Saturday, February 25, 2023

The Russian Public's View of Russia's Invasion of Ukraine

"We ate from the same plate, fed from the same table . . . Now we are soullessly bombarding each other."
"Streams of dirt are pouring from both sides."
Elena, 40, insurance clerk, Moscow

"Would a normal person go up in arms against his brother? . . ."
"What if the red button is pressed."
"Do you think  they won't press it?"
Tokhir, 39, janitor, Moscow

"What can be the feeling when  you see entire systems falling apart before your eyes?"
"The scale and seriousness of the crisis is distressing."
"Less contacts, less chance of running into another clash of opinions. Less chance that they will get into your soul and stab you in the back."
Yuri, 59, university lecturer

"Our people could have bought the Donbas, given everyone citizenship and still had money left over for black caviar."
"What was the point of striking first?"
"1,300 people worked at the U.S. embassy in Ukraine before the start of the special operation. Who are these people?"
"I don't want this fate for my country. And I don't want it for Ukraine. It truly hurts for every victim."
Kristina, 55, financial analyst, Moscow
A view shows an apartment block with a mural depicting Russian President Vladimir Putin in Moscow, Oct. 6, 2022. (Evgenia Novozhenina/REUTERS)

Some experience heartfelt regrets of two nations with intertwining cultures, religious devotion, history and pride at war with one another. Few would question the interpretation of the expressed propaganda reasons given by their president to justify the unprovoked invasion. In their collective opinion it was an event that was provoked by the underhanded actions of the United States and NATO, seeking to -- as President Vladimir Putin put it -- destroy Russia, a competitor for power as Russia takes its rightful pride of place as one of two global superpowers.
 
To these Russians those of their compatriots who have fled their country of origin are contemptible, rather than be forced  into a combat role as a dispensable conscript, dying daily by the hundreds on the field of battle. Some were initially incensed by the invasion of Ukraine, that kinship had been set aside for aggression. They take care to suppress their emotions for fear of drawing attention. They may fear the Kremlin, but they loathe the United States' influence on the world community.
 
Not for them the principle that led other Russians, in the arts and sciences, those whose names are well known at home and abroad, to condemn their country for its brutality and illiberalism. They feel genuine regret and shame at the position their country now holds in the regard of the world community. They cannot express their outrage while in Russia, and cringe at the thought of how they are regarded as Russian nationals by civilized nations of the world. 
 
Public disclosures of their sympathies ensures they cannot return to their country of birth as long as Vladimir Putin is president. None have a wish to join Alexei Navalny in prison under laws that justify imprisonment for 'traitors' or those who criticize their government's decision-making in non-stop bombing of a country they value kinship with. 
 
There is no complete concensus within the Russian population, itself comprised of a minority of close to a million Ukrainians, with another 2.9 living in Russia as refugees. .There are wide-varying views on the situation among Russians, revealed in part by a recent poll of the Levada Centre. Among the population there are many who live with fears of an escalating situation with the potential of a world war looming.
 
Mobilization in both Russia and Ukraine has raised Russian anxiety levels. Ukrainians are shrugging at the excesses of Russian attacks on civilian enclaves to demoralize Ukrainians to apply pressure on the Ukrainian government to stand down, vastly underestimating Ukrainian civilian resolve to resist the violence forced upon them by the Kremlin. In-person interviews have revealed that half the Russian population oppose their president's conflict in Ukraine, but are constrained by fear of speaking publicly.
 
2J0GYBB.max-760x504.jpg

The letter "Z" has come to symbolize Russia's brutal military invasion of Ukraine  Alamy Photo

The suffering of the Ukrainian people is affecting those in opposition to the war. But even while they silently contest their country's aggression in Ukraine, they are completely averse to the opposition of the West and in particular the United States, to their country's war initiative. Doubling the actual number of U.S. embassy employees in Kyiv to have it appear a more sinister presence related to the U.S. Secret Service spying on Russia convinces Russians that Russia was forced to act to counteract American plans.
 
