Tuesday, November 02, 2021

Boys Will Be Men and Military Cadets Will Become Military Leaders in Canada

"The lack of action and the fact the senior leadership looked the other way sends a message to the perpetrators that they have a free hand to do what they want."
"I tried to do something about it, but the chain of command didn't have my back. These individuals are now officers in the Canadian Forces. The predators, the creeps, they are the ones who won."
"You have a situation where the leadership talks about being serious in dealing with sexual misconduct and issues statements like that. But their actions never support that talk. It is a failure of leadership."
Lt.-Col. Mark Popov, Canadian Armed Forces
The official flag for the Royal Military College
"We can confirm that a member was charged with Drunkenness under Section 97 of the National Defence Act in relation to this incident and found guilty."
"The member was sentenced to a fine of $1,000."
"The Royal Military College takes allegations of sexual misconduct seriously, and every complaint is acted upon appropriately and in accordance with applicable Department of National Defence/Canadian Armed Forces policies, including immediate support to any victims."
Dan LeBouthillier, spokesman, Department National Defence
For years it has been acknowledged that the Canadian Armed Forces has a problem with sexual harassment. Years back there was a formal investigation which resulted in corroboration of the seriousness of the endemic sexual misconduct in the forces, and recommendations were made to correct the situation, few of which were considered, fewer yet implemented. Another commission has been appointed to investigate the situation once again. And that has occurred because the situation has become much more serious; the Canadian Armed Forces is rife with sexual intimidation, harassment and violence.

All of which came to the stark notice of the public in the last year when investigations were launched against the-then current head of the Armed Forces, its Chief of Staff who was forced to step down. Even while he was charged with dealing with the problem of sexual misconduct in the military he was himself personally indulging in his own sexual misconduct and had been for many years. A military female under his command brought charges against him, thus the criminal investigation. A new, interim Chief of Defence Staff was put in his place. Then he too was charged with similar offences.

One after another, elite military personnel were revealed to be under investigation on charges of sexual misconduct. Overseeing all of this was the Minister of National Defence. And it was revealed that a military ombudsman had approached the minister with a sexual complaint. The minister was disinclined to take interest, and shied away from being handed evidence. Minister Sajjan publicly assured that he was fully supportive of victims of sexual offences in the military, but repeatedly did nothing to advance an investigation or to take steps to ensure the matter be addressed. 

In a recent cabinet shuffle, Harjit Sajjan was removed from the Cabinet position of Minister of National Defence and instead, is in charge of Canada's Feminist International Assistance Policy; irony abounds under the Liberal government of Prime Minister Justin Trudeau who repeatedly denied himself having any knowledge of elite military personnel indulging in sexual misconduct although his office which also denies accountability, was notified of these events.
 
Revelations continue to emerge to the light of public scrutiny. Now we are informed that Canada's military leadership-in-training being groomed for their futures at the Royal Military College in Kingston, Ontario distinguished themselves by threatening young girls, members of the Sea Cadets who were visiting the College, with threats of rape. No sexual misconduct charges were ever brought against them. But not because someone in charge of the trainees didn't make an effort to convey to them the seriousness of their errant behaviour.

Lt.-Col. Mark Popov in  his position as director of the cadets apologized to the 17-year-old girls who had been subjected to those sexual threats, then confined the RMC officer cadets to barracks and undertook an effort to discover who the leaders of the verbal sexual assaults were. A month earlier a sexual assault prevention educator was abused verbally by those same officer cadets when she was invited to speak on the issue of sexual misconduct. This occurred in the summer of 2015 when the future leaders of the Canadian military demonstrated their contempt for decency.

They shouted at the girls as they hung out of the windows of their barracks, to threaten them with rape, sodomy and other sexual assaults, threatening to force the girls to perform oral sex on the officer cadets. A man and woman, both officers, attempted to intervene and were told to 'f--- off', according to Canadian Forces documents. Which was when Lt.-Col. Popov became aware of the situation, and determining to put an end to this kind of behaviour. Instead, he was informed to cease and desist by RMC Commandant Brig.-Gen.Sean Friday.
 
