"Between January 1, 2019 and February 28, 2023 ... the Immigration Review Board accepted 24, 599 asylum claimants into Canada without questioning them."
"That means that a person from a country on the IRB's Country List can enter Canada, make a claim for asylum, and receive a positive determination in the mail, without being asked a single question."
"Some asylum seekers who present a security risk to Canada may be identified only through in-person questioning at a hearing. Careful questioning can reveal inconsistencies in complex or fabricated accounts."
"The provenance of documents can also be tested at a hearing by asking questions about them. There is no substitute for this process."
C.D. Howe Report. Author James Yousif, former director of policy, Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada
In coming months, two million temporary migrants in Canada will be losing status with the expiration of their visas. In response a campaign headed by a union has emerged, demanding that all of those involved be permitted to remain in Canada permanently. A new group labelling itself the United Immigrant Workers Front has announced plans for its inaugural rally to be held in Brampton, Ontario. Group organizers cited pending expiration of two million visas, expressing their belief that every one of them should have their permits extended, to open a "path to permanent residency".
"Let's build a political workers movement that fights for the interest of all workers regardless of citizenship status", a caption in a video posted to Instagram states, following a wave of demonstrations similarly calling for migrants on expiring visas to be kept in the country, that took place in Quebec. The provincial government is set to phase out its Programme de l'experience Quebecoise that previously fast-tracked international students and foreign workers toward permanent residency. A much more selective skills-based nominee program is set to replace it.
As a result of this change in Quebec the Union of Quebec Municipalities, together with several business and labour unions are now leading a pressure campaign urging that the migrants be allowed to "continue their lives here". They, in turn are supported by many of Canada's largest unions and labour organizations publishing literature that demands millions of temporary migrants be given permission to remain in Canada. Shortly after the Liberal government spoke of its intention to minimize temporary migration rates, a communique titled "migrant workers in Canada deserve access to permanent residency and citizenship" was issued by the Canadian Labour Congress.
The difficulty of finding workers to fill jobs is leading some companies
to hire refugees living internationally through the federal
government's Economic Mobility Pathways Pilot, but the program's
processing times are now increasing. (Sue Goodspeed/CBC)
Statistics Canada in 2022 tracked 1.4 million foreign nationals living in Canada as 'non-permanent residents'. By 2024 that number surged to 3.2 million, with temporary residents representing 7.5 percent of the entire population of Canada. This occurred when the federal government dropped quotas and restrictions on categories from foreign student visas to Temporary Foreign Worker admissions. At last count by Statistics Canada, temporary migrants number 2.8 million.
In other words, about one in every 15 people in Canada is a non-permanent resident, whereas a decade earlier that figure was close to one in every 50. In admitting that skyrocketing temporary immigration's negative effects on civic society, with a scarcity of housing, a burden on the social welfare network, and a strain on Canada's universal health care system, by November of 2025 the government stated that temporary migration "far exceeded our ability to welcome people and make sure that they had good housing and services".
In fact, the soaring price of housing has placed home ownership out of the bounds of all young Canadians. In addition to which employment prospects for Canadian youth have plummeted. Greater numbers than ever cannot access a family doctor. And hospital emergency rooms are overwhelmed, with fewer health care workers able to look after the medical needs of a soaring population. Even the 2025 federal budget stated that "unsustainable" immigration had "put pressure on housing demand" and crowded younger Canadians out of the job market.
Photo credit: 123RF
"Managed immigration growth is now helping to stabilize labour-market conditions and is expected to support better outcomes for youth", the statement went on. The government now has altered its official goal to curb temporary migration so that non-permanent residents represent five percent of the total population in Canada; roughly two million in total. On the other hand, the reality is that Canada is limited in its capacity to remove temporary migrants who may refuse to voluntarily leave the country.
Canada Border Services Agency has a limited capacity to remove people who overstay their visas. Total removals last year came to about 22,000. Another 4,000 "inadmissible" people were refused entry. As for Immigration Citizenship and Refugees Canada, it has no official documentation on when temporary migrants leave the country.
Canada begins to shrink an overburdened population numbers
Canadians Drowning in An Unsustainable Flood of Immigration
"The
rising volume of asylum claims, along with the longer duration of
eligibility [under the Interim Federal Health Program] caused by
extended determination times, has been an important growth driver in
recent years [of steeply rising health costs in Canada]."
"[Resettled
Gazans received $41 million in various benefits; the Interim Housing
Assistance Program was given $400 million and $66.4 million was
described as funding "temporary accommodations to asylum seekers."
Parliamentary Budget Office report
"Rejected
asylum claimants are now receiving better health care than many
Canadians who have paid into a system their entire life."
"At
a time when six million Canadians cannot find a family doctor and are
waiting for care, it's unacceptable that bogus asylum seekers are
receiving better health benefits than Canadians."
MPs Dan Mazier/Michelle Rempel Garner, shadow ministers Health and Immigration
A new report
shows Ontario hospitals spent $9.2 billion on private, for-profit
nursing and staffing agencies over the past decade, a figure that
doubled between 2013 and 2023. Critics of private agencies urge Ontario
to phase them out, calling them a ‘band-aid on a gaping wound.’ CBC
A
new analysis by the Office of the Parliamentary Budget Officer reports
that it will cost Canadians a record $1-billion this year to pay for
health-care premiums of refugee claimants, some of whom continue
receiving free health care even while their claims have been rejected.
Costs are ballooning as a result of an unprecedented number of foreign
nations in Canada, representing a five-fold increase from six years
earlier when the cost totalled $211 million annually.
Looking
ahead to the future, the cost projection reaching into 2030 sees $6.2
billion being laid out for refugee claimants' health care. Even asylum
claimants whose refugee applications have been rejected can access the
benefits of the Federal Health Program. The level of care being offered
to refugee claimants surpasses that given to the average Canadian
citizen where, in addition to hospital and surgical care, the IFHP
covers dental care, vision care, pharmacare and other services not
covered by general public health plans.
This,
at a time when hospitals are overwhelmed by a surge in demand on their
services, when wait times for surgery lead to early deaths, amidst a
shortage of doctors and nurses and hospital beds. A time when six
million Canadians cannot access the services of a family practitioner.
The
surge in both immigration/refugee/migrant levels into the country
amounting to about an increase of a third of the population falls
between the period of 2015 to the present, a decade altogether where two
Liberal-led governments in Canada have fuelled both a stupendous
increase in the population and a concomitant increase in the cost of
welfare and all manner of social services, extending even to a higher
cost of living for all Canadians where housing prices have soared.
Figures
released by the Immigration and Refugee Board indicate 299,614 foreign
nationals in Canada await their refugee claim results, representing over
a 1,800 percent increase from the number -- 16,048 -- in Canada when
the Trudeau Liberals took office in 2015. Tens of thousands of illegal
border crossers entered the U.S. on tourist visas planning to enter
Canada illegally, where they then made refugee claims. Similarly foreign
nationals who entered Canada on student visas, claimed refugee status
once their visas expired and they were expected to return to their home
countries.
