"We're
concerned about the fungibility of support directed by Canada to the
agency, and ultimately where money goes and what it supports."
"There's
been a very long track record of not just of internal corruption within
UNRWA, but there were a number of UN investigations of the agency and
impropriety on the part of their staff -- not just its local-hired
staff, but the international UN staff that manages the organization."
"I
think it would be great if Canada were to step up and seize
opportunities to play a meaningful role [in the future of Israel]. But
you can't do that independently -- it requires Canada to be more fully
in sync with the approaches, the thinking and the considerations of our
like-minded allies, and that's been where we haven't been as intentional
as we could be, and perhaps as we should be."
Shimon Koffler Fogel, President/CEO, Centre for Israeli and Jewish Affairs
"We've
seen instances in which the United States and Republican
administrations have frozen [funding and also under Stephen Harper [as
Prime Minister of Canada prior to the current administration]."
"But
the fact now that you have a Democratic administration in Washington,
Biden, that froze [funding], and now all the other countries have
followed, particularly Canada."
"The
evidence has been very clear -- it's something countries have ignored
for many years, but now because of the direct connection with the
brutality of October 7, there's a recognition that UNRWA cannot continue
to function the way it has been up until now."
"What we are doing are taking these allegations very seriously."
"These
are disturbing allegations, we have very serious concerns about those
allegations, and I expressed Canada's concern over the allegations to
the head of UNRWA."
Canadian International Development Minister Ahmed Hussein
Israel's Iron Dome air defence system fires to intercept rockets fired
from the Gaza Strip, in southern Israel on Jan. 21. Hamas claimed
responsibility for rocket attacks that reached Tel Aviv on Monday. (Leo Correa/The Associated Press)
The New York Times
on Sunday published an outline of Israel's indictment of UNRWA. It
included the information that agency employees were directly involved in
the atrocities that took place on October 7; mass murder, rape,
torture, mutilation, and the abduction of 240 innocent civilians
comprised of children, the elderly, women and men as well as non-Jews
and foreign farm workers.
A day later the Wall Street Journal
published an article that led to the declaration that as many as ten
percent of the 12,000 Gaza employees of UNRWA have ties to terrorist
groups. According to the Israeli dossier, ten of the dozen UNRWA
employees identified with links to terror, were revealed to have been
implicated directly by participation in the Hamas/Palestinian Islamic
Jihad storming of the Israeli border to commit countless acts of
sadistic savagery on Israeli civilians.
Of
that number of UNRWA employees directly involved, ten were full members
of Hamas, while another was affiliated with the Islamic Jihad terror
group. Of the employees implicated, seven were employed as teachers at
UNRWA schools; facilities that have long been known to incorporate
antisemitic and anti-Israel messaging in their school curricula. Two
worked for schools in non-teaching positions and the remaining three
were a social worker, a clerk and a storeroom manager, according to the New York Times. Stockpiles of weapons were kept in UNRWA schools as they were in hospitals.
The Times
also pointed out that one of the implicated employees was a school
councillor in Gaza. This man, assisted by his son, abducted an Israeli
woman to take her as a hostage back into Gaza. She was wounded, and was
kept prisoner in a room of the councillor's home. As well as
participating in the taking of hostages, the UNRWA councillor was
delegated the responsibility of co-ordinating vehicles and ammunition on
October 7. When the Israeli woman was released in a prisoner exchange
in November she related her experience as a captive.
By
Monday of this week fully fifteen nations had announced they had cut
their financial support for UNRWA following the American announcement of
their decision to do so, late last week. It is worth noting that the
Republican administration under Donald Trump had cut its donations to
UNRWA in recognition of its links to Hamas terrorism, and in Canada
under the Conservative government of Stephen Harper, funding by Canada
was also discontinued.
In
both countries succeeding administrations resumed UNRWA funding.
Despite that it was well known how compromised UNRWA was, an utterly
failed institution that knowingly allowed its schools to have textbooks
glorifying violence against Jews and Israel, portraying the Jewish state
as the 'enemy' of Palestinians. In Canada, funding will continue for
Palestinian aid funnelling it through other UN agencies; the World
Health Organization and the World Food Program.
The
problem there is that aid tends to end up in the possession of Hamas,
which uses the medicines, food, water, fuel for its own purposes,
stockpiling it for their own use. Any that does reach ordinary
Palestinians is often 'sold' to them at outrageous cost, further
propping up Hamas rule. In other words the West continues through its
humane generosity to the suffering Palestinian population, to support
and sustain the Palestinians' terrorism oppressor.
Several
countries, including Canada, have cut funding to the United Nations
relief program for Palestinians after accusations that some workers had
links to the Oct. 7 attacks on Israel. The reduced funding is expected
to make aid in Gaza more precarious. CBCNews
"We
had so many warning signs about UNRWA. There were studies done by NGO
Monitor and others that were rejected by Canadian diplomats, but the
evidence is staring them in the face."
"Now,
the evidence was so stark that there was clearly documentation that
shows members of UNRWA were actually moonlighting as terrorists. It got
to the point where they just ignored the evidence, but it's not as if
the evidence wasn't there, they didn't want to see it."
"The evidence was hiding in plain sight."
Aurel Braun, professor of international relations, University of Toronto
"[The
fact that the court was willing to discuss the genocide charges was a]
mark of shame that will not be erased for generations."
"We will continue to do what is necessary to defend our country and defend our people."
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu
Judges of the International Court of Justice are seen while ruling on a
request by South Africa on behalf of Gaza on Friday. (Remko de
Waal/EPA-EFE/Shutterstock)
The
Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide
established in 1948 represented a determination to ensure that the
crimes of the Holocaust would never be repeated. The crime of genocide
requires proof of intentional destruction "in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group".
When the Third Reich destroyed the lives of six million Jews in a
deliberate, state-planned eradication of Europe's Jews, it was the very
quintessence of genocide. The intent was there, the outcome spoke for
itself.
