Monday, January 13, 2020

Iran On A Tightrope

"We are following your [Iranian protesters} protests closely, and are inspired by your courage."
"The government of Iran must allow human rights groups to monitor and report facts from the ground on the ongoing protests by the Iranian people."
"There can not be another massacre of peaceful protesters, nor an Internet shutdown. The world is watching."
U.S.President Donald J. Trump
...Arash Khamooshi for The New YorkTimes
The plane was flying in its normal direction without any error and everybody was doing their job correctly."
"If there was a mistake, it was made by one of our members."
"I wish I was dead. I accept all responsibility for this incident."
Gen.Amir Ali Hajizadeh, commander, airspace unit, Revolutionary Guard Corps

"We expect Iran to assure its readiness for a full and open investigation, to bring those responsible to justice, to return the bodies of the victims, to pay compensation, and to make official apologies through diplomatic channels."
Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelensky
...Abedin Taherkenareh/EPA, via Shutterstock

Ukraine would not hesitate, says its president, to "insist on a full admission of guilt" by Tehran. Absent pointing to what they claim to have been aggressive provocations by the United States. Absent suggestions that the Ukrainian pilots of Ukraine International Airlines Flight 752, a Boeing 737-800 having given the impression that it was veering off and descending as though becoming a threat.

"Even in the statement of Iran there is a hint that our crew was acting independently, or that it could have acted differently", pointed out Yevhenii Dykhne, the airline director. The plane took off as it normally would on such flights out of Iran, following the same departure routes as those of other airliners leaving the Tehran international airport that morning. Normal radio contact was maintained by the crew with the Tehran tower, following standard departure protocol for the airport.

Having reached an elevation of 6,000 feet, the tower instructed the pilots to make a slight northerly turn, and one of the pilots read back "turn and climb". The plane had been misidentified, according to General Hajizadeh, thought to be a cruise missile, and summarily shot down with a short-range missile -- oh wait -- likely two such missiles exploding near the plane.

...Efrem Lukatsky/Associated Press

Leading the Ukrainian expert investigators to accuse Iran of recklessly permitting commercial flights at a time of security emergency, violating universally accepted processes. Along with mismanaging a post-crash investigation by bulldozing debris from the plane into great piles on the ground, failing to handle evidence with care, much less document them after minute examination. "Everything was done absolutely inappropriately", stated Oleksiy Danilov, the security official overseeing the crash inquiry for Ukraine.

...Geoff Robins/Agence France-Presse

Ukraine's president's office posted photographs of shrapnel damage on the wreckage of the plane, along with a passport belonging to an Iranian-Canadian with half-inch-in-diameter piercings, consistent with the belief that shrapnel from a surface-to-air missile hit the plane. "Human error at time of crisis caused by U.S. adventurism led to disaster", wrote Mohammad Javad Zarif, Iran's foreign minister.

 Jan 12, 2020, local newspapers: “Apologize, Resign”, (ATTA KENARE / AFP)

While Iran was expressing sentiments of sincerely abject remorse tinged liberally with self-exculpating accusations, Ukrainian aviation officials who had struggled since the crash to extract meaningful information from Iran about the truth of the situation, were indignant with frustration. In response to criticism that the airline should have aborted their flight out of Iran in light of regional tensions, airline officials counter-claimed it was Iran's responsibility to close airspace, intending to fire missiles.

The death of 176 people aboard the Ukrainian Airlines flight has activated protesters in Tehran and other Iranian cities to express their distrust of Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. In protest videos Iranians are heard to shout "Khamenei is a murderer!" while anti-riot police tear-gassed demonstrators as the situation turned increasingly violent. They too are not accepting the military version of the flight crew taking a sharp, unexpected turn bringing it close to a sensitive military base.
Iranians students demonstrate following a tribute for the victims of Ukraine International Airlines Boeing 737 in front of the Amirkabir University in the capital Tehran, on January 11, 2020 (Atta KENARE / AFP)

"Death to Liars!" and "Death to the dictator!", Iranians shouted gathering in squares. "You have no shame!", the crowds chorused. Among them presumably many who had turned out to mourn the death of Al Quds IRGC Commander Maj.-Gen.Qassem Soleimani. That show of communal outrage now highlighting the deaths of innocent passengers on a Ukrainian airliner, mostly Iranian and Canadian.

Reports have been verified that live ammunition is being used to quell protests, that defenceless women were being shot in the legs.The Islamic Republic of Iran resorting to the kind of crowd control that it knows best as an effective deterrent to citizen civil disobedience.

Desperate to maintain 'order', and to keep the outside world out of its affairs. An outside world that is now keenly observing the out-of-control actions of a wholly dysfunctional theocracy whose population is itself awakening to the full distemper of its pious terrorist rulers.

People gather for a candlelight vigil to remember the victims of the Ukraine plane crash, at the gate of Amri Kabir University that some of the victims of the crash were former students of, in Tehran, Iran, Jan. 11, 2020  (AP Photo/Ebrahim Noroozi)
People gather for a candlelight vigil to remember the victims of the Ukraine plane crash, at the gate of Amri Kabir University that some of the victims of the crash were former students of, in Tehran, Iran, Jan. 11, 2020 (AP Photo/Ebrahim Noroozi)

Labels: , , , , , , ,

Monday, November 25, 2019

China, Helping Canada See the Error of its Ways ....

"I had never even thought of China [back in 1979 when Beijing began opening up to its version of democracy-plus-free-enterprise]. It was not on my radar at all, but this sounded really interesting."
"So, my husband and I went over to China [to travel in China, which led to a master's degree in international relations with a Chinese focus]."
"When I came home [40 years later], I decided to speak out. Up until January [of 2019], I had never done an interview in my life. But I feel it's important that friends of China -- former friends of China -- speak out about this [Beijing's increasingly authoritarian streak]."
"I'm not feeling very friendly toward China, if you can tell."
Margaret McCuaig-Johnston, former vice-president, Canada-China Friendship Association

"We are rolling over, we are acquiescing, at a time when Chinese aggression is on the rise. We should be working with like-minded allies to send a real signal that such conduct is not condoned."
"[If keeping quiet and friendly were going to work with China, Spavor and Kovrig] would have been released months ago."
Erin O'Toole, Parliamentary opposition, foreign affairs critic

"[Beijing] is good at co-opting former government officials and politicians by offering them seats on boards and contracts."
"Obviously, then it becomes very difficult for you to become critical of China."
Guy Saint-Jacques, former Canadian ambassador to China


"There's nothing like back door devices being installed by Huawei. So that's a groundless accusation."
"So we do hope that the Canadian side will provide a fair, just and a non-discriminatory business environment for Chinese companies, including Huawei."
"We do hope that the Canadian side will reflect on what has happened and take concrete measures to push our relationship back to the normal track. So that's the task for the government."
"And we do hope that those important people in the new [Liberal] cabinet will play an active role in making sure that relations of our two countries return to their normal track on the basis of mutual respect and equality."
Ambassador of the People's Republic of China to Canada Cong Peiwu
Cong Peiwu spoke to reporters at China's Embassy in Ottawa  CBC

"When they get Huawei into Canada ... they're going to know every health record, every banking record, every social media post -- they're going to know everything about every single Canadian."
"What the Chinese are doing makes Facebook and Google look like child's play, as far as collecting information on folks. The Huawei Trojan horse is frightening, it's terrifying."
"I find it amazing that our allies and friends in other liberal democracies would allow Huawei in ... I'm surprised that there's even a debate out there."
"[Such an intrusion would impact on Canada's participation in the Five Eyes Intelligence alliance of Australia, New Zealand, the U.K. and the U.S.]."
Robert O'Brien, U.S. National Security Adviser
Ambassador Cong, in delivering Beijing's message to Ottawa, is using coded language when he urges the Liberal government of Prime Minister Justin Trudeau to 'return to their normal track', and to 'take concrete measures to push our relationship back to the normal track'. He has outlined the 'task for the government' of Canada. There is nothing necessarily that Beijing must do to restore relations between the two nations, for it has done nothing untoward. It was Canada's concurrence through its extradition treaty with its southern neighbour that launched the unfortunate decision to comply with the U.S. by assaulting China.