A
refugee claimant arrives at the Roxham Road border crossing at the
US-Canada border in Champlain, New York. Photo by Lars Hagberg/AFP Getty Images
Claimants
for asylum may be given immediate access to government benefits,
leading to uncontrolled surges in federal spending, and an unsustainable
burden to Canadian communities trying to cope with such sudden influxes
of foreigners taking advantage of Canada's reputation as an easy
country to access entry to, with copious social benefits to be had. The
Interim Housing Assistance Program picks up shelter costs and food for
asylum claimants. It was revealed that some asylum claimants receive
room and board benefits of over $200 daily.
Those
asylum claimants who are accepted receive food and shelter to the
equivalent of $84 daily for meals and $140 a day for hotel rooms. Gazans
entering Canada were given exceptional additional federal payouts of
some $3,000 each on entering Canada. Some 130,000 people accessed some
form of benefit from the Interim Federal Health Program in 2016, a
situation that has more than quadrupled to 611,000 according to the
Office of the Parliamentary Budget Officer.
Even
an ineligible asylum claimant can reach for at least two years of
Canadian health benefits prior to rejection of their claim, given the
current 24-month backlog at the Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada.
Benefits can still be accessed until the claimant, if rejected, manages
to exhaust all avenues of appeal, which can take years.
An RCMP officer looks on as asylum seekers cross the Canada-U.S. border at Roxham Road . (Charles Contant/CBC)
Bring Us Your Poor, Unskilled, Uneducated, Oppressed ...
"People from all corners of the globe have sought refuge in
Canada, people who have started the next chapter of their lives here in
Canada,"
"There's another reason that Canada's light shines brightly, and
that is the contributions of refugees themselves in so many ways."
"We've seen refugees give back to their new communities
and their countries, even during the pandemic."
Minister of Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Marco Mendicino
A group of Central American migrants rest along the railway track on
their way to the United States in Macuspana, Tabasco, Mexico March 25,
2021. REUTERS/Carlos Jasso
Immigration
Minister Mendicino made an announcement on June 18 that Canada is
proceeding with a new target number of refugees into the country of
"protected persons"; refugees and asylum seekers set to be accepted for
residence in Canada while their applications for acceptance are being
determined. That acceptance for residence is to be extended to their
families. In 2020 the number brought into Canada stood at 23,500. For
2021 that number is to rise to 45,000.
An
estimated 50,000 haven-seekers, migrants declaring themselves
'refugees' entered Canada illegally in the space of two years between
2018 and 2019, numbers that are declining by a wide margin, but still
ongoing where people who have entered the United States transit into
Canada which has a far more relaxed reputation for accepting migrants'
refugee claims. Many of those haven-seekers, are fleeing poverty, crime
and conflict in their central American homelands, many seek out better
economic prospects.
Many
are drawn by Canada's generous social support system which they can
draw on as soon as they enter Canada. And many of the migrants are
unschooled, unskilled and if and when they look for employment, will
only be suitable for low-skill work that will leave them in poverty,
albeit with the added assistance of social welfare. Finding places for
migrants to live, providing them with initial financial supports,
medical care, language training, educational opportunities strains an
already-strained system in Canada at all government levels.
In
cities like Toronto where many of the refugee declarants head directly
for temporary emergency housing -- already under strain to accommodate
Canadians who have fallen on hard times and/or those whom the added
financial strains of the COVID pandemic's upheaval of social, employment
norms have sent into the ranks of the homeless -- an overburdened
situation has been exacerbated by the presence of migrants.
In
Toronto 40 percent of people in homeless shelters in 2019 were refugees
and asylum claimants. Refugees and asylum claimants represented 80
percent of the total families living in shelters in 2018. A 2018 study
of homeless shelters in Ottawa revealed that close to 25 percent of
those using the shelters were immigrants or refugees. When the viral
pandemic struck, close living quarters in shelters convinced many to
leave that shared housing in preference to living on the street.
The
downtown cores of many cities now reflect the growing number of street
people who have left crowded shelters to live in tent cities in public
parks and on sidewalks. An issue of public safety has arisen in
lock-step with illegal tent cities. So it defies logic and simple common
sense to proudly proclaim Canada's readiness to increase by a wide
margin an already large committed number of refugees to a country which
has been unable to accommodate the needs of newly-entering people.
The
Liberal government speaks of "irregular" entries to the country, when
what they are is "illegal". There are legal entry points where people
can declare themselves and where they know that entering Canada from the
United States where a safe country agreement is in effect whereby the
first country entered is the country where application should be made,
is deliberately bypassed. In illegal entry a strange situation unfolds
where the illegals declare themselves refugees and are enabled to make
applications to remain in the country.
Germany
stands out as the European country that distinguished itself in 2015
and 2016 in its declaration that it was prepared to accept a million
refugees and migrants pouring illegally into Europe from Africa and the
Middle East. Years later the German government finds itself supporting
those they permitted entry to, many of whom are disproportionately
involved in violent crime, according to the government's own data. A
mere 50 percent of the migrants -- mostly young, single men -- are
employed in Germany.
Robust
social welfare systems that leave no one behind are viewed by many who
have long been citizens and grew up in the system, as a last resort when
living turns tough. To many others coming from countries with no notion
of public welfare, state support through welfare seems attractive and
well worth leaving home for. Those genuinely seek a better life and
prepared to work toward it have indeed made Canada what it is, a country
of immigrants.
In
earlier generations those who entered Canada as immigrants and
refugees, many non-skilled, without higher education levels, applied
themselves to whatever employment was available. There were no social
welfare programs of any note in that era. People lived in poverty and
slowly improved their living situations, their children received good
educations and found better employment and left poverty behind. At the
present time, all manner of government programs in support of immigrants
and refugees are available, and, it seems, less effort is put out for
self-support by those feeling entitled to state support.
Police erected a tent at the Roxham
Road crossing, a Royal Canadian Mounted Police officer informs a migrant
couple about a legal border station a few kilometres away. (Charles Krupa/Associated Press)
"These immigrants don't speak the same language. They have different religions, different ways of life. If there are too many differences, it's harder to get along." "It's interesting to meet someone from another country for maybe half an hour, but if you're going to live together, it's tough." "Either it's higher taxes, or you have to cut something." "People don't want to pay taxes to support people you don't work." "Ninety
percent of the refugees don't contribute to society. These people are
going to have a lifelong dependence on social welfare." "This is a huge problem." Urban Pettersson, local council member, Filipstad, Sweden
A church in Filipstad, Sweden, where roughly one-fifth of the nearly 11,000 inhabitants are now foreign-born.CreditNora Lorek for The New York Times
In Filipstad, Sweden there was a downturn in industry. Not enough workers. Its iron ore mines were shut, a factory producing machinery for the logging industry as well. The town's population was half its original size. And then, in 2015 a solution appeared. Refugees from Syria, Somalia and Iraq arrived and they were viewed as potential workers who could occupy vacant homes, learn to speak Swedish adapt Swedish values, take jobs in home care for older Swedes and of course pay taxes to help finance the social welfare programs that would benefit them.