Israel
saw its founding that same year of 1948. It exists today as a bulwark
against another Holocaust. Finally, Jews had a reborn national territory
of their own established on a small portion of their original ancestral
land. And that nation developed a military for the obvious purpose of
defending itself and Jews from another attempt at genocide. The
International Court of Justice delivered its provisional response to
South Africa's claim of genocide perpetrated by Israel on Gaza, on the
very memorial date of the Holocaust.
Could
anything be more spectacularly grim and ironic? Israel, by the metric
of the court consenting to hear the case and adjudicate it well into
years ahead before reaching a final decision even while failing to order
Israel to retreat from Gaza, has been held in suspicion of genocide,
marking it as the fifth country to face the charge of genocide in the
ICJ. As in the United Nations itself, it is always the
human-rights-abusing nations that hold Israel to account for violations
of human rights.
Israel's
violation can be seen in the fact of its existence, in the indisputable
fact that it exists only because it defends itself.
Sudan
committed an intended genocide in Darfur. And when its president and
the head of the Sudanese military were condemned by the ICC as war
criminals the Organization of Islamic Cooperation and the Arab League
paid no mind. Syria's Bashir al-Assad has been accused by the United
Nations itself of having killed 300,000 of its own citizens. Today he is
in good standing in the Arab League. Iran threatens genocide against
Israel, has done so openly, former President Ahmadinejad openly declared
at the UN General Assembly Iran's intention to destroy Israel.
Open
displays of of rampant antisemitism and the celebration of the Hamas
terrorist bloody rampage through southern Israel on October 7 have taken
place in huge rallies throughout the Western world. A world that stands
by and merely observes 'pro-Palestinian' calls in gatherings on city
streets calling for another intifada, calling for a Palestine 'from the
river to the sea', calling for 'gas the Jews'. These are akin to the
rallies and the vicious propaganda that presaged the Holocaust.
How
can any rational mind support a charge of genocide against Palestinians
by Israel, when the populations of both Gaza and the West Bank have
risen steadily at a rate not seen elsewhere in the world? Of a people
considered by the United Nations to be refugees. Whose leaders gather
huge sums of funding from the international community free to plunder
and amass personal wealth. And for Hamas to build a network of offensive
tunnels while amassing a huge cache of weaponry.
The target is Israel. The intent is there, the attacks are deadly.
In
Israel, 20% of the population is comprised of Palestinians. They have
citizenship, a quality of life denied Palestinians in the West Bank and
Gaza, while their leaders accumulate personal riches and deny proper
administration of the territories that would allow the Palestinian
people to prosper, have proper employment and live satisfying lives
instead of being fed non-stop malicious lies about a neighbour hoping at
some time to be able to relax its military vigilance.
Pro-Palestinian demonstrators gather outside the
International Court of Justice in the Hague, the Netherlands, on January
26, 2024. Nikos Oikonomou/Anadolu via Getty Images
"In
my respectful dissenting opinion the dispute between the State of
Israel and the people of Palestine is essentially and historically a
political one, calling for a diplomatic or negotiated settlement."
"It is not a legal dispute susceptible of judicial settlement by the Court."
"This
case is complicated by the fact that in the context of an ongoing war
with Hamas, which is not a party to these proceedings, it would be
unrealistic to put limitations upon one of the belligerent parties but
not the other."
Judge Julia Sebutinde, Ugandan ICJ court member
Judge Julia Sebutinde
"[Israel
must also take] immediate and effective measures to enable the
provision of urgently needed basic services and humanitarian assistance
to address the adverse conditions of life faced by Palestinians in the
Gaza Strip."
"The
Court is acutely aware of the extent of the human tragedy that is
unfolding in the region and is deeply concerned about the continuing
loss of life and human suffering."
International Court of Justice
After
due consideration and hearing of legal arguments from all perspectives
the ICJ did not call for a ceasefire in Gaza and for the IDF to
withdraw. The Ugandan judge sitting on the International Court of
Justice, along with 16 others, was the only judge to have voted
negatively on all of the six provisional measures set out by the IJC.
Even the Israeli justice on the court voted positively for several of
the rulings. Justice Sebutinde felt none of the rulings represented
total fairness and voted accordingly.
She
has become a heroine to Israelis, an outcast to the government of
Uganda and a much detested personage to Hamas and its South African
supporters.
Uganda
is a country that produced two quite notable individuals, whose ethics,
morals and perspectives couldn't be more distant from each other; while
both distinguished themselves as Ugandans, one, Idi Amin its former
President, did so by disrepute, not only hosting Palestinian plane
hijackers at Entebbe airport in a collusion against Israel where a
daring raid rescued the Jewish passengers and led to the death of the
raid leader, Benjamin Netanyahu's brother, but he also expelled
Asian/Indian minorities of long-standing residence in the country.
A
country that was also capable of producing a keen and highly respected
legal mind who gained a different kind of notoriety when she defied her
own country on a previous occasion. Her actions at the IJC had a
response from Uganda’s ambassador and permanent
representative to the United Nations, Adonia Ayebare, who issued a
statement to the effect that:
"Justice Sebutinde’s ruling at the International Court of Justice does
not represent the Government of Uganda’s position on the situation in
Palestine."
"She has previously voted
against Uganda’s case on DRC [Democratic Republic of the Congo]. "
"Uganda’s support for the plight of the Palestinian people has been
expressed through Uganda‘s voting pattern at the United Nations."
While
Israel's actions in Gaza in response to Hamas's savage assaults against
southern Israel where over a thousand people were murdered, hundreds
taken hostage, an untold number of women raped, mutilated and murdered,
children killed along with the elderly and entire families scorched to
death when their homes were torched, over ten percent of the 3000 young
Israeli music lovers at the Nova Music Festival were killed by fanatical
psychopaths, the actions of the Hamas terrorists were never taken into
account by the Court.