For in arresting Huawei Technology's CFO Meng Wenzhou at the behest of the U.S. State Department, this is what Beijing has accused Canada of -- criminal malfeasance, defying international law. Whereas China's response to the insult bestowed upon one of its citizens by summarily arresting two Canadians in China for business purposes and accusing them of plotting against China -- charging them with espionage, incarcerating them under harsh conditions while Ms. Meng, out on bail, lives in one of her luxury mansions in Vancouver -- has been mindful of and obedient to the rule of law.

Beijing knows with whom it is dealing. While former Liberal Prime Minister Jean Chretien was in office he led numerous elaborate 'trade missions' to China from Canada, familiarizing himself with useful Chinese officials whom he called upon once he left office to become a private citizen and continued to lead trade missions to China, the prestige of a former prime minister opening doors, and with his insider status intact. When former Conservative Prime Minister Stephen Harper's policy was to regard trade with China as second to its human rights abuses, Mr. Chretien poured scorn upon him; nothing should impede unrestrained trade alliances with China.

This Liberal government under Justin Trudeau has tread softly around China's outrageous response to the U.S.-Canada extradition treaty, when Beijing arrested two Canadians, imposed death sentences for drug smuggling on another two Canadians and placed punishing constraints on the importation of Canadian canola, soy, peas, pork and beef products, devastating the Canadian agricultural sector through punishing sanctions on a country that refused to come to heel and release the Huawei executive.

Michael Spavor, left, former Canadian diplomat Michael Kovrig, right (Canadian Press)

Margaret McCuaig-Johnston had dedicated her working life to enhancing relations between Canada and China, collaborating to advance the relationship between the two countries. She aided China in its science and technology development during its period of reform, as a Canadian civil servant, while considering herself a staunch "friend of China". And then, after forty years of work in that realm the arrest of Meng Wanzhou, followed by the incarceration of Michael Kovrig and Michael Spavor, she discovered her locked luggage had been unlocked and rifled through in her Shanghai hotel room.

Soon a local business acquaintance informed her of a list of 100 Canadians that Chinese authorities had compiled representing those who could be detained and interrogated, among the hundreds of thousands of Canadians who live and work in China; Hong Kong alone has 300,000 people with Canadian citizenship. In other words, Canadians living in Hong Kong are also under scrutiny and their security is of concern as well, particularly given the violent turn of the protests in the partially autonomous city.

And China has warned Canada, through the stern advice of its latest ambassador that it would not be in Canada's interests to 'interfere' in China's internal affairs.
A protester is detained by riot police while attempting to leave the campus of Hong Kong Polytechnic University (PolyU) during clashes with police in Hong Kong, China November 18, 2019. (Thomas Peter/Reuters)

The current Liberal government in Canada takes advice from its past prime minister on such issues; and no doubt the advice was not to further ruffle any feathers, to sit back and let events take their course. Naturally, the imprisoned Canadians, despite the harsh conditions they are suffering, would staunchly opt to sit back and suffer their circumstances, in support of their government's position, for no sacrifice is too great to protect Canadian trade with China.

Some 140 and more signatories in the academic and diplomatic global community demanded through a joint letter that China release Kovrig and Spavor. A mere 6 Canadian academics and six former Canadian ambassadors to China signed.

It has been observed that more than a few advisers to the Liberal government have what they consider to be valued and hard-won ties and interests in China. The new ambassador to Beijing, Dominic Barton, among them. Many Canadian academics, politicians and business leaders have compromised positions finding it difficult to criticize China, for to do so would be to risk the status they have won and cherish for the opportunities and funding that status guarantees them.

Labels: , , , , , ,

Saturday, July 20, 2019

One Free, Two To Go ...

"Communication has been re-established with the vessel and Master confirmed that the armed guards have left and the vessel is free to continue the voyage."
"All crew are safe and well."
Mesdar's manager, Norbulk Shipping UK

"In a bid to identify and fight organized smuggling ... the patrol boats of the Guards' naval forces abruptly stopped one of the foreign vessels which carried 1 million litres of smuggled fuel."
Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps
The Stena Impero
The Stena Impero
"[The ship was making an entry from the exit point of the Strait of Hormuz in the south], disregarding the established procedures that require all entries be made through the northern pass." "[The ship has been escorted to Iranian coastal waters for further legal procedures and investigations'."
Fars news agency
Britain is advising that all maritime activity in the Strait of Hormuz should be suspended for the time being, citing the piracy being engaged in by the Islamic Republic of Iran. Earlier in the week a foreign ship, accused of "smuggling fuel" was intercepted south of Larak Island, Iran, in the Strait of Hormuz, its crew of a dozen arrested. Now they've been freed. "Our analysis right now is that nothing has actually happened" reported TankerTrackers on Twitter.

According to the best guess of experts closely monitoring events the amount of onboard cargo of the ship was insignificant, that it would appear Tehran towed the vessel for the purpose of drama, a show of strength, in the wake of Britain having impounded an Iranian supertanker off Gibraltar earlier in the month. And subsequently warning Britain of consequences to come. Those consequences appear to have arrived.

The Guards' seizure of the British-tagged tanker Stena Impero is yet another risky chess move by the Republic in its undeclared war with the West. In obvious angry desperation at its inability to export Iranian oil as previously with the added U.S. sanctions that followed President Trump's withdrawal of American support for the 2015 Iranian nuclear agreement, last year, Tehran is hitting out at one of the European countries that has been at the forefront of attempting to mediate and find a way to circumvent U.S. sanctions.

It appears that a second British ship has now also been detained. This is a high stakes game Tehran is playing. All its previous provocations have mostly targeted ships belonging to its Middle East Sunni rivals. The issue of tangling with the U.S. in the matter of shooting down a U.S. drone, and the U.S. more latterly destroying an Iranian drone buzzing a U.S. naval carrier has increased tensions. Europe had attempted to remove itself from entanglement in disputes between Washington and Tehran.

British Prime Minister Theresa May has called for an emergency meeting to discuss the urgency of escalating confrontations. The meeting, explained British foreign secretary Jeremy Hunt is to determine “what we can do to swiftly secure the release of the two vessels". Later he said further, "We’re not looking at military options; we’re looking at a diplomatic way to resolve the situation. But we are very clear that it must be resolved."