Those same social welfare programs that made Sweden famous for its humanitarian care of all its population as a social welfare state. Four years have passed and with it the aspirations of a solution that failed to materialize. Swedes now view those refugees as contributing nothing to the social weal, much less the economy, much less in support of the social programs that have buoyed them as refugees. They have become a public finance drain, resulting in public antipathy to their presence that has failed to benefit Sweden, much less the refugees.
The kinder gentler nation that has long been Sweden is nowhere to be seen at this juncture. Protecting their population from economic dysfunction faced by so many other countries so vital to the Swedish outlook for equality of opportunity and outcome has come to a selective, screeching halt. The influx of immigrants into Sweden representing the largest per capita of any European nation where at the peak in 2015, 160,000 refugees found asylum in a country of ten million people has encountered a bump in public opinion.
The reality that many of those refugees will continue to rely on welfare for years has some Swedes balking at the toll it will take on their own economic well-being. "People are quite open to showing solidarity for people who are like themselves. They don't show solidarity for people who are different", observed Carll Mellin, policy director at Futurion, a Stockholm research institution.
Local officials in Filipstad received assurances from the central government when it brought refugees into the city in 2012; they would be receiving financial assistance from the national government anxious to place refugees in small towns other than hosting them in cities like Stockholm with its scarce and expensive housing. National authorities would cover rent, food, clothing and medical care for the first two years. And after that? well of course the refugees would be working, paying taxes, becoming citizens.
Only this is not quite what has occurred. Municipalities inherited responsibility for the social upkeep of the refugees; figured initially to be not much at all. One-fifth of Filipstad's 11,000 inhabitants are foreign-born now. Among them there are 750 people of working age, 500 of whom have less than a high school education, and two hundred are entirely illiterate. "The state keeps saying we need to prepare people to get jobs fast. That's impossible. You have to educate them", pointed out Hannes Fellsman, manager of work and education programs of the local government.
The cost of social programs for refugees runs about one percent of Sweden's annual national economic output. According to economists, the Nordic model is a proven one fully justifying taxpayer investments in settling refugees whose children will grow up speaking Swedish and will graduate from Swedish schools into jobs. But for the present, people must wait weeks to see dentists, local housing complexes are full of foreigners, preschools have been "inundated" with refugee children and the local government's welfare payments soared over the past decade.
"People's willingness to continue paying the very high taxes needed to finance the social welfare programs is not something that can be taken for granted. We are now beginning to see the emergence of some serious cracks", observed Marten Blix, a Stockholm-based economist. "Before, we got something back. Now, we're not getting back what we paid for", said bus driver Johnny Grahn in Filipstad.
Getty ImagesThe crush of refugees, straining governments to the breaking point, now represent 4 per cent of Sweden’s budget
"It is an easy way for a terrorist to move forward and finance their activities at the expense of the taxpayer." "All you have got to do is get yourself into university and then off you go." "Often, they have no intention of turning up [to the academic courses signed up for, and paid on the public dime]." David Videcette, former Metropolitan police detective, London
"The British system makes funds readily available to jihadist students without checks on them." "There needs to be an inquiry." Prof. Anthony Glees, director, Buckingham University Centre for Security and Intelligence Studies
Salman Abedi received thousands of pounds in student loans -- The Telegraph
They are popularly portrayed in the liberal press as "mad", "insane",
'lunatics", for who else would claim to be doing God's work by
slaughtering innocent people? Well, perhaps people who have been exposed
to a violent ideology calling itself a religion, from cradle to grave.
From the time they are impressionable young children to that time when
they are old enough to respond subconsciously to the ingrained need to
identify with the creed that has instructed you that killing is part of
your world view through your religion's sacred dictates, the indelible
impression is made.
And these religion-impassioned adherents of Islam, the religion of
peace, where peace reins wherever Islam does, and war is regent wherever
Islam is absent, recognize their sacred duty as martyrs whose mission
is to slaughter and by so doing instill the kind of fear that demands
Islam be recognized as the only solution whereby that fear can be
alleviated. The language of Islam includes deceit and manipulation as
tools of conquest.
When in the West, make use of the Western conception of societal welfare
and the language that accompanies it to acquire legitimization. And so,
those who have migrated, those who have been born in the West and whose
exposure to the Western way of life, incapable of dislodging the
Islamic way of life consumed from cradle forward, learn to exploit what
is available to them as part of the larger society, while remaining
aloof from it, and using those benefits to attain their own ends.
Their ethos of self-pity that legitimizes their drive to revenge and
terror is not a sign of lunacy, but one of visceral entitlement to
persuade the unaware non-Muslim enablers of jihad to sympathize with
their victimized state, offering them understanding and material and
psychological support. While happy to accord the title of 'racist' or
'Islamophobic' to any whose vision is clear enough to peer through the
obfuscating veil of normalcy.
The welfare system in Britain and elsewhere throughout Europe that
manifests itself in support for those who clearly cannot and will not
assimilate toward Western social, cultural and legal status, endows the
evil in their midst with generous living allowances, lest they strain
themselves seeking the wherewithal to be self-supporting, even while
they plot against the state that supports their right to freedom of
thought and expression.
In so doing, supporting the belief of Islamists that they have the right
to freedom of action, as demanded by the Koran and by the Islamist
Hadiths enjoining the faithful to jihad. British taxpayer-funded student
loans and benefits generously supported the Libyan Manchester bomber,
enabling him to forward his plans to murder ordinary Brits in Salman
Abedi's drive to martyr himself for the greater glory of Islam.
Even while he was overseas taking training in bomb-making he was
receiving thousands of pounds as his personal entitlement under the
British welfare system. Police, looking into Abedi's finances; how a man
who had never been gainfully employed had more than sufficient funds to
fly back and forth from Britain to Libya, to rent various addresses, to
pay for the bomb-making equipment he planned to use to demonstrate his
loyalty to Islam, have produced some uncomfortable truths.
British jihadists of which there are an estimated tens of thousands, are
readily able to manipulate the welfare system along with the student
loans system in Britain for the financing they require. Jihadists
enrolling in university courses are not interested in becoming educated,
but in collecting student loans. At least seven thousand pounds was
given Abedi from the Student Loans Company when he had registered for a
business administration degree in 2015 at Salford University.
Police teams have been searching the Fallowfield home of Salman Abedi for clues -- Getty Images
Another $12,000 came his way in 2016 for a new academic year. That he
had already dropped out of the course, seemed immaterial. The university
has 'declined' the invitation to explain whether it had informed the
Student Loans Company that they should have ended funding for Abedi. And
the Department for Work and Pensions too abstained from the invitation
to explain whether Abedi had received benefits, inclusive of housing and
income support.