South
Africa's charge to the Court of Israeli genocide deliberately
side-stepped the genocidal intent of the rulers of Gaza. To ascribe
intent of genocide to Israel, on the very eve of Holocaust Remembrance
represents the apex of moral failure. October 7, its outcome and its
aftermath represented a repeat of a loathing for a people so
reprehensible that it led to genocide; to ascribe that intent to the
inheritors of the Holocaust must be accounted a crime unto itself.
The single issue that gave credit to the Court was its statement that it was "gravely concerned about the fate of the hostages" abducted by Hamas, calling for "their immediate and unconditional release". Creditable, but barely; treated as an aside to the main issue of holding Israel suspect of genocide. Any
focus on a two-state solution where there is but one side of the issue
prepared for dialogue and to reach a useful solution acceptable to two
parties in the absence of the second, is a fallacy.
Getty Images
"It
was brought to the attention of the Court that South Africa, and in
particular certain organs of government, have enjoyed and continue to
enjoy a cordial relationship with the leadership of Hamas. If that is
the case, then one would encourage South Africa as a party to these
proceedings and to the Genocide Convention, to use whatever influence
they might wield, to try and persuade Hamas to immediately and
unconditionally release the remaining hostages, as a goodwill gesture."
"I have no doubt that such a gesture of goodwill would go a very long way in defusing the current conflict in Gaza."
"Unfortunately,
the failure, reluctance or inability of states to resolve political
controversies such as this one through effective diplomacy or
negotiations may sometimes lead them to resort to a pretextual
invocation of treaties like the Genocide Convention, in a desperate bid
to force a case into the context of such a treaty, in order to foster
its judicial settlement."
"It
is clear that a permanent solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict
can only result from good-faith negotiations between Israeli and
Palestinian representatives working toward the achievement of a just and
sustainable two-state solution. A solution cannot be imposed from
outside, much less through judicial settlement."
"The United States side should stop abusing international law, cease all dangerous and provocative behaviour, and strictly restrain the activities of front-line troops, which is the fundamental way to avoid accidents at sea and in the air."
"[U.S. warplane and warship activity] on China's doorstep [is the root cause of the problems between the two military powers]."
Beijing Defence Ministry spokesperson Wu Qian
"No member of the international community should be intimidated or coerced into giving up their rights and freedoms."
"The United states military flies, sails and operates anywhere international law allows."
U.S. Navy 7th Fleet news release
The USS John Finn (DDG
113), which transited the Taiwan Strait on January 24 in what the U.S.
calls a "freedom of navigation" operation. China's military responded by
condemning the U.S.'s "provocative acts."
Once again China laid accusations against the United States of having violated international law through military manoeuvres in the western Pacific. The complaint arrived a day following the politically sensitive Taiwan Strait hosting an American naval destroyer sailing through. The USS John Finn sailed through the 160-kilometre-wide waterway separating China from Taiwan. The autonomous island that considers itself a sovereign entity defying Beijing's declaration that it is part of China.
In November of 2023 at a meeting that took place between Presidents Joe Biden and Xi Jinping in California, both agreed -- after a prolonged period of increasingly chilly diplomacy and sporadic accusations of imperilling peace through rhetorical challenges amplified by war games seen on each side as intimidation -- to warm the diplomatic climate by resuming military contacts.
The purpose of which was to manage the potential for an unintentional collision or other incident between the two that could occur while both sides patrol the waters in regional hotspots, including he Taiwan Strait and the South China Sea, which Beijing claims as its sole ownership, clashing with its neighbours -- resentful of their own traditional claims of extended sovereignty from their coastlines hijacked by China.
The United States is intent on demonstrating that the areas of the high seas should remain navigable as international waterways, leading to a clash of interests between the two. The United States sees its actions being in line with international laws guaranteeing freedom of navigation. Whereas China's rising prominence and power allows it to project military might into the western Pacific bringing it into conflict with the United States, whose military power in the region has long been dominant.
U.S. military activity is meant to deter China from launching any kind of attack on Taiwan, much less using its strength to enforce its territorial claims in its disputes with smaller neighbours such as the Philippines. Last year, as disputes over shoals and other outcroppings in the South China Sea flared, Chinese and Philippine ships clashed. China lays the blame on American support, citing joint patrols by the United States with the Philippines emboldening the latter to challenge China's regional dominance.
The USS John Finn (DDG
113), which transited the Taiwan Strait transit on January 24 in what
the U.S. calls a "freedom of navigation" operation. China's military
responded by condemning the U.S.'s "provocative acts."
"[Beijing may be a bit] miffed [at Washington at the
moment, especially after agreeing to restart military-to-military talks
in December]."
"Given that Beijing very likely believes that it extended the
olive branch by agreeing to reopen military-to-military communications
and other high-level exchanges, it might have perceived a lack of
reciprocity from the US."
"[US warships and warplanes regularly travel through and over the
waterway. In 2023, US Navy and Coast Guard ships and Navy reconnaissance
planes made 11 transits of the strait]."
Collin Koh, research fellow, S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies, Singapore
"On the issue of easing tensions in the South China Sea, it is very necessary for the big power concerned, namely the United States, to stop interfering and stop provoking."
Islamist Caliphate Group Retreating to the Dark Recesses of Jihad
"Until
they can provide the right guidelines for the organization's
English-language speaking areas they will avoid, as much as possible,
their membership and activists making statements in the public arena."
"Unless
they can control what their membership is saying in English, then they
can't be sure that they aren't going to say something they will
regret."
"Australia
and Canada tend to, in counterterrorism matters, follow where Britain
goes. It will be quite likely that if the ban and proscription in
Britain is upheld by the British courts, they will apply the same thing
in Australia and Canada."
"The
Hizb ut-Tahrir rejects democracy, it rejects participating in
governance with other parties, it rejects the electoral process as a
method of gaining power -- the only way is by the overthrow of
government by revolution."
