Protesters on a street in Tehran on 9 January Getty Images
"[We
witnessed] young people whose brains were smashed with live bullets,
and a mom who was shot in the neck,her two small children were crying in
the car, a child whose bladder, hip and rectum was crushed with a
bullet."
"What I witnessed will forever haunt me. I feel guilty that I'm alive."
Isfahan MD
"Our statistics are based on the documentation standards of human rights
organizations. They must either be confirmed by two independent
sources, or our organization must have direct access to a very reliable
source."
"Some
of these
statistics [Iran Human Rights estimates that there have been more than
25,000 deaths] include direct reports from victims as well as
information
from the medical field and reliable sources known to us."
Norway-based Iran Human Rights director Mahmood Amiry-Moghaddam
"[Around 7,000 serious eye injuries had been recorded in a specialized eye hospital in Tehran alone by January 16]."
"There are medical protocols in Iranian hospitals, and medical staff
generally refrain from reporting cases that could later be used for
criminal prosecution."
"We already observed this during the
Mahsa movement. Fortunately, medical staff are siding with the
protesters."
Amir Mobarez Parasta, Iranian-German eye surgeon, head, Munich eye center
Tehran protests Yalda Moaiery, Le Monde
Security
forces in Tehran were known to have opened fire from the roof of a
police station at protesters, firing live rounds into a crowded protest
march, one person shot in the head. The protests, small in number at
first when they began in late December, by early January the revolt by
ordinary Iranians had become bloated with people, and then security
forces began their deadly force. Iran's supreme leader Ayatollah Ali
Khamenei, by January 9 ordered the Supreme National Security Council to
crush the protests using any means at their disposal.
Videos
that were slipped out to Western news sources despite the regime
shutting down the internet and phone service show security forces firing
on protesters in cities across the country in early January. Photos
went into circulation of hundreds of victims of the violence taken to
hospitals or to morgues. The official death toll is in the low
thousands. Iran Human Rights, a group based in Norway monitoring the
situation in Iran confirmed 3,400 have been killed, while the Human
Rights Activists News Agency out of Washington identifies the death toll
at 5,200. Both these groups warn the number could eventually rise two
or three times higher.
According
to Iran's own National Security Council, 3,117 people have died,
listing among them 427 of its security forces. Ayatollah Khamenei and
other officials of his government place the blame on terrorist cells
allied with Israel and the United States, both as vectors of the
uprising and the violence that ensued. Gunmen and security forces are
shown on videos riding in pairs on motorbikes, using firearms, batons
and tear gas. This would be the feared and hated Basij, a volunteer
militia linked to the Islamic Republican Guard Corps.
One video filmed in Tehran shows protesters sheltering from gunfire, and a voice is heard to say: "Put your phone down, they'll shoot your hand off. There's a sniper among them." One
video filmed in Haft Howz Square, Tehran shows people running, and the
sound of gunfire. Some of the protesters have leg wounds, leaving trails
of blood as they flee, limping off. A video filming security forces
firing from a rooftop in the Tehran Pars neighbourhood shows rifle
muzzle blasts and the sound of hundreds of gunshots and automatic fire.
Hospitals
across the country, swamped by thousands of injured people in Tehran,
Mashhad, Isfahan and Zanjan, led doctors and nurses to share what they
witnessed, describing chaos, medical staff attempting frantically to
save lives while their hospital whites became drenched in blood.
Patients on benches and chairs and bare floors in the emergency rooms.
Hospitals short of blood, searching for trauma and vascular surgeons.
Their hospitals resembling a war zone. At the sprawling government
medical facility of Shohada Tajrish Hospital, medical staff saw about 70
gunshot-wounded protesters every hour on January 9 and 10, the two days
of peak violence.
In
scenes he described as 'terrifying' one doctor in Mashhad spoke of
security forces appearing, and demanding access to patients so they
could arrest them. Doctors resorted to setting up an ad hoc triage unit
outside of the city for patients fearful of going to a hospital with
their wounds. Most victims were shot in the upper torso, head and neck,
and hundreds arrived dead or so terribly injured they succumbed to their
wounds.
