Thursday, September 04, 2025

Student Social Issues Intimidation on Canadian Campuses

"Inescapable from our study is the recognition that classroom discussions on controversial topics on university campuses fail to reflect the actual cross-section of opinions of students in the classroom."
"[Of 760 university students surveyed, 48.1 percent expressed reluctance to reveal their opinions on a] controversial political issue." 
"The data reveal that the students most comfortable sharing their views at Canadian universities identify as follows: liberal, secular, racialized, homosexual, gender-nonconforming."
"On each controversial issue, the majority of students are uncomfortable -- often very reluctant -- thinking through their views out loud." 
Researchers, Aristotle Foundation for Public Policy 
https://smartcdn.gprod.postmedia.digital/nationalpost/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/students.jpg?quality=90&strip=all&w=564&h=423&type=webp&sig=p-DVujVouK3ZaG1nIWwKwA
 
According to a comprehensive survey newly published by the Aristotle Foundation for Public Policy, close to fifty percent of all Canadian university students actively conceal their opinions with respect to controversial matters, in fear of being sanctioned or suffering mistreatment. As a result, 48.1 percent of 760 university students in the survey expressed reluctance in revealing an opinion on a "controversial political issue"; 27.5 percent were somewhat reluctant, and 20.6 percent were very reluctant. 
 
On the other hand, when respondents were asked about issuing their views on a "non-controversial" issue, 93.4 percent claimed it was not a problem. A student's identity was critical with respect to apprehensions over speaking out. Campus environments where all opinions or views could be expressed without consequence were described by some groups, while others felt campuses have become places where a lack of self-censorship risked poor grades, peer rejection and even campus authority investigation. 
 
Identifying as either "non-binary" or a non-specified third gender, respondents expressed greater confidence than any other cohort airing their views without consequences. One survey question asked respondents to discuss a "controversial gender issue" in class, restraining themselves for fear of being reported to campus authorities for expressing hate or discrimination. Non-binary and third-gender respondents expressed 87.1 percent confidence this would never fall to them.
 
On the other hand, male and female respondents were guarded, with only 31.4 percent of men and 47.7 percent of women feeling they could speak candidly without risk of backlash. When respondents were questioned whether their gender opinions would result in punishment with a lower grade, 71 percent of non-binary and third-gender respondents said they had no concerns, while 32.7 percent of men and 48.8 percent of women had similar reactions.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Gz7ggR5XQAACmlk?format=jpg&name=small 
Of white and Hispanic students, 50 percent of Hispanic and 46 percent of white students preferred to remain out of class discussions on hot-button issues. This survey is one of several Canadian polls to recently reveal campus environments increasingly unwelcoming for Jewish students. The question, if a "controversial religious issue" was discussed in class, elicited a 69 percent Jewish response of reluctance to speak. Of Muslim students, only 36 percent would be reticent about speaking. 
 
Interestingly, the Aristotle survey concluded that moderate or conservative opinions represent at the present time, the plurality of students' political views on Canadian campuses. 38.7 percent of respondents reported "moderate", "conservative" or "libertarian" opinions, as opposed to 37 percent who reported liberal sentiments. The Aristotle survey respondents were disproportionately non-white and women, historically tending to lean left in political views. And although moderates and conservatives represent a plurality, it was they who felt most besieged for their political views.
 
46.2 percent of students were found by the survey to state they were badly treated or treated unfairly as a result of their political views, while 6.6 percent said they have become targets weekly. For this survey, the Aristotle Foundation for Public Policy touched base with 760 students from 34 Canadian universities, with the use of a questionnaire based on the Heterodox Academy's Campus Expression survey.  
"The disparity in perceived freedom to express one’s views among students holding differing views is not limited to political views but was also observed in other areas such as religion. Despite religious students outnumbering non-religious students two to one, it is the non-religious who are considerably more comfortable in a university classroom discussing controversial issues about faith and religion. The data reveals particular concerns around the experience of Catholic, Muslim, and Jewish students, with the latter reporting considerable mistreatment in their university experience. Jewish students participating in our study are four times more likely than the average student to be “very reluctant” to speak up and share their views on religion in class discussions. This fear of expressing their viewpoints correlates to a concerning outcome in the study, whereby 15 percent of Jewish students reported experiencing daily abuse on campus for being Jewish, and 84 percent reported experiencing antisemitism at university at least once a year. By contrast, 90 percent of agnostics, 86.6 percent of atheists, and 75.5 percent of students who elected not to disclose their religious affiliation reported never being treated badly or unfairly, as a university student, because of their religious views. In other words, an agnostic or atheist student from our study population is six times more likely than a Jewish student to report never being treated badly or unfairly for their views on religion. Not a single agnostic, atheist, or “prefer not to say” participant in our study reported daily mistreatment."  
Aristotle Foundation 
 https://aristotlefoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/Fig-19-AF-Freedom-of-Expression-on-Campus-V1-Aug-22-2025-e1756169773881-1024x526.jpg
"Gender and sexuality are the most polarizing topics. On one end, they have the largest share of respondents who expressed that they were “very comfortable” (32%) sharing their honest views on a controversial matter in class; yet, gender and sexuality also have the largest share who expressed that they were “very reluctant” (22%). Like race, the gender and sexuality findings are mixed. Those who rarely experience any mistreatment for their gender or sexual orientation—heterosexual males—are, by far, the least likely to feel at liberty to share their views on those issues. Whereas, despite experiencing more frequent mistreatment—90 percent of students who identify as gay, non-binary, or third gender reported experiencing poor or unfair treatment because of their gender at least once a year—gender-nonconforming and non-heterosexual students are the most comfortable sharing their views on controversial gender and sexuality issues in class."
Aristotle Foundation   
https://aristotlefoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/Fig-30-AF-Freedom-of-Expression-on-Campus-V1-Aug-22-2025-e1756171187684-1024x590.jpg 

