"Many want Beijing to play a larger role as a defender of stability diplomacy, and an open global economy."

"World leaders are heading to Beijing because they increasingly see China as a hedge against an unpredictable United States." 

Neil Thomas, fellow, Chinese Politics, Asia Society Policy Institute Center for China Analysis 

 

"Beijing also has concerns about managing its own relationship with Washington."

"More direct and active involvement in negotiations [with the Islamic Republic] could win the Trump administration's affirmation as much as earn its ire and blame."

Ja Ian Chong, associate professor of political science, National University of Singapore 

 

"It is very easy to criticize the U.S. Even America's allies are at odds with Trump and Washington these days."

"But sooner or later, China needs to go beyond the position of critic, and get some real diplomatic skin in the game."

Richard McGregor, senior fellow for East Asia, The Lowy Institute

Spain struck a trade deal with China on Tuesday

 

China no longer viewed by the West as an economic ogre, one whose finesse at hostage diplomacy, whose penchant for cybertheft and purloining foreign industrial/commercial formulae and government secrets for its benefits; a gargantuan, omnivorous threat to the well-being of other nations' wealth and aspirations? What a swift transition. And to think that it has been occasioned by the president of the United States of America's belligerence over trade tariffs and unity in Western security over threats poised by Xi and Putin!

 

Yet in one week alone Spain's Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez, Abu Dhabi's Crown Prince Sheikh Khaled bin Mohamnmed, Vietnam's president To Lam, all came visiting one after another. Impressed, no doubt over President Xi Jinping's turning the leaf on his book of global exploits in presenting China as a source of dependable stability and (newfound) respect for international rules. As, for example in contrast to President Trump's unspeakably dire threat to bomb Iran "back to the Stone Ages", a bit of bluster to match Iran's own, that horrified Pope Leo XIV. 

 

In fact, the contrast is a deep and unfolding reality, where Trump's unchecked pronouncements on his social media site has served to further confound, affront and distance erstwhile staunch supporters in Europe, North America and Asia of U.S. policies and allied support. Italy's Giorgia Meloni, the U.K.'s Keir Starmer were this week recipients of President Trump's ire; not that it was undeserving, simply a trifle undiplomatic, as is his inimitable style. Nor did Pope Leo come away unscathed for his penchant at being "terrible for foreign policy"; that too not far from reality.   

 

Oh, and Italy's foreign minister also visited Beijing this week, coming away with a pledge that China is prepared to deepen ties with Rome. Mr. Trump's frustration with allies over their disinterest in teaming up with the U.S. military to open the Strait of Hormuz to normal shipping so that energy can continue to flow from the Persian Gulf to the people who most need and use it, including those allies, has deepened with their continued hands-off negativity.  

"Donald Trump’s second Administration is bringing about a historic reconfiguration of transatlantic relations, compelling the EU and its member states to reassess multiple dimensions of their foreign policy. In response to the deepening rift with Washington, Europe is adopting a hedging strategy by strengthening ties with other global actors, including China."

"This approach was underscored by Ursula von der Leyen at the World Economic Forum, referring to the 50^th anniversary of the establishment of diplomatic relations with Beijing as ‘an opportunity to engage and deepen our relationship with China, and where possible, even to expand our trade and investment ties’. "

Mario Esteban, Elcano Royal Institute  

They've chosen instead to go-it-alone as a group, sans the U.S. and that purpose saw the U.K.'s Starmer in Paris to host a video conference alongside Emmanuel Macron, steering a coalition of some 40 countries planning to help independently restore free transit through the Strait of Hormuz, South Korea, Japan and Australia included -- all supporting a ceasefire in return for intervention. Nations in Southeast Asia have been given support in their energy crisis by a $10-billion financial package promised by Japan's Sanae Takaichi on a new "Power Asia" initiative.

 

An aerial view of the cityscape of Beijing, China Photo: VCG

 

That China stoutly maintains its support of Russia, despite its full-fledged conflict in Ukraine makes the entire scenario somewhat bizarrely Byzantine; even as European leaders, fixed in their support of Ukraine's battle to sustain its sovereignty, visit China to explore lucrative trade agreements, Xi met with Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov to pledge deeper bilateral coordination. Not to be forgotten is Russian and Chinese backing of Iran, their major oil supplier, despite global sanctions.