Morgues
were overwhelmed with bodies in black plastic bags. Corpses stacked in
refrigerators, placed on floors with scattered row-on-row of bodies in
parking lots and courtyards where family members searching for their
loved ones would unzip bags hoping to recognize the familiar features of
a son, a father, a daughter known to have been killed, so they could be
buried with honour. "It's a line. A line of people, so they can pick up their deceased. The young people. Their apple of their eyes", one man said.
By January 12 the protests dwindled, people stayed in their homes as security forces prowled the streets.
The killings that swept Iran last month revived memories of 1988, when
the Islamic Republic erased thousands of political prisoners in silence Lawdan Bazargan, Iran Insight
The prospect of a US military strike
against Iran over its violent crackdown on protests has laid bare a
shift in Middle East geopolitics—one marked by the unexpected upending
of long-standing rivalries between Iran and regional powers such as
Saudi Arabia and Turkey.
When
protests erupted
in Iran on December 28, 2025, few anticipated that they would reveal
deep-seated geopolitical anxieties in Riyadh and Ankara. As the
demonstrations spread across the country and drew warnings from US
President Donald Trump of possible military intervention in support of
the protesters, Saudi Arabia and Turkey—along with Qatar and
Oman—unexpectedly rallied behind the Iranian regime, primarily due to
concerns about the potential consequences of a regime change in Iran.
To
be fair, prior to the Iranian protests, relations between Tehran and
its rivals Riyadh and Ankara were not tense; in fact, they were moving
toward closer engagement, with Saudi Arabia following up on the
Chinese-brokered agreement with Iran and Turkey even planning a
presidential visit.
The protests, by highlighting the fragility of Iran’s political order,
triggered new threat perceptions in Saudi Arabia and Turkey, leading
both countries to lobby the Trump administration to refrain from
military action against Iran.
While
Turkey and Saudi Arabia hold differing views on Iran, they share a
rarely highlighted concern: Israel’s potential influence in a
post-Islamic Republic Iran. Both initially assessed
that the protests were unlikely to topple the regime, yet the emergence
of Reza Pahlavi—and his January 8–11 calls that drew massive crowds to
the streets—heightened their anxieties. Monarchist chants calling for
the return of the Pahlavi dynasty dominated the protests.
Reza Pahlavi, who has built strong relations with Israel,
is far from a unifying figure in Iran’s polarized political landscape.
His rise has unsettled non-Persian communities and devout segments of
the population. Yet, from the perspectives of Saudi Arabia and Turkey,
the surge of pro-Pahlavi chants across Iran suggested that Israel and
the United States could expand their influence if the regime were to
collapse. Amid the protests in Iran, Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan
Fidan went so far as to accuse Israel
of orchestrating the unrest, highlighting Ankara’s deep concerns about
instability in Tehran. Notwithstanding, Saudi Arabia and Turkey were
almost certain that Iranian protests, if left to their own devices,
would not succeed in toppling the Iranian regime. US threats of a
potential military strike in support of the protesters, however,
radically changed risk assessments in Riyadh and Ankara.
Depending on how the situation in Iran evolves, the alliance of the
‘elders’ may soon be challenged by an emerging bloc of younger Middle
Eastern states—comprising the UAE, Israel, and the Republic of
Azerbaijan—smaller states that share a convergence of strategic
interests in Iran and beyond.
So far, the US president’s decision
to dial down threats of military action against Iran has contributed to
preserving the status quo in the Middle East, especially after the
Islamic Republic violently quelled protests. However, a significant
military strike against Iran could open the door to profound
geopolitical shifts across the region.
Said Khanafira, (doctoral researcher, Simon Fraser University, Canada) Geopolitical Monitor
Reza Pahlavi, Geopolitical Monitor
"Hopefully,
Iran will quickly 'Come to the Table' and negotiate a fair and
equitable deal -- NO NUCLEAR WEAPONS -- one that is good for all
parties."
"Time is running out, it is truly of the essence!"
"The next attack will be far worse [than that of the summer of 2025]."
U.S. President Donald Trump
"Iran
stands ready for dialogue based on mutual respect and interests -- BUT
IF PUSHED, IT WILL DEFEND ITSELF AND RESPOND LIKE NEVER BEFORE!"
