Back to the U.S/Russia/Ukraine Drawing Board
Back to the U.S/Russia/Ukraine Drawing Board
"Russia's gas supply to Europe — which is crucial to Moscow's economy — currently passes through Ukraine, with critical infrastructure in the country. A major factor that deterred Putin from taking over more of Ukraine than it seized in 2014 while Biden was vice president has been the likelihood that Ukrainian forces defending against Russian invasion would destroy key elements of this infrastructure, cutting off the gas flow.""Nord Stream 2 bypasses Ukraine and removes that obstacle to Putin's ambitions. Attempting to deflect criticism of his green light for Nord Stream 2, Biden made an agreement with Germany. If Russia attempts to use energy as a weapon against Ukraine, Berlin will take "unspecified action" -- likely to be none."Colonel Richard Kemp, Gatestone Institute"We are at a moment of crisis and have been for some weeks now given the Russian buildup, and it will take a high level of engagement to address this and to find a path of de-escalation."Unnamed senior U.S. official
Pictured: Biden and Putin meet in Geneva, Switzerland, on June 16, 2021. (Photo by Peter Klaunzer/Pool/Keystone via Getty Images) |
The
Kremlin's denial of any intention to invade Ukraine is in direct
contrast to the United States informing its allies in NATO that an
invasion of Russia's near neighbour is imminent, given tens of thousands
of Russian troops amassed near the border with Ukraine. As early as the
first month of the new year of 2022. January preferentially, in view of
the morass the winter-frozen terrain will assume come spring. What
other purpose could there conceivably be in amassing a panoply of heavy
military equipment at the border?
Ukraine's
government doesn't seem to be particularly impressed at what might
alternately be a serious intimidation ploy. And it too appears
convinced, on the basis of its own intelligence and security insights
that the Kremlin is planning another invasion. Ukraine, after all,
suffered the experience of a previous presence of Russian military
personnel, aiding, abetting and encouraging the ethnic Russian-Ukrainian
separatists determined to move the Donbas back into the Russian sphere
of possession.
Russia's
peremptorily decisive exploitation of the standoff between the
Ukrainian military and the Russian dissidents by the opportunistic
capture of the Crimean peninsula in 2014, securing the port and
surrounding geography, annexing it into greater Russia in a recapture of
history, claiming it to be a part of Russia's beating heart. Vladimir
Putin defends Russia's intense interest in Ukraine as an expression of
their shared heritage; one indispensable to the other.
President
Biden in early December assured his Russian counterpart of the American
commitment to upholding Ukraine's sovereignty in the face of Russian
aggression, that Ukraine's territorial integrity was sacrosanct in the
international community; warning that should Russia invade it would earn
itself further economic, social and political penalties. In sanctions
which have already had a deep effect on Russia's economic security.
Both
the United States and the United Kingdom have stated each has no
intention of becoming militarily involved should conflict break out
between Russia and Ukraine.
As
for Germany, it is abundantly clear that its high dependency on Russia
as a vital energy source will ensure it too while censuring Russia for
its intransigence, would never commit to military involvement. In the
absence of that kind of commitment from the U.S., U.K. and Germany, no
other NATO members could be relied upon to go beyond sanction punishment
for Russia in the event of military action in Ukraine.
President
Vladimir Putin must feel pretty confident of his relationship with the
American President, both longtime acquaintances from a previous U.S.
administration. No hard feelings appear to be evident from President
Biden toward Mr. Putin over Russia's decision to return Crimea to
Russian possession. Leading President Putin to the confident demand that
NATO withdraw from Russia's near-abroad, a presence that stifles
Russia's ambitions for a future of restoring the Soviet Union to its
former greatness.
Nothing
less than a ban on expansion of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization
welcoming former Soviet states like Ukraine and Georgia, plus the
withdrawal of NATO forces in Europe to 1997 levels. Demands that have
failed spectacularly to impress NATO's allies and its membership. The
exchange of a NATO pullout from eastern Europe, Russia's playground, is
unlikely to result from Mr. Putin's demands that would see Russia
pulling out its troops and weaponry from the Ukrainian border.
An
anonymous U.S. senior official noted that only if de-escalation occurs
at the Ukraine border can a useful conversation take place between the
U.S. and Russia, to include issues such as arms control. Yet high-stakes
diplomacy are set to take place through discussions in early 2022. Two
days before a NATO-Russia Council meeting is scheduled to take place,
negotiators for Russia and the U.S. are set to meet January 10.
Similarly, top advisers to Mr. Putin and German Chancellor Olaf Scholz
plan to meet prior to the NATO-Russian talks.
Threats
by the U.S. and its allies to impose harsh economic reprisals on Moscow
should its troops march into Ukraine carry weight, but just so much,
absent the West's unwillingness to go any further in the absence of
hints of potentially sending NATO troops into Ukraine to aid in its
defence. However, American officials insist no deals will be made that
shortchange the concerns of Ukraine and European allies. "The principle is inviolable -- nothing about them without them", said State Department spokesman Ned Price.
In
view of the American abandonment of another of its allies and
dependents less than five months ago leaving Afghanistan to cope with
its adjustment to the return of the Taliban, a fiasco of huge dimensions
when the Biden administration chose to leave its stranded allies in a
rush to return U.S. troops back home, entrusting its military equipment
to the good graces of a terrorist group primed for revenge on a
population that favoured a Western-approved government to that of the
viciously Islamist Taliban, it's difficult to judge just how content
Ukraine's President Zelensky is with the U.S. promise of loyalty to a
commitment.
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky on the front line on 6 December EPA |
Labels: Invasion, NATO, Russia Sanctions, Threats, Ukraine, United States
<< Home