He had rented a house to live in in south Manchester. And that was
followed by the rental of two other properties where he could stay when
he wasn't travelling back and forth to Libya, Syria and elsewhere to
touch his ancestral roots and the legacy of his religion.
Abedi transferred his brother Hashim, above, £2,500 before the attack.
Hashim is said to have known about the attack a month before -- Mail Onli
An Egyptian street vendor in Cairo on Friday. The country is struggling with soaring inflation and shortages of staple foods.Amr Nabil/Associated Press
"If you look at what's happening, they are making the right choices. It's not going to be easy, but they are pleased that there is new thinking." "Which is what Egypt needed." Angus Blair, chief operating officer, Pharos Investments, Cairo-based bank
"It's only enough for food [government cash transfer for needy families]." "They can buy chicken, some ducks, some vegetables to sell, some sewing thread [with the $21 provided monthly]." Olfa el-Sellami, media adviser, Social Solidarity Ministry
"Where has it [$30-billion provided to Egypt by Saudi Arabia and other Gulf states] gone?" "The policy instability, the corruption, the bureaucracy. When domestic investors are thinking twice, why would international investors come [to rescue Egypt from its economic doldrums]?" Samer Atallah, professor of economics, American University, Cairo
Egypt hasn't had a good ride since the ouster of its former autocratic and traditional President Hosni Mubarak during Egypt's share of the "Arab Spring". Whatever stability there was at the time, went swiftly downhill in the wake of the burgeoning protests and breakdown of law and order and the eventual resignation and imprisonment of Mr. Mubarak and his family, along with his political appointees and supporters. The poor became more impoverished, crime escalated, tourism tanked and the economy was in tatters; foreign investment balked at returning.
When the Muslim Brotherhood -- now banned as a terrorist organization in the country, under the current administration -- won a 'democratic election process' supported by the United States, leading to the presidency of Mohammad Morsi, a Brotherhood stalwart, religious polarization in the country was emphasized with the university educated and liberal, secular portions of the population which had supported and come out for the protests hoping for success in bringing in democratic reform, seeing the economy continue to deteriorate even as Egyptians began to push back against the Islamists.
When General Abdel Fattah el-Sisi became the popularly acclaimed new president of Egypt with the subsequent ouster of the Brotherhood and Morsi, a backlash ensued by Brotherhood supporters and political violence escalated, not only throughout Egypt but in particular in the Sinai peninsula, where Salafist Bedouin, Hamas militias and the Muslim Brotherhood incited hardened Islamist groups to attack the military and the police and cause general havoc. Because of Islamic State's entry into the Sinai, violence escalated, and tourism faltered when foreigners found themselves under attack.
The downing of a Russian passenger plane flying out of the Sinai with holidaying Russians returning home, by a bomb set in its cargo by ISIL affiliates who had infiltrated the airport and had entry to the plane, leading to the death of 224 people on board, and the killing of 12 Mexican tourists on another occasion put the death knell to a recovering tourism industry. Egypt's financial future was seriously faltering. The government attempted to remedy matters anticipating greater income to be had from an expansion of the Suez Canal but its success failed to materialize.
Reuters --There was heavy security in Cairo on Friday to prevent any unrest over the austerity moves
No doubt some of that $30-billion that Egypt had received as largess from Saudi Arabia was used for that purpose. But relations between Egypt and Saudi Arabia have turned sour lately -- even with Egypt surrendering two disputed islands to Saudi hands -- with the Saudis choosing to withhold an expected shipment of discounted petroleum products for the last several months, forcing Egypt to procure these products from other sources. Egypt finds itself in dire financial straits. President el-Sisi's popularity has plummeted along with the growing scarcity of sugar, oil and other staples.
The government decision to float its currency has resulted in a fifty percent devaluation of the Egyptian pound, wiping out many peoples' savings and effectively slicing their salaries by half. Egypt finally had nowhere to turn for financial relief but to the International Monetary Fund for a three-year loan of $12-billion, the first tranche of which at $2.75-billion has been disbursed. Given that Egypt has had $30-billion to play with in the last few years, it's questionable what one-third of that amount can accomplish to aid it in its financial disarray.
Across the board, the 90-million Egyptian population has seen their financial well-being dissolved, leaving people living in real economic hardship. Prices are steadily rising even as real wages have plummeted, leaving whatever is available beyond reach for people whose incomes have suddenly become very limited, forcing students to leave university unable to pay tuition fees, let alone families no longer able to afford basic foodstuffs.
Egyptians are no longer taking to the streets to protest; the original "Arab Spring" protests were as much about unaffordable prices as they were about freedoms, but now protests are forbidden. Security forces in armoured personnel carriers where masked men carry assault rifles, are deployed across the capital and in other cities across the country in an obvious discouragement of people gathering to protest, as inflation soars.
The new government social program meant to alleviate misery for the poor has aided five million Egyptians so far when an estimated twenty-five percent of the population lives in poverty. These are cash transfer programs where one component provides families with a maximum of roughly $35 for each three-month period, with another providing about $21 a month. There were certain stipulations imposed on Egypt with the IMF loan, some of which amounted to a reduction in heating oil and food subsidies.
Egypt's struggles are not amenable to quick and easy fixes. Things seem to go from bad to worse for the country and its population in a geography that has handsomely treated some countries to an abundance of natural resources, while leaving few for their neighbours.
"This is probably the thing that keeps Xi Jinping up at night." "Governments are not swimming in money the way they used to be, and there's less room to compromise." Eli Friedman, Cornell University
"Workers will either silently swallow insult and
humiliation or alternatively they will do much more extreme things such
as blocking roads in order to get back their money since there will be
no one to tell them what they should and should not do and how to fight
for their rights legally."Zhu Xinhua, Foshan factory worker
China, even before its financial slowdown occasioned by its global consuming base buying fewer Chinese products, faced labour protests. Now, however, protests, pickets, strikes have become far more frequent, breaking out all over the country with people angry over pay cuts, loss of employment and all indications that matters will become worse, much worse.
China, which once gobbled up raw resources at a rate that brought Africa wealth in selling them to China, now no longer is able to use those same resources, so the double-whammy of abandoning sources in Africa, and slowing its own manufacturing has had an extended reach impacting millions of lives as unemployment and hard times loom close on the horizon.
The rapid growth in China's economy, as authorities focused on providing employment for young workers streaming into the workforce, in the process dominating the world by its cheap manufacturing and huge labour market has come to a stuttering halt. China's new middle class has become accustomed to living comfortably, and the great strides China realized in reducing national poverty was laudable, even if at the expense of other countries' workforce, unable to compete.
Thousands of angry employees of state-owned Longmay Mining Group, the largest coal producer in north-eastern China staged a politically daring protest and for good enough reason; unpaid salaries. China Labour Bulletin, a labour-rights group out of Hong Kong, recorded over 2,700 strikes and protests in 2015, doubling the number in 2014.