Iranian Embassy in Washington
A screen grab from a
video taken between 9 and 11 January purportedly showing dozens of
bodies outside a morgue in Kahrizak on the outskirts of Tehran, Iran's
capital. Photograph: AP
Appealing
to Muslim states in the Middle East, a desperate Iran has reached out
in a manner totally unlike its usual cloistered relations with majority
Sunni Arab states, as the sole non-Arab Muslim state in the region. The
Damocles Sword of an imminent attack by the United States on the Persian
Islamic Republic has generated panic among the mullahs of the regime.
Attacked by their own persecuted population over economic hardships that
ignited a protest against the sinking value of the rial and the rising
cost of living, the bloody crackdown by the regime drew the ire of the
Trump administration articulating a red line whose crossing would bring
the regime's downfall.
The
world has witnessed a number of widespread populist uprisings in the
Islamic Republic of Iran. All of which were met with violence committed
by the Basij and components of the Iranian Republican Guard Corps,
ideologically-driven to stifle protest by all means that could be
deployed through military-style intervention, while the Iranian Police,
committed to the welfare of their country but informed through the
metric of public order and security may have dealt less harshly with the
protesting public.
The
deaths of thousands of protesting civilians in outbursts taking place
throughout the country, in each of its cities where vulnerable courage
has met implacable denial, first with conventional crowd-control
measures and threats for people to return to their homes, then
increasingly with deadly fire, has captured the notice of the world,
with videos, photographs and personal accounts reaching the outside
world until the regime closed down the internet and peoples' modes of
communication were slammed shut.
Threats
by President Donald Trump of wartime measures his country would take to
defend the protest movement should the massive death count continue,
and hanging of protesters proceed as threatened by Iran's judiciary,
have had their impact. Fear of an invasion has shattered the level of
bombast-confidence that usually issues from the regime's elite
government circles. With an attack impending should Trump finally make
that decision, Saudi Arabia and the UAE let it be known their air or
ground or sea space would be off limits for any U.S. attack on Iran.
Photo provided by the U.S. Navy shows a Boeing F/A-18E Super
Hornet landing on the Nimitz-class aircraft carrier USS Abraham Lincoln
in the Indian Ocean on Jan. 22, 2026. (Mass Communication Specialist
Seaman Daniel Kimmelman/U.S. Navy via AP)
The
USS Abraham Lincoln has been moved to the region along with a number of
guided missile destroyers whose utility can be achieved though simply
launching attacks from the sea. The American armada that has moved into
position is prepared to achieve any goal commanded by the White House.
With communications cut off, it is no longer possible to receive
reliable information on killing of peaceful demonstrators and mass
execution of detainees.
Iranians
have been ordered to remain in their homes. There have been reports of
wounded being taken out of hospitals or shot in hospitals by the
regime's enforcers. People have been forced to pay a ransom to receive
the bodies of their loved ones, and not all have the wherewithal to
retrieve the bodies for a funeral to take place leaving the families in
the double grip of the desolate grief of deprivation. State media now
refer to the protesters as 'terrorists', the preferred term of the
regime.
"I feel that my generation failed to give a better lesson to younger ones."
"The result of decades of teaching by my colleagues and me led to deaths of thousands, and maybe more injured and prisoners."
Mohammad Heidari, Tehran teacher
Iranian authorities responded with lethal force as the protests in Tehran escalated on 8 January Wana via Reuters
The Obdurate Autocratic Failings of the Chinese Communist Party on Zero-COVID
"The party and the people are trying to seek a new equilibrium."
"There will be some intsability in the process."
"Without the clear signal of party leader divisions -- I would expect this kind of protest might not last very log."
"[It is] unimaginable [that Xi would back down, and the party is experienced in handling protests]."
Hung Ho-fung, Johns Hopkins University
"[The West's vaccines offer] a major solution [to China's COVID problems."
"[According
to health experts zero-COVID is unlikely to be achieved until vaccine
uptake among China's elderly sees an improvement]."
"[Efforts are underway to increase coverage but] it's unlikely things will get better for the next half of the new year."
