"I am proactively applying a conflict of interest filter to Alto, a wholly owned subsidiary of the government of Canada."

"This measure is being implemented due to a personal connection to someone close to me in the organization, to safeguard against any real or perceived conflict of interest." 

Francois-Philippe Champagne letter to Mark Carney 

 

"This is a good situation, because we have the partner who can pursue her career."

"So we have to look at them as individuals. We need to have a system that will enable them to have those careers."

"There are rules, there are regulations and the minister of finance has followed those rules and regulations in notification of the ethics commissioner, in recusing himself from dealings with respect to Alto."  

"[This is a] really exciting project for Ontario, for Quebec and for the whole of Canada."

Prime Minister Mark Carney

 

"The prospect of a finance minister making decisions as part of the federal government's budgetary process which present distinct benefits and advantages for his partner and her employer — and acting and voting in Parliament to give those effect — is a very troubling development."

"An investigation is absolutely essential here, including to validate the existence and application of his unpublished — and only now revealed — 'conflict of interest filter' in addition to all of his parliamentary engagement on this matter."

Conservative ethics critic Michael Barrett 

A public consultation on the Alto project in Ottawa earlier this year was packed with displays. (Mathieu Deroy/Radio-Canada)

"From the outset, she disclosed her personal connection to the minister."

"The Office of the Conflict of Interest and Ethics Commissioner was consulted proactively, and clear measures were put in place to prevent any real or perceived conflict."

"[Gaudet] is strictly focused on interactions with the federal public service [and ] is not involved with ministerial offices, including those of Transport or Finance."

Benoit Bourdeau, manager, media relations, Alto 

Finance Minister Francois-Philippe Champagne released a letter written in September by him and addressed to the prime minister, in it vowing he would not participate in any decision relating to the government-backed organization tasked with the high-speed rail link proposal that would travel back and forth from Toronto to Quebec City. This is no casual undertaking. And there is no guarantee that it will be well-used, much less that it is even needed, with a price tag of $90 billion, which critics say with certainty will end up costing more, perhaps much more.

 

The issue at hand is that Minister Champagne's wife, Anne-Marie Gaudet, was hired as vice-president of the environment for Alto, back in August of 2025. Writing his intention to "proactively apply a conflict of interest filter", reflecting the fact that he has a "personal connection" with someone who works for Alto, as finance minister, Mr. Champagne produced a federal budget providing the organization with hundreds of millions of dollars. How this can be construed as 'no problem' as far as conflict of interests are concerned is baffling.

 

Prime Minister Mark Carney was asked whether Finance Minister François-Philippe Champagne has a conflict of interest regarding his partner's role as a vice-president of Alto's high speed rail project. Carney said the minister is following the rules by notifying the ethics commissioner and recusing himself from Alto-related dealings.  Still from video/CBC

 

As finance minister, responsible for steering Canada's finances and budgetary allocations, with his wife deeply involved as a high-functioning employee who stands to benefit materially, her husband is in a position where he allocates government financing of tax money to an enterprise of no particular value to transporting people from Toronto to Quebec city, particularly when other alternatives by rail and air are already in existence. They cost less to operate, are already in operation, the cost of their use to the public is less than will be the case of a high-speed version, which promises to lop an hour off the current time.

 

Minister Champagne's wife Anne-Marie Gaudet has occupied senior roles in environmental assessment and in the transportation sector, including that of a senior role at the Port of Quebec. She is obviously well qualified to take up this position, or would be under circumstances other than being the wife of Canada's Minister of Finance; a clear and obvious issue of unethical decision-making on their part; husband and wife, despite being approved by the ethics commissioner and given a stamp of approval by the prime minister. Entirely inappropriate and inexcusable.

 

Yet Prime Minister Mark Carney sees nothing amiss in the situation, insisting that Mr. Champagne is following government ethics rules in recusing himself from the project. As finance minister disbursing immense sums of government (taxation) funding in the billions of dollars for a splashy infrastructure project, how can he not be involved in matters pertaining to the high-speed rail link? The very prospect is beyond ludicrous and epitomizes this government's penchant for evading basic ethics requirements to ensure public trust.

 

Alto, a wholly owned subsidiary of the federal government, means Champagne, through the filter, may not take part in any discussion, decisions or communications with government representatives on the high-speed rail project he is responsible for funding and in so doing, obviously supporting his wife's pecuniary interests in the process, and by extension, his own.   

 

Prime Minister Mark Carney says Finance Minister François-Philippe Champagne, pictured, has followed ethics rules. (Adrian Wyld/The Canadian Press)

"Ethics screens should be banned because they are secretive smokescreens that are not independently enforced and do not prevent cabinet ministers and top government officials from participating in decision-making processes when they have a conflict of interest."

"[They] hide the fact that the office holder is participating even when they or their family members or friends can profit or benefit from the decision."

"That is clearly a secretive, closed-circle, unethical system that provides no evidence that Champagne actually recused himself from decisions concerning Alto." 

Duff Conacher, Democracy Watch