 

As the world's largest oil importer, China has vast commercial oil reserves to tide it conveniently over the current shortage afflicting its neighbours. China is content with taking an observer's back seat with the ongoing conflict in the Middle East. Officially it calls for restraint and de-escalation. Business as usual, for China.

 

INVESTING IN CHINA

Powered by China Briefing, the experts at Dezan Shira & Associates, and their partners

 

"Unless this trade is tightly constrained, it’s likely to undermine Canada’s industrial base."

"If we take a wrong turn, an entire industrial ecosystem could be hollowed out or captured, leading to a dependency that erodes economic security, sovereignty, and democratic values."

Deeper economic entanglement with China is not a long-term route to achieving any of those goals. It's a dead end." 

"The fundamental problem is that the Chinese Communist Party has an agenda that is hostile to Western democracies because it seeks to weaken our governance and our societies."

"Tilting toward China is a risky bet that is likely to carry more negative costs for Canada than the positive benefits that it could potentially bring."

Michael Kovrig, geopolitical adviser, former diplomat 

 

"It's a massive risk."

"Canada's auto industry depends on our integration with North America and the U.S. specifically. That's been the foundation of the sector, going all the way back to the auto pact."

"An estimated hourly wage at a Chinese [plant] is between U.S. $2 and $4 an hour. Compare that to a unionized vehicle production plant in Canada, where your average wage is about $45 an hour, and that also includes pensions and benefits and a whole range of other advantages." 

Brian Kingston, president, CEO Canadian Vehicle Manufacturers' Association 

 

"We should welcome Chinese car manufacturers but set the rules similarly to what GM Canada had to do when it went to Shanghai in 2009."

"We should say, you are welcome to come to Canada, but you will have, after three years, to have about 30 percent of Canadian content, and after ten years, it has to be 100 percent content."

Guy Saint-Jacques former Canadian ambassador to China 

Models pose near the BYD Seal 06 Dmi, unveiled during the Auto China 2024 show in Beijing, on April 25, 2024. China's largest EV maker has been expanding rapidly into overseas markets and could reach Canadian shores shortly following Ottawa's recent deal with Beijing. (Ng Han Guan/The Associated Press)

Second-guessing Prime Minister Mark Carney's triumphant visit to Beijing in January when he came back home to Canada with a prize; Beijing's agreement to lower tariffs on Canadian canola and pork. That didn't come out of the goodness of China's trading-heart, but it mightily pleased the Canadian agrifood industry after a trade spat that close to destroyed their always-dependable Chinese market. Canola, seafood and pork are important comestibles for the Chinese, but they are products considered in trade talk to be fungible; they can be acquired elsewhere. In return, the negotiators in Beijing smiled broadly when Mr. Carney agreed to drop the 100% tariff Ottawa levied on Chinese electric vehicles and to allow the entry under a favourable tariff rate, an initial 49,000 of the vehicles for the Canadian market.

 

The Canadian auto industry was anything but pleased. Chinese electric vehicles are priced very reasonably in comparison to their counterparts produced in North America. The Canadian auto industry has gone through an agonizing few years thanks to the Trump administration's decision to punish its neighbour for taking the U.S. for a trade ride for far too long, according to their logic. The heavily intertwined industry where parts go back and forth between Canada and the U.S. in production of vehicles had suited both countries very well in the past, where the new tariffs have left Canada's auto industry on its knees.

 

Carney loosens Chinese EV tariffs

Mark Carney smooth-talked the situation as an opportunity for Canadians to consider the purchase of a less expensive option where the market of such vehicles struggle with soaring prices. In five years, he said with confidence, over 50 percent of vehicles in North America will be available at an import price of less than $35,000. More affordable options at a potential cost to tens of thousands of auto industry jobs in Canada. "It's clear that this will be a delicate and sometimes difficult relationship to manage with risks and opportunities that must be carefully weighed, as we heard from the earlier witnesses today", noted director of policy and strategy at Clean Energy Canada, acknowledging the risks associated with Chinese companies accessing the Canadian auto market.