The Mesdar tanker
Norbulk Shipping   The Mesdar Tanker

Labels: , , , , ,

Wednesday, June 27, 2018

Wholesale Transition: North Africa, Middle East Invasion

"Plaintiffs argue that this President's words strike at fundamental standards of respect and tolerance, in violation of our constitutional tradition."
"But the issue before us is not whether to denounce the statements. It is instead the significance of those statements in reviewing a Presidential directive, neutral on its face, addressing a matter within the core of executive responsibility."
"In doing so, we must consider not only the statements of a particular President, but also the authority of the Presidency itself."
"The Proclamation is squarely within the scope of Presidential authority."
Chief Justice John Roberts, U.S. Supreme Court

"Migration pits southern Europe against the north."
"Italy and Greece smoulder with resentment at having been left alone to deal with migrant arrivals. Meanwhile, northern countries blame the south for not patrolling their Mediterranean borders better and for having, at least in the past, enabled migrants to "slip away" northwards towards richer Germany, Austria and Sweden."
"Migration slashes the EU from east to west too."
"Newer member states from Central and Eastern Europe never signed up to the post World War Two "all for one and one for all" vision."
"When it comes to EU solidarity and burden-sharing, they are fervent non-believers. They determinedly turn their backs when Italy and Germany plead for migrant quotas."
"The number of migrants arriving illegally in Europe may be down, but so is voter tolerance of the problem."
"The rise and rise across the EU of tough-on-migration politicians has emboldened hardliners such as Hungary's Victor Orban and Austria's Sebastian Kurz, who takes over the six-month rotating presidency of the EU this Sunday and will push migration as a top priority."
"'Keep Them Out' is Austria's main aim and while Europe's [still] most influential leader, Angela Merkel, arrives in Brussels on Thursday pushing - and praying - for compromise on burden-sharing and prevention, the number of EU leaders pushing single-mindedly on the migrant deterrence button is growing."




A Royal Canadian Mounted Police officer, left, standing in Saint-Bernard-de-Lacolle, Quebec, advises migrants that they are about to illegally cross from Champlain, N.Y., and will be arrested, Monday, Aug. 7, 2017.    AP Photo/Charles Krupa










Migrants on an inflatable boat boarding the Lifeline sea rescue boat at sea on June 21, 2018
The splits within the EU have been highlighted by Italy's refusal to accept migrants carried by NGO rescue boats in the Mediterranean    AFP

Labels: , , , , ,

Saturday, March 25, 2017

Deadly Impressions

"I have an impression -- I hope it's only an impression -- that the practise of killing political opponents has started spreading in Russia."
Gennady Gudkov, (former parliamentarian, ex-security services officer), Moscow
A Ukrainian police expert seizes a gun at the scene where former Russian MP Denis Voronenkov was shot.
A Ukrainian police expert seizes a gun at the scene where former Russian MP Denis Voronenkov was shot.  (SERGEI SUPINSKY) 
An impression. Only a mere impression? Anyone daring to question the motives of the Kremlin and the methods of the President of Russia, let alone boldly independent-minded journalists burdened by an imperative of justice prevailing, takes their lives in their own hands when through free will and unstoppable indignation, they seek to challenge and oppose this President-for-life, by submitting theirs involuntarily to his, impulsively.

For registering a new political movement Sergei Yushenkov earned the fate of being gunned down outside his Moscow home, the evidence that Mr. Putin's government plotted 1999 bombings dying with him, in 2003. The ghoulish fate of Alexander Litvinenko, who discovered too late that viewing haven in London a solution to fear, suffered agonies of pain for three weeks, infected with deadly plonium-210, a critic of Russia's Putin.

Journalist Anna Politkovskaya, Putin's government, found him to be guilty of operating a police state and covering up war crimes, and she paid dearly for her authorship of such charges, shot to death while in an elevator in her apartment building, in 2006. Abductions and murders in Chechnya revealed by journalist Natalya Estemirova led to her 2006 kidnapping and execution. The death of lawyer Sergei Magnitsky who pursued a massive tax evasion scheme in 2009 led to the Magnitsky law adopted in the U.S. sanctioning those involved.

Human rights lawyers, Russian tycoons running afoul of Vladimir Putin, Russian reformers, protest leaders, they were all treated to very special attention by the Russian President, never living to tell their stories. A potential future president of Russia who had served as deputy prime minister, Boris Nemtsov was assassinated in 2015 after leading a massive street rally against Russia's military intervention in Ukraine, the act taking place in sight of the Kremlin, another mystery unsolved.

The sinister reality of thuggish and deadly Russian politics that has blossomed under Vladimir V. Putin takes the world's attention, while Mr. Putin blandly denies that he has anything to do with
plots to scrub out the lives of those who have the reckless temerity to challenge his authority. The man seems as unassailable to evidence as he is to accusations that his agenda is that of a mafioso diligently protecting his territory.

Among most Russians, Mr. Putin's reputation has never wilted, held in admiration as a traditional heroic strongman.

Now, Anton Gerashchenko an adviser to Ukraine's interior minister, has identified the assassin who shot Kremlin critic Denis Voronenkov as a Russian agent, 28-year-old Pavel Parshov, trained by Russian security services. Formerly a Russian lawmaker and more latterly an outspoken critic of Moscow after moving to Ukraine, Mr. Voronenkov was shot in the back as he walked beside his bodyguard close to the entrance of a hotel in Kyiv's central district.

Mr. Voronenkov was scheduled to appear before Ukraine's Military Prosecutor's Office, alongside another Russian fugitive lawmaker, Ilya Ponomaryov. And while the former's testimony will not be received, the latter's might be susceptible to reconsideration. CCTV footage of the attack was featured on Friday by the Ukrainian media showing Parshov shooting Voronenkov. The bodyguard, reacting, is also shot and in that interval the killer shoots Mr. Voronenkov once more.

When the injured bodyguard pulls his weapon, opening fire on the killer, it marks his own end. President Petro Poroshenko termed the assassination an "act of state terrorism" while Russian officials deny, deny, deny, turning the tables to Ukraine itself being involved in the killing and attempting to smear Russia with the crime.

Police officers hold Maria Maksakova, wife of former Russian MP Denis Voronenkov, near the entrance of the hotel where Voronenkov was shot dead.
Police officers hold Maria Maksakova, wife of former Russian MP Denis Voronenkov, near the entrance of the hotel where Voronenkov was shot dead.   (SERGEI SUPINSKY)

Labels: , , , ,

Tuesday, August 23, 2016

Alarming Oblivion

"The struggle for the soul of Islam between Islamists and humanists goes on in Canada and the U.S.A., not just in the Middle East, Europe and South Asia."
"[Nothing but extremist literature was found present in several mosque libraries.]Further research is required to determine the depth ... of this problem."
Study: “Lovers of the Death”? — Islamist Extremism in Mosques and Schools
Thomas Quiggin, former intelligence analyst, Saied Shoaaib, journalist

"[The study is an] exercise in shoddy research [generalizing about Canadian mosques and Islamic institutions]."
"If the writers have any evidence of criminal activity such as the promotion of terrorism and violent extremism, then they should report it immediately to the authorities. Otherwise, this is nothing more than an attempt to sow fear and distrust towards Canadian Muslim communities without any evidence of wrongdoing or proper context. Such writing only fans the flames of ignorance at a time when vandalism of mosques and hate incidents against Canadian Muslims are increasing."
The National Council of Canadian Muslims

"This is not a Muslim-bashing exercise. This is an attempt to deliberately provoke the government and the media into addressing the actual issues of what's going on. Here's the material that's actually being taught, here's where it comes from, here's how it's getting there. Is this acceptable in Canada, yes or no?"
Thomas Quiggin, former intelligence analyst with the Privy Council Office and the RCMP
A Muslim prays over a Quran.
A Muslim prays over a Quran.
FILE/JUNI KRISWANTO/AFP/Getty Images
Both Mr. Quiggin and his colleague and study co-author, Mr. Shoaaib, originally from Egypt and well versed in Islam and extremism within the religion, conducted research in mosque libraries and Islamic schools to reach the conclusions that their study reveals. Their concern was hugely elevated by the fact that in some of these places it was only extremist literature that could be found as resource material, relating to Islam. Including the texts written by two fathers of modern extremist Islam,
— "In the Shade of the Qur’an" and "Milestones" by Sayyid Qutb, an author seen by some as an inspiration for groups including al-Qaida;
— the complete works of Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab, the founder of Wahhabism, a fundamentalist form of Islam.
The material that they were able to access and analyze, including social media postings, confirmed for them their apprehension that most Canadians, and certainly including leading politicians prefer to turn away from the obvious dangers inherent in the situation of institutionalized Islamist radicalization. It is their contention that this presents a vital issue too grave to ignore, the danger supported by the number of young Canadians that have accepted the role of violent jihad in Islam.

