Morsi in Turkey, Calls for Support for Syria and 'Palestine'
In an address in Turkey, Egypt's president urges support "the nations that are aspiring to freedom and independence."
By
Elad Benari, Canada
First Publish: 9/30/2012, 7:42 PM
Morsi speaks in Turkey
Reuters
Egyptian
President Mohammed
Morsi on Sunday discussed several pressing regional issues in an address
delivered at an annual conference of Turkey's ruling Justice and
Development Party.
"Our history, hopes and goals bind us together to achieve the freedom
and justice that all nations are struggling for," Morsi said during a
short
visit to Ankara, according to the Egyptian daily
Al-Ahram.
Morsi, on his first visit to Turkey as Egypt's president, urged members of the audience to support "the nations that are aspiring to freedom and independence."
“The Arab world and the Arab Spring need you and your support to achieve sought-for stability,” he said, according to
Al-Ahram.
Egypt, he went on, "supports the demand of the people for freedom
from oppression and occupation in both Syria and Palestine," stressing
Turkey's role as an "important element" in issues of concern to the
region.
Morsi also condemned the "misery" imposed on the Syrian people and the "bloodshed caused by the Syrian regime."
"The Syrian people have the right to choose their leaders," said the Egyptian president. "And this can only be achieved when they obtain their full freedom on their own soil and have our full support."
Morsi also expressed his hope for the eventual creation of an
independent Palestinian state with Jerusalem as its capital, urging his
listeners to support “the Palestinian national cause.”
He also stressed that the border between Egypt and Hamas-run Gaza
remained open "to meet our obligations to our brothers in Gaza."
Hamas political chief Khaled Mashaal also attended the conference in Turkey, along with several members of the Gaza government,
Al-Ahram reported.
"In Egypt, we aspire for stability, security and productivity," Morsi
declared in his speech. "The Egyptian people are now on the path
towards national revival and the establishment of a true civilization
for the nation."
He went on to reject any outside interference in Egypt's domestic affairs.
The speech comes amid reports earlier on Sunday that Morsi
has expressed willingness to meet top Israeli officials. According to the
Yisrael Hayom newspaper which published the report, his preference would be to meet with President Shimon Peres.
The report said that if such a meeting takes place it would occur in
Washington, shortly after the U.S. election. During the meeting, the two
officials would attempt to set a new basis for the sour
relations between Israel and Egypt, which nearly fell apart after an Egyptian mob stormed the Israeli embassy in Cairo last year.
Last week, in his address to the United Nations, Morsi
hit out at Israel over its veiled threats to attack Iran's nuclear facilities and the deadlock in the Middle East peace process.
Morsi said the Middle East "no longer tolerates" any country's
refusal to join the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty "especially if this
is coupled with irresponsible policies or arbitrary threats."
"The acceptance by the international community of the principle of
pre-emptiveness or the attempt to legitimize it is in itself a serious
matter and must be firmly confronted to avoid the prevalence of the law
of the jungle," he said.
Morsi also put the Israel-Arab conflict ahead of the Syria war in
the list of priorities he laid out before the General Assembly.
"The first issue which the world must exert all its efforts in
resolving, on the basis of justice and dignity, is the Palestinian
cause," Morsi said.
He said that UN resolutions on the conflict had not been implemented
and that
Palestinian Authority Arabs "must also taste the fruits of
freedom and dignity" that other countries in the Arab region have won in
the past year.
Arutz Sheva
Labels: Egypt, Islamism, Israel, Political Realities
Bangladeshi Muslims burn 10 Buddhist temples over Facebook photo
Rioters pinned a Facebook photo of a burning Quran on a local Buddhist boy, but it's unclear if the boy posted the photo or not.
By
Associated Press /
September 30, 2012
Bangladeshi
Buddhist monks form a human chain during a protest against attacks on
Buddhist temples and homes, in front of national press club in Dhaka
September 30. Hundreds of Muslims in Bangladesh burned at least four
Buddhist temples and 15 homes of Buddhists on Sunday after complaining
that a Buddhist man had insulted Islam, police and residents said. The
placard reads, "We express our protest and condemnation."
Andrew Biraj/Reuters
Thousands of Bangladeshi Muslims angry over an alleged derogatory photo of the Islamic holy book Quran on
Facebook set fires in at least 10 Buddhist temples and 40 homes near the southern border with
Myanmar, authorities said Sunday.
The violence began late Saturday and continued until early Sunday,
said Nojibul Islam, a police chief in the coastal district of Cox's
Bazar.
He said the situation was under control Sunday afternoon
after extra security officials were deployed and the government banned
public gatherings in the troubled area.
He
said at least 20 people were injured in the attacks that followed the
posting of a Facebook photo of a burned copy of the Quran. The rioters
blamed the photo on a local Buddhist boy, though it was not immediately
clear if the boy actually posted the photo.
Bangladesh's popular
English-language Daily Star newspaper quoted the boy as saying that the
photo was mistakenly tagged on his Facebook profile. The newspaper
reported that soon after the violence broke out, the boy's Facebook
account was closed and police escorted him and his mother to safety.
Joinul
Bari, chief government administrator in Cox's Bazar district, said authorities detained the boy's parents and were investigating.
Buddhists make up less than 1 percent of Muslim-majority Bangladesh's 150 million people.
The Bangladeshi violence follows protests that erupted in Muslim countries over the past month after a low-budget film, "
Innocence of Muslims," produced by a
U.S. citizen denigrated the
Prophet Muhammad by portraying Islam's holiest figure as a fraud, womanizer and child molester.
Some two dozen demonstrators were killed in protests that attacked symbols of U.S. and the West, including diplomatic compounds.
Labels: Asia, Conflict, Human Fallibility, Islamism, Justice
Syria conflict: Aleppo's souk burns as battles rage
BBC News online - 29 September 2012
The BBC's Jim Muir says the souk was once a "magnet
for tourists", as amateur footage purportedly from the area showed
widespread damage
A blaze has swept through ancient markets in Aleppo, activists say, as
rebels and government forces seek to gain control of Syria's largest
city.
Reports say hundreds of shops in the souk, one of the best preserved in the Middle East, have been destroyed.
Unesco, which recognises Aleppo's Old City as a world heritage site, described the damage as a tragedy.
On the third day of a rebel offensive, battles broke out in the Old City and the Arkub district, reports said.
The fire, believed to have been triggered by shelling and
gunfire, began on Friday but was still burning on Saturday, reports
said.
"It's a big loss and a tragedy that the old city has now been
affected," Kishore Rao, director of Unesco's World Heritage Centre,
told the Associated Press.
The market stalls lie beneath the city's towering 13th Century
citadel, where activists say regime troops and snipers have taken up
positions.