Xi Chen, associate professor, Yale University
A protester is arrested by police in Shanghai on Sunday night. HECTOR RETAMAL/AFP/AFP via Getty Image
Local
authorities in China, making no allusion to credit the mass protests
springing up all over China against the crude lockup methods being
employed to stem the rising tide of COVID-19 outbreaks, have begun to
ease imposed restrictions reflecting the state's zero-COVID mandate. In
Beijing, the city government announced it plans to phase out gating to
block access to apartment compounds where infections are diagnosed.
Manufacturing
and trade centre Guangzhou, the current hot-spot in the latest wave of
infections, announced that selected residents no longer will be required
to undergo mass testing. The stringent measures originally in place to
minimize deaths at the same time that other countries suffered
magnitudes of infections and deaths no longer has the silent consent of
the Chinese population.
According
to the Chinese Communist Party ruling China, anti-coronavirus measures
must continue "targeted and precise", while at the same time the least
possible disruption should be caused to people's lives; local officials
threatened with their jobs or similar punishments should outbreaks
occur, codify their own strategies to match the central government's
zero-COVID command-and-control demands.
Their
response has been the imposition of quarantines and allied restrictions
exceeding what the central government recommends. Hardships imposed on
the population appear to be of no concern to the Xi administration,
beyond the anodyne recommendations that lockdowns not cause community
unrest. Millions of people in Shanghai were placed under strict lockdown
in the spring, resulting in food scarcity and access to medical care
being restricted.
Despite
the ensuing turmoil, Xi loyalist, the city's party secretary, saw
appointment to the No.2 position of the Communist Party. On the past
weekend, protests were so sweeping in numbers and inclusivity many from
among the educated urban middle class of the ethnic Han majority were in
full vocal attendance. This is the group the ruling party relies upon
to recognize a post-Tiananmen agreement that a better quality of life
would accompany autocratic rule.
Following
a fire on Thursday that killed at least ten people living in an
apartment building in the city of Urumqi, where residents have been
locked into their homes for four months, furious protests erupted
particularly when the city council suggested those that died were
insufficiently motivated to save themselves, prompting an avalanche of
angry online questions whether firefighters or people attempting to
escape the fire were blocked by locked doors or similar pandemic
restrictions.
Foreign
governments have suggested to Beijing that it use vaccines developed in
the West to improve protection for its people, and once more effective
vaccines are widely used the government could reconsider and ratchet
back the draconian restrictions of the current zero-COVIDpolicy.
Beijing has consistently refused to import the mRNA-based more highly
successful vaccines developed by Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna, insisting
its own home-grown vaccines are effective.
They
are not, however. Moreover, the most vulnerable in the population, the
elderly, have not received vaccinations in numbers that should satisfy
any responsible government. Analysis indicates that millions of
unprotected people could perish under current circumstances should
zero-COVID be abandoned. The acceptance of Western vaccinations could
turn that scenario around.
"Europe and Germany have had very good experience with administering mRNA vaccinations", stated Steffen Hebestreit, adding that Olaf Scholz had "made this clear"
to Chinese officials during a visit by the German chancellor to China.
China is steadfast in its reliance on its own vaccines based on older
technology, failing to offer the same protection as the West's vaccines
against severe disease and death.
"'Zero
COVID' [was] supposed to demonstrate the superiority of the 'Chinese
model', but ended up demonstrating the risk that when authoritarian
regimes make mistakes, those mistakes can be colossal."
"But
I think the regime has backed itself into a corner and has no way to
yield. It has lots of force, and if necessary, it will use it."
Andrew Nathan, Chinese politics specialist, Columbia University
Protesters are fed up with lockdowns, but their government is not budging
"[The
Islamic Republic's] strategic patience [is wearing thin; Tehran is
preparing to[] punish [them: the U.S., United Kingdom, Israel and Saudi
Arabia for their role in fomenting protests in Iran]."
"[The
U.K. would] pay [for harbouring journalists working for a
Persian-language satellite channel based in London whom British police
have warned that the IRGC] represents an imminent, credible and
significant risk to their lives and those of their families]."