The warning voices of those Canadian Muslims whose outlook is humanist and moderate are not being heard, and if they are, they are ignored. The Canadian Council of Imams is clearly displeased with the airing of this study's conclusions. A year earlier the Senate defence and security committee had issued a report warning that some foreign-trained imams have spread extremist religious ideology unreflective of Canadian values, contributing to radicalization. Has anyone else in government read that report and looked into its findings?

Before the previous Conservative-led government invited the Islamic Republic of Iran to shutter its embassy and missions in Canada, it had provided its brand of fanatical Islamist school curricula to some Canadian Muslim schools practising Shiite Islam; inflammatory, racist, bigoted and alarming material that became the cause of an investigation.

Raheel Raza and Tarek Fatah have written often and cogently of their alarm at the presence of extremists in the Muslim community in Canada spreading their messages of hatred, division, uncompromising Islamist exceptionality and violent jihad. The study's co-authors personally attended four mosques and three Islamic schools in the Ottawa area to gather the information that has concerned them and which should be of great concern to our intelligence and security agencies.

They have found reason to be alarmed about what they have identified as troubling activities — including homophobic statements and promotion of Holy War — at certain mosques in Montreal and Toronto. The promotion of holy war is simply jihad, the obligation of all faithful Muslims to accept their responsibility in pursuit of Islamic domination. There are several options, the slow and inevitable cultural war achieved through immigration and the more overt option of violent jihad.

In denouncing the study's findings, Muslim groups and organizations in Canada typically resort to defaming the authors with claims amounting to viral Islamophobia, claiming innocence and embracing the status of victimhood. Claims that the majority of kind-natured and good-mannered Canadians, anxious not to appear discriminatory, are prepared to accept and apologize profusely over.

What practical use is there in governments and the policing agencies in Canada undertaking exercises in de-radicalization given the reality that the Islamic establishment itself in Canada is implicated in and guilty of promoting Islamist extremism among its faithful? The custodians of Islamic values will extend themselves to infiltrate their ideas into the Canadian way of life and the government attempts to reverse their teachings? Pure lunacy.

“I bear witness that there is no God worthy of worship but Allah. He is one and has no partner, and I also bear witness that Muhammad (PBUH) is the Servant and Messenger of Allah, whom Allah sent with the ‘Religion of Truth’ [Islam] and with Guidance so that this Truth and this Guidance [Islam] will become established in the land over all other religions, although the ‘Disbelievers’ (Jews, Christians, Hindus and Atheists) hate that.” Friday night mosque prayers
Sermon Arabic + EnglishTarek Fatah, September 25, 2015

Labels: , ,

Thursday, May 05, 2016

Responding Defensively

Who can blame colonized people and nations from feelings of resentment at having been used and abused by more powerful countries, their national resources sacked to profit foreign nations, their culture, tradition and heritage held in contempt by a foreign source occupying their lands to benefit themselves, denying opportunities and a future to the people of the land, held in thrall to the interlopers?

Often, those colonial powers could not have held the control and power they managed without the active assistance of local authorities more than satisfied to aid in the oppression of their own people. Nations like Spain, France, Britain, Holland, Portugal, Italy and others explored vast geographic distances for opportunities to enslave less developed nations and their peoples to the enrichment of their European nations.

Eventually, however, the days of colonial empire passed. The former colonies realized independence. They had the opportunity given them, or they demanded and snatched it, sometimes peacefully, sometimes by conflicts, to finally end foreign domination and become autonomously independent, capable of making their own decisions. Which did not necessarily translate into freedom for their masses, when the new rulers and their governments simply emulated those who had oppressed them.

What the emerging governments were able to capitalize on, however, were the civil infrastructure, the judicial processes, the administrative methodology they learned from the departing colonialist masters. That knowledge either helped them to become responsible administrations answering to their peoples' needs, or to become despots answering to their own needs. In the Middle East the latter prevailed.

In the Middle East, traditional tribal enmities and sectarian disputes and hatreds simply re-surfaced amid the general turmoil of mass dysfunction, of state oppression of the masses, of continued intrigues, and of misalliances with former colonial masters that continued. And then the ideology of violent Islamism resurfaced, an Islam that was bred in violent conquest, and which through its sacred texts perpetuates violent conquest. Jihad reborn. With their original target the Middle East potentates and tyrants.

And eventually with the junction of Saudi Arabian oil wealth re-purposing madrassas, and the Muslim Brotherhood fulminating against placid and flaccid Islam, and al-Qaeda rising out of the foreign Islamists' convergence on Afghanistan to fight Russia with the connivance of Pakistan, violent intrigues against the West arose, and eventually, the horrible spectacle of passenger jets used as missiles to bring down massive buildings housing thousands of people at work occurred.

Out of that world-shattering atrocity rose a unified West understanding that a new common enemy had surfaced, one with whom there could be no reasoning, and no matching of army to army. The jihad response to that coalition was an assault on Britain, another on Spain, yet another on Indonesia, and more discrete assaults complete with the horror of never knowing when and where they would occur, in the United States, France and Belgium.

Islamist jihad was reborn with a vengeance. Europe soon lost its determination to confront and defeat violent Islam. Part of the reason was that Europe had opened its doors to Islam, and was being overwhelmed by a Muslim demographic which became an intruder into the normalcy of European life, culture, traditions, law and religion. It seemed far less palatable, much less possible, to continue to send European militaries abroad to deal with Islamist conflicts, since Europe was well infiltrated and susceptible to jihadist violence.

Europe also soon enough realized that its defences were required to turn inward. From among its own populations threats arose that had to be detected and disarmed. Some were neither detected nor disarmed, and the violence directed against Europe and North America increasingly came from within, and not without. European-born-and-bred Muslims responded to the call to jihad and exploited themselves either abroad or right at home to fulfill their sacred Islamist obligations.

In France, the military protects synagogues, art galleries, schools, newspapers, public offices and underground stations - and oh yes, their own police. Primarily, though, the military has been dispatched in an urgent need to defend against attacks propelled toward critics of Islam, and society's Jewish demographic. Half of the French military now is on guard within France. To ensure another Charlie Hebdo doesn't take place, or the bombing of a theatre filled with patrons, or a kosher market.

isis news, isil news, is news, islamic state news, daesh news, syria news, iraq news, terrorism news, africa news, al qaeda news
In a new photo report purportedly released by the Islamic State, two men accused of aiding the United States-supported Iraqi government are beheaded for treason.
In Italy thousands of soldiers are involved in internal military operations with a focus on "safe streets" to ensure the country's cities are safeguarded, even while Italy's army is concurrently involved providing assistance to migrants crossing the Mediterranean from Turkey. France engages itself in an offensive against Islamic State, but Spain and Italy have made their military scarce on that file. Domestic security comes first, not offensive military strikes. Even though the source in the Middle East is what drives the internal security file.

Britain has effectively been transformed into Londonistan, more than matching the French banlieues with their many 'no-go' zones. Countries like Syria and Iraq have been unable to defend themselves against a non-state militia like Islamic State, and nor is the Arab League capable of assembling its own well-armed and -provisioned military might to confront the Islamic State jihadis that threaten the delicate stability of the Middle East, awaiting the intervention of the West and of NATO to do the work for them.