 

Michael Kovrig, whose experience with China was rather less than idyllic, when he was taken into custody while in China, accused of a conspiracy against China, and was imprisoned in less than stellar conditions, with 'soft' torture for almost three years for espionage, as was Michael Spavor, during a different, diplomatic drama when China was polishing up its hostage-diplomacy credentials, warns against any Canadian involvement with Chinese trade.  

 

He addressed the issue of harmful environmental practices and abuses of human rights well known to exist in the supply chains of Chinese production, inclusive of Chinese EV companies. Allegations of using forced labour in the construction of vehicles by BYD, include its plants located in Brazil and Hungary. The U.S.-based non-profit China Labor Watch recently reported evidence of brutal labour conditions for Chinese migrant workers at its facility in Hungary. BYD was also listed by Brazil on its registry of employers subjecting workers to slave labour conditions.

 

Former senior bureaucrat Margaret McCuaig-Johnston last month during testimony before a House of Commons committee cited a Human Rights Watch report that aluminum used in dozens of auto parts in Chinese EVs is likely to be produced by Uyghur forced labour. China-based Zhejiang Leapmotor Technology Co. discussed the potential with Stellantis of building Chinese EVs at their idled Brampton, Ontario plant. The plan involving "knock down" kits assembled in Canada, parts produced and shipped from China. A plan that would wholly diminish Canadian auto parts' and workers' importance in total auto production.

 

While the prime minister claimed Canadian legislation is designed to force companies to report on their supply chains, recognize forced labour elements and keep them out of the Canadian supply chain, critics point out that the Canada Border Services Agency since 2021 halted a mere two shipments containing forced labour, both from China. "The legislation is world class; the enforcement of the legislation is possibly less than world class", former Liberal MP John McKay stated. 

 

A BYD vehicle is assembled on the production line of the company's factory in Camacari, Brazil, on Oct. 9, 2025. (Joa Souza/Reuters)

"I think there are a number of concerns when it comes to this expansion of Chinese companies and their presence in the Canadian market."

"And human rights is one element of it, but economic security and national security concerns must also be considered."

Vina Nadjibulla, vice-president of research and strategy, Asia Pacific Foundation of Canada 

"From the General Assembly resolution 3379 in 1975, which called Zionism 'a form of racism'; through the 2001 Durban human rights conference; to the 2003 election of a representative of Libya's Col. Qaddafi as chair of the Human Rights Council, the UN's veneer of legitimacy has worn thin."

John Ivison, journalist, National Post 

The Security Council chamber at the United Nations in New York City. Photo by Spencer Platt /Getty Images

 

Once a year the UN's Economic and Social Council's [ECOSOC], 54 members which centrally coordinates the UN's work on economic, social and environmental issues, nominates a list of countries to join the UN Committee for Program and Coordination [CPC], which are generally confirmed. Currently the ECOSOC membership includes the United States, Germany, France, Spain, the United Kingdom and Canada, among many other countries. A week ago nominations for the CPC came up for debate. The Islamic Republic of Iran was one of those nominated. And the United States was the only ECOSOC member to dissent over its nomination, declaring Iran unfit to sit on the CPC.

 

In another month the CPC will take to reviewing United Nations programs that address gender equality, disarmament and terrorism prevention. Certainly, Iran knows a great deal about all three issues. And as a world-leader in abuse of women's rights, and the ultimate resistor-country to disarmament, as well as the globally-acknowledged leader in the promotion of terrorism, it could conceivably act as a poster for all that has gone wrong in human rights under its theistic rule. Other than that, what could it possibly add of any value to those items? 

 

Canada was one of the ECOSOC members, along with Germany, France, Spain, and the U.K. to rubber-stamp the Iranian nomination to the CPC -- and just coincidentally Iran had been elected to the group previously, in 2014, 2017, 2020 and 2023, as astonishingly corrupt as that might appear to any befuddled mind that continues to cling to the belief that the United Nations is a global institution whose mandate is one of promoting human rights and world peace. 