Esmaeil Khatib, Iranian Intelligence Minister
"[We
warned back in 2006 that Iran represents a threat to] the entire free
world [as it] is not only seeking nuclear weapons, it is also
destabilizing Lebanon with its Hezbollah proxy, supporting Palestinian
terrorist groups, fueling Shiite militancy in Iraq and urging that
Israel be wiped off the map."
National Post editorial
"[The National Post, as an institution, has been sanctioned by the Iranian Foreign Ministry for its] anti-Iran approach."
"[The sanctions are being imposed on the newspaper and eight individuals] for
supporting terrorism and the Mojahedin Khalq Organization (MKO)
terrorist group, inciting and encouraging terrorist acts and violence
against the people of Iran, propagating false information about Iran and
participation in the implementation and escalation of oppressive
sanctions against the people of Iran."
"Obviously, the sanctions will not rule out the criminal prosecution of
the individuals in competent courts of law due to their involvement in
criminal actions."
National Post, 4 November 2022
In
this photo taken by an individual not employed by the Associated Press
and obtained by the AP outside Iran, Iranians protests the death of
22-year-old Mahsa Amini after she was detained by the morality police
last month, in Tehran, Thursday, Oct. 27, 2022.Photo by AP Photo/Middle East Images
The
Conservative-led government of then-Prime Minister Stephen Harper
closed off diplomatic relations with Iran in 2012. Cited were Iran's
intrusions in Canada on the lives of Iranian-Canadians, an 8-month
attack on the British embassy in Tehran giving notice that diplomats are
in danger there. The fact that Iran was providing military aid to the
Assad regime in the civil war in Syria, another; failing to comply with
UN resolutions on its nuclear program, along with support of terrorist
groups. Also cited was Iran's routine threatening of Israel's
existence, its racist antisemitic rhetoric and genocidal incitement.
Official Canada spoke of Iran as "among the world's worst violators of human rights".
The
Liberal, Trudeau government that followed stated its intention of
restoring diplomatic relations with Iran. And in fact, negotiations
between Canada and the Islamic Republic were taking place to achieve
that end. Given more recent episodes in Iran's ongoing persecution of
its people and its new role in providing Russia with killer drones in
Ukraine, along with the stalemate between the IAEA over nuclear
inspections and the continued stalling on a nuclear program that is
close to achieving Tehran's purpose, capped by the murder by morality
police of Mahsa Amini, a Kurdish woman, resulting in widespread
protests, diplomatic renewal is no longer on the horizon.
The
ongoing protests erupting in every city across the country have brought
out the country's police forces making use of deadly force. Estimates
vary widely, but according to the group Human Rights Activists in Iran
the most recent figures are over 300 dead, although other sources place
that figure much higher. Tens of thousands of Iranians have been
arrested. A week ago the Iranian parliament voted in favour of the death
penalty to teach them -- protesters -- "a good lesson". The possbility
of mass executions cannot be entirely discounted should the regime feel
itself endangered.
Mourners chanted anti-establishment slogans at the funerals of two protesters killed in Javanroud Hengaw
In
the past decade, an estimated 6,876 Iranians have been executed, among
them 67 youth and 185 women. The execution of protesters for crimes
against god and nation are in their nascent stages. The International
Atomic Energy Agency has released a report noting the Islamic Republic
has amassed some 62.3 kilograms of 60 percent enriched uranium, a mere
step from weapons-grade. Last week an IRGC official laid claim to his
country's having developed hypersonic missiles able to evade modern
air-defence systems.
The
current government of Canada has been derelict in dealing adequately
with the threat that Iran poses to the international community. It
remains hesitant to list the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps as a
terrorist organization, which it clearly is, and despite the fact that
the Parliament of Canada voted in favour of doing just that. It would be
humorous if it were not so diabolically serious that Iran accused
Canadians it has targeted for sanctions of "facilitating and supporting terrorist acts". Threatening the seizure of the property in Iran of the eight Canadians sanctioned; of which there are precisely none.
Nor
may they make use of Iran's banking system, or travel to the country.