"The
Hizb ut-Tahrir don't engage in material action, does not undertake
violent acts. They can, however, be accused of 'sanitizing terror
ideology and calling for revolutionary change."
"They express quite extreme forms of antisemitism."
"They
don't do it as a group, so their members don't engage in it [violent
action]. Neither do they call for their members to do so. However, they
do believe that military action to liberate these countries is
acceptable There is an ambiguity there."
Rashad Ali, resident senior fellow, Institute for Strategic Dialogue, counter-extremist think tank, London, England
"As
a listed terrorist entity in the United Kingdom, the Hizb ut-Tahrir
organization should not be given an opportunity to promote and
indoctrinate Canadians with their extreme and radical viewpoints through
their Khalifah Conference."
"If
it had not been pre-emptively cancelled, we would have expected the
authorities to step in to identify it as a potential security risk and
prevent the conference from moving forward."
Shimon Koffler Fogel, president, Centre for Israel and Jewish Affairs
A recent screen shot of the Hezb ut Tahrir Canada website before the group removed it from the internet.Photo by Screenshot / Hizb ut Tahrir
Following
the U .K. declaring an Islamic organization a terrorist group, the
Canadian branch of the group cancelled a scheduled conference meant to
be hosted the past weekend, calling for the resurrection of the Muslim
caliphate and the imposition of Shariah law. The plan was to convene the
Hizb ut-Tahrir Canada conference in Mississauga. The Khalifah
Conference 2024; Khalifah the Arabic word for caliphate, a Muslim
community governed under Islamic (Sharia) law.
Posters,
a website and a promotional video, reflect the group urging rejection
of a Jewish state and the involvement of the United Nations,
international law, or other 'compromises' in the Middle East, in favour
of encouraging military forces in the Muslim world to defeat
'occupiers'. All meant for use during the conference. Those materials as
well as its online presence in its entirety -- active since 2012
including a YouTube channel, Facebook, Instagram and X accounts were
deactivated or deleted internally.
Prior
to its cancellation the annual conference was a cause of concern, given
its statements: antisemitic, dedicated to eradicating Israel, and
though not committed to violence on its own, supporting militant jihadi
violence from well known sources. U.K. Home Secretary James Cleverly
speaking of Britain's proscription order stated:
"Hizb
ut-Tahrir is an antisemitic organization that actively promotes and
encourages terrorism, including praising and celebrating the appalling 7
October attacks."
"Proscribing
this terrorist group will ensure that anyone who belongs to and invites
support for them will face consequences. It will curb Hizb ut-Tahrir's
ability to operate as it currently does." The designation of a terrorist entity was effective from January 19.
A poster advertising Khilafah Conference 2024
A
notification to registered attendees to the Khalifah Conference in
Canada that the event was cancelled was accompanied with a note: "It
is with a heavy heart that Hizb ut-Tahrir Canada has decided to cancel
the Khalifah Conference 2024 because of unforeseen circumstances", apologizing for inconvenience, absent an explanation. Thematically the conference was dedicated to "Khalifah : Eliminating the obstacles that are delaying its return", with materials referring to Israel as "the Zionist Entity", emulating the Islamic Republic of Iran.
One of the keynote speakers, Muhammad Malkawi was quoted saying in a speech last month that if Muslims came together "You don't even need to fight for Palestine because there will not be a Jewish state there." He is based in Jordan, the location of Hizb ut-Tahrir's central headquarters. "He is very well known, very public, a popular speaker within the party and has been active for decades", explained Rashad Ali, a former leader with the group who now is involved in extremist deradicalization.
Another
scheduled speaker, Mazin Abdul-Adhim is resident in London, Ontario,
active on social media, describing himself as a Hizb ut-Tahrir member,
his avatar on X, the logo for the cancelled conference. He reacted to
Britain's ban stating: "By
banning HT, they make us a much stronger force, impenetrable and
absolutely bulletproof from their false allegations and lies". A similar conference is scheduled for March in Chicago, organized by Hizb ut-Tahrir America.
The
organization has been banned in a number of countries, including
Russia, China, Germany, Indonesia, and in most Arab countries. The
group's message is one of overthrowing Muslim governments, posing as an
enemy of many Muslim states. Ironically, it is not banned in Israel. The
English translation of the organization' name is "Party of Liberation",
founded in 1953 as a revolutionary party to serve as a springboard to
power in countries with large Muslim populations in the spirit of
unification to restore the Muslim empire of medieval times.
A Hizb ut-Tahrir demonstration outside the Egyptian embassy in London in November 2023 (X)
"[The
British government says that Hizb ut-Tahrir] has a footprint in at
least 32 countries [with its headquarters in Beirut, Lebanon]."
"The
U.K. government assess that Hizb ut-Tahrir, including its national
branches, is currently concerned in terrorism, and meets the 'promotes
and encourages' limb of the statutory test."
"A
number of articles were posted online on Hizb ut-Tahrir's central media
website [and third-party websites], attributed to several of Hizb
ut-Tahrir's branches, which celebrated and praised the 7 October 2023
attack by Hamas and associated events."
"The
content of these articles, many of which refer to Hamas as 'heroes',
and encourage further terrorist activity constitute the promotion and
encouragement of terrorism."
"No one talks about stopping after this [massive bombing attack on residential neighbourhoods] happens."
"The
sanctions aren't working. The West must stop procrastinating with
ammunition, air defence and financial support, or what we are getting
here will come to their countries."
"Do you want Russia on your borders? Do you think they will stop?"
"The war is not over and Putin's getting stronger and won't stop. Why would he stop? He must be defeated."
Ukrainian political leader Kira Rudik
"I therefore call on our allies in the European Union to also step up their efforts in support of Ukraine."
"The arms deliveries for Ukraine planned so far by the majority of EU member states are by all means too small."
"We need higher contributions."