Rebels were using a Turkish bath, or hamam, in the souk as a base
Activists quoted by Reuters news agency said that the presence
of snipers was making it difficult to approach the Souk al-Madina, once a
major tourist attraction.
Reports estimate that between 700 and 1,000 shops have been destroyed so far.
"It's a disaster. The fire is threatening to spread to remaining shops," one activist, Ahmad al-Halabi, told AP.
He said the Syrian authorities had cut off the water supply, making attempts to control the fire more difficult.
Rebels and civilians were working together to limit the fire with a few fire extinguishers, he added.
The fire took hold with speed, fuelled by the many shops' wooden doors and the clothes, fabrics and leather goods sold inside.
Heavy clashes erupted at several military sites in the city on Saturday evening, Reuters reports.
Fighting was reported at the Neirab military base as well as Bab Antakya, a stone gateway to the Old City.
The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights, a UK-based activist
group, said the focal point for fighting was Salaheddin, a rebel
stronghold on the south-west side of the city.
State television reported attacks on what it called
"terrorist centres" in 10 different locations on Saturday, saying heavy
losses had been inflicted.
The BBC's Jim Muir, in Beirut, says that though both sides
have reported clashes in different parts of the city, the signs are that
the rebels simply lack the firepower and the manpower to score a
significant breakthrough.
"No-one is actually making gains here, it is just fighting
and more fighting, and terrified people are fleeing," one activist told
Reuters.
Activists estimate more than 27,000 people have died in the
violence since the uprising against President Bashar al-Assad began last
year.
Labels: Revolution, Societal Failures, Syria, Terrorism Islam Middle East
U.S. warns of terror threat against women Christian missionaries in Egypt
Saturday, 29 September 2012
A mob raided the U.S. embassy in Cairothis month in
protest at a film mocking Islam made in the United States that sparked
deadly unrest across the Muslim world. (Reuters)
By AFP
CAIRO
The United States warned on Saturday that U.S. women Christian
missionaries in mainly Muslim Egypt face threats of terror attacks and
urged vigilance.
“The embassy has credible information suggesting terrorist interest in
targeting U.S. female missionaries in Egypt,” the American mission in
Cairo said in a statement on its website.
“Accordingly, U.S. citizens
should exercise vigilance, taking necessary precautions to maintain
their personal security,” it said, calling on Americans to ensure they
can be contacted by diplomatic missions in case of emergency.
On Friday, a Republican congresswoman froze a request by the U.S.
administration for $450 million in cash for the Egyptian government,
saying it needed new scrutiny amid rocky U.S. ties with Cairo.
Earlier this month, U.S. President Barack Obama said Egypt was neither a
friend nor a foe in the wake of last year’s uprising that toppled
president Hosni Mubarak and brought Islamists to power.
Obama’s comments came after a mob raided the U.S. embassy in Cairo in
protest at a film mocking Islam made in the United States that sparked
deadly unrest across the Muslim world.
Coptic Christians, who make up six to 10 percent of Egypt’s population
of 82 million, regularly complain of discrimination and marginalization.
They have also been the target of numerous sectarian attacks.
The Copts have been nervous since the Islamists came to power.
Labels: Christianity, Conflict, Egypt, Islamism
Turkish pilots killed by Assad, not crash: leaked documents
Saturday, 29 September 2012
Syrian President Bashar al-Assad ordered
the killing of two Turkish air force pilots who were captured after
their fighter jet was shot down on June 22, 2012, files obtained by Al
Arabiya show. (Al Arabiya)
By Al Arabiya
As political tensions mount between neighboring Syria and Turkey,
newly-leaked Syrian intelligence documents obtained by Al Arabiya
disclose shocking claims shedding light on the dreadful fate of two
Turkish Air Force pilots.
Contrary to what was publically claimed, the documents reveal that the
pilots survived the crash, but were later executed by the regime of
Syrian President Bashar al-Assad!
This disclosure is the first
in a series of revelations based on a number of newly-leaked and highly
classified Syrian security documents which will be aired in a special
program produced by Al Arabiya over the next two weeks; the channel’s
English portal – http://english.alarabiya.net – will be carrying a
subtitled version of the program on daily basis as well as publishing
downloadable copies of the leaked documents.
The documents were obtained with the assistance of members of the Syrian
opposition who refused to elaborate on how they laid hand on the
documents.
Al Arabiya said that it has verified and authenticated hundreds of these
documents and that it is has decided to disclose the ones with
substantial news value and political relevance.
On June 22, a Turkish military
jet was shot down by a Syrian missile in international airspace,
Ankara’s official report said; a claim Damascus has refuted.
Assad’s regime said the country’s defense forces shot down the two-seater F-4 Phantom as it was in the Syrian airspace.
In an interview with Turkish paper Cumhuriyet published in July, Assad
said he wished his forces did not shoot down the jet, claiming that
Damascus did not know the identity of the plane at the time.
The incident set off tensions between the former allies, but Ankara,
which had vowed a harsh response to any border violations by Syria,
limited its reaction to sending military reinforcements to the common
frontiers.
The two pilots on board of the jet were killed.
But both official reports by Syria and Turkey have restrained their
explanation on the causes of the deaths of Air Force Captain Gokhan
Ertan and Air Force Lieutenant Hasan Huseyin Aksoy.
Turkey’s armed forces said it had found the bodies of both pilots on the Mediterranean seabed.
“The bodies (of the two pilots) have been recovered [from] the seabed
and work is underway to bring them to the surface,” the army command
said in a statement released early in July.
The military did not specify where the bodies were found, but there has been no report that the pilots ejected from the plane.
However, after investigating the leaked documents it obtained, Al
Arabiya can now reveal for the first time an alternative narrative of
what might have happened to the two Turkish pilots.
One highly confidential document was sent directly from the presidential
office of President Assad to brigadier Hassan Abdel Rahman (who Al
Arabiya’s sources identify as the chief of the Syrian Special Operations
Unit) states the following:
“Two Turkish pilots were captured by the Syrian Air Force Intelligence
after their jet was shot down in coordination with the Russian naval
base in (the Syrian city of) Tartus.”
Picture of the highly confidential document sent from the
office of the Syrian president confirming the capture of the two
Turkish pilots (Al Arabiya)
The file therefore reveals two
critical reports. First, the pilots were still alive after the plane had
crashed. And second, that Russia held its share of involvement in this
secretive mission.
The same document orders the concerned parties to treat both Turkish
pilots according to the protocol of war prisoners, as instructed by the
president.
It also requests that both men be investigated about Turkey’s role in
supporting the Free Syrian Army (FSA), the country’s main armed
opposition group.