They are, needless to say, horribly disappointed. The people of Iran,
out on the streets protesting courageously braving the assaults from the
basij paramilitary and the riot squads and other policing agencies have
seen expatriate Iranians living abroad coming out in droves to protest
before Iranian embassies in foreign cities. They have seen people not of
Iranian origin worldwide express solidarity with their struggle and
protesting on their behalf to reawaken the world's conscience.
What
they need, desperately, to see is the regime of the Ayatollahs and the
IRGC falter and fall. Leaving the population to recover its dignity and
its hope for the future. A population that will be free to choose for
itself whether it will remain a theocracy, whether it will continue to
foment violence and terrorism at home and abroad, or will relax the
restrictions imposed on them to be victims bound to a theological
ideology that has been corrupted and anti-human in its sweep of human
rights violations.
Soccer Football - FIFA World Cup Qatar 2022 - Group B - England v
Iran - Khalifa International Stadium, Doha, Qatar - November 21, 2022
Iran players line up before the match REUTERS/Hannah Mckay
"Today it was the bloodiest day since the coup happened on the 1st of February."
"We had today -- only today -- 38 people died. We have now more than over fifty people died since the coup started, and many are wounded."
Christine Schraner Burgener, United Nations special envoy on Myanmar
"The systematic brutality of the military junta is once again on horrific display throughout Myanmar."
"I urge members of the UN Security Council to view the photos/videos of the shocking violence being unleashed on peaceful protesters before meeting in Friday's close-door session."
Tom Andrews, UN special rapporteur on human rights in Myanmar
"The problem for Asean is that Myanmar’s armed forces have brought the bar so low — without wiggle room — with their naked seizure of power after losing yet another election [November ballot]in a landslide."
"The Myanmar junta puts up no pretence of popular legitimacy, only a raw power grab that has turned the entire population against it."
Thitinan Pongsudhirak, professor of political science, Chulalongkorn University, Thailand
"This isn't a non-lethal tactic to disperse protesters. This is an
attack on peaceful protesters throughout the country."
"And these
are not crowd control techniques, this is an attack on civilians and
people protesting against the military takeover."
John
Quinley, Senior Human Rights Specialist, at Fortify Rights
Protesters run from police firing tear gas during a pro-democracy demonstration in Mandalay, Myanmar, on Wednesday. CNN
According to witnesses, police and soldiers in Myanmar gave little warning as they opened fire on protesters. Last month's military coup in the country after a landslide election returned Aung San Suu Kyi's government to power outraged citizens who mounted massive protests against the military junta, shouting their anger and rage, insisting that democracy must return to the country and Aung San Suu Kyi released to take her rightful place at the country's head.
The military leaders warned the population not to continue their protests. In response all over the country's cities protests have continued. The military and the police have responded with escalating violence. On Wednesday 38 people were killed, representing the most violent day since protests began. "It's horrific, it's a massacre. No words can describe the situation and our feelings", said activist Thinzar Shunlei Yi. Among the dead were four children.
Attribution: SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty
In Yangon, at least eight people were killed, according to witnesses, when security forces opened sustained fire in the north of the city. "I heard so much continuous firing, I lay down on the ground, they shot a lot", 23-year-old Kaung Pyae Sone Tun, said, describing the panic and the horror. At nightfall residents of Yangon lit candles and held prayers for the dead.
According to Save the Children, a 14-year-old boy was reported shot dead by Radio Free Asia when a soldier on a passing convoy of military trucks, shot him. Foreign ministers from southeast Asian neighbours failed to unite behind a call for the release of Suu Kyi and the restoration of democracy, as they pleaded for restraint from the military.