 Despite which the 200 officer cadets were assembled by Lt.-Col. Popov for the purpose of a dressing down. In high decibel terms he read out word for word phrases of sexual violence hurled at the girls, and in the process used his own foul language, informing the cadets that those among them who just stood by and made no effort to intervene wee as guilty as the perpetrators. Not one of the cadets produced so much as a gesture of regret. 

This was an event that precipitated a dressing down by Lt.-Col. Popov's superior. Brig.-Gen.Friday was disturbed by the foul language used, informing Lt.-Col.Popov that some cadets had complained to their fathers, senior military officers at DND headquarters. These senior military officers were outraged that their sons were addressed in foul language, not that their sons used foul language in threats against under-aged girls in verbal sexual violence. Thereafter military police informed Lt.-Col. Popov that he was expected to cease his actions of discipline and leave it to investigators to examine the situation.

He could face a charge of interference should he continue, according to military documents. In the event, military police failed to interview the girls and no charges of sexual misconduct or disciplinary action with relation to sexual misconduct were laid against the cadets who emerged unscathed, while their director faced discipline for his efforts. When an annual assessment of performance (review) was issued by Brig.-Gen. Friday several months later, the document stated that Lt.90Col. Popov had demonstrated "performance deficiency", citing foul language in the dressing down of the RMC officer cadets specifically.
 
A graduating class of officer cadets stand in the square at the Royal Military College of Canada during a graduating ceremony in Kingston, Ont., Friday, May 20, 2016. (Lars Hagberg/Canadian Press)
 
Medically discharged from the military, suffering post-traumatic stress caused by the toxic environment he was exposed to, he left the military. His commanding officer, Brig.-Gen. Friday retired after being promoted to major general.
"During my time as Commandant of RMC, we did our utmost to ensure that our future CAF leaders could thrive in a healthy and safe learning environment. I worked with my team to disseminate a comprehensive 'RMC Operation Order --OPHONOUR' that contained specific and detailed orders directing all staff, faculty and students to act with character, courage and compassion in responding to and eradicating all forms of sexual harassment and misconduct."
"This order contained a newly developed [over the first three months of my time as commandant], detailed multi-year action plan for providing a safe, healthy and harassment-free environment for students, staff and faculty and contributing to CAF efforts to achieve permanent improvement in this regard."
Royal Military College Commandant Brig.-Gen. Sean Friday

 

Labels: , ,

Friday, February 05, 2021

Power Imbalance in Sexual Harassment Between Superior and Subordinate

"To us [Canadian Armed Forces/Department of National Defence], the strong and accomplished CAF/DND team, the allegations in recent media reports regarding my predecessor are quite troubling -- indeed, distressing and hurtful for all of us to contemplate." 
"Like you, I worry first and foremost, for the well-being of those who have come forward so courageously -- committing to ensure that they are supported and protected."
"Like you, I pray that our collective and enduring efforts in support of survivors will soon help end the fear of speaking up that plagues those feeling violated or hurt and in such need of the compassion and help of teammates -- we have work to do together here and, like you, I hear the call to do more."
"And frankly, I fear that situations like these erode the trust  you have in leadership."
Chief of the Defence Staff Admiral Art McDonald
Former defence chief Jonathan Vance in May, 2020. In a joint statement, Vance's successor Admiral Art McDonald and Defence Department deputy minister Jody Thomas say they take the allegations seriously, without suggesting they had substantiated them. (Adrian Wyld/The Canadian Press)
 
Admiral McDonald's predecessor in the role of Chief of the Defence Staff was not, by any measure that could be seen by the general public, an admirable man. He abandoned his second-in-command, Admiral Mark Norman, who was Vice-Chief of the Defence Staff, at a time when Admiral Norman was being persecuted unjustly by the office of the Prime Minister on a spurious charge of releasing confidential cabinet documents to the news media relating to a badly-needed supply ship for the Canadian Navy.