 

United Nations Headquarters   Image courtesy of Nils Huenerfuerst on Unsplash

 

The following Tuesday in the House of Commons, Opposition Conservative MP Michael Chong, foreign affairs critic, questioned Canada's supine agreement for Iran. Foreign Affairs minister Anita Anand informed  him that there was nothing Canada could do: "As the position was uncontested, there was no opportunity for a vote", she explained. But the opportunity was there to object and Canada failed that metric of responsibility. "Canada will continue to work closely with partners to actively counter Iran's candidacies in UN bodies and will do so on all occasions", she emphasized, having just done otherwise. 

 

But then, of course, she was only relying on the outstanding leadership example of the leader of the Liberal party, Prime Minister Mark Carney, to lead the way on sanctimonious cynicism, as when in January his speech in Davos included this humdinger: "There is a strong tendency for countries to go along to get along. To accommodate. To avoid trouble. To hope that compliance will buy safety. It won't."

 

According to Canadian lawyer Hillel Neuer of UN Watch in Geneva, Anand's position  was "misleading". Canada could have acted with principle, but failed to. It had the opportunity to force a vote on the nominations, at the very least could have done what the U.S. did, to disassociate from the consensus that rubber-stamped Iran's committee membership, once again. The U.S. ambassador to ECOSOC made that abundantly clear, and included Cuba and Nicaragua. 

"To be clear, Canada joined the consensus in endorsing Iran and others, and it was not obliged to."

"I would say this is typical. Much of what happens at the UN is very cynical. If you want to be principled, you are going to be very busy and it is going to be unpleasant."

"Diplomats believe it is good to get along with as many countries as possible It is much easier to go along to get along."

"[Placing] serial abusers [at the helm of human rights at the UN is] like putting Al Capone in charge of fighting organized crime".

Hillel Neuer, UN Watch 

Iran secures UN role with backing from UK, France, Canada, Australia as US stands alone

 

The clearest takeaway from this study is that public opinion on Canada and Israel is not one-dimensional. Canadians may be broadly negative toward Israel overall, but that does not translate into wholesale rejection of Israel’s right to exist or defend itself.

Three quarters of Canadians, 75%, agree that Israel has a right to defend itself when threatened by other countries. Two thirds, 66%, agree that Israel has a right to exist. A majority, 57%, also say Israel faces a uniquely difficult situation in a hostile region.

At the same time, many Canadians are critical of Israel’s behaviour and intentions. Just over half, 52%, agree that Israel is its own worst enemy because it makes no effort to live peacefully with its neighbours. Only 33% believe Israel is actively seeking peace with neighbours willing to stop threatening it. In other words, many Canadians still recognize Israel’s security concerns, but they are far less convinced by the country’s current political and military posture.

Israel’s overall standing is weak across the country. Favourable opinion sits at 22% nationally, and falls to 17% in Quebec. It is also notably lower among women than men, 17% versus 27%. By voting intention, perceptions differ sharply. Conservative voters are far more likely to view Israel favourably, at 38%, while favourable opinion drops to 17% among Liberal voters and 12% among NDP voters.

Canadians who rely mainly on family and friends for Middle East news are more likely to hold a favourable impression of Israel, at 38%, than those who rely on Canadian mainstream media, at 20%. More broadly, mainstream Canadian news outlets remain the dominant source of information on Middle East issues, cited by 57% of respondents, followed by social media at 25% and mainstream international media at 20%.

Asked about the Government of Canada’s response to rising antisemitic incidents since October 7 and the subsequent Middle East conflict, 39% say Ottawa needs to do more. Only 29% say the government is doing enough, and just 7% say it is doing too much.

Canadians are clearly more negative toward Israel than they were three years ago. That shift likely reflects the cumulative effect of war, regional escalation, humanitarian devastation, and the increasingly visible costs of prolonged military action. But Canadians have not moved to a simplistic all-or-nothing position. They still affirm Israel’s right to exist. They still affirm its right to defend itself. And they also affirm homeland rights for Palestinians, almost to the same degree. 