Labels: , , , , , , ,

Sunday, April 25, 2021

Black Perspectives on Justice Reflecting Political Polarization

"Although [George Floyd] wasn't perfect,his life had grea value and dignity to God and he should matter to all of us."
"Those who try to leverage this tragedy for their political or financial gain -- like the founders of BLM & Maxine Waters -- are disrespecting the families who have lost loved ones to senseless violence."
"Defunding the police is not the answer & it isn't what Black people want ..."
"Now is the time for leaders to work together to end violence & address the root issues that lead to crime & altercations."
Bob Woodson, American civil rights movement veteran, founder, Woodson Center, Washington

"One of the most encouraging things about the prosecution's case is that they focused on Chauvin's actions, not presumed racism."
"Unfortunately, many people make honest productive conversations [about]  policing impossible because racial strife benefits them more than actual change."
Delano Squires, The Federalist

"What's happening in America isn't necessarily hatred for police officers.:
"And it's surely not about love for Black people."
"Critical race theorists want to end liberal democracy to establish a postmodernist, Marxist, 'antiracist' system."
Ghanian-Canadian blogger Samuel Sey
"We must all come together to help repair the tenuous relationship between law enforcement and Black and minority Americans."
"To deny the progress we've made is just as damaging as not making progress at all."
U.S.Senator Tim Scott
Former Minneapolis police officer Derek Chauvin, centre, is placed in handcuffs, after a jury found him guilty on all counts in his trial for second-degree murder, third-degree murder and second-degree manslaughter in the death of George Floyd in Minneapolis, on April 20, in this courtroom sketch.
Black intellectuals tend to be conservative by nature and inclination. They are not the least bit favoured by Western media; journalists tend to avoid them, their narrative runs counter all too often to the popular version of black trauma in America persisting in a black-white racial divide within a racially polarized nation. There is, on the other hand, a divide between liberal, liberal-progressive and conservative black commentators, academics and journalists (think Thomas Sowell).

Blacks have indeed made great strides in the last half-century not only in America but everywhere else, as they resoundingly prove their ability to rise to any challenge, in any profession, equal to that of their white and other-minority counterparts. When enough American citizens voted for a majority Democrat government -- twice -- led by a black American, that certainly proved something, as does the presence of black members of Congress, black justices, lawyers, physicians, artists, scientists, academics in every sphere of life, proving that -- yes, they can.

They recognize that within the black community there is a deep malaise that attracts all too many black men and women to relish themselves as victims of their stricken past extending into the present era of rampant racism, a very human character fault that they themselves practise. Black communities for which violence has become a way of life, extinguishing their own dignity as decent human beings when they are themselves the vectors of death targeting others in their own communities. Their over-representation in penal institutions reflects their over-representation in crimes of violence.

Black conservatives deplore all of this and see a desperate need for the black community to come to terms with its own failures. Their perspective is one that finds distinct disfavour from within the white-sympathetic-to-black-plight communities eager to demonstrate their 'wokedness', happy to grovel for dire misdeeds they did not themselves commit, as dark historical shame linked to the oppression and violence that blacks encountered in their role as America's slave-labour force.

Black conservative voices are those of disruption and inconvenient points of view as far as mainstream media is concerned, which turns a deliberately blind eye to their version of events; observing them from the perspective of right and wrong, not black and white. It is their considered opinion that the Derek Chauvin trial reliving the death by criminal misadventure of the Minneapolis police officer was skewed and oversimplified. Justice was done, but under false pretenses.

Post-trial, black conservative commentators have made no secret of their scorn for the institution of Black Lives Matter, securely ensconced within liberal value systems, a favoured movement wholly supported in all its exorbitant charges and motivations steeped in Marxist ideology destructive of the democratic ideal, which they reject with the scorn that it deserves as a divisive, violence-prone band of black social revolutionaries. 

McCarthy will introduce resolution to censure Maxine Waters for comments on "confrontational" protests
Rep. Maxine Waters (D-CA) joins demonstrators in a protest outside the Brooklyn Center police station in Minnesota. Photo: Stephen Maturen via Getty Images

Labels: , , , , , ,

Follow @rheytah Tweet