Monday, January 26, 2026

The Gaza Board of Peace

"[The Board of Peace would] work with many others, including the United Nations."
"Once this board is completely formed, we can do pretty much whatever in conjunction with the United Nations. You know, I've always said the United Nations has got tremendous potential."
"Every one of them [those signing on the 'Board of Peace'] is a friend of mine. A couple, let's see, a couple I like, a couple I don't like."
"No, I like, actually, this group. I like every single one of them, can you believe it? Usually I have about two or three that I can't stand." 
"[I wish that] we didn't need a Board of Peace [but the UN had failed to help solve the world's conflicts]."
U.S. President Donald J. Trump
https://i.cbc.ca/ais/8f612cf8-f89b-4dcd-a025-c68c6ac790a6,1769206282159/full/max/0/default.jpg?im=Crop%2Crect%3D%280%2C3%2C5900%2C3318%29%3BResize%3D860
U.S. President Donald Trump, centre, sits with leaders of other countries during a signing ceremony for his 'Board of Peace' initiative aimed at resolving global conflicts, at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, on Thursday. (Jonathan Ernst/Reuters)
"I think what you're seeing is a board that has been cobbled together for Gaza with much bigger aspirations. But with a set of skills and a set of people that is really very Middle East centric, and I think has quite little relevance to crises outside of that region."
"Yes, the UN has very serious problems. But I think that doesn't mean that Europeans [and] many others — in South America, for example — want to see a world in which the White House, in which Trump, in which Americans acquire disproportionate power over these sorts of decisions."
"This is not just a contest that the U.S. can shape by itself and say, 'I'm done with the UN, it's over.' The Chinese will keep playing this game. Very powerful rising countries like Brazil and India will have a stake in the UN, and they will seek to influence its agencies and bodies more and more as the U.S. draws back." 
Shashank Joshi, defence editor, The Economist  
President Donald Trump in Davos officially launched his Board of Peace initiative, claiming his very personal project so dear to his heart which may yet gain him 2026's nomination for the Nobel Peace Prize, joined on stage by his board's founding members comprised of political allies such as President Javier Milei of Argentina, Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban and representatives from Bahrain, Morocco, Azerbaijan, Bulgaria, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Turkey, the United Arab Emirates and Uzbekistan.
 
All of whom were pleased to join Mr. Trump at the document signing table where the board's charter was declared to be 'in full force', as an "official international organization". Phase two of the Peace Plan is set to proceed, despite the fact that Phase one has not been fully implemented. And considering the critical nature of fully implementing the first portion of the plan focusing on dismantling and disarming the Hamas terrorist group governing Gaza, to follow on seems a trifle premature. It represents, in fact, a failure.
 
Not according to Mr. Trump who considers the initial peace plan phase successful, emphasizing his intention and that of the United States to have Gaza 'properly rebuilt'. There are some heads of state who, given the uncertainties that lie ahead and their concerns regarding the makeup of the board's membership who prefer to hang back before finalizing their decisions to join, and others who are certain there is no good reason for them to be part of the notional planned success. 
 
https://static-cdn.toi-media.com/www/uploads/2025/10/AFP__20251013__78MR6PK__v1__HighRes__EgyptUsIsraelPalestinianConflictTrump-1024x640.jpg
US President Donald Trump (C) speaks during the Sharm El-Sheikh Peace Summit in the Egyptian Red Sea resort town of Sharm el-Sheikh on October 13, 2025. (Photo by SAUL LOEB / AFP)
 
American allies, part of the Group of Seven, remain uneasily on the sidelines. Originally the board was proposed to help oversee the reconstruction of Gaza. A broader purpose has been newly revealed: to "secure enduring peace on areas affected or threatened by conflict", a vision that places many U.S. allies on alert, concerned there is a hidden agenda to rival and perhaps replace the traditional 'relevance' of the United Nations.
 
That a new draft plan suggests countries joining the board contribute $1 billion each should they wish to  place themselves past the initial three-year registration to permanent status, may have taken many aback. The view being that Mr. Trump will remain its chairman in perpetuity, making all the decisions as its "inaugural chairman". The invitation extended to Russian President Vladimir Putin and Belarus's Alexander Lukashenko certainly persuaded Volodymyr Zelenskyy to politely turn down his own invitation, while raising eyebrows throughout Europe.
 
