Wednesday, September 24, 2025

Civil Life in Canada

"[The government's new bill to target use of hate and terror symbols is not a] blanket ban [on any particular imagery]." 
"We see it in our streets. We see it in our parks. We see it in our grocery stores."
"Frankly, we see it almost everywhere."
"This behaviour is not just morally culpable, the impact has reverberations through the entirety of the community. And, I would argue, tears at the seams of the social fabric of the nation." 
"[The bill includes specific language exempting peaceful protest from prosecution and would only apply to conduct where the] motivation [is to intimidate or prevent someone from practising their faith]."
"We have included specific provisions to exempt peaceful protest."
Justice Minister Sean Fraser 
https://i.cbc.ca/1.7638514.1758578962!/fileImage/httpImage/image.JPG_gen/derivatives/16x9_1180/hate-crimes-bill-20250919.JPG?im=Resize%3D860
Justice Minister Sean Fraser tabled a bill Friday adding four new offences to the Criminal Code. (Justin Tang/The Canadian Press)
"Merely displaying this symbol, in and of itself, is not the sole harm we're trying to target." 
"It does have to be tied with the wilful promotion of hatred. This is difficult, because it could take a thousand different forms, and it's going to be for police on the ground and Crown prosecutors to identify when that threshold has been crossed."
Justice Minister Sean Fraser
 
"It is still necessary to show that there is an intention ... an intention to promote hatred by displaying these symbols."
"It's not even clear to me that this law would do what they want it to do, given that you would have to prove, in a criminal context, beyond a reasonable doubt, that the person displaying the flag intended to promote hatred on racial or religious grounds, obviously, in particular, hatred towards Jews." 
Richard Moon, professor, freedom of expression, University of Windsor 
https://i.cbc.ca/1.7001047.1697679109!/fileImage/httpImage/image.jpg_gen/derivatives/16x9_1180/rally3.jpg?im=Resize%3D860
A group of people hold signs at a pro-Palestinian rally. (Travis Golby/CBC)
 
Warning that the Canadian government's new bill that targets the use of hate and terror symbols is not to be considered a 'blanket ban' on any particular imagery, the Justice Minister explained that it would depend on a variety of factors to be evaluated by police and prosecutors in laying a charge, along with questions over implementation.  
 
The measure represents the first piece of legislation since Parliament's resumption this week, representing one of five changes Prime Minister Mark Carney has prioritized in changes to the Criminal Code for an effort to respond to the viral hate messages proliferating in Canada. Those messages have been amplified and become more pointedly vociferous and sinister in the past two years, when the Liberal government in an earlier iteration chose to do nothing.
 
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/F9XpkplXcAA1NAZ?format=jpg&name=360x360

And in doing nothing, merely mouthing the words that 'antisemitism has no place in Canada' -- those who used an inverted triangle, those who flew the flags of Hamas and Hezbollah and the Houthis, championing the groups that Canada lists as terrorists, those who chanted and carried banners shouting 'final solution', symbolizing another Holocaust, who burned the effigy of Israel's prime minister, along with Israeli flags -- were lent tacit encouragement to the  raging mobs accusing Israel of 'Apartheid', and 'genocide'.
 
Immediately on news of the Palestinian terrorist group Hamas leading a flood of thousands of terrorists trained and armed with instructions to rape, mutilate, murder at will on October 7, 2023 in southern Israel, it was well understood that the nation being  savagely attacked would respond. Which led Palestinian groups in Canada to quickly organize protests against the Jewish state mounting its response in Gaza in a determined effort to root out Hamas, its leaders, weapons depots, and deadly operatives. Taking to the streets of Canada along with supporters in the thousands, Jew-haters went on a  rampage of hate, threatening Canadian Jews.
 