Perception of Israel; Survey of Canadians, Leger Poll

Photo by John Mahoney/MONTREAL GAZETTE

 

The recently-published Leger poll that looked into Canadians' support for Israel has concluded that support has dropped to quite a degree since the October 7, 2023 invasion of southern Israel by thousands of Palestinians, led by the terrorist group Hamas, with a clear plan laid out to punish Jews for living on their own ancestral land, that Palestinians claimed as their own, having chosen to reject the United Nations Partition Plan that divided that historically Judean landscape to share between Jews and Palestinians. That punishment took the form of mass rape, torture, sadistic savagery on a scale unimaginable by most sane minds, to rampage through farming communities, slaughtering children, the elderly, men and women.

 

There is always a reaction of sympathy in the immediacy of Jewish tragedy revealed, and it lasts as long as it takes Jews to amass  resources to respond to their deadly persecutors. So when Israel dispatched the Israeli Defense Forces into Gaza to hunt down the mass murderers who have always used the strategy of concealing themselves behind Palestinian civilians, using schools, mosques, community centres and hospitals as headquarters, weapons storage and communications centres amidst a civilian population, the stage is set for triumphant propaganda to persuade foreign news services and governments that Israel is attacking the human rights of defenseless people.

 

That 'public relations' ploy has been perfected against a background of fairly universal, and most frequently underground hatred of Jews and they come together  with a ferocity of awakened antisemitism justifying itself on the basis of 'recognizing' ancient Jewish stereotypes and caricatures of Jews as shrewd manipulators whose goal is to rule the world for their own malign purposes. Accused of controlling world banking, news media, and governments, despite all real events pointing to the obvious opposite, a snarling global media faults Israel for 'indiscriminate' and 'disproportionate' responses to atrocities it suffers when it responds to protect its population.

 

Notionally and nominally viewed as a Western ally, a solid democracy living in a hostile environment of Middle Eastern potentates, theocracies, kingdoms and oil sheikdoms where oil resources exploited by its neighbours have earned great favour in those same Western democracies, Israel's friendships and reliance on erstwhile allies is put to the test, and particularly in these last three years, that test has failed. In the IDF's campaign to destroy the terrorist group with a covenant to destroy Israel from Gaza, other similar groups in Lebanon and Yemen, controlled by the Islamic Republic all sought to pounce in unity, and all have been put back on their heels by the tiny nation that appears as a discrete spot on the globe.

 

Countries in the Jewish diaspora where Jews have lived for centuries and sometimes millennia have latterly become unsafe for continued Jewish existence, from Germany to France, Britain to Ireland, Spain to Greece, Australia to Canada. A massive influx of Muslims has infiltrated the West through a process of immigration, refuge and migration, bringing with them their ancient scriptures demanding jihad against non-believers, beginning with Jews, and since that jihad  takes many forms, the faithful are obliged to their duty, which translates to making life unbearable for Jews wherever they live, beginning with the state of Israel.

 

Governments which commit to equality for all their citizens, suddenly find it difficult to extend that equality to their Jewish populations in view of much larger demographics of Muslim populations. News media obligingly play the role of transmitting subtle, then not-so-subtle portrayals of the Jewish state's questionable responses to threats when forced by violence to respond in kind in a geography that recognizes no other kind of reactions than militancy to be respected and anything approaching diplomacy is a byzantine puzzle to unravel.  

 

In Canada, as in much of Europe, a flood of 'progressive'-left, Critical Race Theory, Diversity, Equity, Inclusion imperatives have refashioned society through their governments' commitments to empathetic action in reaction to charges of 'colonialism' and exploitation of less-developed nations and societies during past imperialistic eras. Conflating Israel, an indigenous people to the Middle East, with 'colonialism' in lock-step with Palestinian propaganda has succeeded in isolating Israel as a holdover from a now-despised age, completely perverting history and reality.

 

The incoherent and confused Canadian reaction to the recent Leger poll reflects to a great degree that condition now prevailing where Israel has become an outcast among democratic nations, through a successful campaign of delegitimization portraying the Jewish state, and Jews in general everywhere as illegal occupiers to be shunned and condemned. That Israel's scientific and technological and agricultural advances have been admired, acclaimed and shared, doesn't spare it one iota, nor the number of Jewish Nobel Laureates, out of proportion to their global population numbers. 