The report also suggests the possibility of transferring the pilots into
the neighboring Lebanese territory, leaving them in the custody of
Assad’s ally, Hezbollah.
However, if the Turkish air commanders were not killed upon the crash of
their F-4 Phantom, further leaked documents confirm that their death
was inevitable.
A subsequently leaked file,
also sent from the presidential palace and addressed to all heads of
units of the Syrian foreign intelligence, reads: “Based on information
and guidance from the Russian leadership comes a need to eliminate the
two Turkish pilots detained by the Special Operations Unit in a natural
way and their bodies need to be returned to the crash site in
international waters.”
The document also suggests the Syrian government sends a “menacing”
message to the Turkish government, insinuating Syria’s capability of
mobilizing Kurdistan’s Workers Party (PKK) on the Turkish borders,
notifying Ankara from the danger it might face in case of any hostile
move.
A copy of the presidential order for the killing in a “natural way” of two Turkish pilots. (Al Arabiya)
The report insists that the Syrian
leadership should hasten and make a formal apology to the Turkish
government for bringing down the plane, which would embarrass the Turks
and win the support of international public opinion. As such, the Syrian
Regime did apologize.
Al Arabiya’s exclusive series on the newly-leaked Syrian security documents continues tomorrow.
Labels: Political Realities Middle East, Revolution, Societal Failures, Syria, Turkey
East is East and West is West
The leaders of the Islamic ummah have gathered in a rare display of unity to express at the United Nations General Assembly their outrage over what they claim is a rising tide of unsuppressed and hatefully malicious slander against Islam. What is sacred to Islamic sensibilities must not be taken in light vein by non-Muslims. As in 'show some respect'.
The United Nations headquarters in New York, where Muslim
leaders demanded international action to stop religious insults.
(Reuters)
Which would be entirely reasonable under different circumstances. Should not those who hold their faith in such high regard restrain themselves from offering death as a consequence to those whose words they find compellingly offensive? Verbal abuse in exchange for violent death. The verbal abuse is insufferable, and completely at fault, causing the pious to respond in such a viciously violent manner.
"Death to America", spoken with passion and a wish to visit instant death on any whom a mob approaches that appear to resemble Americans is excusable, evidently. Passions have been aroused, and the result of that provocation must be severe. Mutilation and death are quite severe. That many Islamic countries have laws that discipline those who take the name of the Prophet or Islam in vain, or who secede from Islam, and thus become fodder for a death sentence is seen as abhorrent in the West.
But Western laws that disallow inhibitions and prohibitions on free speech are held by Islamic countries to represent decadence, a total failure of control and justice, as they know it. It is just and meet that anyone defying the supremacy of Islam, anyone who has the unmitigated gall to point out the obvious, that too many of its adherents subscribe to violent jihad and irrational notions of martyrdom, be held accountable to Islamic law.
The exculpatory protection of free speech at the price of harming the emotional stability of fanatics is held to be a shield for hatred of Islam, according to Turkey's foreign minister, Ahmet Davutoglu, who claims it is 'time to put an end' to the protection of Islamophobia 'masquerading' as the freedom to speak freely. Why might that be so, when Muslims continually speak freely of their utter contempt of any religion other than Islam?
When it is common for a majority Muslim society to inflict real harm on minority religion worshippers in their midst. When fanatical Muslims seek to injure Christians living among them, and see nothing awry in destroying the religious symbols that Christians or other religionists hold sacred?
When churches are destroyed or ancient Buddha statues, does the Muslim national hierarchy issue a stern condemnation?
For that matter, do the kings and tyrants and tycoons and generals gather themselves in outraged condemnation of Islamists slaughtering Muslims? Have they reached a general agreement on being forthcoming in indicting the Syrian regime for its conduct of war against its own? Have they urged Iran to speak less menacingly against the existence of a non-Muslim country in a Muslim geography?
The 193-nation General Assembly heard out the outraged plaints of Turkey and Egypt among others. "Egypt respects freedom of expression, freedom of expression that is not used to incite hatred against anyone. We expect from others, as they expect from us, that they respect our cultural specifics and religious references, and not impose concepts or cultures that are unacceptable to us", decried the new Islamist president, Mohammed Morsi.
But that is precisely the point; Muslim societies like that of Egypt do indeed attempt to impose concepts/cultures that are unacceptable to non-Muslims. The film, Innocence of Muslims, that has so enraged Muslims was produced by an Egyptian-American Christian Copt, whose experience in Egypt was such that he vented his hatred and frustration in the crudely offensive manner that he did. It is the Muslim attitudes and behaviour toward other religions that has propelled this activity.
Their righteously outraged stance at being victimized does not reflect reality.
And while the Western leaders at the United Nations have exhorted Muslim countries to foster democratic reforms and respect and uphold human rights and basic freedoms, they cannot and will not respond positively to calls by Muslim leaders for the United Nations to agree to an international ban on blasphemy. A ban that would reflect the anger of Islam against the West. Where Islam bears no responsibility for itself.
Pakistani President Asif Ali Zardari in whose country over a dozen people have been killed in those anti-Islam film protests was among those demanding criminalization of insults to religion (Islam). The film represented another "ugly face" of religious persecution according to Indonesia's President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono, insisting "Freedom of expression is therefore not absolute", quoting from the Universal Declaration of Human Rights that "everyone must observe morality and public order".
King Abdullah II of Jordan, disparaged the film, and the violence that followed. President Zardari demanded UN action:
"Although we can never condone violence, the international community must not become silent observers and should criminalize such acts that destroy the peace of the world and endanger world security by misusing freedom of expression."
Afghan President Hamid Karzai spoke both of the video and the latest incarnation of cartoons in France satirizing the Prophet Mohammed, terming the insults as representing the "depravity of fanatics", a phrase that neatly fits the reactions of the ravening Muslim mobs, destroying, looting, burning, beating and killing.
But to him and to the 56-member Organization of Islamic Cooperation, "Such acts can never be justified as freedom of speech or expression".
"The menace of Islamophobia" he claimed, represents "a worrying phenomenon that threatens peace and co-existence." And here we were of the apprehended belief that the menace of Islamism represented a worrying phenomenon threatening peace and co-existence around the Globe.
Clearly, a polarizing perspective of East and West.
Labels: Arab League, Communication, Islamism, Political Realities, Social-Cultural Deviations, Traditions, United Nations
India launches 101st space mission, and looks to Mars
The mission will be carried out without international help,
highlighting the growth and ambition of India's home-grown space
program, which plans to launch a mission to Mars.
By
Vaishnavi Chandrashekhar, Correspondent /
September 29, 2012
India's
space program is advancing at a breakneck pace with a goal of reaching
Mars with an unmanned vehicle by 2014. Here, a satellite launch from
earlier in September.