Blocking traffic arteries, entrances to hospitals and universities, synagogues and Jewish-owned businesses, the protest organizers cited their constitutional rights to free speech. And they were permitted to freely speak libelous slanders, inciting to violence, accusing and indulging in vituperative threats against Canadian Jews, even targeting Jewish children attending parochial schools with taunts and accusations. Police presence meant a minimum of physical violence, but no action was taken against verbal violence.
 
https://thehub.ca/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/CP173291771-2048x1365.jpg
The Hub
The new legislative proposal would include criminalizing "willfully promoting hatred against any identifiable group by displaying certain symbols in a public place"; a crime carrying a two-year penalty. Hate symbols defined for the bill's purposes as a Nazi swastika or SS lightning bolts. Defining as well a terror symbol linked to a currently listed  terrorist entity under Canada's designated terrorist lists, including Hezbollah and Hamas. Deliberate alteration of such symbols to be included.
 
The proposed change, according to Richard Moon, professor at the University of Windsor specializing in freedom of expression, raises the question  of assigning motivation to anyone who displays such a symbol. Response to the presence of flags representing Hamas and Hezbollah has Jewish community groups and leaders specifically calling for government action. All such appeals to government have gone unanswered despite the fact that Canada already has anti-hate law legislation.
 
Accordingly, Professor Moon questions whether the government proposal is simply 'performative', since the episodes and symbols new legislation is meant to address are already covered by existing criminal law. In response to the new bill, a spokesman for the National Council of Canadian Muslims, sensitive to any issues that might be addressed to impede the Muslim narrative, insists greater clarity is required on the plan to criminalize the display of terror symbols, since white supremacist symbols "remain untouched"
 
There are, needless to say, no marches, protests, rallies led by white supremacists interfering with civil life in Canada. 
 
https://i.cbc.ca/1.7011532.1698460789!/fileImage/httpImage/image.jpg_gen/derivatives/original_1180/protests-1.jpg?im=Resize%3D805
People on both sides are taking issue with some of the signs and social media posts about recent events in the Middle East. (CBC)
 

 

Labels: , , , , ,

Thursday, February 13, 2025

Solution? Shift Palestinians From Gaza to Egypt/Jordan...?

"We contribute a lot of money to Jordan and to Egypt, by the way, a lot to both. But I don't have to threaten that. I think we're above that."
"I'm talking about building a permanent place for them [because Gaza is] not habitable."
"Yeah, maybe, sure why not? [cut off aid to Egypt and Jordan should they not agree to accept Palestinian refugees]."
"I have a feeling that despite them saying no, I have a feeling that the king in Jordan and that the general — president — but that the general in Egypt will open their hearts and will give us the kind of land that we need to get this done."
U.S. President Donald Trump 
https://i.abcnewsfe.com/a/8ffe8bfa-25a2-4132-9b99-feb858663d28/donald-trump-13-gty-gmh-250211._1739294593850_hpMain_16x9.jpg?w=992
ABC News
 
"Partition meant that millions of people found themselves on the ‘wrong’ side of the borders. Ten million became refugees in what was the largest population movement in history. Muslims travelled to Pakistan; Sikhs and Hindus to India. Up to a million of these refugees were killed in a series of horrific massacres in the border regions."
1947 British Withdrawal/Partition of India/Pakistan
https://www.aljazeera.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Interactive_Partition_migration3-04.jpg?w=770&resize=770%2C770&quality=80
 
During Jordan's King Abdullah's visit to the White House the discussion between himself and President Trump turned rather uncomfortable for the King, recalling possibly his father King Hussein's adventure with Palestinians using Jordan's border with Israel as a means of bombarding the Jewish State; bad enough the PLO was inviting the Israeli military to respond by bombing areas inside in Jordan. Worse, however, was the aggregate Palestinian presence leading to a move within to remove the Hashemites from Jordanian rule, ('Black September' conflict) sending them back to Saudi Arabia (or their death beds) while Palestinians would happily take on the burden of ruling Jordan in its transformation to a Palestinian state.
 