German Chancellor Olaf Scholz
"My personal priority is to have an agreement by 27 [countries]."
"And if this is not possible, we are prepared for an agreement by 26 [minus holdout Hungary]."
European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen
Russia
has renewed its attacks against Ukraine, likely emboldened by the
stale-mate in Washington which has placed further support for the
Ukrainian counteroffensive against the Kremlin on ice for the time being
at a time when ongoing military assistance is critical. In Europe,
leaders are attuned to the nature of Vladimir Putin's bellicosity and
hunger for expansion. They fully understand that nothing will stop
Putin, and they are just as likely to be next on his 'special military
operation' agenda as any.
This
uppermost in mind, European leaders are looking to increase their
support. Data, in fact, from the German-based Kiel Institute indicates
that aid to Ukraine from European nations represents a doubling of the
aid being provided to the embattled country as compared to what the
United States has committed to.
Britain and France jointly reaffirmed a pledge to defeat the Russian war machine. "What
we have to do is make that economic strength [the combined economies of
the West 25 times larger than Russia's], and that commitment pay", asserted British Foreign Secretary David Cameron. "I have no doubt that we can make sure that Putin loses and it's essential that he does lose."
When
British Prime Minister Rishi Sunak earlier in January visited Kyiv, he
announced a $4.3 billion support package. In the same token, French
President Emmanuel Macron made an announcement of his country planning
to deliver additional military aid to Ukraine that would include 40
long-range cruise missiles and hundreds of bombs.
The
Baltic states and Norway together delivered the equivalent of over one
percent of their economies in support of Ukraine, according to figures
released by the Kiel Institute. Fighter jets have been pledged by
European countries and last summer the Netherlands and Denmark pledged
they would supply Ukraine with 61 F-16s in coming years. As new
replacement models arrive, Belgium is prepared to deliver over 50 jets,
and Norway is to donate upwards of 10 F-16s.
A
new trilateral initiative to improve maritime safety in the Black Sea
and assist Ukraine in maintaining open shipping lanes by clearing
Russian mines, was signed off by Romania, Bulgaria and Turkey. Members
of the European Parliament in Brussels have taken to efforts to strip
Budapest of its veto powers so that they can prevent Hungary from
blocking aid to Ukraine.
The
G7 is considering whether to confiscate $300 billion in frozen Russian
assets to finance the war in the realization that they have no option
but to assist Ukraine in defeating Russia or risk becoming the next
countries to face an unexpected invasion with Russian bombs destroying
their own homes and neighbourhoods.
"Europe has clearly overtaken the United States in promised aid to
Ukraine, with total European commitments now being twice as large."
"A
main reason is the EU’s new €50 billion “Ukraine Facility,” but also
other European countries have upped their support with new multi-year
packages."
"For the first time since the start of the war, the US is now
clearly lagging behind. This is one of the results of the latest update
of the Ukraine Support Tracker."
The most recent package for Ukraine was announced on Dec. 27, and it
included $250 million in artillery, air defenses and other weapons. |
Yasuyoshi Chiba/AFP/Getty Images
"[The lack of funding forced
the Pentagon to] pause [sending additional weapons from its inventories] given the implications for our own military readiness."
"This
of course prevents us from meeting the most urgent battlefield needs,
to include things like artillery rounds, anti-tank weapons, air defense
interceptors."
Pentagon
spokesperson Maj. Gen. Pat Ryder
"Without funding, we would not be able to match the pace that we have provided Ukraine with since the start of this conflict."
"[That’s why the Pentagon is focused on] the need to answer Congress’s
questions so that they are able to move forward on a decision to pass a
supplemental."
"The conflict hasn’t died down. And in fact, the intensity remains high based on Russian activity."
Celeste Wallander, Pentagon top official overseeing international security affairs
Ukrainian
President Volodymyr Zelenskyy's most influential, most
materially-generous supporter in his nation's valorous bid to prevail
against Vlaldimir Putin's deadly invasion of Ukraine has been forced to
stand down from its generosity, likely temporarily due to political
infighting between Democrats and Republicans that has the Biden
government awaiting the U.S. budget to pass through Congress, leaving
Ukraine in a bind that its staunch allies elsewhere have tried to
unravel with their own ongoing commitments to shore up its need for
additional military hardware.
The
United States, while hosting the monthly gathering of some fifty
countries in an international coalition established to support Ukraine
by U.S. Defence Secretary Lloyd Austin in 2022, is itself unable on this
occasion to send to Ukraine promised and sorely needed ammunition and
missiles used to fend off Russia's war with Ukraine. Awaiting the
critical budget which would enable the administration to fulfill its
stated obligations to Ukraine and approve additional allocations, it is
to its allies in the struggle to keep Ukraine supplied with war materiel
that the defence secretary now turns.
"I urge this group to dig deep to provide Ukraine with more lifesaving ground-based air defence systems and interceptors",
opening remarks by Austin -- video broadcasted from his home,
recuperating from prostate cancer surgery -- stated. In Brussels NATO
Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg spoke of a new $1.2 billion joint
contract for over 222,000 rounds of 155 mm ammunition, some of the most
heavily used munitions in the Ukraine-Russia conflict. The contract he
announced to be used to back-fill allies whose reserves had gone to
Ukraine.
"Even though we aren't able to provide our security assistance right now, our partners are continuing to do that",
stated deputy Pentagon press secretary Sabrina Singh. Russia's attacks
against Ukraine have been ongoing, not as well reported any longer, with
the conflict between Israel and Hamas dominating the news for the past
three months. A barrage of over 40 ballistic, cruise, anti-aircraft and
guided missiles were launched by Moscow into Ukraine's largest cities
days earlier.
On the morning of Jan.
23, 2024, Russian troops fired missiles at a residential area of
Kharkiv. One of the missiles destroyed an entrance to a five-story
building, damaged nearby houses, and destroyed half of the market.