January alone of 2015 saw over 500 protests emerge. And the government notices. Having noticed, and concerned over challenges to the authority and respect for the Communist Party, President Xi Jinping responded with a crackdown to quash protests, and to dismantle labour-rights organizations. Activists risk imprisonment. On the other hand, businesses have faced government pressure to settle disputes.
Billions of dollars have been resourced out for welfare payments and retraining programs by the government. President Xi is contemplating a downsizing of China's state industries, producing more steel, cement and other products than the market can handle at this time. A recent study revealed that over three million workers could find themselves unemployed within the next two years should the cuts proceed.
"Many people around the country are unhappy and may think now is the time to teach the government a lesson." German Chancellor Angela Merkel
Refugee families walk through fields under mountains towards the
Greek-Macedonia border on March 03, 2016 in Idomeni, Greece [Getty
Images]
Ironically, as Egypt, the most populous of Arab countries, is struggling with militant Islamism, and attempting to moderate the fanatical elements of Islam on Egyptian politics, Europe finds itself engulfed in a tidal wave of Muslim refugees and asylum-seekers and economic migrants clamouring for the opportunity to find their future in the wealth and political stability of Europe. The presence of huge numbers of newcomers from across the spectrum of Muslim countries from the Middle East to South Asia and Africa, does not represent a new introduction of Muslims to Europe.
The Continent has experienced previous waves of both immigration and refugees entering it over past decades, and has slowly absorbed those numbers. In so doing, as though by the stealth of unobtrusive and gradual immigration, Europe found itself confronted by the reality of its traditions, customs, heritage and social contract overwhelmed by a non-native religion, traditions and social customs entirely foreign, their numbers threatening the stability of European traditions.
The greater the number of Muslims that settle within a Western, democratic society, the more entitled the introduced community have felt to special considerations outside the traditions, laws and customs of their hosts. Muslims speaking in positions of authority have stimulated and incited their communities to demand equality of a nature never before insisted upon. Not equality within the existing laws and societal mores, but those that transcend what was considered the norm, in recognition of Islamic ideology.
Europe has struggled with those conflicting and destabilizing conditions of having absorbed people of a religion and heritage and culture utterly unlike their own for years. And Europe finds itself completely embattled by the presence of hundreds of thousands of migrants and refugees whose humanitarian needs must be addressed, but whose presence represents yet another massive infiltration threatening the very nature of Europe.
Because Chancellor Merkel stood outside and apart from her European peers in deciding to invite and to support all refugees and migrants who could reach Germany's borders, she has gone from being hugely admired to being condemned for Germany's decision on her watch to absorb an unbelievable million-strong Muslims all of whom must be identified, processed, housed, fed, given medical attention, completely overwhelming the country's capacity.
She has been forced by predictable circumstances to reverse her previous position. She has also been the major contributor behind the EU's offer of almost $9-billion to Turkey to aid it in its support of its immense refugee camps of close to three million Syrians, and to convince Turkey it must do more to prevent the refugees from setting out from its shores across the Mediterranean to Europe. Turkey now gains access to its citizens able to traverse Europe at will.
Europe's emergency in attempting to cope with unassimilable numbers of needy people while tending to the ongoing needs of their own has resulted in a tragedy of massive proportions as refugees and immigrants are mired at borders refusing to open to the ongoing influx. The backlash of resentment from Europeans whose way of life and prosperity has been threatened is predictable. A growing xenophobia is obviously present expressing their own frustrations and outrage.
"It was agreed that the church and the mosque would stay. By demolishing
them, the authorities are showing contempt for NGOs (non-governmental
organisations) and are seeking conflict with the migrants who used these
places." Christian Salome, NGO Auberge des Migrants
Migrant church and mosque demolished -- AFP/Getty
“It was never a question of evacuating the south zone in a brutal fashion using bulldozers. This would scatter the migrants everywhere across the region." "We intend to proceed by finding shelter for all those who are in the
southern zone at Calais, particularly unaccompanied minors." "[A] reception centre [would be set up with women and vulnerable children a priority]." French Interior Minister Bernard Cazeneuve
The Lille court has ruled that the migrants' makeshift shelters could be destroyed, comprised of tents and lean-to shelters, accommodations for hundreds of migrants in t he slum cap known as the "jungle", in Calais, where the inhabitants' intention is to somehow get to Britain, where their problems will be solved. They will be finally ensconced in a civil society where their needs for employment, dignity and a decent future awaits them, they dream.
Except that: it doesn't. They live at the makeshift camp, they have made a temporary life for themselves there, waiting and hoping, and becoming a community that outside sources compassionately do their best to accommodate, short of helping them achieve their goal of escape from the "jungle", into Britain. Most of the civil conveniences that make a community have been established there from houses of worship to schools to cafes.
Aid groups and the migrants themselves have gradually built up a rough approximation of a shanty town to accommodate those who have travelled from Syria, Iraq or Afghanistan to escape conflict, human rights abuses and African nations' endemic poverty. In Calais they see the portal that will finally bring them to peace and prosperity -- not there, but in Britain. Without the required papers they hope to sneak across the Channel.
Residents of the camp were given the choice of temporary centres around France or to remain in a heated container set up in a fenced-in area behind the camp which holds 125 of these quasi-homes that provide shelter. "You're basically going to scatter a lot of people", observed Maya Konforti of the association Auberge des Migrants, critical of the move to disperse the migrants from the camp, predicting they would simply go elsewhere around Calais.
But authorities cited security and sanitation concerns. Let alone that Calais, a city of 80,000 that prides itself on tourism, having now to cope with the influx of thousands of migrants living in poverty and close proximity is coping with great difficulty. Calais became the perfect place for migrants to congregate with its ferry port, Eurotunnel and truck traffic crossing the English Channel, giving them hope that they might too cross into Britain one day.
Truckers using the byways from France to Britain have experienced disconcerting events that dismay and anger them, leaving them fearful of bold moves by migrants intent on taking rides across the Channel. Razing the camp will offer no solution to the migrant problem, it will simply remove part of a festering sore, and place it elsewhere. If there is a solution to the plight of thousands of people desperate to find a home for their futures, it has not yet been struck.
"It's inhuman to live in the jungle. But certain associations, certain billionaire stars are telling us to leave things alone." "That's enough. The jungle must be evacuated". Xavier Bertrand, head of the region
"The news is just starting to filter down and people are really nervous.
They don’t know where they can go. There is a lack of information." "Children have already travelled to the Dunkirk camp, where conditions are
far worse than here." Caroline Anning, Save the Children
"My first reaction was a feeling of heartsickness, because we were in charge of monitoring this project. Then I felt shock and grief." "Usually the monitoring entity should be in place when the first tier of a disposal site is compacted. When we entered, they'd already filled in to the fifth tier." "By late November, we had found it had problems with stability, removal of obstructions, compactness and elevation." Bian Yuxiang, senior construction engineer, Shenzhen J-Star Project Management Consultants
It was meant to be a temporary project, a dump in Shenzhen, China. Local authorities in the municipality had contracted with Long Huamei's Shenzhen Yixianlong Investment Development Company to operate the dump. This was a company whose professional focus was primarily for projects such as garden design, street cleaning and waste disposal. But it thought the the dump project in Hong'ao Village on Shenzhen's outskirts represented an opportunity to make a profit.