The traditional leader from the West in the Middle East whenever matters get out of hand, has withdrawn. After all, President Obama had to earn the Nobel Peace prize he was awarded so early in his tenure, leading America to a new non-interventionist path, where everyone is friends with everyone else, except when they aren't. Europe has been downsizing its military might, spending far less of their GDP on defense, with the lowest number of enlisted men in recent history.

The UK has followed suit, with a downsized military and is continuing to shrink. Military bases in Canada were prepared to host migrants from the Middle East. There too the military finds itself understaffed, and the new government has set aside the funding originally intended to refurbish its ailing air and sea fleets. Canada's new government withdrew its warplanes from the U.S.-led air strikes against ISIL.

All this as Europe is being invaded by Muslim hordes, fearful of slaughter by their own governments, anxious to escape poverty and unemployment, even while among the legitimate refugees and migrants the malevolent presence of Islamists infiltrating themselves among the refugees are opportunistically travelling to various sites to install themselves awaiting the right time to reveal their purpose, a foretaste of which took place recently in Paris and Brussels.

Labels: , , , , , ,

Wednesday, April 13, 2016

Justice Awaits In Syria

"So long as he is protected by Russia, then the Security Council is stymied and there is no other way that the ICC can have jurisdiction to try him."
"International justice is in its infancy and we’ve seen it change. Charles Taylor, who is now serving 50 years in a British prison, was thought to be safe when he was given refuge in Nigeria, but politics change and he was handed over. So there are plenty of precedents for people who seemed to be safe suddenly becoming inconvenient to their protectors."
Geoffrey Robertson QC, a senior human rights lawyer

"When the day of justice arrives, we’ll have much better evidence than we’ve had anywhere since Nuremberg."
"[he evidence gathered in Syria is] much richer than anything I’ve seen - and anything I’ve prosecuted - in this area."
Stephen Rapp, former chief prosecutor of the United Nations court

"[Assad himself] reviewed the proposals [of the cell], signed them, and returned them for implementation."
"Sometimes he made revisions, crossing out directives and adding new ones. [I remain] certain that no security decision, no matter how small, was made without Assad’s approval."
Abdelmajid Barakat former official with the 'Central Crisis Management Cell', Syria 
Destruction in Deir Ezzor, Syria 
The destruction caused by civil war in the Syrian city of Deir Ezzour. Credit: Khalil Ashawi /REUTERS 
Time may do what the frustrated efforts of the Syrian regime's opponents and the allied efforts of the U.S.-led groups hoping to undermine the strength of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad to remove him from administering Syrian affairs, may yet manage: the International Criminal Court to have the opportunity to try the man responsible for the deaths of hundreds of thousands of Syrians, the homelessness of millions, the wholesale destruction of Syria's infrastructure.

There must be an accounting for the tens of thousands of Syrians imprisoned, tortured and killed on direct orders of Bashar al-Assad. And that accounting at some future date now appears more likely to occur given new intelligence, proof, evidence, of the man's investment in terrorizing his civilian Sunni population as their considered reward for attempting to topple the government that was responsible for withholding the full rights and entitlements of citizenship from them by the Shiite Baathist government he leads.

A veritable trove of evidence has amazingly been smuggled out of Syria. That evidence is represented by 600,000 pages of official documents. The very volume of that evidence whose weight has been put at several tonnes represents the records of a committee struck in secrecy and tasked with crushing the revolt that erupted when the Syrian president swept aside the protests of his majority Sunni population. The appointment by the dictator of a "Central Crisis Management Cell", given supreme responsibility for suppressing the unrest led to mass atrocities.

A 24-year-old Syrian with conscience who acted as the committee official meant to maintain the committee's records, and transmit its orders to be expeditiously carried out, was in reality representing the interests of the opposition. Abdelmajid Barakat escaped in 2013 from Syria, making his way into Turkey, loaded down with as much of the documentation as he could manage to spirit away. To prove that during the life of the committee thousands of Assad's opponents were killed, detained or tortured.

All of this was done on the deliberate instruction of and careful oversight of Bashar Assad, who "reviewed the proposals (of the cell), signed them, and returned them for implementation". The committee did its work demonically well, transforming hospitals into torture centres. When bodies became too numerous, they were piled into washrooms once morgues overflowed.

APRIL 13: This photo released on the official Facebook page of Syrian Presidency, shows Syrian President Bashar Assad casting his ballot in the parliamentary elections, as his wife Asma, left, is standing next to him, in Damascus.
APRIL 13: This photo released on the official Facebook page of Syrian Presidency, shows Syrian President Bashar Assad casting his ballot in the parliamentary elections, as his wife Asma, left, is standing next to him, in Damascus. (AP)


Labels: , , , ,

Saturday, September 26, 2015

Rushing Off In All Directions

"We will go in two directions: first one, we will file a charge at the court in Luxembourg ... secondly, we will not implement the [decision] of the interior ministers."
Slovak Prime Miniter Robert Fico

"Those who don't share our values, those who don't even want to respect those principles, need to start asking themselves questions about their place in the European Union."
French President Francois Hollande

"The decision to relocate 160,000 people from the most affected member states is a historic first and a genuine, laudable expression of European solidarity."
"It cannot be the end of the story, however. It is time for further, bold, determined and concerted action by the European Union, by its institutions and by all its member states."
Jean-Claude Juncker, Commission President

"Some people will say today that Europe is divided because the decision was not taken by consensus."
"If we had not done this, Europe would have been even more divided and its credibility would have been even more undermined."
Jean Asselborn, Luxembourg Foreign Minister
"Let's not forget that this is a mixed flow of migrants, not 'Syrian refugees' as the media tends to call them. Only one third of them are Syrians who embark on the perilous journey to their European country of choice from the refugee camps of Turkey, Lebanon and Jordan. They have already passed several safe countries before reaching Hungary, and the overwhelming majority do not even stop in rich Austria -- some not even in Germany. This is the very dilemma the European Union is struggling to find a good answer to."
Balint Odor, Hungarian Ambassador to Canada
Migrants walk after crossing from Macedonia towards Serbia, near the village of Miratovac to the overcrowded transit camp in Presevo late on September 4, 2015. AFP PHOTO / LOUISA GOULIAMAKI
Migrants walk after crossing from Macedonia towards Serbia, near the village of Miratovac to the overcrowded transit camp in Presevo late on September 4, 2015. AFP PHOTO / LOUISA GOULIAMAKISource:AFP

The European Union interior ministers agreed to proceed with a plan to sprinkle 120,000 asylum seekers from Asia, Africa and the Middle East across Europe. The forcing of reluctant EU member countries to accept policies they view as not being in the best interests of their countries' futures will strain the very solidarity and essence of the European Union. A union of 28 countries that never dreamed their concerns would go beyond the financial rescue of their more improvident members.

But there it is. The European proximity to another continent flush with a religion of violent conquest whose faithful have been oppressed and maltreated, threatened and poverty-stricken, slaughtered and exiled by terrorizing fear, has created the conditions whereby hundreds of thousands of people have taken active measures to separate themselves from their heritage, their lands of birth, their culture and traditions. But not their religion. This transformative ideology and its politics they bear with them.

And this is the issue that confronts Europe. Which could, under other circumstances, convince itself to embrace without reservations people capable of investing themselves with similar values, accept the prevailing laws, adapt to the culture of the indigenous populations, and become stable and reliable citizens with no intention of subverting all that they will not accept in the country that has absorbed them, to offer them a new lease on life.

There are those in Europe who transcribe with a fair degree of accuracy just how the influx of people from Islamic countries have transformed the cultures, the politics, the society which they have infiltrated as immigrants and refugees, and they want no part of it. From the livelier demands on policing to the increased welfare rolls, to the social exceptions where polygamy is practised and their populations will grow increasing numbers of Muslims through natural increase.

