China's Political Subversion Agenda : A Real and Present Danger
"Secret [for] Canadian Eyes Only."
"Triads [covers the activities of Chinese organized crime groups including within Canada]."
"Intelligence
Services of the People's Republic of China [details the methodology of
Beijing's agents and their infiltration activities in Canada; and] The
PRCIS and the Triads [analyzes the connection between the People's
Republic of China's Intelligence Service and organized crime]."
RCMP/CSIS Joint investigation report
An
early draft of this report had been leaked before now but was
controversially discredited by Canada’s Security Intelligence Review
Committee.Photo by Government of Canada
Evidence was found by Canada's domestic spy agency CSIS (Canadian Security Intelligence Service) and its federal police force, the RCMP (Royal Canadian Mounted Police), and spelled out in detail in a secret report both agencies contributed to, of foreign agents infiltrating Canada to "influence ... important leaders" and "neutralize"
any criticism of China. This is a report, recently surrendered for
public scrutiny after many redactions, that had been composed a
quarter-century ago.
The
report had been finalized in 1998 and is now partially declassified; a
report resulting from a joint RCMP-CSIS investigation called 'Project Sidewinder'
that set out to examine links between the Chinese government
intelligence agencies and Chinese organized crime groups. While an early
draft of the report had been leaked at one time it had been discredited
by Canada's Security Intelligence Review Committee.
"They
[Chinese agents] attempt to secure access to, influence with, and the
support of important leaders, officials and sectors of the population,
particularly with the Chinese communities."
"The
PRCIS also seeks to mute criticism of the Chinese government in Canada
and to identify and neutralize political forces in Canada opposed to
Beijing's policies."
"Canada
is seen as an excellent source of indigenous and foreign advanced
technology both open and restricted [ie. proprietary, classified or
embargoed], with which to expedite the modernization of China's
economy."
RCMP/CSIS Joint investigation report
The report, entitled "Allegations of Co-operation Between the Triads and the Government of the People's Republic of China",
describes concerns relating to Chinese political interference in
Canada, concerns that have re-emerged recently through intelligence
leaks alerting the public. Accusations that the current Liberal
government of Justin Trudeau continued to ignore such warnings in its
zeal to sign a free trade agreement with China, led finally to the
launch of a public inquiry as a result of pressure exerted on the
government by parliamentary opposition critics.
In the late 1990s, relations between Canada and the Chinese government
were warm. Here, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau is seen with
China's Xi Jinping during a G20 summit in Bali last year. (Sean Kilpatrick/The Canadian Press)
The
report is 26 detailed pages in length, incorporating three main
sections. Issues of concern were possible cooperation between Chinese
criminal groups and the Chinese government; Chinese political
interference in Canada; and China's intelligence services activities.
The final conclusion reached by the report was that Chinese intelligence
services actively attempted to recruit business and political leaders
in Canada to influence Canada's political activities dating from the
1990s.
"PRCIS
front companies and Canadian companies have been used to slip PRCIS
[People's Republic of China Intelligence Services] personnel into Canada
in delegations."
"The
thousands of Chinese students and delegates who come to Canada each
year and are hampered by few restrictions in moving about the country,
pose the greatest Chinese intelligence threat."
RCMP/CSIS Joint investigation report
There
was also the highlighted issue of China's intelligence services
actively seeking Canadian intellectual property to be handed over to
Chinese organizations. Noted in the report as well was China's use of
"mass line" intelligence gathering with the use of a network of informed
Chinese nationals tasked to travel abroad for the express purpose of
gathering useful intelligence information.
Old intelligence reports accused Beijing of using criminal triads to do
their dirty work outside mainland China. In one recent example, criminal
groups are suspected of beating pro-democracy protesters in Hong Kong,
seen here in 2019. (Ming Ko/AP)
Former
national security analyst Stephanie Carvin commented on China's pursuit
of a similar agenda in 1999, similar to what it is pursuing at present,
irrespective of different leaders of the Chinese Communist Government
in the last 25 years. When the report was submitted to government 25
years ago, then-Liberal prime minister Jean Chretien dismissed
allegations of political interference. It would, if given credence,
interfere with his personal plans to do business in China which his
series of trade missions had set the groundwork for.
