Saturday, March 06, 2021

Compromised Minister of Defence, Dysfunctional Canadian Military

"[Canada's 'whistleblower' laws are slow to deal with cases, often ruling against whistleblowers; they are] nearly entirely dormant."
"Too often the rights that look impressive on paper are only a mirage of protection in practice."
"It takes tenacity and financial resources for any whistleblower to sustain a reprisal dispute for over six years, only to lose."
International Bar Association report
Prime Minister Justin Trudeau faced criticism from Democracy Watch for the poor protection of whistleblowers.
"I'm not surprised."
"The report doesn't go far enough. We need whistleblower protection for everyone involved in federal politics."
"Whistleblower protection is one of the most potent accountability mechanisms you can have, and it's clear the Trudeau Liberals don't want that accountability."
Duff Conacher, co-founder, Democracy Watch
Walbourne
CF ombudsman Gary Walbourne  CP/Sean Kilpatrick
"I left the job early on the advice of my doctors and my own realization that no reasonable person could possibly be expected to continue in the hostile circumstances created by the Department of National Defence."
"It was obvious this process was being used as a means of intimidation prior to my testimony before the committee."
"The only thing I ever wanted the minister to do was his job. Doing nothing was not the response I was looking for."
Gary Walbourne, former Canadian Military Ombudsman
"The Minister has always been committed to having a productive working relationship with the CAF [Canadian Armed Forces] Ombudsman and had regular meetings up until he was informed of the then-Ombudsman's intention to resign."
Tod Lane, spokesman, Minister of Defence, Harjit Sajjan
Oddly enough, just as former National Defence and Canadian Forces ombudsman Gary Walbourne was testifying before a Parliamentary committee, news came from a study released by the International Bar Association, rating Canada's performance with respect to commitment for the protection of whistleblowers; which is to say people who reveal misdoings and misbehaviours on the part of institutions and leaders to alert government, industry and the public that matters are not as they should be.

The International Bar Association report ranks Canada at the very bottom of the list of nations which have committed to whistleblower protection. Canada meets a mere one of twenty best practices -- for transparency and review -- placing it alongside Norway and Lebanon for weakest protections, well behind nations such as Ireland, the United States and Serbia, all three top-ranked. Canada fell back on whether whistleblower laws protect identity, protection against harassment, prevention of gag orders and granting a "genuine day in court".

Through former ombudsman Gary Walbourne's testimony we now know that Defence Minister Harjit Sajjan saw fit to cancel no fewer than 17 consultative meetings in lock step with the military watchdog's increasingly vocal voicing of the need for government to give greater aid to injured soldiers. Mr. Walbourne tabled his calendar and dates of the cancelled appointments with the House of Commons committee in their examination of allegations of sexual misconduct against General Jon Vance, who recently stepped down as chief of the defence staff.

Minister Sajjan headed a conspiracy along with senior defence officials, to freeze Mr. Walbourne out of the position he occupied for the past four years in reaction to his insistence on doing the work he was hired for. Mr. Walbourne did not consider himself a decoration the government could point to elaborating its commitement to whistleblower protection, but a dedicated spokesman for the vital task of ensuring members of the military had a voice that would be heard at the executive level and into the governing cabinet.
 
Canada's new top military commander, Admiral Art McDonald, has voluntarily stepped aside as he is investigated by the Canadian Forces National Investigation Service on unspecified allegations. McDonald assumed command on Jan. 14   CBC
 
 
Once he began pressing into the shabby way injured Canadian Forces personnel had been treated it gave him sufficient ammunition to produce six reports within a two-year period, detailing lack of support for military staff and families. Ombudsman Walbourne recommended that his office would be more effective were it to be removed from the control of senior defence officials, to enable the office to report instead directly to Parliament. Reprisals came his way as he found himself cut off in 2018 once he had informed Sajjan of serious allegations of sexual misconduct on the part of General Vance, personal friend of the Minister.

The immediate result of that meeting was cancellation of seven scheduled meetings, with another ten to follow. A portrait of a toxic culture prevailing at National Defence headquarters was revealed through the ombudsman's testimony before the Commons defence committee which heard testimony directly contradicting that of Minister Sajjan who insisted he had no knowledge of the situation until several weeks ago when it became public news. Not only had Mr. Walbourne briefed the minister in March of 2018, but he had offered evidence of the allegations which the minister refused to accept.

Additionally, his request for independence resulted in a vindictive campaign to drum him out of the ombudsman position, and the military. Soon Mr. Walbourne found himself requiring permission from the deputy minister to enable him to travel to a base for the purpose of hearing concerns expressed by military personnel and their families. A few months following his report in March 2017 recommending his office be made independent, DND officials informed him that a complaint had been lodged against him, refusing to divulge details, but suggesting it involved inappropriate contracting.