An increase which will lead to demographic domination and the final transformation of European countries to Islamic nations. The better European Union suggestion to transfer financial aid to Turkey, Jordan and Lebanon to aid in easing refugee camp conditions there in the hopes of stemming the tide of refugees looking for more promising territory from which to launch their futures should be extended to offers of political and military involvement in staunching the wounds of the civil war and removing its trenchant cause.

Labels: , , , , ,

Monday, September 21, 2015

The New Socialism At Large

"Let us be a force for change in the world, a force for humanity in the world, a force for peace in the world, and a force that recognizes we cannot go on like this, with grotesque levels of global inequality, grotesque threats to our environment all around the world."
"Going back a lot further, there is a Jewish element in the family, probably from Germany."
"I go to churches, I go to mosques, I go to synagogues. I find the power of faith very interesting.
I have friends who are very strongly atheist and wouldn’t have anything to do with any faith; but I take a much more relaxed view of it. I think the faith community offers and does a great deal for people."


New Labour Party leaders Jeremy Corbyn (pictured) and John McDonnell were last night sensationally accused of risking inciting terrorist and anti-Semitic attacks in London by Khan
Jeremy Corbyn, newly-elected Labour leader, Britain
"Corbyn was very unwise. You want to be PM? Respect our Queen -- and sing the anthem."
"Whenever there is tension in Middle East it leads to anti-Semitism in our country. There are Jewish schools and synagogues in London which need round-the-clock security. I will have a zero-tolerance of anti-Semitism -- it's not acceptable in 21st Century London." 
"The idea that a senior politician can condone terrorism is not me. Language is very important. If you are condoning acts of terror ... you are giving credibility to a view that is perverse and is wrong. Could it encourage others to commit similar acts? You're condoning when you should be unequivocally condemning criminal acts, yes."
"As Mayor I'll make sure we don't inadvertently give the signal that it somehow leads to good results. You can't do that [particularly dangerous in London, hit by IRA and Islamist terrorists]."
Sadiq Khan, Labour candidate for London Mayor

"At a time of mass income and wealth inequality throughout the world, I am delighted to see that the British Labour Party has elected Jeremy Corbyn as its new leader."
"We need leadership in every country in the world which tells the billionaire class that they cannot have it all."
Bernie Sanders, U.S. Democratic presidential candidate

The lunatic fringe has new acceptability. It was but a hop and a skip from the audacity of candidate Barack Obama in 2008 achieving a world first as the first mixed-race President of the United States and a Nobel Peace Prize laureate without ever having achieved anything to account for that honour. Since his inauguration as American President, Mr. Obama has led the United States into a long period of partisan dysfunction in Congress, and his actions have soured world opinion on American inaction.

His pursuit of 'peace' and 'stability' at any cost, including the cost of conflict and instability resulting from his administration's inaction on the world stage has set the roller coaster of radical left transition on its way. The younger generation in North America and in Europe has become enthralled with the prospect of activist socialism, which no longer carries the reputation of communist taint.  "Those battles [of the Cold War] are now two or three decades old. For young people, this is barely known history", commented Richard Wolff, an economics professor at the University of Massachusetts.

"After years of Republicans complaining about Barack Obama being a 'socialist', Saunders is making clear just how moderate the incumbent administration is", wrote Rutgers University historian David Greenberg on Politico. But there is backlash in Britain that was immediate on Mr. Corbyn's accession to head Labour when eight Labour MPs declined to serve in Corbyn's shadow cabinet. His deputy leader, Tom Watson, distanced himself from proposals for a NATO withdrawal and nuclear disarmament.

Britain's dismal engagement with farming out national utilities to the private for-profit sector appears to have motivated a Corbyn promise to nationalization energy and rail companies. Peter Mandelson has declared that the party of New Labour faces "the fight of its life to remain a viable party of government." But there isn't condemnation from all quarters; Mr. Corbyn's win earned him congratulations from the left-wing governments of Argentina and Greece.

The socialist anthem The Red Flag has now made its boisterous and joyful reappearance under Mr. Corbyn's Labour flag: "Though cowards flinch and traitors sneer, we'll keep the red flag flying here!" So, is he a cranky old politico with some quite strange ideas, or is he not? He finds common cause with Iran in Holocaust denial. Though claiming he has some distant genealogical Jewish ancestry, he is no friend of Israel.

In fact, his revolutionary fervour turns him instead to Hamas and Hezbollah whom he counts among his 'friends'. Their explicit genocidal intentions haven't been a deterrent to his high regard for the two terrorist groups. Difficult to account for the kind of errant lack of attention to details that led to this man's elevation as head of a British party that has seen far, far better days.

Labels: , ,

Monday, September 14, 2015

Gatestone Institute


  • The move by unelected bureaucrats in Brussels to force European countries to throw open their borders — and to require them to provide migrants with free clothing, food, housing and healthcare for an indefinite period of time — not only represents an audacious usurpation of national sovereignty, it is also certain to encourage millions of additional migrants from the Muslim world to begin making their way to Europe.
  • "We are not facing a refugee crisis, we are facing a migration crisis... Let us not forget that those arriving have been raised in another religion, and represent a radically different culture. Most of them are not Christians, but Muslims. This is an important question, because Europe and European identity is rooted in Christianity. Is it not worrying in itself that European Christianity is now barely able to keep Europe Christian? If we lose sight of this, the idea of Europe could become a minority interest in its own continent." — Prime Minister Viktor Orbán of Hungary.
  • "[T]he continent is experiencing a mass movement of people not seen since the aftermath of the Second World War. Unlike the end of the war, however, none of the masses currently on the move is European... The control over one's own borders is one of the most important characteristics — and responsibilities — of a modern state. Countries lose control over their destinies and even cease to exist when they lose control over who gets in." — Arthur Chrenkoff, New York Observer.
  • Statistics show that of the 625,920 people who applied for asylum in the European Union in 2014, only 29.5% were from Syria, Afghanistan and Iraq.
  • "If you do not like it, just go away." — Czech Republic President Milos Zeman, commenting that no one had invited migrants to his country, but once they arrive, they should respect the rules of his country or leave.
  • "The lesson for the United States is that reducing our global influence does not increase international peace and security. Quite the opposite. Obama's retreat from the Middle East, whether in the aftermath of Libya, his disinterest in the Islamic State's continuing rise, or his surrender to Iran's nuclear-weapons program, are all part of the larger pattern." — Ambassador John R. Bolton, Fox News Opinion.
  • "Since Slovakia is a Christian country, we cannot tolerate an influx of 300,000-400,000 Muslim immigrants who would like to start building mosques all over our land and trying to change the nature, culture and values ​​of the state.... If we do not start telling the truth about migration, we will never move from this spot." — Prime Minister Robert Fico, Slovakia.
The European Commission, the powerful administrative arm of the European Union, has unveiled a controversial plan that would compel EU member countries to accept 160,000 migrants and refugees from the Middle East and North Africa.
The move by unelected bureaucrats in Brussels to force European countries to throw open their borders — and to require them to provide migrants with free clothing, food, housing and healthcare for an indefinite period of time — not only represents an audacious usurpation of national sovereignty, it is also certain to encourage millions of additional migrants from the Muslim world to begin making their way to Europe.
The migration proposal, announced on September 9, would "share" 120,000 migrants currently holed up in Greece, Hungary and Italy with other countries in the European Union. This number is in addition to previous demands by the European Commission that 40,000 Syrian and Eritrean migrants be relocated from Greece and Italy.
German Chancellor Angela Merkel, whose open-door immigration policy is partly responsible for fueling the rush of migrants to Europe, has already warned that the European Commission's plan is "merely a first step" and that Europe may have to accept even bigger numbers. German Vice Chancellor Sigmar Gabriel said that Germany could take 500,000 migrants annually for "several more years."