In addition, the Project Sidewinder report confirmed that Chinese criminal organizations were actively working in Canada.
"this country is an excellent place for them to invest in companies,
launder profits derived from criminal activities, secure a portion of
their assets outside Hong Kong and obtain a Canadian passport".
Media
reports earlier in 2023 informed by intelligence source leaks speak of
widespread efforts by the Chinese government to interfere in recent 2019
and 2021 elections in Canada. Underhanded work such as misleading
social media to reflect a Chinese agenda, and WeChat posts
in Chinese aimed at influencing Canada's huge Chinese diaspora
communities, in a deliberate mission to have the Liberals returned to
government while demonizing their opposition Conservatives.
Former Conservative MP Kenny Chiu says he was targeted for attacks by
the Chinese government in the 2021 election after he proposed creating a
registry of foreign agents, like some other countries have. (Adrian Wyld/The Canadian Press)
"I would say what's different now is scale."
"The
other thing that's really coming in since 1999, I would say is the
cyber angle [China's online disinformation and computerized
intelligence-gathering]."
"I don't think this was ever forgotten [keeping an intelligence services eye on China in the 1990s of subversive activities]."
"I'm just not sure the extent people were paying attention until recently."
Stephanie Carvin, associate professor, Carleton University, former national security analyst
A Chinese man cycles past a billboard in front of Beijing's Forbidden
City before a 2001 visit by then-Canadian prime minister Jean Chretien.
At the time, concerned U.S. officials were secretly probing Chinese
operations in Canada. (Reuters)
Canada's Security Intelligence Agencies vs Canada's Activist Courts
"What
I'm kind of starting to notice is that ... whether it's explicit or
not, they can be politically motivated. There might be a trend here. It
may be too early to tell, but that's ... something that I've noticed and
something that I've heard."
"Our
client was fortunate enough that he had the resources and the means to
hire a lawyer to assist him [in] this process, but if you weren't so
fortunate, I mean, he might be facing a lifetime ban."
"It is next to impossible to challenge the advice that security intelligence agents offer to the department."
"It's
really about how we interpret what constitutes a risk, and what sort of
association actually renders someone inadmissible."
"[Many people are screened out based on secret evidence that can't be reviewed, which] often leads to egregious injustices."
"What I would say is that in the immigration domain, it is pretty much a Wild West."
Sharry Aiken, professor of law, Queen's University
A recent Federal Court decision suggests the Canada Border Services
Agency relied on unreliable intelligence when it chose to deny permanent
residency to Liping Geng. (Darryl Dyck/The Canadian Press)
In
Canada, a controversial discussion continues to rage around foreign
interference, efforts by foreign entities in service to their
governments to disrupt Canadian elections. At the same time two arms of
the federal government routinely deport people suspected of engaging in
espionage or terrorism. Or, they are barred from entry to Canada.
Lawyers working within the immigration system anticipate a ramping up of
these efforts by security officials, as a reflection of the heightened
attention on the internal meddling by other countries in strictly
Canadian affairs.
But
then, it is not the work of immigration lawyers to be aware of
potential disruptions allied with the entry to Canada of foreign
elements tasked with infiltrating Canadian academia, society,
corporations and governments at all levels; their bread-and-butter is
successful representation of the clients in whose service their
professional credentials earn them both reputation and financial
security. Their very business model is based on representing clients,
not the security and welfare of Canada.
In
the security screening process which determines who may enter Canada
and which visa applicants may not, the Canadian Security Intelligence
Service, Canada Border Services Agency and the Immigration Department
are all involved. Officials are tasked with barring permanent residents
or foreign nationals from entry to Canada through the Immigratuon and
Refugee Protection Act, should they be engaged in terrorism or in
espionage injurious to Canada's interests.