Altogether some 60 leaders were given invitations to join. France, the United Kingdom, Sweden, the Netherlands, Norway and Germany have declined their invitations. Canada accepted, but given its trade overtures to Beijing that followed, has been  summarily disinvited.  The UN Security Council had originally endorsed the Gaza plan, but may since have had second thoughts.
 
 
 

 

Labels: , , , , ,

Friday, May 11, 2018

Ending It

"My life has been rather poor for the last year or so. And I'm very happy to end it."
"At my age, and even at rather less than my age, one wants to be free to choose the death and when the death is the appropriate time."
David Goodall, 104 years old, British-born Australian scientist

"He wishes to have no funeral, no remembrance service or ceremony."
"David has no belief in the afterlife."
Exit International
Goodall at work in the 1950s.
Goodall at work in the 1950s.

He chose to die with the help of an intravenous drip of pentobarbital. This is a chemical used frequently as an anesthetic, but it can be deadly when excessive doses are used. Mr. Goodall was so anxious to get it over with, to be dispatched not into an afterlife, but into that dark nothingness of non-existence that he complained lightly that the process was taking longer than he expected it would, after all.

He took care to donate his 104-year-old corpse to medical science. Alternately, should no one see fit to take up his offer, he felt he would wish his ashes to be locally sprinkled, a soil amendment process, restoring to the earth what came of the earth, or in more familiar terms "ashes to ashes, dust to dust", irrespective of the fact that we are often informed that our atoms are comprised of stardust.

Even while he was hastening death, he took pains to inform reporters that it was his considered opinion that medically assisted suicide should be recognized as a boon and a bonus if not a right to those who wish to relinquish their lives to death. That it should not only be those who are terminally ill who can make that choice for themselves, but those like him, who have lived a long life and are prepared to leave it.

As he waited for the pentobarbital to do its work, he hummed and sang a bit of Beethoven's Ninth Symphony, casually awaiting the end of existence. "This is taking an awfully long time", he observed before losing consciousness. It was in a town outside the city of Basel, Switzerland that he left life. Liestal was his destination of travel, taking advantage of Switzerland's assisted-suicide laws.

It had taken him, he said, twenty years to finally realize his thoughts of surrendering life. Only when his quality of life had deteriorated to the point of no return, however, over the course of his final year of life, did he become determined to end it all. No longer mobile, restrictions placed on him by doctors' orders, and a law in Australia where he lived prohibiting him from taking his own life were among his complaints, but ill he was not.

David Goodall in his Basel hotel room, two days before his death.
David Goodall in his Basel hotel room, two days before his death.

Labels: ,

Friday, February 05, 2016

Europe -- Coping

"Our expenses on asylum-seekers are the second highest in the whole of the EU, if you look at the percentage of spending relative to GDP. Also, when we support asylum-seekers economically, it has clear economic consequences and the number of asylum seekers goes up dramatically."
"We have this basic principle that if you can support yourself then you have to do so. But if it’s gold — and it will be gold in some cases — then of course there is a world market for gold."
Danish Immigration Minister Inger Støjberg

"We don’t want to have refugees everywhere because this is not good for integration."
"The problem is we already have a lot of trouble with integration. It’s not possible for Denmark to take the same amount of refugees as Germany."
Kirsten Ketscher,  professor of social security and welfare law, University of Copenhagen 

"Even though few politicians will say directly in public, the goal seems to be to spread uncertainty among refugees outside Denmark about whether Denmark really is a welcoming country."
Kristian Jensen, integration researcher, Aarhus University
© Arnd Wiegmann
Arnd Wiegmann / Reuters
When word first arose in the international community that Denmark was preparing to pass a bill allowing authorities to seize cash and jewellery from refugees crossing into the country, to help pay for living in Danish asylum centres, Denmark was roundly castigated. That bill has now been passed.
“We want to limit the inflow,” Prime Minister Lars Loekke Rasmussen, stated, characterizing the new bill as "the most misunderstood bill in Denmark's history."

The purpose of the bill is obvious; like other European countries Denmark has been swamped with the presence of migrants, not necessarily from Syria, but mostly Syrian refugees, many of whom were able to leave the refugee camps in Turkey because they had valuable assets enabling them to pay their way. The bill will permit Danish authorities to take possession of cash and any individual items whose combined value exceeds 10,000 kroner (€1,340, $1,450) from migrants.