 

Do any of Israel's detractors in the West even note that when Jews mount protests they do so peacefully, holding not only the  flags of Israel aloft, but flags denoting their countries of  residence. 'Pro-Palestinian' protests, on the other hand, see people masked, shouting invective, threatening the local Jewish population, chanting for the destruction of Israel, wearing keffiyehs to signal Palestinian triumphs over adversity when a death-cult mentality identifies their target as genocidal. 'Palestine' is a useful symbol for those who use it  as a cudgel, nothing more, with which to demolish Israel's place in the world. 

 

People attend a rally outside Convocation Hall on the University of Toronto campus on Monday, May 27, 2024 as members of the Ontario Federation of Labour support the pro-Palestinian encampment at the university. (Chris Young/The Canadian Press)

 

"Today, we began the process of establishing a new passage and we will share this safe pathway with the maritime industry soon."

"Additional U.S. forces, including underwater drones, will join the clearance effort in the coming days."

U.S. Central Command commander Admiral Brad Cooper 

 

"Effective immediately, the United States Navy, the Finest in the World, will begin the process of BLOCKADING any and all Ships trying to enter, or leave, the Strait of Hormuz. At some point, we will reach an “ALL BEING ALLOWED TO GO IN, ALL BEING ALLOWED TO GO OUT” basis, but Iran has not allowed that to happen by merely saying, “There may be a mine out there somewhere,” that nobody knows about but them. THIS IS WORLD EXTORTION, and Leaders of Countries, especially the United States of America, will never be extorted. I have also instructed our Navy to seek and interdict every vessel in International Waters that has paid a toll to Iran. No one who pays an illegal toll will have safe passage on the high seas. We will also begin destroying the mines the Iranians laid in the Straits. Any Iranian who fires at us, or at peaceful vessels, will be BLOWN TO HELL!"

U.S. President Donald J. Trump 

A Navy destroyer in the U.S. Central Command area of operations transits the Strait of Hormuz, April 11, 2026.  Photo: U.S. War Department  

"The blockade will be enforced impartially against vessels of all nations entering or departing Iranian ports and coastal areas, including all Iranian ports on the Arabian Gulf and Gulf of Oman. CENTCOM forces will not impede freedom of navigation for vessels transiting the Strait of Hormuz to and from non-Iranian ports."

"Additional information will be provided to commercial mariners through a formal notice prior to the start of the blockade. All mariners are advised to monitor Notice to Mariners broadcasts and contact U.S. naval forces on bridge-to-bridge channel 16 when operating in the Gulf of Oman and Strait of Hormuz approaches [per the release]."

Centcom press release  

The U.S. Department of War announced on its website that the USS Frank E. Peterson and the USS Michael Murphy are operating in the Persian Gulf, part of a broader mission to fully clear the Hormuz Strait -- an international sea passage and essential trade corridor -- of sea mines, laid courtesy of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps. Underwater drones, along with  additional American forces, are set to join the clearance project in coming days.

 

US has deployed two Navy guided-missile destroyers to Hormuz (Representational Image)

"We're sweeping the strait. Whether we make a deal or not makes no difference to me", said President Trump, even as negotiations between U.S. and Iranian representatives -- alongside a Pakistani mediator -- on a potential ceasefire broke down. The Iranian preconditions were a non-starter, with Israel intent on continuing its strikes on Hezbollah in southern Lebanon. Iran's continued insistence on its right to continue with its nuclear program, its demand that the U.S. withdraw from bombing Iran and prepare to pay reparations, along with its refusal to put a stop to its support of proxy terrorist groups ensure the talks would go nowhere.

The Islamic Republic's 'red lines' expressed as demand for damage caused by U.S.-Israeli strikes compensation and the release of  Iran's frozen assets, are a reflection of the supreme arrogance of a ruling elite that refuses to acknowledge its position as a bludgeoned theistic hegemon that threatened its neighbours and launched terror attacks by proxy internationally whose beating is its just due for the further threat its nuclear ambition poses to the world at large. 

The country of 93 million people is deserving of relief from the tyranny of a regime that persecutes its own population, using vast oil reserves to fund global terrorism rather than investing in internal infrastructure of benefit to the country's future -- not as a conquering Islamist totalitarian state, but as a responsible government adhering to international norms of human rights standards. That its disregard for and abuse of its female population's right to equal treatment and respect given to their male counterparts is ignored by the United Nations where Iran was recently appointed to a human rights group is cynicism on steroids.