Dozens of people were hospitalized. Several people have died. The search
for people under the ruins continues.(Oleksandr Stavytskyy/Suspilne Ukraine/JSC "UA:PBC"/Global Images Ukraine via Getty Images)
Moscow
had, a day before its latest attacks refused to consider any agreement
that Kyiv and its Western allies backed in a bid to bring the almost
two-year war to a conclusion. Of the missiles, Ukraine's air defence
intercepted some 21, while the attacks hit four districts of Kyiv,
injuring several dozen people. The last U.S. security assistance for
Ukraine was announced on December 27 representing a $250 million package
including 155 mm rounds, Stinger anti-aircraft missiles and other
high-demand items from existing U.S. stockpiles
No
further additional munitions can be supplied until funding to replenish
the stockpiles can be appropriated, awaiting Congress's approval of
more funds. Leaving over $110 billion in aid for Ukraine and Israel
stalled over the disagreement over policy priorities between Congress
and the White House, including additional security for the U.S.-Mexico
border.
Airmen from the 436th
Aerial Port Squadron use a forklift to move 155 mm shells ultimately
bound for Ukraine, April 29, 2022, at Dover Air Force Base, Delaware. On
Jan. 23, 2024, Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin will host a monthly
gathering of about 50 allies as the U.S. is out of money for Ukraine,
unable to send Ukraine the ammunition and missiles it needs to fend off
Russia.(AP Photo/Alex Brandon)
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in a meeting with relatives of
hostages held in Gaza, at the Prime Minister’s Office in Jerusalem on
January 22, 2024. (Prime Minister’s Office)
"Contrary to what is [being] said, there is no genuine proposal by Hamas."
"On the other hand, there is our initiative, which I will not detail."
"If
we agree to this [the Hamas demand that the Israel Defense Forces
withdraw from Gaza and end its war with Hamas] we will not be able to
guarantee the security of our citizens."
"We will not be able to return the evacuees safely to their homes, and the next October 7 will only be a matter of time."
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu
Demonstrators hold up portraits of hostages held by the Hamas terror
group during a rally to demand their release, near the Prime Minister’s
Residence in Jerusalem on January 22, 2024. (Ahmad Gharabli/AFP)
Israel
has been attempting to negotiate through third parties with Hamas for
the release of the remaining 136 Israeli hostages being held by the
terrorists in Gaza. Public pressure and the desperate pleas of the
hostages' families, along with the state's own fervent intention to have
all Israelis rescued from the plight of further traumatic treatment at
the hands of Hamas and other terrorist groups in Gaza have exerted
pressure on the government which cannot function solely on its pledge to
destroy any future capability of Hamas and Islamic Jihad to mount
further attacks on Israel and its citizens.
The
Israeli Prime Minister speaking to representatives of the hostage
families in a meeting, apprised them of that simple fact; no offers that
could be seriously contemplated have been received from Hamas whose
suggestions for the release of the remaining hostages come from a source
that believes it has the upper hand in the certainty of how dearly
Israelis take the well-being of their citizens to enable it to put
forward the kind of offers that no sane government could ever
contemplate; certainly not one tasked with the security of its nation.
Benjamin
Netanyahu did on the other hand, confirm that during negotiations Hamas
demanded the retreat from Gaza of the Israel Defense Forces, and that
Israel commit to ending its war with the terrorist group -- a unilateral
demand in that whatever Israel might commit to in withdrawing its
troops and its commitment to destroy the terrorist group, Hamas would
have no intention of stopping its intermittent violent attacks against
Israel. Hamas's arrogance demands "the release of all the Nukhba (terrorist commando) murderers and rapists, and leaving Hamas intact."
Troops operating in the Gaza Strip in an undated photo released on January 23, 2024 (Israel Defense Forces)
A committee session at the Israeli parliament in Jerusalem (Knesset) saw
several dozen relatives of Israelis held hostage disrupt the event with
demands that the lawmakers make a greater effort to free their family
members. Many of the protesters carried photographs of their family
members taken to Gaza.
"Is it reasonable that 260 trucks of flour are entering Gaza now while my brother is eating nothing", Adi Angrest shouted. His brother Sgt. Matan Angrest remains a hostage in Gaza. "It doesn't make any sense that my brother isn't eating anything when they bring them [Palestinians] 260 trucks of flour!"
French
Defence Minister Sebastien Lecornu was in Israel to meet with Prime
Minister Netanyahu in Jerusalem. Issues being discussed included the
Paris-brokered agreement where medicines were to be delivered to Israeli
hostages suffering from chronic illnesses that were destined to be
provided to them entered the Gaza Strip last week and which the
International Committee of the Red Cross stated they had no intention of
delivering to the hostages. Instead, they said, the deliveries would be
entrusted to Hamas.
Mr.
Lecornu was informed by Netanyahu that he is awaiting evidence that any
of the medicines had actually reached the Israeli hostages, emphasizing
that the implementation of the agreement must be monitored. Official
Israeli figures state that 136 hostages remain in Gaza out of the total
of 240 taken there on October 7. An unknown number are believed to have
been killed there. 100 of the hostages had been released in November
through a deal brokered by Egypt and Qatar.
Israeli
authorities have no reason to believe that the hostages received any of
the life-saving medications prescribed for their medical conditions.
Instead, there is a common belief that just as Hamas operatives had
commandeered much of the fuel, food, water and medicines sent by the
international community into Gaza through border crossings to alleviate
Palestinian shortages, so too did the Hamas terrorists advantage
themselves with the delivery into their hands of medications meant for
ailing Israeli hostages.
Friends and family members mourn during the funeral of IDF soldier Hadar
Kapeluk in the Mount Herzl cemetery in Jerusalem on January 23, 2024, a
day after he was killed in combat in the Gaza Strip (Photo by Menahem
KAHANA / AFP)
"Gender binary is a colonial and white supremacist structure rather than a natural and indisputable truth."