Arun Sankar K/AP/File
India marked its 101
st space mission today with the launch of its heaviest communications satellite, GSAT-10, from French
Guyana.
The satellite, carrying 30 communication transponders and a
navigation payload, is the first of 10 missions slated for the coming
year, a hectic schedule that the
Indian Space Research Organization (ISRO) hopes will have glorious finale in November 2013 with the launch of an orbiter to Mars.
India’s Red Planet mission is to be carried out without international help, highlighting the growth of the agency.
“At the moment, we plan to do it on our own,” said ISRO chief K Radhakrishnan at the agency’s headquarters here last week.
After 50 years and 100 missions, the Indian space program is growing faster than ever. India’s scientists, some
NASA-trained,
assembled the country’s first rocket in a village church in the 1960s.
Today, India’s home-grown space program is considered one of the top six
in the world.
In recent years, the mission has expanded its
original development agenda to embrace more commercial and exploratory
interests – though to what extent remains to be seen.
The
government has increased budgets, accelerating the pace of missions and
moving toward more prestigious – and sometimes controversial – projects
throughout the past decade.
“The first 50 missions took 27 years,
the next 50 took place in the last 10 years and the next 58 missions
will happen in the next five years,” said Mr. Radhakrishnan, whle
emphasizing the agency’s “success on a shoestring” story.
ISRO’s budget is barely 7.5 percent the size of NASA
, but it has been growing every year since the early 2000s, jumping from $591 million in 2004-05 to $1.3 billion in 2012-2013.
“I
can think of no other major space program in the world that has enjoyed
such a level of sustained annual budgetary growth,” says Asif Siddiqi,
an associate professor of history at
Fordham University, who is working on a book on the Indian space program.
The
budget expansion parallels India’s economic growth in the past decade,
notes Mr. Siddiqi. And high-profile successes have also helped boost
government support for ISRO, he says.
For
five decades, ISRO stuck close to founder Vikram Sarabhai’s vision to
reject “the fantasy of competing with economically advanced countries"
to explore the moon and instead use space technology to improve the
lives of ordinary people
.
The result: India has built one
of the largest communication satellite systems – used to support
telemedicine and tele-education programs for rural areas – and one of
the world’s best remote sensing systems, which helps with forecasting
the weather and monitoring natural resources, including locating water
sources.
But the agency’s recent forays into space exploration –
including the 2008 Chandrayan 1 lunar probe and proposed missions to the
sun – and reconnaissance satellites is a “fundamental shift” from
Sarabhai’s “space for development” agenda, says Siddiqi.
India’s uncertainty about that shift was evident last month with
Prime Minister Manmohan Singh’s announcement of the
Mars
mission, called Mangalyaan (Sanskrit for “To Mars”), which was met with
mixed response. The mission, timed to coincide with the next window
when the planet is closest to earth, is intended to help collect data on
methane sources.
Skeptics question not only the tough deadline, but whether India
should be spending almost $90 million on a scientific mission that comes
amid economic slowdown in India and after the
US has already undertaken a similar mission.
Not everyone has been critical, however. “India is a country which
works on different levels,” says Krishan Lal, president of the
Indian National Science Academy.
“On the one hand, we have a space mission, on the other hand a large
number of bullock carts. You can’t, say, remove all the bullock carts,
then move into space. You have to move forward in all
directions.”
Officials
have defended their program: ISRO chief Radhakrishnan pointed out that
of this year’s budget, 55 percent was allocated to space applications
like communication, navigation, and remote sensing, 36 percent to launch
vehicles and just 9 percent to science and exploration missions
including Chandrayan 2 and the Mars orbiter.
Many observers agree
that prestige is partly behind the Mars mission (the announcement was
made when it became clear that the second Moon mission would not keep
its 2013 date and even took the scientific community by surprise). But
they also say there is little evidence India is engaged in a real space
race.
China’s space exploration program is far ahead of India’s, especially in manned spaceflight.
“India’s
space program will be driven by its budgets, not by a race with
competitors,” said Dinshaw Mistry, an associate professor of political
science at the
University of Cincinnati
specializing in nuclear, missile, and space technology, in an e-mail.
The Mars mission is “relatively cheap,” he notes, “costing no more than
launching a satellite, while a manned mission is an order of magnitude
more expensive and far more risky.”
Less controversial has been
ISRO’s entry into the multibillion dollar international commercial
launch market via Antrix, its commercial arm. India has launched 29
foreign satellites during the past decade, including the simultaneous
launch of the French SPOT 6 and a Japanese microsatellite in September.
But
“India has barely begun to scratch the surface” of the market, says
Susmita Mohanty, founder and CEO of Earth2Orbit, India’s first private
space start-up.
ISRO is still perfecting its Geosynchronous Launch
Vehicle,which is meant for launching telecommunications satellites, but
it has a robust Polar Satellite Launch Vehicle for launching earth
observation satellites, Dr. Mohanty notes. Theoretically ISRO is capable
of building and launching five to six Polar Satellite Launch Vehicles a
year but for the past few years, has launched about two a year, she
says, “most likely because our national priorities precede any
commercial intent.”
To grab a greater chunk of the market, says Mohanty, who has previously worked in the aerospace industry in US and
Europe, ISRO would have to “develop a more international outlook” and privatize routine rocket manufacturing.
There are signs that this is already happening. At the recent close of
Bangalore's
Space Expo, Radhakrishnan said that ISRO plans to encourage private
participation so that it can focus on research and development. He
suggested that what India needs is a consortium of big space contracting
companies similar to the US.
“We can learn from Europe and America though their situation is different,” he said.
Labels: India, Science, Space
Iranian Satellite Blew Up After Liftoff
ArutzSheva7
First Publish: 9/28/2012, 1:56 PM
Indian satellite launch
Reuters
An Iranian attempt to launch a
satellite into space failed when the missile
carrying the satellite exploded shortly after liftoff, completely destroying the satellite.
HIS Janes reported that the accident took place in May, and that
Iran's space agency has made great efforts to hide it from the public's
knowledge.
The failure is expected to set back Iran's space
program considerably.
Western experts said that the mishap shows Iran is facing
difficulties in ballistic missile development. Janes revealed that U.S.
spy
satellites followed the
attempted launch, which took place at the space center near Tehran.
Black spots were seen covering the area around the launching pad
immediately after the accident.
Iranian officials announced that the Safir-1B satellite launch
vehicle would be launched on May 23, but subsequently announced that the
launch had been delayed for up to 10 months without saying why.