Abdullah finally committed to an exercise in Solomonic wisdom, offering to take a thousand Palestinian children suffering from cancer or "in a very ill state" back to Jordan to give them haven and the medical attention required "as quickly as possible". That offer/solution was inspired and it pleased Trump immensely as a start to siphoning Palestinian civilians out of Gaza in a larger bid to remove all members of Hamas as well as the entire population while excavating the bombed-out mess the Strip has become during Israel's war against the Palestinian terrorists pledging to destroy Israel.
 
The vision of Gaza as a U.S.-owned 'Riviera" has failed to please the larger audience in the Middle East; not so inspired a solution to solving Palestinian violence against Israel, after all perhaps. On the other hand, if Arab leaders of surrounding nations have no solutions to offer that would safeguard the Jewish state from further, ongoing attacks -- meant to slaughter as many Jews as possible and in the process lavish the tender mercies of sadistic savages on those Jews unfortunate enough to be caught in the act of living, by torturing, mutilating, murdering babies, infants, the elderly, while raping and dismembering girls and women -- they might do well to cooperate.
 
King Abdullah was prepared to deliver a joint message from the Arab world that they would not stand for eliminating a Palestinian presence in the 'West Bank' and Gaza, as they continue to emphasize that Palestinians must have a state of their own, despite that it has demonstrated time and again that the only state that would suit the Palestinians is one that encompassed the entire land mass (small as it is) between the Jordan River and the Mediterranean Sea. Palestinians are resistant to reason and prepared to support their belligerent entitlement with more martyrs and more, many more dead Jews, even if retaliation measures infinitely greater numbers of dead Palestinians.
 
https://media.cnn.com/api/v1/images/stellar/prod/gettyimages-103289204.jpg?q=w_1110,c_fill/f_webp
 
President Trump's original recommendation that Jordan and Egypt open their borders for the permanent settlement of Palestinians within their territories has somehow failed to enthuse the King and the General/President. Even for Mr. Trump's noble purpose of rebuilding the Strip that has become a "demolition site". That President Trump was adamant that Palestinians would not be invited to return to Gaza when pointedly asked, won him no fond regards from the Arab world. 
 
As the fourth and fifth largest beneficiaries of American generosity in foreign aid to their countries, Jordan and Egypt, both of whose economies lag far behind those of their oil-rich Middle East brethren would feel the pinch of a withdrawal of U.S. aid. Jordan in particular, for which the financial assistance represents 3 percent of its GDP. And as much as Egypt needs financial assistance it could still hobble along without U.S. generosity which represents a mere 0.5 percent of its gross domestic product.
 
Arab nations are concerned with the wider Middle East situation where Israel has carried out attacks in Lebanon and Syria. And thus speaks another terrorist group, the Iranian proxy Hezbollah. Internal security concerns are uppermost in mind for most Middle East nations; the known and demonstrated propensity of Palestinians to foment problems wherever they happen to roost makes them less than desirable guests. Anywhere they happen to land the terrorist operatives among them target Israel, drawing host Arab nations into the Palestinian dysfunction of continual terrorism.
 
Forced migration of huge populations have taken place. At great cost in human life all too often, but recognized at times as necessary when deep-rooted violent antipathies between people representing sectarian conflict and tribal animosities of long duration in a regional culture of the strong eating the weak represent a fact of life, one that civilized mores demand a response to, when separation is the only solution. No one should have to live next to a neighbour whose endless plots of violation of the human rights of the other claim beauty in death in  honour of a religious devotion whose sacred writing demands no less.
 
https://www.cfr.org/sites/default/files/styles/immersive_image_3_2_desktop_2x/public/image/2024/06/Hamas_BG.webp
The Palestinian terrorist group governed the Gaza Strip before launching a surprise attack on Israel in 2023. Now facing Israel’s military campaign to destroy it, Hamas’s future is in doubt, as is Gaza’s. Council on Foreign Relations
 

Labels: , , , ,

Follow @rheytah Tweet