"Sayyid [Hassan Nasrallah, Hezbollah leader] means a lot to me. There are thousands who admire him, but I'm like Number 100 on the list." "Please help us [video of apology for denouncing Nasrallah]. Really, we're starving ... We don't have jobs." Lebanese Shiite
"Hezbollah has never prioritized bread-and-butter issues, but suddenly they're faced with a community that's basically saying, bread and butter are a priority." "It's now part of a government that's corrupt, and they can't blame others for the corruption; they're part of the corruption equation." Randa Slim, Lebanon analyst, Middle East Institute
Anti-government demonstrators rally behind barbed wire in downtown Beirut on Jan. 25. Anwar Amro/AFP/Getty Images
"The [military security] officer was forcefully raising my arms above my head, and another came on a motorcycle and hit me in the
back. I felt a pop in my back.” “They would take us outside of the [prison] building; we felt air as if we’re in
an open space [blindfolded]." "Suddenly, someone comes over and tells us to
kneel, pushing us to the floor … reloads a Kalashnikov over our heads,
waits a bit, then takes us back inside.” Basal, Lebanese protester, among hundreds taken into custody
Since October 17 when the protests in Lebanon first began, hundreds of protesters have been injured in the melees between themselves and the military, and hundreds more have been imprisoned. Unlike protests taking place in Iraq, however, where hundreds of people are known to have been killed and thousands injured, there have been no such reports in Lebanon. They decry their corrupt government and their dire living conditions. They want a change in government hoping that things will change for them; employment, opportunities, affordability of the basic necessities of life.
Where four people have died in Lebanon during the protests and the clashes, over 600 were killed in Iraq and in Iran at least 1500 protesters lost their lives. Iranians are desperate for a change in government, to be able to live their lives more freely, with prosperity and hope for the future, denied them by a government that invests in terrorism in support of a murderous regime in Syria where a half-million have died in almost a decade of civil war. Iran's Shiite axis of Syria, Iraq, Lebanon and Yemen is in poor health.
Basically, Iraq and Lebanon want a lot less of the Islamic Republic of Iran ordering their lives and their governments. An echo from Iranians themselves. And for all of them, the protests are of little avail.
Lebanese Shiites, loyal to Hezbollah and its leader, have turned critical of both. Hezbollah loyalists caught on television denouncing its leader in the early days of the uprising in Lebanon are now contrite; they have been warned to cease and desist. And because of that they have reappeared on television to counter their initial criticism of the leader of the terrorist militia which has achieved power in government, of a corrupt and failing country.
In Lebanon, of the 18 recognized religious sects, the Shiites represent the largest, dependent on Hezbollah for protection, employment, social services and a group loyalty in a shared struggle against enemies, principally Israel. Now entering its fifth month, Lebanon's disruptive protests that have roiled government have brought in people from all backgrounds united in their detestation for leaders incapable of guaranteeing their basic needs; a functional economy, good governance, reliable electricity.
For Shiites who joined in the protests and bitterly blamed Hezbollah for failing them, it represented a total rethink; how to be loyal to Hezbollah and critical of the government at the same time when Hezbollah now is the government? "I support resistance against Israel", declared 51-year-old Ali Ismail in Kafr Rumman, south Lebanon long dominated by Hezbollah and Amal the other Shiite power. "But I also support resistance against corruption", he added. He lacks party connections, and so is shut out of favouritism by either Shiite party.
In the early stage of the protests, Nasrallah told his supporters to go home. His words carry weight, his supporters believe Nasrallah is heroically responsible for having run Israel out of the country, after its 18-year occupation of southern Lebanon. He is considered personally incorruptible; Hezbollah and its allies dominated the government which resigned in October, as it does the new cabinet formed to take the place of the old one, in January.
Both Hezbollah and Amal followers have beaten protesters with sticks and fists. Threatening calls, anonymous What'sApp warnings of a "negative impact on your life", or visits telling those known to take part in protests, to stop protesting, by party representatives have troubled protesters. The protests, insinuates Hezbollah, are in reality a foreign-led conspiracy against Shiites, amply belied by the fact that the protesters are friends, neighbours and relatives.
"People used to watch Nasrallah's speeches without asking questions. But now, even though they still support him, they've started asking questions", Ihab Hassane, 29, a Shiite protester from Tyre explained. He is among those who have lost hope in Lebanon, planning to leave and go abroad. If the protests have accomplished anything, he believes, it has been to question the value of Hezbollah and Nasrallah to the Shiite community that supports it.
Protesters in central Beirut were quick to reject the new government EPA
This represents a general opinion site for its author. It also offers a space for the author to record her experiences and perceptions,both personal and public. This is rendered obvious by the content contained in the blog, but the space is here inviting me to write. And so I do.