Admiral Norman suffered through years of disgrace brought on by a concentrated attempt by a Prime Minister intent on overturning all the initiatives undertaken by the previous Conservative government of Prime Minister Stephen Harper, and Admiral Norman happened to have contradicted -- through his professional view as an experienced naval officer -- what the Liberal government was attempting to do in short-changing the dire naval requirements of the Canadian fleet operationally. Admiral Norman's superior officer abandoned him. In the event, however, the government was forced to admit its error.

Former Chief of the Defence Staff, General Jonathan Vance distinguished himself in other ways as a poor judgement of appropriate behaviour when he conspired with the prime minister, JustinTrudeau, to interfere in a matter completely out of his sphere of experience by harassing then-solicitor-general Jody Wilson-Raybould, to interfere in the matter of the office of the independent prosecutor's decision to permit court action against Quebec-based SNC Lavalin for corruption.

Ironically, given the fact that General Vance -- now retired from the post of Chief of the Defence Staff -- was the driving force behind Operation Honor, the determination of the military to come to terms with sexual misconduct in the Canadian Forces, is himself now being investigated for allegations of sexual misconduct against lower ranking female service members under his command matters have gone badly awry. General Vance has denied any inappropriate conduct on his part, and in so doing offered explanations that have been identified as misleading.

The sad thing about this entire sordid affair, where when a junior associate member of the Force asked for his advice and assistance, he responded by suggesting they arrange a vacation together at a clothing-optional resort, another instance where his behaviour was an obvious assault on the honour principle between a superior and a subordinate. A longstanding affair with another, more senior member of the Armed Forces was well known by senior ranking members of the Service.

Gossip evidently was rife of his misconduct among the top echelon of the Service Command and their wives. Despite which no one intervened because, they explained, no one had lodged a formal complaint. Which women are highly unlikely to do in such circumstances, a well enough-known social phenomenon where women are faced with the likelihood of their word against that of a high-placed superior. Even if relations were consensual, they would have gone against the code of conduct expected in such interactions.

Although other generals were aware of the misconduct allegations against General Vance no one spoke up when he was named chief of the defence staff in 2015. Staff at National Defence headquarters among themselves took to discussing the situation but formal complaints lacking, nothing was done to alert the political authorities in the-then office of Prime Minister Stephen Harper. One woman had raised concerns relating to the general's behaviour, with the Canadian Forces ombudsman strictly for the purpose of alerting him to the behaviour, refusing to file a formal complaint.

Labels: , , ,

Saturday, November 14, 2020

The All-Too Fallible

Pope Francis, St. John Paul II and retired Pope Benedict XVI are pictured in a composite photo. (CNS/Paul Haring/Joe Rimkus Jr.)
Pope Francis, St. John Paul II and retired Pope Benedict XVI are pictured in a composite photo. (CNS/Paul Haring/Joe Rimkus Jr.)

"By virtue of the simple fact that this investigation had to be conducted and this report had to be written, my heart hurts for all who will be shocked, saddened, scandalized and angered by the revelations contained therein."
Wilton Gregory, archbishop of Washington
Then-Msgr. Theodore McCarrick, in a 1966 file photo (CNS)
Then-Msgr. Theodore McCarrick, 1966 photo (CNS)
"Pope John Paul II became ‘convinced of the truth’ of McCarrick’s denial."
"[There was no evidence] that Mc­Carrick’s customary gift-giving and donations impacted significant decisions made by the Holy See regarding McCarrick during any period."
"[Three of the bishops] provided inaccurate and incomplete information to the Holy See. Bishop Edward Hughes, who had received several explicit accounts from McCarrick’s adult victims, wrote that 'I have no direct, factual information concerning any moral weakness shown by Archbishop Mc­Carrick, either in the past or in the present.There are only two instances where I have known of any allegations against the Archbishop.' Hughes wrote. 'Both allegations came from priests who were guilty of their own moral lapses'."
"[Francis, before 2017, heard] only that there had been allegations and rumors related to immoral conduct with adults and believed that the allegations had been] reviewed and rejected by John Paul II."
Vatican report
"[The report is] impressive — the most significant document on the abuse crisis to come from the Church." 
"[The report’s greatest failure was giving Francis a pass, under the premise that he hadn’t been properly informed or knew only that there had been rumors.]"
"Plausible deniability must end for popes and bishops.They are responsible for reading the abuse files and for correcting the negligent or complicit acts of their predecessors."
Anne Barrett Doyle, co-director, abuse-tracking site ­BishopAccountability.org
Pope John Paul II
Pope John Paul II
 