Labels: Iran, Political Realities, Societal Failures, Technology
Eventually they will have no
where to flee to. "Egypt's Copts abandon Sinai homes after threats,
attack," by Yousri Mohamed andTamim Elyan for
Reuters, September 28
(Reuters)
- Most Christians living near Egypt's border with Israel are fleeing
their homes after Islamist militants made death threats and gunmen
attacked a Coptic-owned shop, a priest said on Friday.
The departure of nine families that made up the small Christian
community in the border area of Egypt's Sinai peninsula will fuel
worries about religious tolerance and the rise of militancy after the
overthrow of president Hosni Mubarak last year.
"Coptic Christian families decided to leave ... out of fear for their
lives after the threats and the armed attack," said Mikhail Antwan,
priest at the Coptic Margirgis church in the North Sinai town of
al-Arish.
Death threats had been printed on flyers circulating in the desert area, he added.
Two armed men riding a motorcycle opened fire on a Coptic-owned shop in Rafah on Wednesday but no one was injured.
Two families from the small community had already left while the rest
were still packing up their possessions in Rafah and Shaikh Zuwaid
after living 20 years in the area, he added.
All were planning to move to al-Arish, the administrative center of North Sinai, where security was better, the priest said.
Islamists with possible links to al Qaeda have gained a foothold in the area, analysts say.
Israel has voiced concern about security in Sinai, where at least
four cross-border attacks have taken place since Mubarak was toppled in
February 2011.
Egypt's new president, Mohamed Mursi, has vowed to restore order. But
efforts to impose central authority are complicated by the indigenous
Bedouin population's ingrained hostility to the government in Cairo.
A local official, who asked not to be named, confirmed the departures
and said the families planned to return when security improved. It was
the second wave of Christian departures - another seven families left
soon after Mubarak's fall.
Labels: Christianity, Conflict, Egypt, Human Relations, Islamism
At UN Muslim world questions Western freedom of speech
Reuters
By John Irish
UNITED NATIONS |
Fri Sep 28, 2012 7:14pm EDT
(Reuters) - Muslim leaders were in unison at the United Nations this
week arguing that the West was hiding behind its defense of freedom of
speech and ignoring cultural sensitivities in the aftermath of
anti-Islam slurs that have raised fears of a widening East-West cultural
divide.
A video made in California
depicting the Prophet Mohammad as a fool sparked the storming of U.S.
and other Western embassies in many Islamic countries and a deadly
suicide bombing in Afghanistan this month. The crisis deepened when a French magazine published caricatures of the Prophet.
Turkish
Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu said it was time to put an end to the
protection of Islamophobia masquerading as the freedom to speak freely.
"Unfortunately,
Islamophobia has also become a new form of racism like anti-Semitism.
It can no longer be tolerated under the guise of freedom of expression.
Freedom does not mean anarchy," he told the 193-nation U.N. General
Assembly on Friday.
Egypt's newly elected Islamist president, Mohamed Mursi, voiced similar sentiments in his speech on Wednesday.
"Egypt
respects freedom of expression, freedom of expression that is not used
to incite hatred against anyone," he said. "We expect from others, as
they expect from us, that they respect our cultural specifics and
religious references, and not impose concepts or cultures that are
unacceptable to us."
Mursi was one
of the first leaders to be democratically elected after Arab Spring
revolutions that led to changes in the governments of Tunisia, Egypt, Libya and Yemen last year.
Western
states that backed the uprisings have urged these countries to quickly
foster democratic reforms and adhere stringently to human rights
principles and basic freedoms.
They
fear a more austere version of Islam could hijack the protest
movements. Most Western speakers at the United Nation defended freedom
of speech, but shied away from calls by Muslim leaders for an
international ban on blasphemy.
While
repeating his condemnations of the video, U.S. President Barack Obama
staunchly defended free speech, riling some of those leaders.
"The
strongest weapon against hateful speech is not repression, it is more
speech - the voices of tolerance that rally against bigotry and
blasphemy," Obama said in a 30-minute speech dominated by this theme.
Speaking after Obama, President Asif Ali Zardari of Pakistan,
where more than a dozen people were killed in protests against the
anti-Islam film, demanded insults to religion be criminalized.
"The
international community must not become silent observers and should
criminalize such acts that destroy the peace of the world and endanger
world security by misusing freedom of expression," he said.
Highlighting
the anger of some, about 150 protesters demanded "justice" and chanted
"there is no god but Allah" outside the U.N. building on Thursday. One
placard read: "Blaspheming my Prophet must be made a crime at the U.N."
Foreign ministers from the 57-member Organization of Islamic Cooperation met on Friday. The film topped the agenda.
"This
incident demonstrates the serious consequences of abusing the principle
of freedom of expression on one side and the freedom of demonstration
on the other side," OIC Secretary-General Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu told
reporters.
Human Rights First and
Muslim Public Affairs Council, two U.S.-based advocacy groups, warned of
the risks of regulating such freedoms.
"Countless
incidents show that when governments or religious movements seek to
punish offences in the name of combating religious bigotry, violence
then ensues and real violations of human rights are perpetrated against
targeted individuals," they said in a joint statement.
The
47-member U.N. Human Rights Council, dominated by developing states,
has passed non-binding resolutions against defamation of religion for
over a decade. Similar ones were endorsed in the U.N. General Assembly.
European
countries, the United States and several Latin American nations in the
council opposed the resolutions, arguing that while individual people
have human rights, religions do not, and that existing U.N. pacts - if
enforced - were sufficient to curb incitement to hatred and violence.
German Foreign Minister Guido Westerwelle attempted to dampen talk of a clash of civilizations on Thursday.
"Some
would have us believe that the burning embassy buildings are proof of a
clash of civilizations," Westerwelle said in his U.N. address. "We must
not allow ourselves to be deluded by such arguments. This is not a
clash of civilizations. It is a clash within civilizations. It is also a
struggle for the soul of the movement for change in the Arab world."
(Editing by Mohammad Zargham)Labels: Arab League, Chaos, Communication, Human Rights, Islamism, Social-Cultural Deviations, Societal Failures, Terrorism, United Nations
Few Choices, Raw Imperative
"I
believe that faced with a clear red line, Iran will back down - and it
will give more time for sanctions and diplomacy. Red lines don't lead
to war, red lines prevent war ... nothing could imperil the world more
than a nuclear-armed Iran."
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu
This
is not the first time that the Prime Minister of Israel has resorted to
graphic demonstrations to prove a point. On a previous occasion he
came equipped with documentation and architectural plans to impress upon
the delegates at the United Nations General Assembly that contrary to
Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's insistence that the Holocaust
never took place, it most certainly did, a fact that should be seared
indelibly on the sensibilities of every intelligent human being.