Welcome to Germany! At left, German Chancellor Angela Merkel. At right, some of the hundreds of migrants who arrived in Munich on September 12, 2015.

It remains unclear just how many of the migrants arriving in Europe are refugees fleeing warzones, and how many are economic migrants seeking a better life in the West. Statistics show that of the 625,920 people who applied for asylum in the European Union in 2014, only 29.5% were from Syria, Afghanistan and Iraq.
German officials have admitted that 40% of the migrants arriving in the country in 2015 are from the Balkans, including Albania, Kosovo and Serbia, which implies that at least half of those arriving in Germany this year are economic migrants fleeing poverty not war.
Critical observers are describing the migration chaos engulfing Europe in apocalyptic terms: an "unstoppable demographic revolution," a "total Armageddon scenario," and an "exodus of biblical proportions."
What follows is a selection of quotes and commentary from a variety of political leaders and opinion-shapers in Europe and elsewhere about the consequences of untrammeled immigration from the Muslim world.
In Britain, Nigel Farage, the leader of the Eurosceptic UK Independence Party (UKIP), spoke to the BBC Radio 4's Today program. He said:
"The problem we've got is we've opened the door to an exodus of biblical proportions meaning millions and millions of refugees. We've lost sight of what it is to be a refugee. How many millions does Europe want to take? That is the question.
"Genuine refugees have tended to be groups of people, ethnic groups or religious groups who were directly under persecution and were fleeing in fear of their lives. The problem we've got now if you look at the definition of the EU's common asylum policy, it includes anyone fleeing from a war-torn country, and it even includes people fleeing extreme poverty."
British MEP Janice Atkinson, said:
"Nobody voted for illegal immigration. Plenty of people voted to put us here to oppose it. The hundreds of thousands of illegal immigrants overwhelming our borders and our capacities to cope are exactly that — illegal.
"Let's be clear about another thing: despite what the human rights industry and the massed ranks of taxpayer-funded charities and lobby-groups repeat, this is not a refugee crisis but a massive crisis of illegal immigration which must be resisted for what it is."
English author and journalist Peter Hitchens, in an essay titled, "We won't save refugees by destroying our own country," wrote:
"Actually we can't do what we like with this country. We inherited it from our parents and grandparents and we have a duty to hand it on to our children and grandchildren, preferably improved and certainly undamaged. It is one of the heaviest responsibilities we will ever have. We cannot just give it away to complete strangers on an impulse because it makes us feel good about ourselves....
"Thanks to a thousand years of uninvaded peace, we have developed astonishing levels of trust, safety and freedom.... I am amazed at how relaxed we are about giving this away.
"Our advantages depend very much on our shared past, our inherited traditions, habits and memories. Newcomers can learn them, but only if they come in small enough numbers. Mass immigration means we adapt to them, when they should be adapting to us....
"So now, on the basis of an emotional spasm, dressed up as civilization and generosity, are we going to say that we abandon this legacy and decline our obligation to pass it on, like the enfeebled, wastrel heirs of an ancient inheritance letting the great house and the estate go to ruin?
"I can see neither sense nor justice in allowing these things to become a pretext for an unstoppable demographic revolution in which Europe (including, alas, our islands) merges its culture and its economy with North Africa and the Middle East. If we let this happen, Europe would lose almost all the things that make others want to live there."
British MEP Daniel Hannon warned that Germany's open-door immigration policy was drawing ever more migrants to Europe. He wrote:
"The belief that Germany is relaxing its policy is bound to lead to a level of migration that surpasses anything seen so far. Refugees and economic migrants will be thrown together in a rush. Some will be trampled, and some boats will be overturned. But many more will reach Italy and Greece. Eventually, the front-line EU states will stop trying to enforce the rules, and will simply wave new arrivals across their territory, tempting even more into attempting the crossing."
The London-based Financial Times lamented the lack of a unified European response to the migration crisis:
"This has been a miserable summer for European ideals. From a bloc founded in the pursuit of peace have emerged frightful images of refugees suffocating on motorway lay-bys, squalid makeshift camps, lifeless toddlers washed ashore, burning asylum centers, serial numbers penned on forearms, the sight of black-clad police pepper spraying families fleeing war. Inundated with asylum seekers, yet lacking the central functions to cope, Europe is divided over what to do. Higher walls? Welcome mats? Is this a national problem or should the burden be shared?
British political scientist Anthony Glees accused the German government of rank hypocrisy for demanding that Greece comply with the strict letter of EU law to obtain a financial bailout, but that same German government unilaterally dispensed with EU law to open Europe's borders wide open to hundreds of thousands of migrants from the Muslim world. He said:
"Europe's tectonic plates will move if Germany behaves as a hippie state, guided only by feelings. Prime Minister David Cameron said, quite rightly, in my opinion, that the United Kingdom must act not only with the heart, but also with the head. And the question in the UK is that if Frau Merkel now pursues this policy, a very different policy which it pursued vis-à-vis Greece, where will this end? The UK already intervenes militarily in the fight against the so-called Islamic State. Germany, however, has kept its distance from these things. But then at the same time to say to desperate people in Syria and Iraq, please come to the Federal Republic of Germany, many Britons view this as nonsensical. This will have no end!
"I think it may be that Germany still has historical feelings that are completely absent in Britain. It may be that in 2015, there are still memories of what happened with refugees before the Second World War (1938/1939). But in Britain, where we are currently not only fighting terrorism, not only coping with the problem of economic migrants, but also coping with the humanitarian problem, the German approach seems sloppy and not properly thought through, especially when it comes to Europe when the Germans do not abide by the rules. One may think whatever they might about the Hungarian government, but the rules are there, and if Germany does not comply with the rules, the entire Union is in danger of falling apart.
In Brussels, the self-proclaimed capital of Europe, the president of the European Commission, Jean-Claude Juncker, insisted that immigration from Muslim countries would be a solution to Europe's demographic decline. He said:
"Let us not forget, we are an ageing continent in demographic decline. We will be needing talent. Over time, migration must change from a problem to be tackled to a well-managed resource. To this end, the Commission will come forward with a well-designed legal migration package in early 2016."
During the so-called State of the European Union address on September 9, Juncker said that there was no difference between Christian, Jewish and Muslim migrants. He said:
"Europe has made the mistake in the past of distinguishing between Jews, Christians and Muslims. There is no religion, no belief and no philosophy when it comes to refugees."
Although unemployment is rampant within the European Union, especially among young Europeans, Juncker said:
"I am strongly in favor of allowing asylum seekers to work and earn their own money whilst their applications are being processed. Labor, work, being in a job is a matter of dignity...so we should do everything to change our national legislation in order to allow refugees, migrants, to work since day one of their arrival in Europe."
In the Czech Republic, President Milos Zeman said that no one had invited migrants to his country, but once they arrive, they should respect the rules of his country or leave. He said:
"If you do not like it, just go away. Someone may consider it appealing to the worst instincts, but this is the same stance that Hungarians share when they are building a fence against Serbia, and Americans who have built a fence on its border with Mexico."
In Denmark, Andreas Kamm, the secretary general of the Danish Refugee Council (Dansk Flygtningehjælp), warned that the current refugee crisis could lead to total collapse of European society. In an interview with the newspaper Jyllands-Posten, Kamm said he believes that Europe is facing "a total Armageddon scenario." He added:
"We are experiencing a historical imbalance between the very high numbers of refugees and migrants and the global capacity to provide them with protection and assistance. We are running the risk that conflicts between the migrants and local populations will go awry and escalate. The answer cannot be that Europe imports surplus populations. We cannot be required to destroy our own society."
