Disageeably Agreeing to Disagree
"We don't know whether President [Vladimir] Putin has made the decision to invade. We do know that he is putting in place the capacity to do so on short order should he so decide.""Should Russia follow the path of confrontation, when it comes to Ukraine, we've made clear that we will respond resolutely including with a range of high impact economic measures that we have refrained from pursuing in the past."U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken"Our recent warnings have indeed been heard and are having a certain effect: tensions have risen there [NATO-U.S.].""It is important for them to remain in this state for as long as possible, so that it does not occur to them to stage some kind of conflict on our western frontiers that we do not need."Russian President Vladimir Putin
"I would like again to officially state that Ukraine does not plan any military offensive in Donbass.""This is Russian propaganda nonsense in order to cover up Russia's own preparations for a potential attack."Ukrainian Foreign Minister Dmytro Kuleba"[Stability and predictability mean] less American meddling in our domestic affairs, with less attempts by the U.S. to limit our completely legal and legitimate interaction with our friends, allies and partners all over the globe."Sergey A. Ryabkov, Russian Deputy Foreign Minister
Mr. Putin's end game: for Asta Skaisgiryte, foreign policy adviser to Lithuania's president, there is a simple answer: "To restore the Soviet Union".
That's a given. Well enough understood by Mr. Putin's statement of
profound regret that Greater Russia is simply that, no longer the Soviet
Union, its hegemonic tentacles tightly gripping its neighbours'
sovereignty as Moscow's own. Time and the tides provides no answer for
Mr. Putin for he plans his legacy as the restorer of what once was; if
subtle persuasion won't do it, violent aggression will.
For
Mr. Putin, Russia's near-abroad is Russian hegemonic territory. The
encroaching presence of NATO in support of Baltic states cringing at the
very prospect of once again being caught in a Soviet-style ambit
represents their living nightmare. That they have the support of the
United States extending to NATO and its member-states is their assurance
that they won't go into that dark night of Russia's grasp whimpering
helplessly. They have Western champions.
To
the Kremlin, to Mr. Putin, the presence of Western troops under the
NATO aegis in Russia's area of disputed control is a major threat. They
have no business in eastern Europe, it is Russia's bailiwick. And if
Russia feels like reminding its neighbours of how good their lives were
once as part and parcel of the USSR, that's Russia's business. The
buildup of Russian troops beside Ukraine is a statement of regional
power, not defiance, but a promise of what could unfold and may yet.
A serviceman of the Ukrainian Armed Forces takes part in military drills at a training ground near the border with Russian-annexed Crimea in Kherson region, Ukraine, in this handout picture released by the General Staff of the Armed Forces of Ukraine press service November 17, 2021. via REUTERS |
The
volatile situation is not Russia's fault but that of NATO and the
United States daring Russia to take another step further to claim its
historical patrimony. From the Baltic to the Black Sea competition for
influence amidst a threat of an emerging potential for military conflict
is seething. Russian long-range nuclear bombers flew patrols repeatedly
near the border of the European Union with Poland. Leaving Western
intelligence warning the Kremlin could be planing groundwork for another
invasion of Ukraine.
Last
month Mr. Putin made clear his use of the Russian military to bring the
West to a respectful attitude toward Russian interests in the region,
and succeeding. It is now known in the Western halls of power that
Russia is serious it will defend its 'red lines'; NATO has no business
being present near its borders. The Belarusian gambit of creating
friction by massing Syrian refugees on the border with Poland as
punishment for the EU's interference in the after-effects of the Belarus
election is generally viewed as another irritation engineered by Mr.
Putin. Ditto the energy crunch in supplying natural gas to Western
Europe.
Despite
repelling challenges to his presidency from opposition groups,
imprisoning those whose campaigns prove too inconvenient as an
alternative to assassination or forcing others into exile, Mr. Putin
rests easy in an approval rating above 60 percent, making him
indisputably a more popular leader than most Western-based leaders.
Russia may be suffering a dreadful COVID toll, but the
United Russia party saw victory in its September parliamentary
elections, and Mr. Putin has established himself as President-for-life.
Changing the country's constitution proved so popular that other
dictators have followed suit.
It
is, however, the possibility that the West will continue its incursion,
expanding a military presence in post-Soviet Eastern Europe where
Latvia, Estonia and Lithuania have become NATO members satisfied with
their bonus of hosting Western troops; too close for Mr. Putin's
comfort. In September the Kremlin stated that the "broadening of NATO infrastructure on Ukrainian territory" would
cross one of Russia's red lines. Recent military activity by the U.S.
and its NATO allies in the Black Sea region near Ukraine has served to
further infuriate Russia.
NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg poses with foreign ministers for a family photo during a NATO Foreign Ministers summit in Riga, Latvia November 30, 2021. REUTERS/Ints Kalnins |
"President Putin has come to the conclusion that normal diplomatic channels, means, forms and methods are not working.""The situation is, potentially, a rather bad one."Dmitri Trenin, head, Carnegie Moscow Center think tank
Labels: Baltic States, NATO, Russia, Russian Aggression, Ukraine, United States, Vladimir Putin
<< Home