The
Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada acts as the independent
administrative tribunal hearing applications. Should there be red flags
when people submit applications for visas, they become subject to
background and security checks; CSIS and CBSA produce reports to the
board, and how to manage an application then is up to the discretion of
the Immigration and Refugee Board. Those applicants deemed inadmissible
through this process have the right to appeal to the Federal Court.
A
former Canadian citizen who had been denied permanent residence, deemed
inadmissible on the basis that he taught English to Chinese spies and
might be involved in espionage himself, was represented by immigration
lawyer Athena Portokalidis. Liping Geng, a 68-year-old Chinese citizen's
case was set out in a report prepared by the National Security Screen
Division of CBSA, citing information from a CSIS report.
Double-screening, in other words by two separate, but cooperative
intelligence agencies.
According
to court records, Geng was a member of China's People's Liberation Army
as a young man. He worked as an English teacher after completing
school, at an army-operated department training students in foreign
languages. Everyone who attended the school was "in or was linked to Chinese military intelligence",
Canadian officials stated; the teachers were actively engaged in
espionage. Later, Geng spent nine years completing master's and doctoral
degrees at University of Toronto.
From
there he went on to teach, and his family was approved for permanent
residence status in Canada, becoming citizens in 1995. Geng returned to
China in 2007, choosing to renounce his Canadian citizenship, since
China will not recognize dual citizenship. He continued to regularly
visit his family in Canada in following years, then chose to return
permanently to Canada after retirement, in 2019.
Security
officials were criticized for taking their evidence from newspapers and
other open sources to build their case to exclude the man, instead of
acquiring hard evidence, leading Federal Court Justice Richard Mosley on
appeal to find that CSIS and CBSA reports accusing Geng of espionage "drove the decision-making process".
The justice then wrote a ruling that quashed the Immigration and
Refugee Board's decision; that the security assessments amounted to an "overzealous effort" to establish Geng as a member of the Chinese military.
Federal Court Justice Richard Mosley found the the consequences of the
decision to deny Liping Geng admission were 'particularly harsh.' (Sean Kilpatrick/Canadian Press)
But
failing to take into account that China enacted a law calling on all
its expatriate citizens wherever in the world they live, to be loyal to
China and follow the Chinese Communist Party rules of engagement.
Espionage, both commercial/scientific and military/government, along
with academic, is a Chinese strategy long recognized to have robbed
Western countries of trade and military secrets. Moreover, Chinese law
empowers Beijing to hold Chinese who are citizens of other countries
liable to China for maligning the CCP, or refusing to act on Beijing's
behest.
"[A CBSA security assessment in April 2021 cited the CSIS report and
other documents found on the internet to conclude that the language
school falls within the organizational structure of the Chinese signals
spy agency] and that many graduates are assigned to 3/PLA monitoring and
control stations, including those targeting the United States and
Canada."
"As a result of his
employment as a lecturer with the LFLI, there are reasonable grounds to
believe that the applicant is a member of an organization, the 3/PLA,
that has engaged in acts of espionage that are against Canada and
contrary to Canada's interests."
"There are also reasonable grounds to believe that the applicant himself has engaged in espionage."
CBSA report
"[The language institute where Geng taught] is a military training institute
where officers and foreign affairs officials receive language training,
including for the purpose of being assigned to listening posts."
CSIS report
People walk across a street near a large screen promoting the Chinese People's Liberation Army in Beijing.Andy Wong/The Associated Press
"You can't monitor them all -- the number of targets are exceeding capacity." "We have a proper security dilemma that no positive progressive thinking program can easily fix." Ray Boisvert, former assistant director intelligence, Canadian Security Intelligence Services
“As the director of CSIS indicated before a parliamentary committee some
months ago, the number of returns known to the Government of Canada is
in the order of 60, and they are under very careful investigation.” Ralph Goodale, Minister of Public Safety
Minister of Public Safety Ralph Goodale
stands during question period in the House of Commons on on Parliament
Hill in Ottawa on Tuesday Nov. 7, 2017. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Sean
Kilpatrick
"Then [when the guard is down and the infiltration is complete] the danger begins." "Having profiled these gents for many, many years, [the idea] that everyone is suitable, let alone able, to be reintegrated [back into normal society after having left Canada to join jihadi terrorist groups] is absurd." "What does that mean [deploying resources for surveillance of returning terrorists]? It means I'm spending a ton of resources on what might be yesterday's threat." "The newly radicalized kid goes uninvestigated for lack of person-power." Experienced unnamed intelligence sources
The Canadian Liberal government is assuring Canadians through responses to questions from the opposition in the House of Commons that no problem exists. Yes, of course there is the prospect of increasing numbers of jihadists who left Canada to join terrorist groups now returning, requiring surveillance and extreme caution in the wake of the dissipating fortunes of the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant. Which has also incited its members to return to their places of origin in the West and there prove that ISIL and its agenda remain alive and thriving.