In October of 2017, deputy minister Jody Thomas informed him the allegation would proceed to a formal investigation even as the specifics were withheld from him. That notification arrived the very day prior to Mr. Walbourne's testifying before a Commons committee about DND's failure to act on his recommendations to give assistance to military personnel.
Minister of National Defence Harjit Sajjan cancelled 17 meetings with the military ombudsman between November 2016 and September 2018.

Labels: , , , , , ,

Sunday, November 27, 2016

Gagging Revelations

"Given the subject-matter and commercial sensitivities associated with the work, it was deemed to be an appropriate and necessary procedure."
"In this case, a non-disclosure is principally used as a reminder to ensure sensitive and corporate information is protected in the long term."
Daniel Le Bouthillier, spokesman, National Defence, Ottawa

"I can't recall anyone in any of my project teams having to do that."
"Any of our people, I trust them to use their judgement."
"Anyone reading [Lt.-Gen. Michael] Hood's comments would come to the conclusion that there is no capability gap."
Alan Williams, former assistant deputy minister of materiel (2000--2005), National Defence, Ottawa
Alternatives to the F-35 (pictured) are the Boeing Super Hornet or Eurofighter’s Typhoon. Photo: Lockheed-Martin
Alternatives to the F-35 (pictured) are the Boeing Super Hornet or Eurofighter’s Typhoon.  Photo: Lockheed-Martin

The former assistant deputy minister of materiel, Dan Ross (2005--2012), who oversaw the F-35 fighter jet project admitted significant technical and commercial secrets involved with the jet program are at stake. Such secrets, he clarified, are protected within existing security classifications, carrying a penalty of prison time if divulged, and so have been more than sufficient cautionary practicality to remind personnel of the need for circumspection.

The decision mandated by the Liberal government of Prime Minister Justin Trudeau to force National Defence procurement officials to a lifetime of secrecy represented a heavy-handedness to maintain a tight leash to ensure that no government whiff of malfeasance be broadcast. Which led to 235 officials having to sign a "life-time" non-disclosure agreement just as the government is involved in negotiations with American aerospace giant Boeing Co. for an "interim" purchase of 18 Super Hornets to beef up Canada's aging jet fleet.

Purchases of such magnitude require an open competition for bidding to determine which plane and which producer most accurately responds to Canada's needs. For all intents and purposes general agreement is that Lockheed-Martin's F-35 is that plane, a conclusion reached by all of Canada's NATO partners, as well as other countries looking for a technologically up-to-date, state-of-the-art warplane.

The issue revolves around the Liberal pledge during the 2015 election campaign that it would scrap the previous Conservative government's plan to buy F-35 Lightning II warplanes produced by Lockheed-Martin, despite that Canada has benefited over the years under an agreement to purchase, with Lockheed-Martin establishing the production of parts for the F-35 produced in Canada, ensuring jobs and production came with that agreement to purchase. Trudeau is intent on bypassing or reversing as many of the previous government's decision-making as he can.

The Trudeau government has insisted there is a critical shortfall of dependable operating jets in the current aging Canadian fleet, and that in recognition of that fact, an "interim" purchase of 18 Boeing jets will be made, before the entire fleet replacement is put out to a competitive bidding process. When, in actual fact, Canada's current fleet is still operational and will be for years. And it is in Canada's best interests to make good on its arrangement to purchase the F-35s to be integrated with other NATO member countries which have purchased the state-of-the-art F-35s.
A Canadian CF 18 fighter jet in a file photo by the Canadian Press

"Keeping old planes flying longer won't address the capability gap" stated a government spokesperson. "With the current availability rate what it is, even if the 77 airplanes (in the fleet) could fly forever, there still wouldn't be enough of them to simultaneously meet our NORAD and NATO commitments", an argument that cuts no practical and reality ice with those who know the fleet intimately as well as the requirements for Canadian participation in NORAD and NATO commitments.

Now, the head of the Royal Canadian Air Force, Lt.-General Michael Hood, has weighed in with his professionally knowledgeable statement that the U.S. military and other allies are working on upgrades to the current aging fleet that Canada relies upon, that would effectively reduce risks and costs should they be required for even longer periods of time than the 2025 he himself guarantees they will be reliable for. Hence no need for the absurd "interim" purchase of the Boeing CF18s that fit the government's agenda, not that of the Defence Department.

"However you want to parse the words, he's (Lt.-Gen. Hood) talking about the ability to meet Canadian Defence policy" commented Defense analyst David Perry of the Canadian Global Affairs Institute, clarifying yet again that Lt.-Gen. Hood feels he is able to maintain sufficient CF-18s currently in the fleet operational until a replacement is finally selected, through a competitive process, not the sneaky end-run that the government is attempting.

Labels: , ,

Follow @rheytah Tweet