The limit of the value was raised to $1,450 bringing it in line with another law which requires Danes to sell all of their valuables before they are permitted to apply for unemployment benefits. Now Switzerland too has stated it is prepared to introduce legislation to force refugees to surrender cash and valuables to Swiss authorities to help pay for their upkeep. The Swiss decision follows the controversial plan implemented by Denmark.
Refugees arriving in Switzerland, once their bill is passed will have to turn over assets they possess valued at over 1,000 Swiss francs ($997). "If you have property worth more than 1,000 Swiss francs when you arrive at a reception center you are required to give up these financial assets in return for a receipt,” an information sheet for refugees states.

Europe is under great stress, and there is no sign in the near future that the catastrophic conflict that has led to the floods of refugees and migrants streaming into Europe will be ending any time soon. There is concerning anticipation that in fact, with spring on the way if anything that flood will turn into yet another massive deluge.
  • "Sweden sends sharp signal with plan to expel up to 80,000 asylum seekers";
  • "Finnish PM drops promise to let refugees use his home";
  • "Norway is latest country to propose seizing asylum seekers' cash and valuables".
Those quickest to condemn these countries are those who are not facing an invasion of refugees and migrants from countries whose governments are harassing and exploiting their populations, where endemic poverty and unemployment offers no future for citizens governed by tyrannical rulers where dissent is not tolerated and prison and torture beckons as an alternative to grovelling in fear of alerting authorities to discontent.

Sweden has taken in 160,000 asylum seekers and is preparing to expel half that number. It is a country of ten million people with a limit to absorption of those whose heritage, culture and religion represents an upheaval of striking proportions boding ill for the future. Austria too has put a cap on refugee arrivals at 1.5 percent of its population.

Last month an International Monetary Fund report estimated that Denmark faced a Syrian refugee financial burden equivalent to 0.57 percent of GDP for 2016. The estimate for Sweden was one percent. In an Oxfam report released this week countries' 2015 contributions to the Syrian refugee crisis was measured where Denmark contributed far more than its fair share at 318 percent; Norway at 385 percent; Sweden at 142 percent and Finland at 136 percent.
© Johan Nilsson
Johan Nilsson / Reuters

Labels: , , , , , ,

Tuesday, May 21, 2013

   
Gatestone Institute

Switzerland: Multicultural Paradise?

In March, the Swiss Federal Intelligence Service announced that a growing number of jihadists are being recruited in Switzerland. The number of robberies and assaults on Swiss trains has skyrocketed to such an extent that the Swiss government recently opted to equip transport police with firearms, and at least 1,400 women in Switzerland have been victims of forced marriages.
A controversial new report by the Swiss government claims that Muslim immigrants are so well integrated into Swiss society that no further federal policies or programs are needed to promote Muslim integration or to counter Islamic extremism.

Published by the Swiss Federal Council [Bundesrat] on May 8, the 102-page study -- known by the short title, "The Situation of Muslims in Switzerland" -- so completely downplays the countless problems associated with Muslim immigration in Switzerland that the report has been ridiculed as being worthy of a "case study in political correctness."

The report was first commissioned by proponents of multiculturalism within the Swiss Cabinet shortly after Swiss voters overwhelmingly approved a referendum in November 2009 to ban the construction of minarets, the tower-like structures on mosques that are often used to call Muslims to prayer.

The surprise outcome of the referendum, which passed with a clear majority of 57.5% of the voters, represented a turning point in the debate about Muslim immigration in Switzerland.

Among other matters, the referendum exposed the growing gap between Swiss multiculturalists and ordinary Swiss voters on the issue of Muslim immigration. The Swiss Federal Council had campaigned hard against the ban, arguing it would "endanger peace between religions" and "hinder integration." After the ban was approved, the government launched a multi-pronged effort to "educate" the Swiss populace through taxpayer-funded pro-Islam research.

The latest report estimates the Muslim population of Switzerland to be between 350,000 and 400,000, or around 5% of the total population of 8 million. The vast majority of Muslims in the country originate from the Balkans, Turkey and North Africa, and roughly one-third are Swiss citizens. Many of them are second- and third-generation immigrants firmly establishing themselves in Switzerland.

The report says that most Muslims in Switzerland are not religious; only 12% to 15% of Muslims in the country regularly attend a mosque. According to the study, Islam in Switzerland is neither homogenous nor monolithic; it is organized around multiple ethno-linguistic identities that rarely interact with each other.