United Nations General Assembly, UN Watch

The 15-point proposal by the United States includes restrictions on Iran's nuclear program and the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz, while Iran's 10-point proposal prior to the talks focused on a guaranteed end to the war and control over the Strait of Hormuz, where it plans to collect a maritime passage fee for each ship passing through, amounting to $1 million. An average of 100 to 130 ships passed through the strait daily, prior to the U.S.-Israel joint aerial assaults. 

That toll, if permitted to proceed, despite the deep objections of the other Gulf States that the IRGC has been bombing persistently since February 28, would enable the Islamic Republic to amass an astronomical fortune, far outstripping its revenues up to the conflict derived from its energy products. And all of it would be directed toward restoring its destroyed ballistic missile and drone stocks, along with other military assets that it has lost during the prosecution of the war, including warplanes and warships. 

"An integrated suite of unmanned maritime systems and sensors, the MCM MP counteracts mines in the littorals while increasing the host vessel’s standoff distance from the threat area."

"Embarked with the MCM MP, [a littoral combat ship] or a vessel of opportunity can conduct the full spectrum of detect-to-engage operations (hunt, neutralize, and sweep) against mine threats using sensors and weapons deployed from the MCM Unmanned Surface Vehicle (USV), an MH-60S multi-mission helicopter, and associated support equipment."

U.S. Navy, new mine countermeasures mission package

Getty Images

"[The] delusion of omnipotence [that is fuelling the U.S.-Israel war in Iran must stop]."

"Enough of the idolatry of self and money! Enough of the display of power! Enough of war!"

"[Praying for peace is a way to] break the demonic cycle of evil [to build instead the Kingdom of God where there are no swords, drones or] unjust profit."

"It is here that we find a bulwark against that delusion of omnipotence that surrounds us and is becoming increasingly unpredictable and aggressive."

"Even the holy Name of God, the God of life, is being dragged into discourses of death."

"[God] does not listen to the prayers of those who wage war, but rejects them. Even though you may make many prayers, I will not listen -- your hands are full of blood [Isaiah]." 

Pope Leo XIV

Pope Leo XIV presides over a prayer vigil and rosary for peace in St Peter's Basilica at the Vatican on 11 April. Photograph: Remo Casilli/Reuters

"They're two white guy boomers but they could not be any more different in their life experiences, in their values, in the way they have chosen to live those values."

"This is a very stark contrast, and I think an inflection point for American Christianity."

"There's no question about his [Pope Leo's] inflection and meaning. It removes any ambiguities."

Natalia Imperatori-Lee, theology professor, Fordham University

 

"For the last five centuries, the church has been involved in a project of helping develop strong international norms [including the Geneva Conventions in recent centuries]."

"It is a very long-standing tradition rooted in Scripture and theology and philosophy."

Professor William Barbieri, Catholic University  

The first American pope has taken to directly criticizing the American president over the war in Iran, when Pope Leo declared President Trump's "belligerence is truly unacceptable". Two polarized world views, one on the part of the 79-year-old U.S. President, the second a 70-year-old pontiff from Chicago. Coevals in time, sharing common cultural roots with distinct oppositional attitudes they bring to their positions of immense power and influence. 

 

Leo's opposition to the war in Iran, according to Catholic Church experts, reflects established church teachings, quite aside from the politics of the time. Speaking of an American administration in the 
White House with close links to conservative evangelical Protestantism which claims Trump's war on Iran is backed by heavenly endorsement. Americans were urged by U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth to pray for victory "in the name of Jesus Christ". As for President Trump, asked whether he felt God approved of the war, replied: "I do, because God is good -- because God is good and God wants to see people taken care of."

 

President Trump's response alludes to the plight of the Iranian people, held in thrall to a radical, fundamental tyranny of theocratic jihadists whose goal is conquest of mind and soul packaged into a submission to Islam as the only true religion, through the Shi'ite version specifically. A theocracy that has exemplified in its foundational belief in worldwide conversion to wipe all other religious devotion out of contention. Beginning with world Jewry and Israel, then on to Christianity, and Buddhism, Hinduism and others will fall into place, and be no more with conquest completed.