Oversight of the project was in the hands of the district urban management bureau. It was assigned there since the dump was considered to represent a transitional project, not a permanent project requiring more stringent checks and oversight. The bureau itself was engaged in minor issues such as illegal parking and litter. They had a casual hands-off attitude, feeling the situation well looked after by the contracted firm.
And then Shenzhen Yixianglong Investment decided to contract out the dump project to a local company, Shenzhen Luei Property Management. Both companies more or less ignored approval rules, safety warnings and the complaints of nearby residents that the dump was unstable. There was also an engineering firm attached to the project, engaged to monitor work associated with it. And that engineering firm, Shenzhen J-Star, warned for months of the risks related to the Hong'ao Construction Waste Dump project.
Once they began working on the project in September, J-Star cited problems that had bypassed inspection; cracked drainage and other risks. The urban administration bureau appeared disinterested. In mid-December, a J-Star official reviewed his firm's concerns at a meeting with representatives of Yixianglong Investment along with officials from the urban management bureau as well as an earlier engineering consultant company, where agreement was reached to suspend dump operations.
The dump as a temporary measure took advantage of the presence of a quarry situated on a hill overlooking the village. That quarry looked temptingly like a solution to the problem of rapid growth leading to massive construction waste requiring to be placed somewhere. Residents and workers located nearby were concerned that the growing mound was unstable. "It began to rise slowly, but then it began to grow faster", observed Zhang Guisheng, a factory worker.
Finally, another emergency meeting was struck when all those concerned discussed the safety concerns and it was agreed that no more waste should be piled onto the existing site. The matter seemed settled, if only temporarily so. But instead of being settled, it had just been set aside, and the dump trucks kept arriving with the construction loads. Four days after the meeting that resulted in the agreement to suspend operations, the unstable dump piled with construction waste gave way.
Rescue efforts underway at the
industrial park in northern Shenzhen. Photograph from the Shenzhen Fire
Department’s official Weibo.
A massive landslide of debris collapsed and 69 people were killed, on 20 December. It was a dreadful disaster that could and should have been averted. An investigation was launched by the government. "The local government knew what was going on, because people complained", an exasperated Mr. Zhang noted. "Nothing happened." Well, nothing happened to ensure that safety was uppermost in concern, but now that 69 people have died and buildings in the path of the landslide were destroyed, action has been taken.
Long Huamei of Yixianglong is in police custody and so are another two dozen managers and officials. The Shenzhen police on January 15 stated that Zhang Juru, executive director of Luwei had been arrested, while six others had made themselves scarce. A more traditional note of self-reproach was struck when Xu Yuan'an, head of the district urban management bureau that approved the dump, committed suicide.
"Islam still provokes misunderstandings, prejudices and
is rejected by some citizens. Yet Islam is here to stay in France. It is
the second largest religious group in our country." "We must say
all of this is not Islam: The hate speech, anti-Semitism
that hides behind anti-Zionism and hate for Israel, the self-proclaimed
imams in our neighborhoods and our prisons who are promoting violence
and terrorism. We are in a war against terrorism. We are not in a war
against religion, against a civilization. We are at war with terrorism,
jihadism and radicalism. France is not at war against Islam and
Muslims."French Prime Minister Manuel Valls
After
the January 2015 jihadist attacks in Paris, France's President François
Hollande declared: "We must reject facile thinking and eschew
exaggeration. Those who committed these terrorist acts, those
terrorists, those fanatics, have nothing to do with the Muslim
religion."
"It is not just my view, but the view of my closest military and
civilian advisers, that that would be a mistake [sending
additional U.S. troops to take on ISIS]." "A strategy has to be one that can be sustained. Given
the fact there are sacrifices involved in any military action, it is
best that we don’t shoot first and aim later. It’s important for us to get the strategy right, and the strategy that
we are pursuing is the right one." "My only interest is to end suffering and to keep the American people
safe. If there is a good idea out there, then we’re going to do it." "Folks want to pop off
and have opinions on what they think they would do, present a specific
plan. If they think that somehow their advisers are better
than the chairman of my Joint Chiefs of Staff or the folks on the
ground, I want to meet them and we can have that debate." "What I’m not interested in doing is posing or pursuing some notion of
American leadership, or America winning or whatever slogans they come up
with, that has no relationship to what is actually going to work to
protect the American people and protect people in the region who are
getting killed. I’m too busy for that.” "Let’s assume we were to send 50,000 troops into Syria. What happens
when there is a terrorist attack generated from Yemen? Do we then send
more troops into there or Libya perhaps?" U.S. President Barack Obama
"I would anticipate that this is not the only operation that ISIL has
in the pipeline." "It is clear to me that ISIL has an
external agenda that they are determined to carry out these kinds of
attacks. This is not something that was done in a matter of days. This
was something that was deliberately and carefully planned
over the course of several months." CIA Director John Brennan
These are random events that shock and target Western countries. America had its colossal trauma that warned the world that a new order of organized terror capable of mounting unprecedented attacks was on the horizon. Britain, Spain and Indonesia had their moments of excruciating shock and the pain of loss. Not to mention, of course the paroxysms of inner conflict within Islam itself collapsing any vestige of civility that acted as a screen shielding the dysfunction of sectarian hatreds bubbling under the surface of communities in the Middle East, South Asia and Africa.
These are all countries that have evinced little concern and/or sympathy for a country and a nation that stands out for its differences; the only country in the world dedicated to the preservation of the world's Jews, that perennial scapegoat in world affairs. The scapegoat remains a scapegoat, too convenient as an all-purpose blaming tool to be set aside. Besides, classic anti-Semitism has it that Jews deserve the ostracism and the unpleasant side-effects that come with.
Aside from enabling others to vent their own frustrations, hatreds and despair. This is the one country of the world that has had to defend itself time and again from the onslaughts of combined armies representing the interests of their closest geographical neighbours. When those formalized military adventures in ridding the neighbourhood of an unwanted presence failed, the banner was handed over to informal militias known as Islamist terrorist groups who somehow manage to find sympathy in the West even while they threaten the existence of a democratic state.
So, in the interests of preserving themselves, it would seem to make sense for Western countries finding themselves under siege to consult with the one country on the front line of threats from the very same Islamist groups that concern them. This is a nation, after all, for whom attacks are not merely occasional and random, but frequent and focused. This is a nation which has had ample opportunity to fine-tune their response, let alone their pre-emption of the need to respond, through proaction over reaction.
But sometimes decoys are used, even if they're not named as such or even recognized as such. In the hope, perhaps that spleen will be adequately vented against one source of irritation to a perpetually angry group feeling itself victimized by some ill fate that they attribute to another source. And that hatred and anger, venting itself will, the hope goes, dissipate and the target source, though battered, will go on, since they always do, to live another day. And the imminent threat has thus been defused.