On
this occasion it was a graphic of a bomb in process that Mr. Netanyahu
used to ensure that his audience understood the fundamentals of
preparation and approach to completion of an cataclysmic explosive
device, one fully capable of altering the world order. Entirely
re-writing, in its larger capacity the geography of the Middle East and
far, far beyond.
"Iran
is 70% of the way [to completing the first stage of its progress toward
creating a nuclear device] and ... well into the second stage. By next
summer, at current enrichment rates, they will have finished the medium
enrichment and move on to the final stage. From there it is only a few
more weeks before they have enriched enough for a bomb."
His
contention, as leader of the country most directly threatened by that
acquisition, is that merely claiming the intention to deter Iran from
acquiring what it seeks is insufficient to ensure that it does not
achieve its intent. The purpose of a red line is to inform, without
equivocation, that one has reached the limit of the designated line
identified as "stop right here". To proceed beyond is to invite
whatever precautions to be undertaken to destroy that purpose.
To
stop the project from proceeding from the second stage to the third and
last. That represents the only possible, reliable safeguard. It is
not just Prime Minister Netanyahu who warns of Iran's impending date
with nuclear destiny, it is the United Nations' own nuclear regulatory
[and inspection] authority that has confirmed the situation at its
direst. That action is required is obvious.
The latest intelligence on the outcome of the sanctions on Iran's economy inform of straitened circumstances.
There
is yet hope that another, even stricter round of sanctions may lead
Iran to the brink of final abandonment of the nuclear program and
uranium enrichment beyond commercial-medical applications. In the
interim, Israel, far more than any other country, including Saudi Arabia
and the Gulf States, knows its presence in the Middle East is
imperilled.
It has little patience for the kind of patience that the United States is pressing upon it.
And
with reason. A nuclear-armed Iran would represent a lowering and
constant threat to the world, but first of all to Israel. Iran has
iterated and reiterated its intention to redraw the map of the Middle
East, to release the geography from the presence of the 'cancer' it
names the "Zionist entity". That raw, undisguised threat cannot be
dismissed out of hand.
Iran is a terrorist state in
support of other terrorist states and militias. The savagery of its
punishment meted out to those it considers adversaries is taken to be
legitimate under the canopy of Islam's directives.
"Given the record of Iranian aggression without nuclear weapons, just imagine Iranian aggression with nuclear weapons", reminded Mr. Netanyahu.
The
leader of a civilized society, Prime Minister Netanyahu speaks of
deterrence, not aggression. The leader of an uncivil, brutally
primitive government, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and the Grand Ayatollah
Khamenei speak of extermination.
Labels: Iran, Israel, Nuclear Technology, Political Realities, Societal Failures, Terrorism, United Nations, Values
World Statesman of the Year
"I
say these things not to counsel any particular action, not to wish any
additional hardship on the long-suffering Iranian people and certainly
not to advocate war, but rather so that we not shrink from recognizing
evil in the world for what it is."
Canada's Prime Minister Stephen Harper
Prime
Minister Harper spoke indirectly to the international community of a
regime "where evil dominates", calling upon the world to make an effort
to "step up pressure and isolate" the Islamic Republic of Iran. The
occasion was during his being awarded the World Statesman Award from the
Appeal of Conscience Foundation, in New York. A ceremony that took
place at the very time when the United Nations General Assembly was
reconvening.
Present at the opening of the UN General
Assembly were heads of state and of government of well over one hundred
member countries. Many of whom made speeches from the General Assembly
podium. Prime Minister Harper made a judiciously considered decision
not to attend. And that decision without a doubt had much to do with
the fact that the United Nations whose purpose is to foster peace and
human rights within the international community appears to be failing.
Setting
aside entirely the gruesomely absurd reality that one of the United
Nations' last Secretary Generals had been a Nazi officer in World War
II, implicated in the murder of Jews, utterly defiling the sanctity of
the United Nations as a sanctuary from vile fascism, more latterly the
world's latest fascist regime has been allowed to present its
credentials there. From Kurt Waldheim, former Austrian president, to
Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, the United Nations has irremediably sullied itself.
And
continues to do so, with little backward glance at the original purpose
of the League of Nations in the wake of that dreadful world cataclysmic
eruption, the Second World War. It was not just the horrors of a
Fascist covenant intent on overthrowing democracy, but the realization
and acknowledgement of the world's failure in preventing the wholesale
destruction of six million Jews during the Final Solution that resulted
in the Holocaust.
And here, yet again, another lecture at the podium of the General Assembly in the holiest of human rights sanctuaries,
by yet another fascist dictator state; the emissary from Tehran,
speaking of an 'illegitimate state', the cancer of Judaism/Zionism, and
the bland intention of the Islamic Republic of Iran, on specific orders from rabid Islamism
to destroy the State of Israel. A statement issuing from a country
that is infamous for spreading and supporting terrorism and oppressing
its own people.
The question should be why would any
self-respecting head of state or government be complicit in permitting
sanction to the right of one UN member-country to viciously slander and
overtly threaten another so openly? By their very presence, their
willingness to sit and hear out the never-changing insults and assaults
those in attendance were conferring respect upon the unrespectably indecent.
When
Prime Minister Harper made the decision to absent himself yet again
from the UN General Assembly it was with impeccable reasoning. His
government's support for the State of Israel, and his government's
rejection of the legitimacy of a state that represses its own, tortures,
imprisons and executes political dissenters, persecutes religious
minorities, lends itself to brutal suppression of revolt in other
tyrannical states should be widely supported and joined by other
democratic countries.
"It
is important to state, that whatever Israel's shortcomings, neither its
existence nor its policies are responsible for the pathologies present
in that part of the world." After which, like a
statesman, Prime Minister Harper went along to the United Nations to
meet with President Mahmoud Abbas of the Palestinian Authority, and
later to meet with President Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel.
Labels: Canada, Diplomacy, Iran, Islamism, Israel, Political Realities, United Nations, Values
Woe!
"I will be held, if I am convicted, in solitary confinement, for the
rest of my life in very harsh conditions, with probably no possibility
of parole. I am a disabled man and have no arms and there will be very
little granted to me to alleviate that."
In the grand legal tradition of the mother country, Canada has experienced no end of difficulties ridding itself of failed refugee and immigration claimants most of whom, because they become familiar with the democratic laws of the country favouring the individual in reflection of the Constitution and Canada's Charter of Rights and Freedoms, one appeal after another can take place, costing the government tax dollars and exhausting all legal avenues, eating up years in the effort.
This is the legacy of legal protections under the law that Canadians treasure, and which are extended to all those whose feet touch Canadian soil. The tedious, cumbersome and lengthy procedures tie up the courts and government agencies' patience, while benefiting those whose claims are very often vexatious in nature, enabling them to continue enjoying the generous social benefits that Canada is renowned for.
