Monday, February 08, 2021

India: Rescued by Herd Immunity

 

"It was totally overwhelming. November was the worst. We could only accommodate the number of patients we could discharge."
"We were managing very, very sick patients in the ward, as there was no room in the ICU."
"To our relief and surprise, the number of cases have started to come down drastically."
"If the situation continues like this for a month, we can say we have achieved sustained low numbers because of immunity and vaccination."
"But we have to keep our fingers crossed. These good times may not continue forever."
Dr.Sushila Kataria, Medanta hospital, New Delhi  

A mural in New Delhi is part of public health messaging in India. The country has seen a dramatic decline in new cases since the fall, but researchers aren't sure why.  Sanchit Khanna/Hindustan Times via Getty Images

"What we seem to have done is let the virus run its course. By not flattening the curve in the beginning, India went through the herd immunity threshold and the epidemic seems to be naturally coming down."
"We will never know how many people died -- no one is counting."
Jacob John, virologist, retired professor, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu state

"I am hopeful the worst is over. In certain areas, like large cities, we may have come close to achieving a good amount of immunity -- if not herd immunity, close to it."
"The estimates are that 30 to 50 percent of individuals may have had asymptomatic or mild infections and not gotten tested. Many who had developed mild symptoms may have had COVID-19 without realizing it."
Dr.Randeep Guleria, director, All India Institute of Medical Sciences

"We are seeing a lot less severe disease than the rest of t he world, and a lot more asymptomatic infections."
"Part of the reason might be prior exposure to lots of other pathogens. We live in an environment where we are exposed to all kinds of pathogens all the time and we learn not to react too much."
"It looks like the virus has really spread widely in the country. Maybe the reason the numbers are crashing is that most people have been infected and infection gives you at least 80 percent protection for months at a time."
"If you look at the places that did well with control early on, they are the ones [that] have a high level of infection now."
"And if a variant comes along that escapes immune responses, then everyone is in play again."
Gagandeep Kang, microbiologist
People wearing protective masks wait in line to board a bus amidst the spread of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) in Mumbai, India, October, 6, 2020
India has recorded some 10.7 million Covid-19 infections so far   Reuters
 
Exhausted doctors in New Deli whose non-stop reaction to the COVID pandemic left them overworked, isolated for fear they would transmit a virus to their families, and anxious to see the end of the nightmare of the SARS-CoV-2 viral epidemic are incredulous but thankful to recognize that daily new infections in India's capital have seen a sharp drop in recent weeks. This is a trend that has extended well beyond New Delhi where India's new confirmed coronavirus infections nationally have fallen suddenly from a peak of close to 100,000 new infections daily in September to an average of 13,000 to 14,000 each day at the present time.

Health surveys reveal that much higher public exposure to the virus than was previously understood to have occurred was the reality. While many other countries all with infinitely smaller populations are struggling through second and third waves and recognizing the emergence of troubling new variants of the coronavirus, India's precipitous drop in infections seems to indicate that their version of the pandemic is well on its way to burning out in India. 

Speculation has led to the conclusion that this is the result of the nation's crowded cities and that the level of communication of the virus has led to natural "herd immunity" having arisen even before vaccines have been widely used in mass inoculations. The most reasonable hypothesis to the surprise drop in infections is seen to focus on the virus spread losing steam, a situation leading to cautious optimism that the pandemic's shadow is slinking off, allowing the country to begin repair of its collapsed economy resulting from a strict lockdown, restrictions and public fear.

The Reserve Bank of India recently issued a bulletin alerting to the "increasing probability" of a stronger-than-anticipated economic rebound in lock step with COVID receding. "Barring the visitation of a second wave, the worst is behind us. The recovery is getting stronger in its traction, and soon the winter of our discontent will be made glorious summer", the bulletin poetically crowed.

Back in March when India began reeling under the certainty that the first few hundred coronavirus infections would soon balloon out to hundreds of thousands, a draconian nationwide lockdown was imposed by Prime Minister Narendra Modi, for which he apologized as a necessity to avert complete disaster. The purpose, he explained, was to break the chain of viral transmission. Public transport was suspended for months, people could only buy food, medicine and cleaning products while India's economy contracted 24 percent year on year.

In a country where millions live in tight proximity sharing community toilets and water taps in congested slums, lockdown failed to accomplish its purpose. The pathogen spread from the cities into the hinterlands carried by laid-off migrant workers who returned to their far-off villages. Over 10.7 million confirmed coronavirus infections were reported in all of India, the second-highest number following that of the U.S. Even so, experts feel the real case total to be much higher; most infections not recognized nor recorded.

Photo: PTI
Photo: PTI
"The reported cases are not even remotely a reflection of true cases -- they only reflect people who got tested. For reasons that we don't fully know, the virus has spread like wildfire in India -- more than in any other country in the world", stated Vikram Patel, professor of global health at Harvard Medical School. Over half of residents in cities like Delhi, Mumbai and Pune have been exposed to the virus according to seroprevalence studies. An estimate of 31 million infections by mid-August in Karnataka state, included 44 percent of the rural population and 54 percent of the urban population.