There are also fears from within Russia itself that their government could make use of nuclear weapons if a breakthrough with conventional weapons fails. Older Russians see their retirement years stressed by conflict and an inevitable decline in economic stability. Some who have the means required to leave Russia hesitate in concern that they will be viewed as a pariah in a world that has become anti-Russian. "Run away to feel like a third-class person? The whole world hates us", said 36-yer-old sports equipment retailer Sergey, whose western-made products have been sanctioned.
 
Russian President Vladimir Putin announced plans to call up 300,000 reservists to fight in Ukraine, a sign of how much Russia’s military is struggling. A Moscow-based student who got his draft notice says he was shocked by the massive mobilization.
"The war was necessary, to shove U.S. interests far away."
"There was no other way out, nothing."
Denis, 42, car sales manager
 
"The United States want to maintain world dominance."
"We are taking them for a ride on their own roller-coaster."
Rodian, 41, loan adviser, Moscow

 

Labels: , ,

Saturday, June 29, 2019

Frankly, Mr. Putin

"The liberal idea presupposes that nothing needs to be done. The migrants can kill, plunder and rape with impunity because their rights as migrants must be protected. What rights are these?
"Every crime must have its punishment."
"So, the liberal idea has become obsolete. It has come into conflict with the interests of the overwhelming majority of the population."
Russian President Vladimir Putin
Vladimir Putin: '[Liberals] cannot simply dictate anything to anyone just like they have been attempting to do over the recent decades' © Alamy

This is a man who speaks freely, confident of his views and disinterested in how they will be received. He has no need for rose-coloured glasses; he sees the world as it is and as he would have it. He is canny, he is autocratic and he is aggressive, but he is not stupid, nor is he anything but frank. Liberalism like all ideologies has become unbalanced; it has lost its way, forgotten that to be useful it must also be reasonably balanced.

Liberalism has become progressively liberated, more conscientiously socialized in its intemperate acceptance of all values being of equal worth than is tolerable for reasonable people to accept. In many ways the lengths to which liberalism has genuflected toward regarding all ways of life and values in life as worthy of respect reflecting social constructs and cultures infusing them all with equal human rights entitlements must be both a puzzle and a source of amusement to a traditionalist like Vladimir Putin.

He is a conservative socialist, a not-quite-rigid communitarian, a practical-minded man for whom 'rules of engagement' are flexible. German Chancellor Angela Merkel has always had time for her Russian counterpart. She seems to regard him as a basically reasonable individual whom cogent arguments could sway. In turn he had the patience to listen to her, but he has never felt obliged to agree with any course of action unattractive to his sense of preservation of Russia, its priorities and his place within its future.

While he sees Russia as a competitor to the United States in forging alliances useful to his nation, establishing and re-establishing footholds in the near-abroad and further afield, he feels entitled to regard former USSR satellites as being obligated to Russia and is comfortable playing the heavy there irrespective of international rules of territorial integrity. In the Middle East, he has ingratiated himself with Syria, seeing no problem in aiding Bashar al-Assad in further subjugating and tormenting his Sunni population.

Would he permit intruding migrants from the Middle East, with their everlasting propensity to tribal violence, sectarian hostility and threats to stability and law and order wherever they congregate further complicate Russia's already fraught relations with its Muslim neighbours? The upsurge in violence and the diminishing of European culture and values through a vast influx of migrants from the Middle East and North Africa through the assent of the European Union's liberalism is a lesson Mr. Putin takes seriously.

His friend Angela Merkel's decisive acceptance of a million 'refugees' and asylum seekers to augment the millions Germany had already absorbed has changed that country just as it has Sweden, Denmark, Norway, the Netherlands and other hapless European nations, wreaking havoc in their social welfare in their public arena, in their cultures and in law and order. And he will have none of it. Attributing it to the weak-minded effect of liberalism.

And he's perfectly right.

Russian President Vladimir Putin listens during an interview with the Financial Times
Vladimir Putin says liberal ideals conflict with the interests of most people    Reuters

Labels: , , , , ,

Follow @rheytah Tweet