"Because
of colonialism, gender in Ontario and Canada, and specifically in the
education system, still tends to be understood in binary terms or as
being on either end of this 'spectrum' or somewhere in between it."
"European
settlers forced their rigid views on gender upon the civilizations they
invaded, reforming Indigenous gender roles through colonial
restrictions as a tool to align patriarchal family and kinship
structures that mirrored the privileged European family systems during
the time of the invasion."
"Cisgenderism, cissexism and cisnormativity are the root of the violence perpetrated against trans and gender diverse people."
Trans-Affirming Toolkit for teachers, federal gov't funded
As
difficult as it is to credit, the Liberal government of prime minister
Justin Trudeau has financed a 'Trans-Affirming Tookit' for the use of
teachers with a stated purpose to educate teachers on
transgender-identifying students. This is a 100-page instructional to be
used in Canadian schools, addressing social justice theory, leftist
identity politics, and assertions relating to biology, history and sex.
Teachers
are informed via this teaching tool that biological sex has seven
elements to determine gender; no single element, it insists, can
determine sex; certainly not DNA. No, the elements related to external
genitalia, internal sex organs, gonads, secondary sex characteristics,
hormone production, hormone response and chromosomes all come into play,
and teachers had better familiarize themselves with all of them for
they will be held accountable for the manner in which they disport
themselves in the classroom as advocates of promoting the well-being of
.09 percent of the population.
Above
all, teachers must flush out of their minds the wildly inaccurate
assumption that people are either male or female, for this is clearly
racist. Anyone with an ounce of intelligence and common sense, it points
out, must acknowledge that gender norms are of European derivation, and
since Europeans were colonial settlers that oppressed indigenous
populations everywhere, so-called gender norms are inherently
oppressive.
The
instructional encourages teachers to 'audit' their personal views on
gender and take the time to introspectively deconstruct them -- in the
classroom. According to Statistics Canada, 99.7 percent of the
population identify as female and male. The vast majority of any
population are not trans-represented despite the toolkit insisting such
assumptions to be cruel and unjust social constructs. Teachers would do
well, the teaching tool emphasizes, to review their 'cis-privilege', and
reflect on unfortunate instances when they made 'cisnormative
assumptions'.
Progress
Pride flags should be on display in every classroom and gender ideology
embedded in the curriculum. Teachers have an obligation to speak about
trans people throughout lessons, and students should be taught about
dogmatic privilege hierarchies that are the driving mechanism behind
social justice. Teachers must consider reading books about transgender
children to their classes. Students should be charged with completing
gender-introspective worksheets.
In
the toolkit, Critical race theory has its place, encouraging teachers
to apply 'intersectionality' theory to identify layers of oppression.
This new initiative can partner with the federally funded "Anti-Hate
Toolkit" for teachers that speaks of the Red Ensign as a symbol of white
supremacy. Wayne Martino, professor of 'equity and social justice
education' at Western University had a hand in producing the
Trans-Affirming Toolkit. Teacher trade unions are circulating the
treatise to their member-teachers.
University of Western Ontario
"Every
single student needs to learn about gender diversity in all areas of
the curriculum, inclusive of science and mathematics, and not just in
language arts and history."
"Knowledge
about gender diversity in the study of biology is important, for
example. Learning about trans and gender diverse communities for their
brilliance beyond gender-based activism, survival in the face of
violence and transition stories that center linear representations of
transition is vital."
"Students
must be affirmed in their identities, and so no assumptions should be
made about them [for example, educators should not assume that all
students are cisgender as the default]."
"Dedicated
separate spaces must also be provided for students who are Othered so
that they might find support if and when they experience harm."
"In terms of migrants per day, December 2023 has been larger than any average we have ever seen."
"Every official who is commenting on it, on all levels, says they're near or past the breaking point."
"If
you move to a place that's super remote, there won't be a lot of agents
on staff, and that increases your chances of being released into the
U.S."
"There is nowhere to put people They can't hold you."
Adam Isacson, migration expert, Washington Office on Latin America
Women wait in a hallway Friday, Dec. 15, 2023, at a Border Patrol station in Ajo, Ariz. (AP Photo/Gregory Bull)
In
a remote, cold and lonely place while awaiting the arrival of border
guards, dozens of migrants huddle close to a hole in the border wall.
They have been given coffee by aid group No More Deaths. Given blankets,
food and emergency telephone calls should there be any there who
sustained life-threatening injuries on their journey. Those hailing from
Sudan have escaped another Darfur-like conflict, patiently waiting for
their search for haven to end far from their homeland.
Among
them are others, not only themselves fleeing war in Sudan, but those
escaping from Central American violent gangs and Mexican cartels. All
have crossed illegally into the United States, trekked over rugged
terrain for tiring hours, to arrive near Sasabe, Arizona exhausted,
hungry and cold. They wait to turn themselves over to authorities to be
given the opportunity to ask for asylum; stranded in the Arizona desert,
but hopeful.
Just
as night time temperatures begin dropping, a convoy of American Border
Patrol agents roll in. The men are loaded into a van where they're
briefly processed. The van continues driving in its search for more
people needing rescue. "We are not equipped to deal with this. It's a humanitarian disaster", comments Scott Carmon, a Border Patrol watch commander, of the crisis unfolding at the southern U.S. border.
A migrant walking along a road shadowed by the steel columns of the separation border between Mexico and Arizona. AP
Once
again, migrant encounters reach toward record levels, testing the
capacity of American law enforcement. Thousands of migrants arrive
daily, on their way from Africa, Asia, the Middle East or South America.
Relentless violence, desperation, fear and poverty drive them from
their places of birth where they can no longer find a future.
There
was a broad sigh of relief in the spring when crossings into the U.S.
declined after the lifting of pandemic border restrictions. The
anticipation was that the floodgates would burst, but they held. More
lately, numbers have spiked. The number of apprehensions in a recent
week soared to over 10,000 a day -- the Border Patrol found itself
stretched beyond capacity.
