The Perplexing Problem That is Peter Hoekstra
"It has really sent a signal of alarm here that the ambassador may be coming a bit too close to what the general population deems acceptable.""The message, I think, has been received at the other end.""Other than the satisfaction of seeing results, superficially, I would not think that, looking at it the day after and the day after that ... I'm not sure that there would be much to gain.""Maybe one feels good by expelling an ambassador but what happens the day after?"Anne Leahy, former Canadian ambassador to Russia"That career diplomat [alternative] would probably not have the access to key people in the Trump administration because they weren't appointed by President Trump.""Given the damage that's been done, you do need to have someone who is an expert on U.S.-Canada relations, who's well-respected on both sides of the border, to take up that role.""[And that message is] that Pete Hoekstra is not the right person for this job.""At this point, it needs to be the Trump administration to withdraw him."Andrew Hale, fellow, Advancing American Freedom, Washington
![]() |
| U.S. Ambassador to Canada Pete Hoekstra takes part in the PNWER (Pacific Northwest Economic Region) Annual Summit, in Edmonton Monday July 20, 2026. Photo by David Bloom /Postmedia |
The
American Ambassador to Canada under the Trump administration has been
called out for his role in exacerbating to a degree the already-strained
relations between the U.S. and Canada, over issues relating to the
imposition of steep trade tariffs under the pretense of 'unfair trade
practices' on the part of Canada, taking advantage of the United States,
Canada's largest-by-far trade partner, and mutual-defense ally. A
citizen-led list of signatures in support of having Ambassador Hoekstra
removed from Canada has gained steam. A quarter-of-a-million Canadians
have so far signed the petition.
Apart
from the imposition of steep tariffs, President Donald Trump's
oft-repeated jibes of Canada becoming the '51st state' have left
Canadians with a feeling of deep resentment. Ambassador Hoekstra's
penchant for making light of it, and his puzzlement over Canadians'
growing hostility toward the White House he serves has failed to endear
him to Canadians. Once the petition has been closed to accepting new
signees in several months' time, it will be presented to Parliament for
consideration.
Canada's
Green Party leader, Elizabeth May was quick to sponsor the petition,
offering in her official role as a Member of Parliament, to table it.
Ms. May knows the unlikelihood of the petition being passed with
unanimity, much less the unpalatable likelihood of Prime Minister Carney
agreeing to seek the Ambassador's expulsion. His own relationship with
Donald J. Trump is rather on the spontaneously prickly side, and no
action that he can take to further distance President Trump's good
graces toward Canada would be a wise move.
Arguing
that Washington should nonetheless recall Ambassador Hoekstra from
Canada, and with little expectation that Canada would pursue the
Ambassador's expulsion, Andrew Hale feels that sufficient damage has
been done to the relationship of two nations coexisting with the longest
border in the world as friends and cooperative partners economically
and politically. Petition e-7531, drafted by Calgary resident Lelanne
Walker, calls on Ottawa to declare the Ambassador persona non grata.
Once
the petition is presented to Parliament ,a 45 day period within which
he government must respond would take place. In Mr. Hoekstra's absence,
should the situation develop to that end, the Embassy could be left in
charge of a charge d'affaires; the embassy's deputy chief of mission who
would be a career State Department officer. According to Mr. Hale, that
could leave Ottawa minus an envoy with political access of a
presidential appointee.
Former
Canadian ambassador to Russia, Anne Leahey, who was herself in the
position of being declared persona non grata in 1988, suggests allowing
the petition to speak for itself; a public message sent to emphasize
Canadians' displeasure with the blunt performance of a man purporting
not to be a diplomat, but assigned to that role, nonetheless.
Colin
Robertson, on the other hand, as another former Canadian diplomat,
believes that Mr. Hoekstra serves his purpose, whether or not he listens
to Canadians to relay their views to the White House. Believing that an
ambassador who can reflect the President's views, is an important
conduit for both Canada and the United States.
"It goes way beyond that [the aggressive advocacy by a U.S. ambassador]. It is Trumpian. We've never had an ambassador like Hoestra.""I think he probably ... can pick up the phone and get through too the chief of staff and cabinet officials.""What I don't know is how much he's transmitting our message. I don't see evidence of that.""I think it's more important that we have him here so we know we have an accurate read whenever we need it on where the administration is coming from."Colin Robertson, vice-president, Canadian Global Affairs Institute
![]() |
| Pete Hoekstra is seen campaigning for U.S. President Donald Trump in November 2024. The U.S. ambassador's comments about Canada, including on the possibility of becoming the 51st state, have caused tens of thousands of Canadians to call for him to be expelled. (Rebecca Cook/Reuters) |
Labels: Diplomacy, Parliamentary Petition, Persona non Grata, U.S. Ambassador to Canada Pete Hoekstra, U.S.-Canada Relations



<< Home