for American mass media! Only it wasn’t. (Knock, knock, New York Times?
Anybody home?) In fact, to be fair to the paper of record, not a single
major outlet has covered it. Not AP or Reuters. Not CBS News or CNN.
Not Time magazine or U.S. News & World Report. Not the Washington Post, the Wall Street Journal, or USA Today. Etcetera. And therein lies a story, which this column can only begin to skin open here. …
Undoubtedly, the Cairo and
Jerusalem bureaus of the big U.S. media outlets saw the story. But the
news only found its way to certain American readers and viewers by
getting picked up in Jewish and/or conservative forums over the
following days. …
Most would agree that, even in the internet age, the [New York] Times is
still the leading agenda-setter for major media. It is, after all, the
best paper around, a true wonder-of-the-world. But it does seem to
avoid covering Islamist incitement against Jews (and Christians) like
the plagues.
From the original release of the story on January 4 and Richard Behar’s article on January 11, it has taken some eleven days for the New York Times to file a report.
According to the NY Times report: “Representatives of Mr. Morsi have declined repeated requests over more than three days for comment on his remarks.” This would imply that journalist David Kirkpatrick first cottoned on to the story on the day that Behar called out the NY Times.
While it is concerning that the NY Times initially didn’t consider anti-Semitic and anti-Israel comments from the Egyptian president to be worth covering, at least the paper did eventually publish the story. We wait to see whether others will follow the NY Times’s lead.
Why is this important? That Egypt’s president uttered these statements is newsworthy in its own right. But in the bigger picture, the media tends to concentrate its attention on presenting Israel as the intransigent side, placing issues such as settlements at the heart of the Middle East conflict.
Meanwhile, anti-Israel incitement from the Palestinians and the wider Arab world is virtually never covered and is thus rarely factored in as a potential obstacle towards peace.
It’s time that the mainstream media acknowledges that the Mideast conflict might actually be based on more than just a simple territorial dispute.
In this case, thanks to Richard Behar, it’s better late than never.
UPDATE
The Algemeiner reports that Morsi’s anti-Semitic remarks have been condemned by White House Press Secretary Jay Carney at a Tuesday press briefing:
“We strongly condemn the remark that
then-Muslim Brotherhood leader Morsi made in 2010. The language that we
have seen is deeply offensive. We completely reject these statements,
as we do any language that espouses religious hatred. This
discourse–this is a broader point–this kind of discourse has been
acceptable in the region for far too long and it’s counter to the goal
of peace. President Morsi should make clear that he respects people of
all faiths, and that this type of rhetoric is not acceptable or
productive in a democratic Egypt. Since taking office President Morsi
has reaffirmed Egypt’s commitment to its peace treaty with Israel in
both word and deed, and has proven willing to work with us towards
shared objectives including a ceasefire during the crisis in Gaza last
year. These commitments are essential to our bi-lateral relations with
Egypt as well as for stability in the region.”
Labels: Anti-Semitism, Conflict, Controversy, Crisis Politics, Culture, Egypt, Islamism, Middle East, Muslim Brotherhood, United States
posted by Pieface @ Tuesday, January 15, 2013
<< Home