We needn't concern ourselves, assures Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, since Canada's national security agencies are on the job, monitoring returned jihadis who have had their passports revoked and face the laying of criminal charges. And give the government credit; it is engaging in a mind-reversal exercise with the launch of its new Canada Centre for Community Engagement and Prevention of Violence, geared to aid jihadists "let go of that terrorist ideology".
Simple, so simple, and so very credible. We do have people of genius quality to think of these things. Perhaps they consulted with Saudi Arabia which also has such a program. Of course Saudi Arabia also practices a double game of financing madrassas whose purpose is to inculcate Wahhabist Islam into the minds and hearts of the faithful, in which the very important concept of jihad is emphasized as an integral part of Islam, one that believers are bidden to obey. Just not in Saudi Arabia.
But Canada's program of mind-bending release from medieval brutality and butchery in the name of religion is unique. Guaranteed to succeed with hardened, experienced and driven extremists. Changing minds with ease when "appropriate disengagement and re-integration support" is present and available, as it will be, under this government. Not for Canadians the brutal, inhumane approach taken by other countries like Britain, to 'kill off' their returning citizens seasoned in jihad.
Simply enough achieved by removing their citizenship along with their passports, leaving them mired in Syria or Iraq where they are trained to contend with adversity and if death befalls them well so be it, since this is a choice they have made, right? When Canada's public safety minister was asked by immigration critic, Conservative Michelle Rempel how many have returned and are under 24-hour surveillance she was informed security agencies are busy with everything that would possibly keep Canadians safe.
Oh, and in the process 'respecting the rights and freedoms' of returnees.
Oh my, the rights and freedoms of returnees. Forgot about that, didn't we? It's not only law-abiding citizens whose rights and freedoms concern this government, but that of returnees, those who dedicated themselves to jihad, willing and able to slaughter and destroy in the name of Islam. A phrase that should not be repeated even in impolite company lest one bring down upon oneself the charge of Islamophobia and the potential of being brought before a Human Rights Council.
The minister of international development in the United Kingdom made a public statement a week ago that the only way to deal with British citizens who of their own free will joined ISIL, is to kill them. Yes, he said that, obviously having no trust whatever that 'returnees' are readily susceptible to kindly persuasion to behave themselves like good citizens. This is not, however, the Canadian way; amend that; the Liberal Canadian way.
"Canada does not engage in death squads", said Goodale, loftily of the fact that the U.S. has explicitly stated its mission is to ensure any foreign fighters having joined ISIL in Syria, die in Syria. Australia and France as well have chosen a similar response to the question. French special forces in cooperation with Iraqi units are hunting down and killing French fighters. But this is not Canada's sunny way, not at all.
According to an intelligence officer with inside knowledge, the RCMP and the Crown look for "hard and irrefutable evidence -- the perfect case" related to those suspected of terrorist activities. CSIS responds to jihadists returning and appearing to behave as normal citizens do, by tasking surveillance teams, intelligence officers, analysts, translators and technicians in an effort to monitor as many suspects as possible in responding to this seemingly intractable situation.
And the pity of it is, there are just so many warm bodies to deploy, and no more.
This represents a general opinion site for its author. It also offers a space for the author to record her experiences and perceptions,both personal and public. This is rendered obvious by the content contained in the blog, but the space is here inviting me to write. And so I do.