The greatest barriers to Muslim integration are due to language, not religion, says the study, and serious problems related to Islam occur "only in exceptional cases." The study notes that the vast majority of Muslims are fully integrated into Swiss society, that Islam presents no particular problems for daily life in Switzerland, and that Islam rarely leads to social conflict. As a result, the study says, the government has decided that no further measures are necessary to promote Muslim integration.

At the same time, however, the report says that Muslims in Switzerland often feel discriminated against, and that the government needs to do more to educate Swiss citizens about "Islamophobia." Muslim "victims" also need to be better informed of their legal rights under existing anti-discrimination laws.

Needless to say, Muslims have welcomed the government's conclusions. In a press release, the Islamic Central Council of Switzerland (IZRS), a radical Salafist group that states its desire to install Islamic Sharia law in Switzerland, said the report provides information that could help "reduce widespread fear in the Swiss population." The IZRS -- which has been monitored by Swiss intelligence for its anti-constitutional activities -- also called on the Swiss Federal Council to take action against the "spread of Islamophobia" in Switzerland.

The study has left many Swiss voters scratching their heads in disbelief because it is common knowledge that the twin issues of multiculturalism and Muslim immigration are far more problematic than the rosy assessment proffered by Swiss cabinet.

According to a recent survey of popular perceptions of Islam produced by the Bertelsmann Foundation, fully half of all Swiss voters view Islam as a threat to their country, and 58% believe it does not belong in the Western world. Two-thirds of Swiss voters view Islam as a source of conflict. Considering that hardly a day goes by without news of some Islam-related problem in Switzerland, those survey results are not surprising.

In May 2013, for example, it emerged that more than two-thirds of the pupils attending 80 schools in Zürich do not speak any German. At one school in the Sihlfeld district of Zürich, only one pupil is a native German speaker. In Basel, the lack of German language skills among Muslim immigrants is so acute that politicians are seeking to establish quotas at the so-called ghetto schools, requiring that at least 30% of the students at any given school be native German speakers.

Also in May, the Supreme Court of Switzerland ruled that a 14-year-old Muslim girl could not be excused from swimming lessons just because the teacher was male. Her parents had sought permission, but school officials had rejected the request. In its ruling, the Supreme Court referred to a 2008 ruling that established the principle that obligatory swimming lessons take precedence over religious duties.

In April, it emerged that since the beginning of the Arab Spring, the crime rate in Switzerland has doubled, and some politicians are now demanding that all male asylum seekers from North Africa and the Middle East provide DNA samples that would be stored in a data bank to help Swiss police investigate crimes.

In March, the Swiss Federal Intelligence Service (FIS) warned that a growing number of jihadists [holy warriors] are being recruited in Switzerland. In an interview with the Swiss newspaper Berner Oberländer on March 11, the head of Swiss intelligence, Markus Seiler, said, "What worries us, is that there are more and more people in our country who are recruiting Swiss people for jihad." More than two dozen Swiss Muslims are thought to have travelled to Syria to join the fighting there.

In February, the Vimentis polling platform, in its annual survey for 2013, found that immigration is by far the top issue of concern for Swiss voters. It also found that nearly 70% of Swiss voters favor increasing the number of police officers in the country due to rising levels of insecurity.

In January, Swiss authorities said they are bracing for a massive increase in asylum seekers in 2013. The government had budgeted for 23,000 asylum applications for 2013, but that figure is forecast to hit 30,000. Costs to deal with political refugees are expected to explode to 1.43 billion francs ($1.5 billion).

In November 2012, the chief of police for the Swiss canton of Zug, Beat Villiger, said Switzerland needs at least 1,500 more police officers to fight a crime wave perpetrated by foreign gangs. Villiger said: "The professionalization of criminals in the areas of pickpocketing, tricks and skimming [from ATM machines using duplicate credit card readers and wireless cameras] is rising." He also called for special prisons for failed asylum seekers and increased video surveillance in trains. The number of robberies and assaults on Swiss trains has skyrocketed to such an extent that the Swiss government recently opted to equip transport police with firearms.