As, for example, last year when pro-Palestinian demonstrations with ample black and white ISIS banners in view, shouted their raging hatred for Jews. Thousands of protesters, Muslims as well as their local supporters on the left, chanting "Mort aux Juifes! Mort aux Juifs!, offering to complete what the Holocaust failed to adequately finalize; visiting violence on French Jews, on the symbols of Judaism, on their presence where they should not be; translated as anywhere on Earth.
Meanwhile, French citizens who have surrendered to Islam plot to take vengeance on their land of birth, where they have been socialized, educated, employed, raise families, but are mortified to be living among non-believers, infidels, the filth of the Crusading West which wages war on Islam. These can be Muslims living among non-Muslims, albeit in geographical cliques set apart, but sharing a town, as an example.
As an example take Ismael Omar Mostefal, 29, the first of the identified attackers, born in France to an Algerian father and a Portuguese mother. "It was a normal family, just like everybody else. He played with my children. He never spoke about religion. He was normal. He had a joie de vivre. He laughed a lot", said the former neighbour, insisting on anonymity. But the president of a local Muslim group, Ben Bammou, had no wish for anonymity.
He recalled Ismael Omar Mostefal, as "timid", leaving the Muslim community of Chartres where the attacker grew up confused, wondering what had happened. "We're grieving, like everyone else", he explained. "Everyone was shocked when we learned this last night and this morning" said another neighbour, Arnauld Froissart, remembering that Mostefal and his family were "very nice". "I've lived in this neighbourhood since 1986 and there's no problem here", he said.
But Mayor Jean-Pierre Gorges of Chartres appears less sanguine: "How many deaths will occur before our political leaders understand and take action", he asks in despair, describing how he feels: "emotion, incomprehension and anger". He wants to see strong action and he isn't eager for full information on that anger. "Our leaders don't need to prove they are legitimate: We have elected them, so they take responsibility of the executive power of the republic. Their duty is to act effectively and ultimately we don't need to know how."
But that would never, ever do. Besides, there are always the canaries in the coal mine. And all in good time; France now, the rest by and by.... Come to think of it, if France and Russia have been targeted in reflection of their irritant-factor to Islamic State thanks to their bombing missions that are so inconvenient to the plans of the caliphate over its destiny, perhaps the power that heads up the coalition bombing missions targeting ISIL should think twice and then a third time over the consequences of inaction; Yemen has no ISIL strength yet, but it does have Iran.
The surge in Germany's Muslim
population — propelled by a wave of migration unprecedented since the
Second World War — represents a demographic shift of epic proportions,
one that critics of the country's open-door immigration policy warn will
change the face of Germany forever.
"There are 20 million refugees waiting at the doorstep of
Europe." — Johannes Hahn, EU Commissioner for European Neighbourhood
Policy and Enlargement Negotiations.
According to Aiman Mazyek, head of the Central Council of Muslims
in Germany, attendance at many mosques has doubled in the past month
alone.
A large number (40%) are from countries in the Balkans, including
Albania and Kosovo. This implies that nearly half of those arriving in
Germany are economic migrants, not refugees fleeing war zones. — Thomas
De Maizière, German Interior Minister.
Muslim men residing in Germany routinely take advantage of the
social welfare system by bringing two, three or four women from across
the Muslim world to Germany, and then marrying them in the presence of
an imam. Once in Germany the women request social welfare benefits,
including the cost of a separate home for themselves and for their
children, on the claim of being a "single parent with children." — From
an exposé broadcast by RTL television.
"For us today, what is at stake is Europe, the lifestyle of
European citizens, European values, the survival or disappearance of
European nations, and more precisely formulated, their transformation
beyond recognition. Today, the question is not merely in what kind of a
Europe we would like to live, but whether everything we understand as
Europe will exist at all." — Viktor Orbán, President of Hungary.
Germany's Muslim population is set to skyrocket by more than 700,000
in 2015, pushing the total number of Muslims in the country to nearly 6
million for the first time.
The surge in Germany's Muslim population — propelled by a wave of
migration unprecedented since the Second World War — represents a
demographic shift of epic proportions, one that critics of the country's
open-door immigration policy warn will change the face of Germany
forever.
At a press conference on August 19, German Interior Minister Thomas de Maizière revealed
that a record 800,000 migrants and refugees — the equivalent of nearly
one percent of Germany's total population — are expected to arrive in
Germany in 2015, a four-fold increase over 2014. He said that 83,000
migrants had arrived in July alone, and that the figure for August would
be higher still.
De Maizière said that although many of the migrants are from the
Middle East and North Africa, a large number (40%) are from countries in
the Balkans, including Albania and Kosovo. This implies that nearly
half of those arriving in Germany are economic migrants, not refugees
fleeing war zones.
According
to German public broadcaster Deutsche Welle, the Berlin refugee center
pictured here receives up to 2000 applications for asylum per day.
(Image source: Deutsche Welle video screenshot)
Of the 800,000 migrants and refugees arriving in Germany in 2015, at least 80% (or 640,000) are Muslim, according to a recent estimate by the Central Council of Muslims in Germany (Zentralrat der Muslime in Deutschland, ZMD), a Muslim umbrella group based in Cologne. This estimate is not in dispute.
In addition to the newcomers, the natural rate of population increase
of the Muslim community already living in Germany is approximately 1.6%
per year (or 77,000), according to data extrapolated from a recent Pew Research Center study on the growth of the Muslim population in Europe.
Based on Pew projections, the Muslim population of Germany reached an
estimated 5,068,000 by the end of 2014. The 640,000 Muslim migrants
arriving in Germany in 2015, combined with the 77,000 natural increase,
indicates that the Muslim population of Germany will jump by 717,000, to
reach an estimated 5,785,000 by the end of 2015. This would leave
Germany with the highest Muslim population in Western Europe.
By way of comparison, the surge in Germany's Muslim population would
be equivalent to the Muslim population of the United States increasing
by 3 million in just one year.
Critics say that German officials, under pressure to solve Europe's migration crisis, are ignoring the long-term consequences of taking in so many migrants from the Middle East and North Africa.
In addition to security concerns (Islamic radicals are almost
certainly trying to enter Germany disguised as refugees), they say, the
surge in Muslim immigration will accelerate the Islamization of Germany,
a process that is already well under way.
Islam is the fastest growing religion in post-Christian Germany. This
is evidenced by the fact that an increasing number of churches in
Germany are being converted into mosques, some of which are publicly sounding calls to prayer (the adhan)
from outdoor loudspeaker systems. The increase is such that some
neighborhoods in Germany evoke the sights and sounds of the Muslim
Middle East.