The situation is an inherited one. From the Mother Country, from the colonial outreach period when Great Britain ruled the seas and spread her influence far and wide throughout the Commonwealth. What has made justice groan to a stumbling halt in Canada in attempts to extradite unwanted claimants whose claims are deemed to be illegitimate, or those who have committed criminal acts while in Canada, occurs with regularity in Britain as well, since it is the fount of these judicial strangleholds on sovereign decision-making.
Britain experienced a problem that has become common enough throughout Europe and North America; the troublesome and worrying presence of agents - often clerics - of fanatical Islamism who seek converts to radical violent jihad in the name of extending Islamist influence worldwide through intimidation, fear and violence. From mosques and Muslim community centres youth graduated into jihad in support of Islamism, some going abroad to fight 'wars' against the infidel, some remaining behind to become home-grown jihadists prepared to defend the ideology of violent jihad right at home.
Eight years ago Britain took steps to begin extradition procedures of one of its most notorious jihadist extremists whom the United States requested on a 2004 warrant for organizing military training camps there and for being implicated in abductions that took place in Yemen. Abu Hamza, a man dedicated to the violent overthrow of democracy to replace it with Islamist rule and Sharia law, invested in converting young Muslims to rabid jihadists has taken advantage of all the appeal mechanisms available to him over the years.
Just recently the BBC made a public apology when one of its regular interviewers revealed injudiciously that Queen Elizabeth II during an interview had stated her bemusement and annoyance at the fact that her country was not able to speedily dispatch this man out of Britain and into the waiting arms of the American justice system. It obviously represented a source of frustration and anger to the Monarch that her country could be held to judicial ransom by its own laws to the benefit of such a malevolent figure.
And now, Lord Chief Justice, Lord Judge reveals that this situation represented "a real source of fury" to him that such egregious situations would exist. Emphasizing the "great public interest" that terrorism cases be dealt with expeditiously and expressing his frustration at the absurdity of a known terror felon being able to pull such delaying tactics using the law that was meant to protect individuals from harm, in the case of someone like this cleric devoted to causing harm to others.
Perhaps the most absurd and bedevilling part of the entire situation is that Abu Hamza piteously clings to exhortations that people have pity on him. That it should be kept uppermost in mind of those who seek justice on behalf of those whom he has harmed, that in so doing he would be harmed and that would be simply dreadful. He could, he insists, face a life sentence in a maximum security prison if convicted, and that would represent an affront to European human rights prohibitions against torture and ill treatment.
While it was perfectly legitimate, ethical and moral on behalf of jihad for this cleric representing the tenets of Islam to decry the perfidious debasement of the West and his contempt for the inferiority of infidels deserving to die to satisfy sadistic jihadists in their mission to find salvation in Paradise in recognition of their heroic status as martyrs successful in human slaughter, his human rights should be viewed as inviolable.
The way has been cleared, finally, for British courts to act to expedite the removal of this menace from the country. Abu Hamza's plea to the European Court to have mercy on him, as a poor, misunderstood man with unfortunate disabilities hasn't worked its magic. The Strasbourg court ruled that "no violation" of this man's human rights would be breached, clearing the way for this miserable saga to come to a long-deserved end.
But not, alas, until yet another appeal has been heard in England, still blocking the extradition.
Labels: Britain, Canada, Democracy, Human Rights, Islamism, Justice, Terrorism
Black holes: Scientists measure the point of no return
Christian Science Monitor
Using imaging of the galaxy M87, astronomers have for the first time
measured the closest stable orbit within which matter can circle a black
hole. They found that this innermost orbit measures 750 times the
distance from the Earth to the sun.
By
Clara Moskowitz,
SPACE.com /
September 27, 2012
This image from a simulation shows an energy jet launched from a spinning black hole surrounded by a disk of accreting material.
Avery E. Broderick (University of Waterloo/Perimeter Institute)
For the first time, scientists have peered to the edge of a colossal black hole and measured the point of no return for matter.
A black hole has a boundary called an event horizon. Anything that falls within a
black hole's event horizon — be it stars, gas, or even light — can never escape.
"Once
objects fall through the event horizon, they're lost forever," Shep
Doeleman, assistant director of the MIT Haystack Observatory and
research associate at the
Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory,
said in a statement Thursday (Sept. 27). "It's an exit door from our
universe. You walk through that door, you’re not coming back."
Although
the event horizon is an imaginary line that's impossible to observe,
astronomers have imaged the region around a giant black hole at the
center of a distant galaxy, and measured, for the first time, the
closest stable orbit in which matter can circle the black hole. The
findings were reported today in the journal Science.
The
supermassive black hole in question lies at the center of the galaxy
M87, which is about 50 million light-years from our own Milky Way. This
behemoth black hole contains the mass of 6 billion suns.
Using a new observatory called the Event Horizon Telescope, which links up radio dishes in
Hawaii,
Arizona and
California,
astronomers measured that the innermost possible orbit for matter
around the black hole is roughly 5.5 times the size of the black hole's
event horizon.
This innermost orbit is about five times the size
of the solar system, or 750 times the distance from Earth to the sun,
Doeleman told
SPACE.com. The distance between the Earth and the sun is nearly 93 million miles (150 million kilometers).
The observations allowed the researchers to confirm that this swirling mass around the black hole is the
source of the powerful jets of
light seen radiating from the galaxy. Many galaxies throughout the
universe spot similar jets, thought to be produced by matter falling
into their central black holes. Until now, no telescope has had the
resolution power to verify the idea.
The
Event Horizon Telescope is
a new project that aims to link as many as 50 radio dishes around the
world to work in concert to image the distant universe. Already, the
observatory can see celestial objects with 2,000 times more detail than
the
Hubble Space Telescope.
You can follow SPACE.com on Twitter @Spacedotcom. We're also on Facebook & Google+.
Labels: Nature, Space
Leading News Agencies Comparing Netanyahu to Hitler?
Associated Press and Reuters both featured 'Nazi salute' photos of Binyamin Netanyahu's U.N. speech.
By Gil Ronen
First Publish: 9/28/2012, 2:05 PM
Netanyahu lifts arm during speech.
Screenshot from video
A disturbing thing happened in the course of Binyamin Netanyahu's
speech at the United Nations General Assembly Thursday. The world's two
largest news agencies,
Associated Press and
Reuters, both selected photos of the same infinitesimal moment in Netanyahu's speech to send to their subscribers worldwide.
That moment was one in which Netanyahu raised his left hand, his arm
straight, inadvertently assuming a position that immediately calls to
mind Adolf Hitler giving a Nazi salute in the course of a speech - even
though he did not hold the position or symbolize anything by it.