 

On its way to that conquest beginning with its own Iranian population almost a half-century ago, complete restraints on civil society; all forced to adhere to the version of Islam that demanded full obeisance in faith through complete surrender of self in the interests of the idolized Ruhollah Khomeini who took up the Prophet Mohammad's scimitar and wielded it with the passion of the celestially nominated. The Ayatollah who tasked the Islamic Republican Guard Corps with stifling the spirit of Iranians, who assigned the al Quds division the task of forming, training, arming and dispatching Shia terror militias on missions abroad.

 

Investing in them the full authority, under his unquestioned own to supervise uranium enrichment for use in nuclear technology, while perfecting the range and power of ballistic missiles capable of taking warheads vast distances. This is a nation dedicated to performing its obligations to the foremost directive for the faithful in the sacred scripts demanding non-stop jihad for full transformation from false gods to the only religious devotion recognizing the sole Divine Eminence. 

 

Iranians, women in particular, forced to appear in public only garbed in black all-encompassing garb, paid dearly for their transgressions of occasional passionate rejection of the demands for absence while present in their gender-obscuring garments that offered no protection from rape and murder at the behest of the authorities. Mass demonstrations of youth demanding freedom and liberty to live as human beings earned themselves the freedom to take the lethal brunt of the regime's response. Iran's vast oil wealth failed to trickle through to improving the civilian population's lives, but flowed extravagantly in support of terror.

 

What would be the Catholic Church's solution to a population of 93 million people in thrall to terror crying out for rescue from their ill fate?  What has Pope Leo to say of a nation whose leaders continuously threaten to eradicate the Jewish State of Israel from the Middle East, and which has exported its Jew-hate propaganda throughout Europe and North America? What has Pope Leo to say of Islamists in Africa, Asia, Europe and North America targeting Christians in faith to jihad? 

The Red Cross and the Vatican both helped thousands of Nazi war criminals and collaborators to escape after the second world war, according to a book that pulls together evidence from unpublished documents.

The Red Cross has previously acknowledged that its efforts to help refugees were used by Nazis because administrators were overwhelmed, but the research suggests the numbers were much higher than thought.

Gerald Steinacher, a research fellow at Harvard University, was given access to thousands of internal documents in the archives of the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC). The documents include Red Cross travel documents issued mistakenly to Nazis in the postwar chaos.

They throw light on how and why mass murderers such as Adolf Eichmann, Josef Mengele and Klaus Barbie and thousands of others evaded capture by the allies.

By comparing lists of wanted war criminals to travel documents, Steinacher says Britain and Canada alone inadvertently took in around 8,000 former Waffen-SS members in 1947, many on the basis of valid documents issued mistakenly.

The documents – which are discussed in Steinacher's book Nazis on the Run: How Hitler's henchmen fled justice – offer a significant insight into Vatican thinking, particularly, because its own archives beyond 1939 are still closed. The Vatican has consistently refused to comment.

Steinacher believes the Vatican's help was based on a hoped-for revival of European Christianity and dread of the Soviet Union. But through the Vatican Refugee Commission, war criminals were knowingly provided with false identities.

The Red Cross, overwhelmed by millions of refugees, relied substantially on Vatican references and the often cursory Allied military checks in issuing travel papers, known as 10.100s.

The Guardian 

SS officers at Auschwitz in 1944. From left: Richard Baer, who became the commandant of Auschwitz in May 1944, Josef Mengele, commandant of Birkenau Josef Kramer, hidden, and the former commandant of Auschwitz Rudolf Höss, foreground; the man on the right is unidentified. Photograph: AP

  

"What Pope Leo and Donald Trump have in common is they both lived through the postwar polarization [including the political upheaval of the Civil Rights Movement and Vietnam War]."

"In some ways he's [Leo] just like us, [someone] who understands where our domestic political crisis came from [unlike the Argentinian Francis] who did not fully understand the peculiarities of the United States [even as he offered implicit criticism]."

Professor Steven Millies, Catholic Theological Union, Chicago