Also in November, Swiss police arrested several members of a Muslim gang called Jamahat who forced adolescents from disadvantaged families in the cities of Le Locle and La Chaux-de-Fonds to convert to Islam and then to sell drugs. The Jamahat gang is made up of young Muslim men originally from Afghanistan, Chechnya and the former Yugoslavia. According to police, the group "is attempting to radicalize its activities by seeking to impose -- by physical and psychological violence -- a monopoly on the sale of marijuana in our region."

In nearby Lausanne, the imam of a local mosque was accused of polygamy after he married a Swiss woman who converted to Islam. Both the imam and the woman were already legally married to other spouses. The polygamous marriage was performed in a religious ceremony; however, in Switzerland only civil marriages are officially recognized by the state.

In October, Muslims complained about "offensive" advertising by Swiss Airlines. The campaign included large-format posters depicting an airplane with the red and white cross of the Swiss flag painted on the tail fin, accompanied by the slogan "Cross is Trump" [Kreuz ist Trumpf, a play on words referring to card games]. Muslims were outraged by what they said was a "Christian slogan used as a provocation and attack against Islam." Swiss Airlines said its advertising campaign carries no religious or political message.

Also in October, a sixth grade boy at a school in Winterthur was forced to change schools after Muslim children repeatedly pressured him to convert to Islam. The problems began after one of the boys, whose father is an imam, tried to force the boy to pray to Allah. After the boy refused, the Muslim child began ridiculing his Christian faith. Soon thereafter, other Muslim classmates (14 of the 19 boys in the sixth grade class are Muslim) began harassing the boy, even calling for him to be killed for refusing to bow the knee to Allah. Muslim children at the same school have also sought to enforce Islamic dress codes.

That same month, a gym teacher at the André-Chavanne school in Geneva prevented female students from using a track field on Fridays because of complaints from a nearby mosque. When outraged parents confronted the teacher, she justified her action by saying she was concerned for the girls' safety because Muslims had previously shouted insults at them.

In September, the Swiss House of Representatives voted against banning Muslim women from wearing burkas in public spaces. Parliamentarians who voted against the burka ban argued it would "encourage negative opinions of Switzerland" and "hurt tourism from Muslim countries."

In August, a study conducted by a pair of academics from the University of Neuchâtel found that at least 1,400 Muslim women in Switzerland have been the victims of forced marriages. Most forced marriages involve Muslim immigrants from the Balkans, Turkey and Sri Lanka.
In June, Swiss police warned that radical Muslim groups are using Switzerland as a base from which to promote jihad in Europe and beyond. Islamists in Switzerland are providing jihadists with logistical support, and also stepping up their use of Internet websites there to spread Islamic propaganda as well as to incite their supporters to commit acts of terrorism and violence. In response to the rising threat from radical Islam, Swiss police launched a new specialist IT research department to intensify efforts to monitor jihadist websites and their operators.

In February, leading Islamic groups in Switzerland announced plans to establish their own parliament that will enable all of the country's Muslims to "speak with one voice," and that their new "parliament" will be based on the principles of Islamic Sharia law. Swiss analysts, according to an exposé published by the newspaper Basler Zeitung, say the initiative is an effort to establish a "parallel" legislative body in Switzerland that will be a mouthpiece for Islamic fundamentalists who are seeking to impose Sharia law in the country.

In January, the extremist Islamic Central Council of Switzerland (IZRS) announced that it was trying to raise money from countries in the Persian Gulf to build a 20-million Swiss franc ($21 million) mega-mosque in Bern. With three floors, the planned mosque would be the biggest in Switzerland. In addition to a prayer room for more than 500 worshippers, the building would have conference and training rooms, shops, underground parking and a garden.

In September 2011, an immigrant group based in Bern called for the emblematic white cross to be removed from the Swiss national flag because as a Christian symbol it "no longer corresponds to today's multicultural Switzerland." In an interview with the Swiss newspaper Aargauer Zeitung, a Muslim activist said the cross has a Christian background, and while the Christian roots of Switzerland should be respected, "it is necessary to separate church and state" because "Switzerland today has a great religious and cultural diversity. One has to ask if the State wants to continue building up a symbol in which many people no longer believe."
Soeren Kern is a Senior Fellow at the New York-based Gatestone Institute. He is also Senior Fellow for European Politics at the Madrid-based Grupo de Estudios Estratégicos / Strategic Studies Group. Follow him on Facebook.
Related Topics:  Soeren Kern

Labels: , , , , ,

Follow @rheytah Tweet