Small
towns on both sides of the border were overwhelmed with people funneled
through new routes by human smugglers, to evade capture.
American
officials monitored a caravan moving north through Mexico comprised of
over 2,000 migrants, heading toward the United States; unlikely to
complete their journey according to experts, but drawing significant
media notice to the migrant tide crossing the border. What has caused
the recent swell is as yet unknown.
Theories
include larger numbers of Mexicans fleeing from cartel turf battles;
rumours of a key legal pathway ending; smugglers who push desperate
people of all nationalities to attempt entry at increasingly remote
parts of the vast border. Border officials in Arizona closed a key port
of entry to legal crossings early in December to enable them to focus on
the unlawful entries.
Migrants huddle around fires for warmth along the U.S.-Mexico border near Lukeville, Arizona.Camilo Montoya-Galvez/CBS News
"It's
still delicate, it's fragile, and it will take a long time, but I think
that it is actually an opportunity to move forward in the world and the
region toward a better future."
"When
nations come forward and say 'two-state solution', they have to first
deal with a preliminary question, which is a core question for human
beings: Are we offered real safety?"
"Israelis lost trust in the peace process because they could see that terror is glorified by our neighbours."
"[Hamas's attack on Israel was planned and carried out by one of the proxies of the] empire of evil emanating from Tehran."
"We are praying that all the medication …. will reach them [Israeli hostages held in Gaza], but that’s only the beginning."
"We all understand that there has to be a vision, and I think part of
it should be also going back to the normalization process of Israel and its neighbors in the region. I think it’s part of a package."
"But that requires to support Israel's efforts to undermine the capabilities of Hamas, and it’s still there."
Israeli President Isaac Herzog, speech, World Economic Forum Davos Meeting
Israeli President Isaac Herzog. Stefani Reynolds/Pool via REUTERS
The
day before Israel's president addressed the World Economic Forum in
Davos, Saudi Arabia's foreign minister, Prince Faisal bin Farhan, spoke
on a Davos panel of the Kingdom having agreed "regional peace includes peace for Israel". That Saudi Arabia "certainly"
would recognize Israel as part of a larger political agreement. Of
course, there are conditions, nothing new about those conditions, since
they're reiterated constantly.
"But that can only happen through peace for the Palestinians, through a Palestinian state",
he averred in a familiar refrain. Omitting the obvious, that 'peace for
the Palestinians' is actually in the hands of the very Palestinians
that Saudi Arabia persists in advocating for. It is the Palestinians
that have had their peace negotiators throw roadblocks time and again
during now-defunct/frozen/dead peace talks with Israeli negotiators,
where each and every concession at great cost to Israel, was rejected.
It
is from Fatah, through the Palestinian Authority that incitements to
violence and encouragement of children through school curricula to
seriously consider the avocation of 'martyr' as 'resistance to
occupation' has taken place, with the PA speaking one set of conditions
to its audience in the West, and its true intentions to its home
audience. It is from Hamas that the assurance comes that it will never
abandon its charter promise to eradicate Israel from the map of the
Middle East. Details, mere details.
As
for the United States' position on the necessity of a 'two-state'
solution to the impasse between Israel and the Palestinians, U.S.
Secretary of State Antony Blinken took that opportunity as well to
exhaust the patience of any Israeli leader in the wake of October 7, and
subsequent West Bank Palestinian polls that showed Hamas enjoying high
popularity among Gazans and even more so among West Bank residents,
averaging out to 82 percent of Palestinians believing Hamas did well in
prosecuting their cause by raping, mutilating and slaughtering over
1,200 Israeli civilians.
Traumatized
Israelis, said President Herzog, are focused on their security,
translating to low support for the two-state conditions the outside
world insists on imposing on Israel. What other nation on Earth would be
prepared to live in such conditions that Israelis face day by day,
never knowing when some hate-crazed assassin will lurch at someone
standing at a bus stop with a knife, with intention to kill, or a
vehicular homicide perpetrated by a Palestinian, or a forced night-time
entry to a girl's bedroom who will be raped and murdered.
Knowing
that people who live a stone's throw across a border are prepared at
any given time to wreak havoc and target Jews for death, either singly
or in gatherings, Israelis live with an existential tension few other
countries have ever had to contend with. The lesson taught by Hamas
terrorists, supported by Palestinian Islamic Jihad and the PLFP on
October 7 was a stark reminder of the level of lethal hate Israel is
subjected to. Horrendously, ordinary civilian Palestinians flocked into
southern Israel with the terrorists to add to the demonic chaos and
death count.
Israel
still awaits the return of 130 of the hostages left in Gaza. In reality
there seems to be scant hope they will be recovered. Signs are that
Hamas has been murdering the hostages they hold; bodies of Israeli
hostages are being discovered by the Israel Defense Forces. Hostages
with chronic health conditions were to have finally been given
medication as a result of mediation, yet the Red Cross which has never
stirred itself to insist it be given access to hostages to evaluate
their conditions refused to deliver the drugs, handing them over to
Hamas.
Once
again the world community stands by in shallow sympathy with the Jewish
state, just as they stood by when genocide was being actively
perpetrated by state machinery addicted to annihilating Europe's Jews
during the Holocaust years, when neither the Vatican, the Red Cross,
Interpol, or world powers made any overtures to intervene. On that
occasion it was Jews abandoned and alone; on this occasion it is the
Jewish state reborn to protect their own.
President Isaac Herzog speaks at the World Economic Forum in Davos,
Switzerland, Jan. 18, 2024, alongside a photo of Hamas-held Israeli
hostage Kfir Bibas. (AP Photo/Markus Schreiber)
This represents a general opinion site for its author. It also offers a space for the author to record her experiences and perceptions,both personal and public. This is rendered obvious by the content contained in the blog, but the space is here inviting me to write. And so I do.