Over 154,000 COVID-19 deaths were reported in India, but the actual death count may never be known, since most Indians tend to die at home without a cause of death ever formally determined. Some researchers, despite that reality, feel that India's COVID mortality rate has in all probability not been as high as many other regions given the relative youth of the country's population with just 6.5 percent over 65 years of age in comparison to Europe's one-fifth.

Health economist Rijo John, based in Kerala, feels the virus strain that has swept through India is a less virulent one than has inundated populations elsewhere. "It's pretty generally accepted that in India, we have a very mild form of the virus. But the future is hard to predict." For the meanwhile, however, India's pandemic appears to be in steep decline.Most of the country's 270 million schoolchildren have been out of class since March. White-collar professionals work from home and have done so for almost a year, with most elderly people remaining exclusively at home, susceptible to infection.

An ambitious vaccination campaign has been launched by the government with an aim to inoculate 300 million Indians by August's end. A number that includes health-care workers and the elderly. Roughly 3 million people have been vaccinated once the drive began two weeks earlier indicating that reaching the total of 300 million will probably become a slow, protracted process.
"A lot of this is in the rear-view mirror but that doesn't mean we are done and dusted yet."
"We have an artificial situation in which we've reached an equilibrium, but if we went back to normal, there is still a lot of room for cases going up."
Ramanan Laxminarayan, director, Center for Disease Dynamics, Economics & Policy
Figure 1. The distribution of severity: Cumulative severity of COVID-19 and proportionate mortality from top causes (percent)

Cumulative severity of COVID-19 and proportionate mortality from top causes (percent)   Source: Johns Hopkins University; World Health Organization.


Labels: , ,

Saturday, June 06, 2020

Sweden's Mea Culpa

"What every country is trying to do is to keep people apart, using the measures we have and the traditions we have to implement those measures."
"The citizen has the responsibility not to spread a disease."
“If we were to encounter the same illness with the same knowledge that we have today, I think our response would land somewhere in between what Sweden did and what the rest of the world has done."
Swedish public health agency's chief epidemiologist, Anders Tegnell

"[Tegnell] still can’t give an exact answer on what other measures should have been taken. That question remains, I think."
"For months, critics have been consistently dismissed. Sweden has done everything right, the rest of the world has done it wrong. And now, suddenly, this."
Sweden’s minister of health and social affairs, Lena Hallengren
sweden coronavirus at the bar
People had lunch at a restaurant in Stockholm on April 21, 2020, during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Jonathan Nackstrand/AFP via Getty Images
The "this" that Sweden's Minister of Health refers to is a staggering death toll. It is a gamble that failed. Sweden is no further ahead economically, it failed in its goal to establish a country-wide 'herd immunity' effect that would in theory have seen the SARS-CoV-2 virus extinguish itself in exasperation at being unable to infect people because too many were immune to its lethal blandishments. The Swedes, goes the theory, are so logical in their thinking and so capable of independence of thought they would self-protect naturally.

No need for government to get in the way, to autocratically impose limits on people's freedom of movement. Common sense would prevail. Except, somehow, it failed to. Yes, there were some restrictions imposed; no large gatherings permitted and some schools were closed, while those who were able to work from home were encouraged to do just that. Otherwise, life in Sweden went on undisturbed, nothing out of the ordinary, no routines upended by inconvenient lockdowns.

Restaurants and bars remained open, schools for children under age 16 operated as per usual, in a decidedly calculated move to do things differently, logically, under the guidance of Anders Tegnell, the country's authoritative epidemiologist whose judgement everyone appeared to trust and to revel in. Who just happens to be the very same man who now regrets the immense loss of life in his country; win some, lose some.

He did enjoy the support of those who would have nothing to do with lockdown. And Swedes themselves in general appeared copacetic, confirmed in their belief in themselves and their government. And life went on. Though it stopped for many. Sweden has a death rate that considerably exceeds its neighbours' who did go into lockdown, and this was not the way things were supposed to turn out.

Sweden realized 450- deaths-per-million (for a total of 4,500 deaths), while comparable deaths-per-million for neighbours like Denmark (100), Finland (58), Norway (44) appear almost palatable by comparison, if any deaths at all can be felt to be acceptable under any conditions.That deaths-per-million for Sweden represents one of the worst the world has seen, even in hard-hit Europe. So much for death avoidance; that just didn't pan out.

And then there is the economy. While not the worst that Europe has seen, the country's economy is in fairly dire straits, a reflection of what has occurred around the world. Sweden has a drop in GDP of seven percent projected, commensurate with the same conditions and results seen elsewhere; in other words, nothing whatever gained. For one thing, it is hugely dependent on trade with neighbouring countries and they have been in no position to trade. A forgotten calculus.

Anders Tegnell
Anders Tegnell Photographer: Pontus Lundahl/AFP via Getty Images
Herd immunity? The general consensus is that at least 60 percent of the population would have to be considered immune to have the entire population protectively impacted.Yet by April's end no more than 7.3 percent of the population were seen to have acquired a degree of immunity. Stockholm's eventual figure, according to Mr. Tegnell might reach just over 20 percent, and that most certainly does not equate with effective herd immunity. Another calculus gone kaput.

 

Labels: , , , , , , , ,

Follow @rheytah Tweet