Theodore McCarrick amassed powee\r and prestige in the Roman Catholic Church despite credible rumours, including written evidence about sexual misconduct on his part with seminarians, priests and teen boys, according to a recently released Vatican report. The report also reached the determination that Pope John Paul II had knowledge of the allegations surrounding the U.S. cardinal fully two decades before the man was finally defrocked.
 
Pope Francis authorized an internal investigation which gave life to the report, released two years later. The investigation and the resulting report represent the most comprehensive effort yet to provide transparency relating to major abuse in the Church, providing a play-by-pay of how church leaders simply disregarded clues on McCarrick's sexual misconduct; that "church men" were given credence over their victims, making every effort to ensure that discipline would be modest and private. 

Information given to John Paul II of the then-bishop sharing a bed with young seminarians he had authority over was  given in 1999, yet he chose to appoint McCarrick archbishop of Washington. Eventually he was named a cardinal. The then-pontiff honoured a letter written by McCarrick to the pope's personal secretary that he had never had sexual relations with anyone. Several U.S. bishops did their part to mislead the Vatican when they claimed that though McCarrick shared a bed with young men no sexual misconduct took place.
 
Theodore McCarrick (Reuters/M. Rossi)
Theodore McCarrick was defrocked by Pope Francis in 2018

"This inaccurate information appears likely to have impacted the conclusions of John Paul II's advisers and, consequently, of John Paul II himself", concludes the report. Though ideologically at odds, the pope and the miscreant found common ground as Cold Warriors. "McCarrick successfully deceived the pope", George Weigel, a biographer of John Paul II weighed in. 

While in Washington, McCarrick put on dinners for President George W. Bush, he presided over memorial services for Washington's elite, and he became a world-travelling church power broker and diplomat, building a high profile of service to the Church, while simultaneously undermining its very fundamental moral structures of decency, honesty and respect. It helped, considerably, that he became a church fundraiser.

Pope Benedict in his turn, following the death of John Paul II, received ample warning over McCarrick's behaviour, yet Pope Benedict thought not to apply formal penalties, informing McCarrick to maintain a somewhat lower profile. The Holy See did request "spontaneous" withdrawal as archbishop of Washington of McCarrick in 2006, once he reached the retirement age of 75.

Even so, McCarrick carried on his representation of the Church around the world, as a good will ambassador of the Holy See, unwilling as it might have been at this point for him to continue his little charade. It was only in 2018 that they rained on his parade, removing him from public ministry, and defrocking him a year later. 

The report sketched a scenario of Pope Francis acting against McCarrick once clear evidence emerged, claiming that before 2017 Pope Francis had heard "only that there had been allegations and rumours related to immoral conduct with adults", leaving him with the impression that the allegations had been "reviewed and rejected by John Paul II".

Then-Cardinal Theodore McCarrick of Washington and then-Archbishop Donald W. Wuerl smile during a 2006 news conference after introducing Wuerl as the new head of the Washington Archdiocese. (CNS/Paul Haring)
Then-Cardinal Theodore McCarrick of Washington and then-Archbishop Donald W. Wuerl smile during a 2006 news conference after introducing Wuerl as the new head of the Washington Archdiocese. (CNS/Paul Haring)

Labels: , , , , , , ,

Follow @rheytah Tweet