Netanyahu was not saluting, of course. Rather, he was saying this:
"Recently, I was deeply moved when I visited Technion, one of our
technological institutes in Haifa, and I saw a man paralyzed from the
waist down climb up a
flight of stairs, quite easily, with the aid of an Israeli
invention."
The arm gesture illustrated the story of the man climbing the stairs.
The average consumer of news would have a hard time realizing that
AP and
Reuters
had done something wrong. The news agencies sell their reports and
photos to newspapers, websites and television stations, which are the
ones who pass the materials on to the end consumer. The agencies
essentially serve as reporters-for-hire, for news outlets that rely on
them to cover the events in a purely professional manner.
Therefore, it takes a journalist to fully recognize the apparently
base and manipulative nature of what the agencies did. The news
agencies could not help but realize the visceral reaction to that
position, which remains frozen in a
photograph.
The
Weekly Standard noticed, and featured the story under the headline
"Shock Photos of Netanyahu at U.N. from AP, Reuters."
The
Daily Caller went a step further and
contacted the National Director of the Anti-Defamation League (ADL), Abe Foxman.
“I can’t believe it, if it in fact happened,” Foxman told The Daily Caller. “I think it is ugly, disgusting, offensive."
Arutz Sheva has contacted the Prime Minister's Office and asked for a reaction, but has not yet received one.
Netanyahu talked of how
Israel
offers medical care to all who need it. Israel treated 115,000
Palestinian Authority Arabs in its hospitals in the year 2011 alone.
As published online at ArutzSheva 7 Labels: Communication, Corruption, Israel, Traditions, United Nations
Why has it taken Britain eight years to extradite Abu Hamza?
British extradition proceedings against the militant cleric Abu
Hamza, wanted in the US on terror charges, began in 2004. But only this
week has an end to the legal process become visible.
By
Ben Quinn, Correspondent /
September 28, 2012
In
this January 2004 file photo, self-styled cleric Abu Hamza leads his
followers in prayer in a street outside Finsbury Park Mosque, on the
first anniversary of its closure by anti-terrorism police, London.
John D McHugh/AP/File
Eight years after the first steps to extradite to the US one of
Britain’s
most notorious extremists, that legal saga is likely to come to an end
next week should he fail in a last-ditch legal gambit to prevent his
removal.
Yet even before the latest delay, legal deliberations over the fate of Abu Hamza – originally arrested in 2004 on a
US extradition warrant for allegedly organizing a militant training camp in
Oregon and assisting in kidnappings in
Yemen – had long tested the patience of many, as the case wound its way through British and European Courts.
While not mentioning the case specifically, none other than the most senior judge in
England and
Wales suggested Thursday that he was as frustrated as anyone.
The
Lord Chief Justice, Lord Judge, said it was “a real source of fury” to
him that cases should take as long as eight years to go through the
courts as different grounds for appeal are attempted, and that there was
a “great public interest” in allegations concerning terrorism being
dealt with swiftly.
The
comments by Lord Judge were welcomed by MPs as well as news outlets
that have focused on the cost to the tax-payer of providing legal aid to
Hamza and channeled anger at perceived foot-dragging by the
European Court of Human Rights (ECHR), which ruled back in 2008 that extradition could not take place until it examined the case.
Hamza
had argued that his extradition to the US, where he could face a life
sentence in a supermax prison if convicted, would run afoul of European
human rights prohibitions against torture and ill treatment.
Julian
Knowles, a barrister specializing in extradition law, says “a lot of
the problems that have arisen here, and which have required litigation,
are to do with just how savage the US sentencing system is and that gave
the basis for Hamza to go to the European Court and say: ‘I will be
held, if I am convicted, in solitary confinement, for the rest of my
life in very harsh conditions, with probably no possibility of parole. I
am a disabled man and have no arms and there will be very little
granted to me to alleviate that.' ”
In April, the
Strasbourg
court ruled there would be "no violation" of the rights of Hamza and a
number of others if they were put on trial in the US. And on Monday, the
ECHR rejected the men's appeal, clearing the way for a possible end to
the long legal saga.
After failing in
Europe,
Hamza is making a final stand in England, where judges issued an
interim injunction Wednesday blocking the extradition and granting a
court hearing for an appeal. Hamza’s legal team must show that there is
some new and compelling factor that has not been already considered by
previous court hearings.
“This case has taken a long time because the [ECHR] is very under
resourced and has a backlog of cases, so by the time you go there you
are building in up to a three-, four-year delay,” he says, adding that
the extradition proceedings under English law also made the case a
lengthy one.
Knowles also says that Hamza's eight-year saga is not
a sign that Britain's extradition system is too weighted in favor of
individuals fighting against their removal. It's just the opposite, he
says.
“The law is overwhelmingly in favor of the government
seeking extradition. Very little has to be shown for the US to seek
extradition, and in fact the controversy recently has been about whether
it has been too easy for the US to get people from here as compared
with if the UK was asking the US, where the hurdle is much higher.”
The sheer complexity of the Hamza case was also an issue.
The case's outcome is one that may have a lasting legacy in Europe.
The
precedent set by the ECHR's ruling may turn out to be a green light
across Europe for future extraditions to US supermax prisons, as the
court officially has jurisdiction over 47 states across the continent
(though
Russia
often ignores its rulings). The ruling is not apt to affect extradition
to the US in death penalty cases, as Europe's opposition to capital
punishment remains entrenched.
Symbolic importance
If
Hamza's last-ditch effort fails, extradition is likely to quickly
follow for a figure who has been one of the most striking encapsulations
of what many Britons regard as the face of
Al Qaeda inspired extremism.
Security experts emphasize the symbolic importance of the case of the hook-handed, one-eyed radical cleric, who took charge of
London’s
Finsbury Park Mosque in the 1990s and used it as a base to persuade young Muslims to take up the cause of holy war.
“In
terms of his strategic relevance, he is no longer an active figure in
terms of jihadi terrorism in general but he somehow represents the kind
of threat that the UK has been facing since 2001,” says Tina Soria, an
analyst specializing in counter-terrorism and Security and London’s
Royal United Services Institute think-tank.
“His
extradition would mark the end of one very important chapter in
counter-terrorist narrative in the UK and how effective it has been in,
hopefully, disrupting terrorist activities.”
“He represented a
significant player in terms of radicalization, and the kind of threat
that the UK was facing up until, maybe, 2007 and 2008 but we have seen
an evolution in the terrorist threat and we of course now that kind of
ideological message is equally circulating online.”
Labels: Britain, Islamism, Justice, Political Realities Middle East