Islamic Sharia law is advancing
rapidly throughout Germany, with Sharia courts now operating in all of
Germany's big cities. This "parallel justice system" is undermining the
rule of law in Germany, experts warn, but government officials are "powerless" to do anything about it. At the same time, German judges are increasingly referring and deferring to Sharia law in German law courts.
Polygamy, although illegal under German law, is commonplace
among Muslims in all major German cities. In Berlin, for example, it is
estimated that fully one-third of the Muslim men living in the Neukölln
district of the city have two or more wives.
According to an exposé broadcast
by RTL, one of Germany's leading media companies, Muslim men residing
in Germany routinely take advantage of the social welfare system by
bringing two, three or four women from across the Muslim world to
Germany, and then marrying them in the presence of an imam (Muslim
religious leader). Once in Germany the women request social welfare
benefits, including the cost of a separate home for themselves and for
their children, on the claim of being a "single parent with children."
Although the welfare fraud committed by Muslim immigrants is an "open
secret" costing German taxpayers millions of euros each year,
government agencies are reluctant to take action due to political
correctness, according to RTL.
Spiraling levels of violent crime perpetrated by shiftless immigrants
from the Middle East and the Balkans have turned parts of German cities
into "areas of lawlessness" — areas that are de facto "no-go" zones for police.
In Wuppertal, groups of bearded Muslim radicals calling themselves the "Sharia Police" have tried to enforce Islamic law
on the streets by distributing yellow leaflets that explain the
Islamist code of conduct in the city's Sharia zones. In Hamburg, Muslim
radicals have infiltrated dozens of primary and secondary schools, where
they are imposing Islamic norms and values on non-Muslim students and teachers.
In Berlin, local officials have waived rules
prohibiting religious dress in public buildings so that Muslim women
can wear headscarves. In Bavaria, Muslim children are being exempted from mandatory visits to former concentration camps as part of Holocaust education programs.
In Bremen, city officials signed an agreement
with the city's 40,000-strong Muslim community. The agreement
guarantees the protection of Muslim community properties, the approval
of the construction of mosques with minarets and domes, the allotment of
land for Muslim cemeteries, the supply of halal food at prisons
and hospitals, the recognition of three Muslim holidays, Muslim
representation in state institutions and other rights and privileges.
More than 700 German Muslims have joined the Islamic State and traveled to Syria and Iraq, and some of them have continued to receive welfare benefits
from the German state while on the battlefields of the Middle East.
Jihadists who have returned to Germany and pose an acute threat to
national security threat are nevertheless eligible to receive benefits
once again.
Germany is home to more than 7,000 Salafists who adhere to a branch
of radical Islam that is vehemently opposed to Germany's democratic
order. German officials say that 1,000 of these individuals are
especially dangerous (some are believed to have joined sleeper cells) and could attack at any time.
At the same time, however, Salafists are allowed to openly
proselytize on German streets to find new recruits and thereby increase
their numbers. In a recent recruitment initiative, Salafists launched an
unprecedented nationwide campaign, "A Koran in Every Home,"
to distribute 25 million copies of the Koran, translated into the
German language, to every household in Germany, free of charge.
And yet the guardians of German multiculturalism have been working
overtime to silence critics of the rise of Islam in Germany. In Bavaria,
for example, German activists opposed to the construction of a
mega-mosque in Munich have been classified as "extremists" and are being
monitored by German intelligence.
German media consistently accuse commentators on the rise of Islam of
engaging in hate speech, in an underhanded effort to try to intimidate them into silence. A particular object of wrath is a very popular German-language website called Politically Incorrect
(PI), which over the years has grown into a major information resource
for people concerned about the spread of Islam in Germany. PI's motto
reads "Against the Mainstream, Pro-American, Pro-Israel, Against the
Islamization of Europe." Not surprisingly, German media elites want PI
shut down.
It is quite possible that German Chancellor Angela Merkel — who recently admitted that German multiculturalism has failed — views
mass immigration from the Muslim world as the solution to Germany's
collapsing birth rate, which is among the lowest in the world.
The German government expects the population to shrink from roughly
81 million today to 67 million in 2060, although Germany's statistics
office, Destatis, recently reported that high levels of immigration would cause the country's population to shrink more slowly than previously expected.
A study
by the Hamburg-based World Economy Institute has warned that the low
birthrate threatens the long-term viability of the German economy. "No
other industrial country is deteriorating at this speed despite the
strong influx of young migrant workers," the report said. "Germany
cannot continue to be a dynamic business hub in the long-run without a
strong jobs market."
Germany will need to do a far better job of integrating immigrants if
they are to be a net gain for the German economy. A recent study
by the Cologne Institute for Economic Research showed that Muslim
immigrants were more likely to be unemployed and living off the social
welfare state than any other migrant group in Germany. The report said
that root cause for the high unemployment rates is the lack of
educational attainment and job training qualifications.
Meanwhile, the migration crisis shows no sign of abating. At a summit
on migration held in Vienna on August 27, the EU Commissioner for
European Neighbourhood Policy and Enlargement Negotiations, Johannes
Hahn, said:
"There are 20 million refugees waiting at the doorstep of Europe. Ten
to 12 million in Syria, 5 million Palestinians, 2 million Ukrainians and
about 1 million in the southern Caucasus."
On August 21, Germany suspended the so-called Dublin Regulation
— a law that requires people seeking refuge within the EU to do so in
the first European country they reach — for asylum seekers from Syria.
This means that Syrians reaching Germany will be allowed to stay while
their applications are being processed. Critics say the move will
encourage even more migrants to make their way to Germany.
Most Germans seem to be unfazed by what is happening to their country. An August 21 poll for German broadcaster ZDF showed
that 60% of Germans thought their country could cope with the high
number of refugees, and 86% said that Germany was a country of
immigration.
In an interview with the newspaper Der Tagesspiegel,
Aiman Mazyek, the head of the Central Council of Muslims in Germany,
said that so many Muslims have been flowing into the country that
attendance at many mosques has doubled in the past month alone.
Commenting on the demographic revolution sweeping Germany, Mazyek summed
it up with an understatement: "The number of Muslims in Germany will
increase significantly."
In nearby Hungary, President Viktor Orbán has been one of the few
European heads of state to sound the alarm. "A year ago I said that we
live in times when anything can happen, and I still say so today," he
said recently. "Who would have thought that Europe would not be capable
of protecting its own borders against unarmed refugees?" He added:
"For us today, what is at stake is Europe, the lifestyle
of European citizens, European values, the survival or disappearance of
European nations, and more precisely formulated, their transformation
beyond recognition. Today, the question is not merely in what kind of a
Europe we would like to live, but whether everything we understand as
Europe will exist at all."
Soeren Kern is a Senior Fellow at the New York-basedGatestone Institute. He is also Senior Fellow for European Politics at the Madrid-based Grupo de Estudios Estratégicos / Strategic Studies Group
This represents a general opinion site for its author. It also offers a space for the author to record her experiences and perceptions,both personal and public. This is rendered obvious by the content contained in the blog, but the space is here inviting me to write. And so I do.