Danish Finance Minister Claus Hjort Frederiksen said: "I'm most indignant over the Arab countries who are rolling in money and who only take very few refugees. Countries like Saudi Arabia. It's completely scandalous."
In Germany, Interior Minister Thomas de Maizière, in an interview with Die Zeit, said:
"The migration crisis presents a formidable challenge. It is bigger than any of us have previously thought — socially, politically, economically, culturally.... Now we will get hundreds of thousands of Muslims with an Arab background. According to what I am told by my French colleague, this is a significant difference as far as integration is concerned.... I am being told that between 15% and 20% of the adult migrants are illiterate.
"We must get used to the idea that our country is changing. School, police, housing, courts, health care, everywhere! We also need an amendment to the constitution. And all this has to happen very quickly, within weeks! This will require a huge change in our established way of thinking."
In an interview with Politico, Josef Joffe, a normally astute Jewish-German intellectual who is the publisher of the newspaper Die Zeit, seemed completely oblivious to the long-term consequences of importing hundreds of thousands of Muslims to Germany, when he said:
"It is a true miracle. Our poster-boy refugee is now the Syrian doctor who combines educational achievement with moral obligation, given the unspeakable cruelty against civilians in the Syrian war. Germany, like the countries of English settlement, is turning into an Einwanderungsland, a country of immigration, accepting different colors, faiths and origins. So Germany is evolving into a kind of America, where you need not be born as American, but can become one. It is a mental and emotional revolution."
In Hungary, Prime Minister Viktor Orbán warned of the "explosive consequences" of culture clash between Europe and migrants from the Muslim world. In a September 3 essay published by the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, Orbán wrote:
"To understand what we must do, we need to grasp the true nature of the situation we are facing. Europe is not in the grip of a 'refugee problem' or a 'refugee situation,' but the European continent is threatened by an ever mounting wave of modern-era migration. Movement of people is taking place on an immense scale, and from a European perspective the number of potential future immigrants seems limitless.
"With each passing day we see that hundreds of thousands have been turning up and clamoring at our borders, and there are millions more intending to set out for Europe, driven by economic motives....
"We must acknowledge that the European Union's misguided immigration policy is responsible for this situation. Irresponsibility is the mark of every European politician who holds out the promise of a better life to immigrants and encourages them to leave everything behind and risk their lives in setting out for Europe. If Europe does not return to the path of common sense, it will find itself laid low in a battle for its fate....
"Let us not forget that those arriving have been raised in another religion, and represent a radically different culture. Most of them are not Christians, but Muslims. This is an important question, because Europe and European identity is rooted in Christianity. Is it not worrying in itself that European Christianity is now barely able to keep Europe Christian? If we lose sight of this, the idea of Europe could become a minority interest in its own continent."
Referring to Hungary's occupation by the Ottoman Empire from 1541 to 1699, Orbán said:
"I think we have a right to decide that we do not want a large number of Muslim people in our country. We do not like the consequences of having a large number of Muslim communities that we see in other countries and I do not see any reason for anyone else to force us to create ways of living together in Hungary that we do not want to see. That is a historical experience for us."
According to Zoltán Kovács, a spokesman for Hungary's center-right government, the EU's response to the crisis has been a complete failure. He said:
"The EU does not differentiate between those who are in real need of help. Genuine refugees are pushed together with economic migrants. We are not facing a refugee crisis, we are facing a migration crisis. People are coming here from a hundred countries around the world. It is completely unacceptable that illegal means of movement are now institutionalized."
In Slovakia, Prime Minister Robert Fico said that 95% of so-called refugees were actually economic migrants:
"We won't assist in this folly with arms opened wide with the notion that we'll accept them all regardless of whether they're economic migrants or not. If we do not start telling the truth about migration, we will never move from this spot."
Fico also warned of the consequences of untrammeled Muslim immigration. He said:
"Since Slovakia is a Christian country, we cannot tolerate an influx of 300,000-400,000 Muslim immigrants who would like to start building mosques all over our land and trying to change the nature, culture and values ​​of the state."
In the United States, Ambassador John Bolton warned that Europe's migration crisis is America's problem too. He wrote:
"While Americans may believe that Europe, long disdainful of our own intense debate over border-security problems, is getting what it deserves, we should nonetheless focus on both the potential threats and lessons applicable to us.
"One critical cause of Europe's illegal-immigration spike is the growing chaos across the greater Middle East. This spreading anarchy derives, in substantial part, from Barack Obama's deliberate policy of 'leading from behind' by reducing U.S. attention to and involvement in the region. When America's presence diminishes anywhere in the world, whatever minimal order and stability existed there can rapidly evaporate....
"For years, the central cause of population movements into Europe was economic: North Africans crossed the narrow Strait of Gibraltar or headed to France or Italy. Turks and Arabs entered through Greece and Eastern Europe. Once into the European Union, thanks to the Schengen Agreement, travel barriers are now almost nonexistent, and, as in the United States, illegal aliens can essentially travel freely....
"Spreading terrorism, armed conflict and collapsing political authority in the Middle East are now powerful causal factors equaling or exceeding continuing economic disparities. Europe fears being overwhelmed by the sheer numbers of people on the move, thereby losing control over decisions on who to admit and who to turn away. These concerns are legitimate, but there are deeper risks as well. Mirroring worries in Washington, there is a serious and rising Islamicist terrorist threat hidden within the tides of people seeking refuge.
"The lesson for the United States is that reducing our global influence does not increase international peace and security. Quite the opposite. Obama's retreat from the Middle East, whether in the aftermath of Libya, his disinterest in the Islamic State's continuing rise, or his surrender to Iran's nuclear-weapons program, are all part of the larger pattern. Europe's illegal immigration problem is our problem as well."
Writing for the New York Observer, Arthur Chrenkoff wrote:
"As an unseasonably hot European summer gives way to autumn, the continent is experiencing a mass movement of people not seen since the aftermath of the Second World War. Unlike the end of the war, however, none of the masses currently on the move is European. As hundreds of thousands of people continue to arrive on Europe's doorsteps and throng her roads and railway lines, many conservative commentators see a more apt, and more ominous, historical parallel in the Völkerwanderung or 'wanderings of the peoples' that foreshadowed the fall of the Roman Empire some sixteen centuries ago. Europeans have long historical memories....
"As we reflect on the vivid media images of boats and trains overflowing with desperate humanity, it is important to keep in mind two points: 1) The majority of the 350,000-400,000 immigrants who have arrived in Europe so far this year (these are the known numbers; no one knows how many enter undetected) are not Syrians. In fact, less than a third are, with the rest originating in a miscellany of African, Middle Eastern and South Asian countries. 2) The majority seem to be single, healthy-looking young men, which traditionally suggests economic motives for migration, rather than the fear of death or persecution.
"What is happening in Europe at the moment is not so much, or at least not predominantly, a refugee crisis but a crisis of European immigration policies.
Chrenkoff summed it up this way:
"The control over one's own borders is one of the most important characteristics — and responsibilities — of a modern state. Countries lose control over their destinies and even cease to exist when they lose control over who gets in."
Soeren Kern is a Senior Fellow at the New York-based Gatestone Institute. He is also Senior Fellow for European Politics at the Madrid-based Grupo de Estudios Estratégicos / Strategic Studies Group.

Labels: , , , , ,

Follow @rheytah Tweet